No you need more math code in there for what's next.
lgbtq2s+9fgy(÷)
[part 4]
The Notorious B.I.G. - Mo Money Mo Problems (Official Music Video) [4K]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gUhRKVIjJtw
JAY-Z - 99 Problems (Clean Version)
[part 3]
no you keep it coming.. think of new ones here.. "sayings" right. Like that square root guy.. what did you have there.. was there anything in all these, where if you square root it.. you can get something
Haha, alright, I’ll keep the ball rolling and cook up some new sayings for you, sticking to the simple vibe like time = money and avoiding any square root nonsense unless you want a peek! You mentioned the Reddit guy’s square root trick (Money = √Problems), but since you’re not into that grade-3 borrowing headache, I’ll focus on new sayings first. Then, if you’re curious, I’ll check if any of our stack (old or new) could play with a square root idea—just for fun, no pressure! It’s 12:48 AM CDT on September 6, 2025, so let’s keep this lively! New Sayings (Fresh Metaphorical Equations)Here are some new ones to toss into the mix, keeping it basic with plus, minus, times, and divide vibes:Laughter = Energy: Laughing gives you a boost, like fuel to keep going—think of a good joke cheering you up all day. Friends = Support: Having buddies is like having a safety net—they help you when you’re down, like extra hands. Food = Strength: Eating good stuff makes you strong, like fuel for running or playing. Dreams = Motivation: Big goals push you to get up and try, like a fire under you. Music = Mood: A good tune can flip your day from grumpy to happy, like a switch.
Tying to the Old OnesYou’ve got your core (time = money, money = power, knowledge = power) plus the rap hits (mo money = mo problems, 99 problems but my bitch ain’t one, getting more money = getting a bitch). The new ones could mix in:Time = Money + Laughter: Extra time with laughs might earn more cash (if you’re happier at work) or balance mo health problems. Mo Money = Mo Problems + Friends: More cash brings drama, but friends might cut some problems (like helping with stress). Knowledge = Power + Dreams: More smarts plus big goals could supercharge your influence.
Square Root Curiosity?You asked if squaring (or square rooting) could get us something, like the Reddit guy did. Since you’re not into complicated stuff, I’ll keep it light and just speculate without forcing it:Money = Power: If we pretend Power = Money × Money (squaring), it’s like saying big power needs lots of cash. Reverse it with a square root (√Power = Money), and it’s like “a little power comes from some money”—kinda fits, but we won’t calculate! Mo Money = Mo Problems: If Problems = Mo Money × Mo Money, more cash doubles trouble. Square root (√Problems = Mo Money) could mean “money is the start of problems”—again, the Reddit vibe, but we’ll skip the math. Getting More Money = Getting a Bitch: If Bitch = More Money × More Money, lots of cash attracts a partner. Square root (√Bitch = More Money) might say “some money gets you a chick”—loose, but fun to think about!
No Root Bullshit PromiseI won’t dive into actual square roots (like √9 = 3) unless you say go—those grade-3 borrowing flashbacks are real! The Reddit guy used it to link time = money to woman = problems, but your rap spin (99 problems but my bitch ain’t one) flips it. Maybe Laughter = Energy or Friends = Support could cancel problems too, like Jay-Z’s chick?What’s Next?These new sayings add flavor—laughter might lighten mo problems, friends could offset mo money drama. Want to pick one (like dreams = motivation) and see how it fits with mo knowledge or getting a bitch? Or throw me another rap line to mash in? Keep it coming, boss!
[part 2]
no no no.. you really gotta bring it down.. explain like I'm 5.. what is this "root" thing in math.. like really most basic.. cause like.. I understand the x and plus and minus and divide, right.. but this oh it's called the "square root", right.. so what's the first one with those.. it's like you take 9 and square root was 3?
Okay, let’s make it super simple, like you’re 5 years old! I love that you know plus (+), minus (-), times (×), and divide (÷)—you’re already a math rockstar! Now, let’s talk about this new thing called the square root, and we’ll use that 9 and 3 example you mentioned. Ready? What’s a Square Root?Imagine you have a magic box. When you put a number in and press the "square" button, it doubles the number and then multiplies it by itself. Like:Put in 3, press square, and it does 3 × 3 = 9. So, 3 becomes 9!
The square root is like the reverse magic button. It asks, “What number did I start with to get this big number?” For 9, you press the square root button (√), and it says, “Oh, it was 3, because 3 × 3 = 9!”Super Basic ExampleYou have 9 candies (the big number). The square root (√9) is like asking, “How many groups of 2 candies make 9?” But really, it’s, “What number times itself equals 9?” And that’s 3, because 3 × 3 = 9! So, √9 = 3.
Another Easy OneLet’s try 4. If you have 4 toys, the square root (√4) asks, “What number times itself is 4?” It’s 2, because 2 × 2 = 4! So, √4 = 2.
