Well, according to this graph, 25 million more people voted in '92 than in '88, and 20 million more voted in '04 than in '00. 26 million isn't that out of place on this graph. This graph also doesn't tell me what the population is each election, or what the voter participation rate is. So as far as this graph shows, it's just the US population growing in spurts.
Maybe you made some typos? Maybe you'd like to add more data and context to your graph? This latest election has 99% voter turnout in some districts, which is more than Maduro and Castro ever had, and is a universally-recognized, guaranteed sign of fraud around the world.
It’s not substantial restive to previous data though. Both the ‘88-‘92 and ‘00-‘04 cycles have significant growth that, when set relative to the voting eligible population at that time, is similar to the growth in ‘16-‘20.
More people voted, must be fraud.
Voting participation has almost doubled since 1980. Eventually they are going to have 80-90-100% turn out. I wonder how that will be explained.
This graph doesn't show voter participation. All it shows is total votes.
True but the gain in total votes has outstripped population increase, so it means higher participation as well.
Explain it? Nah man, we just call it fraud if we lose and patriotism if we win.
So you believe enthusiasm for Biden existed? Really?
For him? God no.
But enthusiasm to elect literally anyone but Trump? Definitely.
Back to reddit then kiddo
Well, according to this graph, 25 million more people voted in '92 than in '88, and 20 million more voted in '04 than in '00. 26 million isn't that out of place on this graph. This graph also doesn't tell me what the population is each election, or what the voter participation rate is. So as far as this graph shows, it's just the US population growing in spurts.
Maybe you made some typos? Maybe you'd like to add more data and context to your graph? This latest election has 99% voter turnout in some districts, which is more than Maduro and Castro ever had, and is a universally-recognized, guaranteed sign of fraud around the world.
Just pointing out that your argument is, literally, that increased voter turnout means fraud.
It’s not substantial restive to previous data though. Both the ‘88-‘92 and ‘00-‘04 cycles have significant growth that, when set relative to the voting eligible population at that time, is similar to the growth in ‘16-‘20.