by pkvi
0
newuserfromreddit 0 points ago +2 / -2

Just pointing out that your argument is, literally, that increased voter turnout means fraud.

-2
newuserfromreddit -2 points ago +1 / -3

Trash, but better than Trump's. Election 2020 was a choice between two evils imo, and Biden was the lesser for most people.

0
newuserfromreddit 0 points ago +2 / -2

Seven months later and you people still, somehow, think voters went for Biden because they liked him. The majority of Biden voters (myself included) didn't vote for Biden because we liked him — we just voted for him because he wasn't Trump.

by pkvi
-8
newuserfromreddit -8 points ago +1 / -9

More people voted, must be fraud.

-5
newuserfromreddit -5 points ago +1 / -6

Or, y’know, they won’t find anything because there wasn’t fraud to begin with.

-1
newuserfromreddit -1 points ago +2 / -3

The mods ran this place into the ground a long time ago lol. It’s just an endless circle jerk nowadays, especially after they started banning dissenters.

-2
newuserfromreddit -2 points ago +1 / -3

It’s only “less censored” if you go along with whatever right wing conspiracy is popular right now. This place was and is a bloodbath for anyone that dares to question the election fraud and COVID conspiracies.

by pkvi
1
newuserfromreddit 1 point ago +2 / -1

To be fair, he is the commander in chief.

-1
newuserfromreddit -1 points ago +2 / -3

Qtards are retarded and plagued with inaction, but there's nothing to do about the new president. The dude won and, notwithstanding whatever P.W seems to think, there's no mountain of evidence that the election was "stolen."

-3
newuserfromreddit -3 points ago +3 / -6

This is pretty much what me and every other non-MAGA head in the early stages warned against. I remember saying, pretty explicitly, that this place would only succeed if it actually fostered the free speech it was made to.

Instead, axol decided to mod a ton of TD.W users and banned anyone that dared to question the predominant conspiracies on this site or suggest that nothing would happen on inauguration day.

That's why it doesn't surprise me to log back on and see that this place is a ghost page and a significant amount of posts is just axol whining about his Reddit ban.

-1
newuserfromreddit -1 points ago +1 / -2

Sorry, I was banned for wrongthink and have been busy with work, I'll take a look at this all shortly.

-8
newuserfromreddit -8 points ago +2 / -10

Glad to see the dissemination of information has struck such a chord with you that you feel the need to become a follower of mine. Welcome aboard.

-4
newuserfromreddit -4 points ago +3 / -7

Damn, you can see he's genuinely scared when he realizes he can't control the mob he just helped lead to the capitol.

-4
newuserfromreddit -4 points ago +1 / -5

As in the last archive, comment section is now a graveyard as mods try to hide their history in the wake of the January 6th attack.

-2
newuserfromreddit -2 points ago +1 / -3

I actually read Neustadt in undergraduate! I really enjoyed his work. I totally agree that agencies do not act at the explicit direction of the president, and they definitely have a degree of discretion. However, that is a far cry from saying they are controlled by a party opposite to what controls the executive, and is not relevant to the legal element of probable cause needed to make arrests.

by Spoonks
0
newuserfromreddit 0 points ago +2 / -2

Will it die? No. Will it be significantly weakened and lose more elections against the democrats as a result? Yes.

-4
newuserfromreddit -4 points ago +1 / -5

The FBI does arrest on it's own. The DOJ is headed at the bequest of the executive, which -- for the past four years -- has been controlled by Trump.

What you're confusing is probable cause. You constitutionally need that to arrest someone, which most right-wing theories have thus far lacked.

-3
newuserfromreddit -3 points ago +2 / -5

Yup, rioters that had broken into the building handing weapons to rioters that were still trying to break into the building.

Quite the jump to use this as evidence of a false flag attack, considering that -- even if the implied assumption that the non-rioters handed out weapons was true, which this doesn't show -- this would still necessarily have required the rioters on the outside to use those weapons to break in.

Not to mention, intent to do precisely what occurred at the capitol was circulating for weeks beforehand.

-4
newuserfromreddit -4 points ago +1 / -5

A violent attack. I think attempted coup is stretching it. Anything akin to 9/11 or Pearl Harbor is absurd.

3
newuserfromreddit 3 points ago +4 / -1

It's a good analogy at the base, but I don't know how much you can really apply it to the real world

0
newuserfromreddit 0 points ago +2 / -2

If he did something illegal, arrest him and charge him. As someone that leans left, I fully agree with that.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›