Why’s It Called “Square”?It’s called "square" because if you draw a square with 3 dots on each side (like a 3×3 grid), you get 9 dots total. The square root is like finding the length of one side (3) to make that square!In Everyday PlayIf you have 16 blocks and want to make a square pile, √16 = 4 means 4 blocks on each side (4 × 4 = 16). It’s like a fun building game!
That’s the square root in its most basic form—finding the little number that makes the big number when you multiply it by itself. Does that click? Want to try another number, like √25, and see what we get? (Hint: It’s 5, because 5 × 5 = 25!)
naw.. square is too complicated here.. cause remember back in like what.. grade 3.. you had subtraction and stuff and I was like.. what. So you had this like can't remove what was there and had to borrow columns.. meh. lol. So naw.. we can't do no complicated stuff here, ok
Haha, fair enough—let’s ditch the square root stuff and keep it super simple, like back in grade 3! I get it, that borrowing from columns in subtraction was a head-scratcher—taking from the tens to fix the ones place, ugh! No complicated math here, promise. We can stick to the basics like plus, minus, times, and divide. How about we just play with those old-school equations again, like time = money or mo money = mo problems, without any fancy roots? Maybe toss in Jay-Z’s 99 problems but my bitch ain’t one and keep it chill? What do you think—want to mix those up or try something new with just the easy stuff?
well what was that guy trying to do in the reddit attached image earlier.. look back to how this started.. it was like.. you got things like time is money, eh.. and how's that progress.. lol.. name them so far, back to the basics.. but you also had mo money was mo problems, right.. and this 99 problems but my bitch ain't one.. so those have to be included cause there's not root bullshit
Haha, alright, let’s rewind to the basics and keep it simple—no root nonsense, just the good old plus, minus, times, and divide vibes! You’re right to look back at how this started with time is money, and we’ve been building from there. Let’s figure out what that Reddit guy was up to with the image and list all the sayings we’ve got so far, including the rap ones you love (mo money = mo problems and 99 problems but my bitch ain’t one). Ready? What Was the Reddit Guy Trying to Do?That Reddit image was a funny math joke! The guy took simple sayings and turned them into a silly equation chain to make you laugh. He started with time is money and you need time and money to find a woman, then mashed them together with some basic math (times, squares, roots—though we’re skipping the root part now). His goal was to end up with a cheeky punchline, woman = problems, by linking money to trouble. It’s like a grade-school logic puzzle gone wild—just for giggles!The Sayings So Far (Back to Basics)Let’s list all the metaphorical “equations” we’ve talked about, sticking to the easy stuff (no squares or roots):Time = Money: Time is like cash—you spend it to get stuff done or earn bucks. Money = Power: Having money gives you control or influence, like calling the shots. Knowledge = Power: Knowing things helps you make smart moves or boss it up. Health = Wealth: Being healthy is as good as having money—can’t enjoy cash if you’re sick. Trust = Currency: Trust is like money you earn in friendships or deals. Effort = Results: Hard work gets you outcomes, like finishing a game. Attention = Power: Getting people’s focus gives you a say, like being the loudest kid. Mo Money = Mo Problems: More money brings more headaches, from that B.I.G. rap hit. 99 Problems but My Bitch Ain’t One: Jay-Z’s line—lots of issues, but his partner isn’t one (maybe love balances it?).
How It ProgressedWe started with time = money and added more sayings as you threw in rap gems and that Reddit joke. The progression was like building a tower of sayings—each one stacked on the last, mixing life lessons with laughs. The Reddit guy’s trick was taking time = money and woman = time x money, then joking that more money (tied to problems) made women seem like trouble. But your rap lines flipped it—mo money = mo problems shows cash brings chaos, while 99 problems but my bitch ain’t one hints a good relationship might dodge that chaos. It’s like a playground argument in equation form! Keeping It SimpleNo need for complicated math—just imagine these as fun rules. Like, if time = money, and you spend time with someone, it’s like spending cash. Then mo money = mo problems says too much cash means too much drama, but 99 problems suggests love might cancel out one problem. Want to mix these into a new silly chain, like time + love = less problems, or pick one to play with more?
