-1
newuserfromreddit -1 points ago +1 / -2

Oh, is it a film I’m supposed to be watching now? My bad. Must have forgotten to add that to my list of “This Will Totally Prove Election Fraud and Reinstate Trump, Trust Me Guys.”

I’ll make sure to stick this alongside the Kraken, the AZ Audit, Italy-gate, and Pillowman’s TV marathon, then watch you all memory hole it when it eventually panes out as nothing.

Edit: Banned. What a surprise!

-24
newuserfromreddit -24 points ago +1 / -25

Probably because they don’t show evidence of widespread voter fraud.

— because there wasn’t widespread voter fraud.

-1
newuserfromreddit -1 points ago +1 / -2

I mean, they’ve already been bombing residential blocks since the start of their invasion. I don’t think anyone would care how much they target infrastructure.

0
newuserfromreddit 0 points ago +1 / -1

Aren’t you the one that just criticized MSM? Weird to now be rejecting the definition of crowd-sourced media, which is the antithesis to MSM. Almost like you don’t actually care what source it comes from.

Most native English speakers know how English works ¯_(ツ)_/¯

0
newuserfromreddit 0 points ago +1 / -1

My guy it’s even on Wikipedia. Maybe just stop watching TASS all day lol.

It’s also interesting how all of the pro-Russian handshake accounts are always littered with English misspellings, grammar errors, and punctuation mistakes.

0
newuserfromreddit 0 points ago +1 / -1

Weird, it’s just Washington Examiner. Here’s the ISW report it cites.

-1
newuserfromreddit -1 points ago +1 / -2

The U.S. took Afghanistan in less than two months and lost a grand total of 13 soldiers.

Last I saw, Russian losses are somewhere between 15,000-25,000, with a quarter of their entire military rendered combat ineffective. After 3 months, they have been chased out of northern and central Ukraine, and still haven’t even managed to get control of the eastern front.

-7
newuserfromreddit -7 points ago +1 / -8

Well, yeah. The issue most people have is that it’s eliminating a right that was previously secured at the federal level.

That would be like if the court eliminated the First Amendment from the Constitution. Yeah, states are still free to allow free speech — there is just no federal mandate to do so.

-9
newuserfromreddit -9 points ago +1 / -10

Idk it’s kind of an understandable thing to be pissed about, lol.

8
newuserfromreddit 8 points ago +10 / -2

Twitter OP is saying that a court order compelled a release of all files concerning patients in the vaccine trials. Of all the patients recruited at these testing sites, case files were released for only 3.9% of patients. This leads to the inference that the other 96.1% of patients do not have case files and thus were fake.

At least, that’s what I take from the thread. I’m not familiar with this litigation or whether Twitter OP is making reliable claims. Axo can correct me if this is wrong.

0
newuserfromreddit 0 points ago +2 / -2

now look at their posts and see how many people attack them

Probably because everyone knows that Corp and his bots are shills.

-1
newuserfromreddit -1 points ago +1 / -2

do you have anything to say about the content or are you satisfied with your shill crybaby hit and run?

Of your 11 comments in the last 24 hours, 10 are on Corp’s posts defending him.

by DrLeaks
-7
newuserfromreddit -7 points ago +1 / -8

This is what happens when you don’t get laid enough.

0
newuserfromreddit 0 points ago +2 / -2

Lol. Okay Corp.

Ironically, posted at 9am Moscow time too. Start of the work day?

1
newuserfromreddit 1 point ago +3 / -2

Pretty sure Erlanger is just EBay’s global shipping center. Any non-domestic package shipped through EBay has to go through there. It’s not a USPS issue.

0
newuserfromreddit 0 points ago +2 / -2

Sorry, I should have been more specific. I meant, is the leak or the link to the protest being censored?

by DrLeaks
2
newuserfromreddit 2 points ago +4 / -2

Into the memory hole.

0
newuserfromreddit 0 points ago +1 / -1

And a defeat early on doesn’t mean your side loses in the end.

Right, it just means that your plan for a sweeping invasion of the country has failed — which was my point.

0
newuserfromreddit 0 points ago +2 / -2

it seems we may be on the same page

Well, you post at the same times, on the same topics, and use the same grammar/spelling mistakes — so yeah, I guess you're on the same page.

0
newuserfromreddit 0 points ago +1 / -1

MacArthur got chased out of the Philippines, vowed to come back and eventually did.

Right. That doesn't change the fact that getting chased out of the Philippines is recognized — by even the U.S. government — as an American military defeat. Just like getting chased out of all of central and western Ukraine is a Russian military defeat, i.e., a failed invasion.

I mean, really. It almost goes without saying that if you and your joint-operative try to do a sweeping invasion of a country, lose 25,000 troops and render a quarter of your battalions combative ineffective, then retreat from all but a sliver of the country, you have failed your invasion.

But hey, say what you like. I will circle back to you in a couple months when Russia is in full mobilization, more combat ineffective, and kicked out of even more of Ukraine.

-2
newuserfromreddit -2 points ago +1 / -3

I love you too my LGBTQASD42069 ally. Safe travels.

view more: Next ›