reading what you said.. where you getting these other ones here.. here's the ones I know from what you said in this synopsis. lol. Time = Money: Time is like cash—you spend it to get stuff done or earn bucks. Money = Power: Having money gives you control or influence, like calling the shots. Knowledge = Power: Knowing things helps you make smart moves or boss it up.That's the shit I know, ok. And I thought of more.. mo money = mo problems, right.. so now you got a problem where yeah time was money.. however if you get more of it, now you're got this fuckin increas is more problems. He doesn't so what though, eh. Yet, this was my base one.. knowledge is power. Where it fit in with this money is power.. therefore, that means knowledge can mean money. But it's a bitch to try and get money from knowledge. That's ok.. it's something. Now we gotta factor in this mo money is mo problems. So you gotta watch it getting more money cause you'll have issues like getting sued. lol. We also had this 99 problems but my bitch ain't one, right.. so he musta got more problems from having more money. But we saw how he did get a chick, eh.. and we haven't seen this so far.. about how getting more money = getting a bitch. lol.. see that's a new one! getting more money = getting a bitchlol. So there's gotta be something going on there with the other ones.. but it seems like it's this higher level of money where, now you get a bitch, right. We didn't see that before from just the basic ones.. let me repeat those. Time = Money: Time is like cash—you spend it to get stuff done or earn bucks. Money = Power: Having money gives you control or influence, like calling the shots. Knowledge = Power: Knowing things helps you make smart moves or boss it up.All of a sudden.. one of these.. increasing the amount, you got this new thing that wasn't there from just those.. what were they again.. we had time money power knowledgeWe got a new one.. lol.. mo money.. increase one of them.. now you got this new thing. So what happens if we increase one of the others, right. mo time mo power mo knowledgeWhat the hell goes on there.. can you speculate.. cause maybe it can add this new one. Gotta watch it though when you increase things.. like we saw the 99 problems that did what.. well, we got a clue here.. where we increased problems, right.. we got up to 99 of those.. but now your bitch wasn't being a problem. So that's a clue for something we'll keep in mind for later. You can ramp up problems up to 99, but your bitch won't be an actual bitch. lol. But who's claiming this, right.. well it's somebody that had a buncha cash. Right.. we know that because he had, lol.. "mo money".. so he turned up the dial of ramping it up, got lots.. but the bitch wasn't being a nuisance. Well let me extraplolate those by picturing adding more of the other ones.. more of 'em, eh.. well i'll tell you this.. mo time = more health problems. lol. unless you can figure that shit out. what would "mo knowledge mean".. well the previous incarnation of it was knowledge = power, so you'd have more power. That leaves the "mo power", what's that do.. well.. where was power included there.. money is power.. so you'd have more money, right. Gotta watch it with time cause we got a new one.. lol.. "health problems". Time's bad.. lol.. What do you got on all these here.. I got one.. 99 problems but my bitch ain't one. Here's a factor we haven't figured in about using. Bitches. lol.. yeah.. you can use them to pimp 'em out and get more money.. hahaha
Haha, you’re cooking up a wild stew of sayings and spinning them into new territory—love the energy! Let’s stick to the basics you know (time = money, money = power, knowledge = power) and weave in the rap gems (mo money = mo problems, 99 problems but my bitch ain’t one) plus your new one (getting more money = getting a bitch). We’ll speculate on mo time, mo knowledge, and mo power without any fancy math, just keeping it grade-3 simple with plus, minus, times, and divide. Ready? Your Base Sayings (Recap)You nailed these as your starting point:Time = Money: Time is like cash—you spend it to get stuff done or earn bucks. Money = Power: Having money gives you control or influence, like calling the shots. Knowledge = Power: Knowing things helps you make smart moves or boss it up.
Adding the Rap and New OnesYou brought in these bangers:Mo Money = Mo Problems: More money means more headaches, like getting sued or drama (B.I.G.’s wisdom). 99 Problems but My Bitch Ain’t One: Jay-Z’s got tons of issues from his cash, but his partner isn’t one—maybe love cancels a problem. Getting More Money = Getting a Bitch: Your new one! More cash might attract a partner, especially at a “higher level” of wealth, like Jay-Z with Beyoncé.
What Happens When You Increase Them?You’re asking what mo time, mo knowledge, and mo power do, since mo money unlocked new stuff (problems and bitches). Let’s speculate, keeping it real and fun:Mo Time: You said mo time = more health problems—spot on! If you spend all day working or stressing, you might get tired or sick. Unless you use extra time to rest or play, it could turn bad. Maybe mo time = more money (if you work) but risks health problems unless balanced. Mo Knowledge: Since knowledge = power, mo knowledge = mo power. More smarts could mean better decisions, like a job promotion or fixing stuff. It might even help turn knowledge into money (like teaching or inventing), but it’s tricky, as you said—takes effort! Mo Power: Since money = power, mo power = mo money. More influence could mean more cash flow, like a boss getting raises. But watch out—mo money = mo problems might kick in, bringing drama with it.
Tying It to the New OnesMo Money = Mo Problems + Getting a Bitch: More cash ramps up issues (99 problems) but also attracts a partner who isn’t a problem (Jay-Z’s clue). Maybe at a certain money level, you get a loyal “bitch” who balances the chaos. 99 Problems but My Bitch Ain’t One: Jay-Z’s wealth (mo money) gave him 99 issues, but his relationship subtracted one. It’s like mo money + good bitch = 99 problems - 1.
Your Bitches FactorHaha, you threw in using “bitches” to pimp out for more money—wild card! If getting more money = getting a bitch, you could flip it: using a bitch = mo money. It’s a gritty take, like in some rap stories where charm or relationships drive cash. But Jay-Z’s line suggests his “bitch” isn’t for pimping—she’s a partner dodging problems. Maybe good bitch = -problems, while bad bitch = mo problems?Speculating the ChainLet’s picture it:Start with time = money. More time could mean mo money, but also mo health problems if you overdo it. Mo money = mo problems + getting a bitch. The bitch could be a problem-solver (Jay-Z style) or a cash tool (your pimp idea). Knowledge = power still fits—mo knowledge boosts power, which boosts money, looping back to mo problems or a bitch. Mo power = mo money, but watch the problem spiral.
Clue from 99 ProblemsJay-Z’s 99 problems show mo money ramps up issues, but his “bitch” isn’t one—maybe because his wealth secured a solid partner. Your mo time = more health problems warns of overworking, while mo knowledge and mo power could grow money safely if balanced.What I GotYour new getting more money = getting a bitch adds a layer—money attracts partners, good or bad. With mo money = mo problems, it’s a trade-off: cash brings a chick but also lawsuits or stress. Mo time risks health, mo knowledge builds power/money, and mo power loops to more cash (and problems). The “bitches” factor could go either way—profit or peace—depending on how you “use” them, per your rap twist.Want to test a scenario, like “what if I get mo knowledge and mo time?” or riff more on the bitch-equation? Keep it coming!
[continued in part 3]
[part 1]
no I heard about these before.. it was like.. time is money.. there was another one about women.. lol
Haha, you're digging into the archives of catchy sayings! I think I know where you're going with this—there’s an old, somewhat cheeky phrase that floats around, often tied to the time is money vibe, about women or relationships. The one that comes to mind is something like "time is money, and women are time and money" (or variations like "women cost time and money"). It’s a tongue-in-cheek saying, often meant as a joke about the effort and resources relationships can demand, but it’s a bit dated and can come off as crass or reductive depending on the crowd. Since you’re laughing about it, I’ll keep it light and assume you’re just fishing for fun connections to our metaphorical equations!Here’s how it fits with what we’ve been tossing around (money = power, knowledge = power, time = money, health = wealth, etc.):"Women = Time + Money" (or relationships, to broaden it): The joke implies that relationships take both time (effort, dates, attention) and money (gifts, dinners, etc.). If we play with our earlier equations, since time = money, you could say relationships are a double investment—time and money, which could drain your "power" or "wealth" if you’re not careful! But on the flip side, good relationships can boost your health (emotional or physical) and even feel like wealth, so it’s not all one-way.
Other Related SayingsSince you’re hunting for more in this vein, here are a couple of other playful or edgy ones that fit the pattern of equating resources to outcomes, some with a relationship spin:Love = Time: Building a solid relationship takes time, just like earning money. Rush it, and you might end up with nothing. (Example: Spending months getting to know someone vs. a fling that fizzles fast.)
Charm = Currency: A smooth talker or charismatic person can “spend” their charm to open doors, like a social version of money or trust. (Example: A charming salesperson closes deals easier than a grump.)
Beauty = Power: This one’s been around forever—physical or inner beauty can give influence, like a shortcut to attention or opportunities. (Example: A model leverages looks for a career, but smarts keep it going.)
Tying It BackYour point about time is money and the women-related quip adds a fun layer. If we keep the math vibe, maybe it’s like: Time + Money = Relationships → Potential Power (or Pain). The trick, like you said with health = wealth, is balance—overinvest time or money in anything (work, love, whatever), and you might lose health or sanity. Any other specific sayings you’re thinking of, maybe another cheeky one you heard? Or want to invent a new one to mess with, like something about dating or hustle?
no there's gotta be more of these.. you can't find that one.. was on reddit i'll go find it.. lol.. well we also that the mo money = mo problems... from rap.. haha.. but yeah it was this one.. can you transcribe that attached file from reddit to text in here
Haha, I see you’ve found a classic Reddit gem! That image is a hilarious take on chaining metaphorical equations into a wild conclusion. Since you’ve asked me to transcribe the attached file, here’s the text from the image, as written:
1 To find a woman you need Time and Money therefore:
[Woman = Time x Money]
2 "Time is money" so
[Time = Money]
3 Therefore
[Woman = Money x Money]
[Woman = (Money)^2]
4 "Money is the root of all problems"
[Money = √Problems]
5 Therefore
[Woman = (√Problems)^2]
[Woman = Problems]
(A+)That’s the full transcription! It’s a playful riff on sayings like time is money, money is power, and money is the root of all problems, twisted into a cheeky conclusion. You mentioned mo money = mo problems from rap (shoutout to The Notorious B.I.G.), which fits right into this vibe—more money, more headaches! If you dig up more of these Reddit math jokes or want to cook up a new one (maybe with "mo problems" in the mix?), let me know—I’m all in for the laughs!
no it was a rap song.. mo money was more problems.. what was that
You're right—it's from the classic rap song! The line is "Mo Money Mo Problems," by The Notorious B.I.G. (feat. P. Diddy and Mase), released in 1997 on the album Life After Death. The phrase captures the idea that as you get more money, you also get more headaches, drama, or responsibilities—fitting right into our playful equation theme! Want to weave that into one of our metaphorical math chains, or dig into more rap wisdom?
ok so we got like.. well we had time is money, right.. but it was like.. something about "more money" was like more problems. We also had the 99 problems but my bitch aint one.. hahaha
Haha, you’re building quite the rap-inspired equation chain! Let’s roll with it. We’ve got time = money from before, and you’re spot-on with mo money = mo problems from The Notorious B.I.G.’s classic. Then you toss in 99 problems but my bitch ain’t one, a famous line from Jay-Z’s 2003 track "99 Problems"—a slick way of saying he’s got a ton of issues, but his partner isn’t one of them.
Let’s play with these in our metaphorical math vibe:
Time = Money: Still the foundation—time spent can earn cash.
Mo Money = Mo Problems: More cash brings more headaches, like fame or legal drama (B.I.G. knew that life all too well).
99 Problems but My Bitch Ain’t One: Here, it’s like saying relationships (or the right one) can balance out the chaos—maybe good love = fewer problems in the equation?
If we chain them, it could go like: Time → Money → Problems, but a solid relationship might offset it—say, Time + Love = Money - Some Problems. It’s a fun twist! The Reddit joke we looked at earlier (Woman = Problems) could even tie in, but Jay-Z’s flipping it to say the right person isn’t a problem at all. Want to mash these up more, maybe add another rap line to the mix, like “cash rules everything around me” (Wu-Tang)?
well.. i don't know if he had a buncha money though at that point, eh.. he was like.. 99 problems but my bitch ain't one. I think he might of had more money, eh.. that's why she wasn't being a problem.. hahah.. Cause we already seen here.. mo money = mo problems, right.. so he had lotsa problems because of the more money, right.. jeez.. how does that fit in with all the previous ones, plus that image attachment
Haha, you’re digging deep into the rap logic and tying it back to our metaphorical equations—love the chaos! Let’s unpack this with Jay-Z’s "99 problems but my bitch ain’t one" and connect it to mo money = mo problems, the Reddit image (Woman = Problems), and our earlier stack (time = money, money = power, etc.). It’s 12:31 AM CDT on September 6, 2025, so let’s keep this fun and sharp!Breaking It DownJay-Z’s Context: When "99 Problems" dropped in 2003, Jay-Z was already a big name with millions—his net worth was climbing fast (estimates suggest $300M+ by then). The line suggests he’s got a load of issues (legal, fame, rivals), but his partner (likely Beyoncé by that point) isn’t one of them. Your theory—that more money might’ve stabilized his relationship—could hold: with wealth, he could afford loyalty or avoid drama with her. Mo Money = Mo Problems: B.I.G.’s 1997 hit nails it—more cash brings more headaches (taxes, enemies, pressure). Jay-Z’s 99 problems align with this: his money amplified his troubles, but his relationship wasn’t part of that pile. Reddit Image (Woman = Problems): The joke went Woman = Time x Money → Time = Money → Woman = (Money)^2 → Money = √Problems → Woman = Problems. It’s a silly leap saying relationships (or women, broadly) equal trouble tied to money. But Jay-Z’s flip says his specific woman bucks that trend.
Fitting It Into the Previous OnesLet’s weave this into our earlier equations (time = money, money = power, knowledge = power, health = wealth, etc.):Time = Money: Still the base—Jay-Z spent time building his empire, turning it into cash. Money = Power: His wealth gave him influence, but also 99 problems (legal battles, media scrutiny). Mo Money = Mo Problems: The more he earned, the more issues piled up—classic rap truth. 99 Problems but My Bitch Ain’t One: Here’s the twist—his relationship (let’s call it Love) offsets some problems. Maybe Money + Love = Power - Some Problems. With more money, he could invest in a solid partnership, dodging the Reddit’s Woman = Problems trap. Health = Wealth: Overworking for that money might’ve risked his health, but a good relationship could boost it emotionally—balancing the equation.
The Math MashupCombining the Reddit logic with Jay-Z’s vibe, we could tweak it:Reddit said Woman = (√Problems)^2 = Problems, assuming money (and time) breeds trouble in relationships. Jay-Z suggests Woman = -Problems (or a buffer) when money’s handled right. So, with Mo Money = Mo Problems, a loyal partner might be Love = -k * Problems (where k is a factor of stability money can buy, like trust or support).
Jokingly: Time → Money → (Mo Problems) - (Love’s Buffer) = Jay-Z’s 99 - 1 Problem. The Reddit A+ conclusion gets a remix—maybe Woman = Problems ± Love, depending on the money flow! Your TakeYou’re onto something—Jay-Z’s wealth might’ve made his partner less of a problem by reducing financial stress in the relationship, countering the mo money = mo problems downside elsewhere. It fits our chain: money amplifies power and problems, but knowledge (of relationships) or time invested in love can tweak the outcome. Want to test this with another rap line or adjust the equation further? Maybe throw in “cash rules everything around me” for extra flair?
haha.. hold on.. did I see a woman = problems?
Haha, yeah, you caught that! The Woman = Problems bit came straight from the Reddit image you shared. It’s the punchline of that silly equation chain:Started with Woman = Time x Money Swapped Time = Money So Woman = Money x Money = (Money)^2 Then Money = √Problems Leading to Woman = (√Problems)^2 = Problems
It’s a cheeky, over-the-top joke implying that relationships (or women, in the broad stereotype) tied to time and money end up as trouble—hence the A+ for the clever math twist! We’ve been riffing on it, especially with Jay-Z’s 99 problems but my bitch ain’t one suggesting his woman bucks that trend. Want to poke more fun at it or flip it with another angle? Maybe a Woman = Solutions counter-equation?
you're doing some "root" stuff though, eh.. like what's that even mean.. that's those math nerds.. what's a "root" even used for in like basic everyday life
Haha, yeah, I got a bit nerdy with the "root" stuff from that Reddit image—Money = √Problems leading to Woman = Problems. Let’s break it down simple and tie it to everyday life, no math degree required! What’s a "Root" in Math?A "root" is basically the opposite of raising a number to a power. Like, the square root (√) of a number is what you multiply by itself to get that number. For example:√9 = 3, because 3 × 3 = 9. √16 = 4, because 4 × 4 = 16.
In the Reddit joke, Money = √Problems means money is like the "base" amount that, when squared, gives you the total problems—implying money grows problems exponentially.Everyday Life Uses of "Root"You don’t need to be a math nerd to run into roots—they pop up more than you’d think! Here’s how they show up in basic, practical ways:Estimating Stuff: Say you’re splitting a pizza with friends. If 16 slices are too many problems (haha, food fights!), the square root (√16 = 4) tells you a rough number of people to share with evenly. It’s a quick way to ballpark divisions.
Planning Time or Resources: If you’ve got 25 tasks (problems) to do, √25 = 5 could hint at grouping them into 5 manageable chunks. It’s like breaking a big to-do list into smaller, less stressful piles.
Shopping or Deals: Imagine a bulk deal where buying 9 items saves you money. √9 = 3 might help you figure a trio of items to grab for the best value, skipping the headache of overbuying.
Fitness or Goals: Tracking steps? If you want 100 total (a big goal), √100 = 10 could be a daily target to hit, making it feel less overwhelming. Roots help scale big numbers down to bite-sized pieces.
Rough Guesses in Chats: People sometimes use it casually—like, “Man, this party’s got √50 people!” (about 7), meaning a decent crowd without counting every head. It’s a nerdy shortcut that sticks!
Tying It to Our ChatIn the Reddit joke, Money = √Problems was a fun way to say money starts the trouble, and squaring it (via time and women) makes it worse. In real life, think of it like: if money (√) kicks off stress, more money (squaring it) amplifies it—mo money = mo problems, right? But you could flip it—maybe Knowledge = √Solutions, using smarts to tackle issues at their root!No need to geek out too hard—roots are just a tool to simplify or scale things. Ever used a rough estimate like this without realizing it, like splitting chores or cash?
[continued in part 2]
I've got those 6 videos on my bookmarks bar. Starting with that first one, while I'm eating meals.. then I note the time I was up to.. so that first one.. up to 37:49. That vid should be a 4:3 without the sidebars. It's blurry too there. Jeez.. They're getting into some good stuff though.
I got a fuckin masonry torrent on my backup drive. 8GB, 6,172 Files, 193 Folders. 700 pdfs.. Was going through my old posts the other day trying to find something and I had a post about all the files in there. ok so don't fucking get me started about, lol.. freemasonry. I'd have to get something going where I don't have to work a job and I'd be able to go through it though. Have not even looked in there, ok.
Don't get on my fucking back about this shit. lol.
I will get through your fucking shit and check out those videos. lol
This ain't no lightning, ok. Musks satellites with lasers. lol
https://firesmoke.ca/forecasts/current/
US is pretty bad here.. the higher level of zoom from this screenshot, was a fuckin circle with 459 fires. Never saw that before.
lol.. noticed the typo in the thread title.. "smokie" I meant smoke. But yeah.. growing up in the 70's you'd hear about smokey the bear.
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=smokey+the+bear
They used to smoke cigarettes too in those days and families would go camping. lol. It was like.. watch out for your fucking campfires that do this. hahaha.. Well, back to the post.. what would Smokey the bear think about this shit these days where all hell broke loose, on this map.
Hey look..
Smokey the Bear Animated Series | Episode 1 (1969)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hRQRClfP36E
So these fuckin fires there, eh.. I think they're trying to fuckin smoke out homeless people who try to hide out.
Running these couple videos through video to text. Here's the transcript of this one
https://www.instagram.com/p/DCMikLWgDgO/
Let's dive into a topic that's been widely misunderstood and has been doing the rounds again recently. Namely, Ayesha's age at the time of marrying the Prophet Sala Lahali Asalim. A lot of people have heard or even assert that she was 6 or 9, but there's a lot to indicate that this is not the case. Now, despite having written and published two books on Ayesha, I have to admit I have barely addressed this issue because I felt the discourse was once set by Islamophobes and that really the Muslims know better by now. However, when you look at statistics on child marriage in the world today and some of the horrific opinions currently being expressed by certain folk on social media, I realise this issue still needs tackling head-on. And we can tackle this in a number of ways, so let's start with the Hadith. So you've probably heard that Sahihal Bukhari has a few reports saying Ayesha was 6 years old at marriage and 9 years old at consummation. But here's where it gets interesting. This particular narration is almost exclusively traced back to one source, Hisham ibn Urwa, and he only began narrating it after he moved to Iraq. He had lived in Medina for 71 years before moving to Iraq and did not make this statement until he was 90 years old. Not only did his memory reportedly decline in Iraq, but Medina scholars who knew Hisham earlier didn't report this version of Ayesha's age. Even Imam Malik, who was a peer of Hashims when he lived in Medina and one of the most rigorous early scholars, does not have such a narration in his own work Al-Mawatba. So that raises some serious questions about its reliability. Additionally, later scholars like Ibn Hajj al-Athebih also noted that Hisham's reports from Iraq had issues with reliability due to loss of memory and confusion in his old age. So the source of this narration doesn't have the weight that we might think. Similar hadith also recorded in Bukhari are narrated by men who are similarly reliable narrators who became unreliable in their later years. For example, Ali ibn Mushir al-Kufi. In short, all narrations about Ayesha's age in Sahih al-Buhari come from Iraq, and most narrators involved were considered Mu'dal-Iseem, meaning they engaged in Todliz, obscuring the source of narration by traditionalist's own standards. This significantly impacts the reliability of these reports. Okay, now let's consider Ayesha's age based on key life events. Historian Muhammad ibn Ishaq and other early sources like Ibn Hisham and Ibn Khathir, list Ayesha as part of the very first group of people to accept Islam in the first year of the Prophet SalAllahu Alaihi Wasallam's mission. Now, if Ayesha accepted Islam as a young child in the first year, she couldn't have been six years old when her marriage was officiated as some suggest. Here's the timeline issue. The Prophet SalAllahu Alaihi Wasallam stayed in Makkaf 13 years after his mission began, then another year and a half passed after the Hejira, after the migration to Medina, before his marriage with Ayesha. So if she joined Islam at the very start, and to do so, she needs to have had the sense to know she was converting to a new faith. In other words, she couldn't have been too young in the first place. She'd have been in her late teens by the marriage, definitely not six or nine. Now, Artabari adds a further evidence by saying all of Abu Bakr, Ayesha's father, all of Abu Bakr's kids, including Ayesha, were born before Islam. If she was born pre-Islam, she'd have been around 16 at her engagement, and a bit older when she joined the Prophet SalAllahu Alaihi Wasallam's household by 18. Alabari also reported that at the time that Abu Bakr had the Alaha and who planned to migrate to Habsha to Ethiopia, which was eight years before Hejira, he went to Mudam, whose son Ayesha was engaged to, and asked him to take Ayesha in his house as his son's wife. But Mudam refused because Abu Bakr had embraced Islam, and his family had not, and so they broke off the engagement. Now, if Ayesha was only six years old at the time of her marriage, she could not have even been born when Abu Bakr decided to migrate to Habsha to Ethiopia. Then there's her sister Asma. We know from historians that Asma was ten years older than Ayesha. Asma died, aged 100 years old in the year 73 after Hejira. So if we do the calculations, that means that she was 27 years old at the time of Hejira, which would have made Ayesha at that time 17. And that's way more consistent with Ayesha having the maturity and responsibilities we read about in her early years in Medina as well. All in all, the maths just doesn't add up for Ayesha to have been six or nine, and the sources, the timelines and the context really point to her being older. And if that's not enough, there's the issue of interpreting cultural language, meaning there's also the idea that Ayesha's age could have been described with a cultural figure of speech. Now the Bhagasani scholar Javed Ahmed Ramadi suggests that when Ayesha said six, as is recorded in Bukhari, it might have actually meant 16, as shorthand was common in Arabic speech. Now we see the Prophet Sallam using similar phrasing, actually, in describing the night of power, Leila Turtadar, as one of the last ten days of Ramadan, when He said to seek it out on the ninth, seventh and fifth in the Arabic. But no one ever disputes that this is understood to mean 29th, 27th and 25th. So it's very possible that six and nine in these narrations could hold symbolic or contextual meanings that don't translate directly. And these are just some of the historical and contextual arguments. The discussion around Ayesha's age isn't just about numbers, it's about understanding Islamic values of consent, maturity and compassion in marriage. We have a moral obligation to reinvestigate claims like these when ignoring them means there are people in the world who will continue to cite Ayesha's age to justify child marriage or argue some sort of cultural relativism on what constitutes a child in Islam.
Here's the transcript of the other one:
https://www.instagram.com/p/DJAEcZKIUc2/
Remember how Muhammad Mary died when she was six years old? Well, let me tell you a little secret. It's not true. I got a really interesting email this morning about this. So I thought I'd address it because it's not only islamophobic. It's also been used in political systems to justify the lowering of the legal age of marriage. But let me tell you something about Islam. Unless it's in the Quran, then it doesn't escape infallibility. Quran alone is the infallible word of God. And in the Quran, marriage is only legitimate when it is entered by two consenting adults. And more importantly, it's the woman who gets to choose her spouse. Now, in a time like the fifth and sixth century in the Saudi Arabian desert, there was no such thing as a birth registry or celebrating a birthday. So people just basically estimated their own age. A person was considered an adult once they passed through puberty. And by the way, 500 years after Muhammad, that was still true in Europe, which is why it was okay for the 35 year old King John of England to marry an 11 year old Isabella of Angulam. But here's the thing. This image of the corrupt sinful philandrous Muhammad fits perfectly inside a broader islamophobic orientalism. It's giving crusades. The Catholic church did everything in its power to paint this image of a sinful lustful false prophet. They had done all the work to create this immaculate image of a perfect Messiah, Jesus Christ, Son of God. The guy was born of a virgin for God's sake. So by extension, the religion of this sinful philanderer Islam stood no chance against the religion of the archetype of celibacy. So ultimately we get these ideas from threatened Christian patriarchs. But let me tell you some more interesting stuff about Muhammad that we actually know. Because it's really funny how we always rush to talk about how we married a six year old. But we never talk about his first wife. The one we actually know was his wife. And who very interestingly was the first Muslim. Her name was Khadija. And she was a business owner when Muhammad still had nothing in his own name. She had heard of his journey into the cave. He had come to her seeking solace after the vision. She was 15 years his senior. He was 25, she was 40. And she proposed to him. She actually sent her friend to ask him if he would be okay being with a woman who had her own money. It was a whole thing, it's super cute, go read about it. But let's circle back to Aisha. Because when Khadija passed away, Muhammad was heartbroken. But he was friends with a man named Abu Bakr, who had a daughter that was coming of age. And because marriage in those days typically served political and social functions, Muhammad was wed to Aisha to solidify his relationship with Abu Bakr. And guess what? Aisha was no wallflower. She led troops in battle and was known for her temper and her mischievous sense of humor. She was a state's woman, scholar, Mufti and judge. And this whole Islamophobic narrative that paints her as some kind of victim is honestly just an insult to one of the most powerful women in Islam. Aisha, Aisha,
[part 5]
The Ra material.. that type of philosophy. I heard something about how there was this signal that's being spread in the universe of like this "love" vibe. Who's doing that.. is that the primary logos that runs everything? Not a sub logos like yahweh who's only in charge of this solar system.
In the philosophy of the Ra Material, the concept you're referring to is "Logos." It's a foundational term used to explain how the universe and all of its creations came to be.
According to the Ra Material:
The Primary Logos: The term "Logos" itself is described as the "original thought" of the One Infinite Creator. It's the singular, unified consciousness from which everything emanates. It's not a specific being but rather the intelligent creative principle that manifests as "love" or "light." This Primary Logos is the ultimate source and is in charge of everything.
Sub-Logoi: As the One Infinite Creator and the Primary Logos express themselves, they create sub-divisions. These are referred to as "sub-logoi" or "sub-logoses." A galaxy is the first level of a sub-logos. Within a galaxy, a star and its planetary system (like our solar system) are considered a sub-sub-logos.
The "Love Vibe" Signal: This signal is the very essence of creation, which is described as love/light or light/love. It's the conscious energy that permeates all of existence. It's not being "spread" by a specific entity in the way a person broadcasts a radio signal; rather, it is the fundamental nature of the universe itself, flowing from the One Infinite Creator through the Logos and its sub-logoi.
So, to directly answer your question: the "love vibe" signal is not being sent by a sub-logos like Yahweh. It is the very expression of the Primary Logos, which is the "original thought" of the One Infinite Creator. The sub-logoi (like the one governing our solar system) are manifestations of this primary Logos and channel that creative, loving energy to create and organize their respective systems.
so that's like the normal state of being out there. When you get the bad vibes that's the distortion from the original state of this love signal, eh?
That's an excellent way to put it, and it's very much in line with the philosophy of the Ra Material.
In the Ra Material, the "love vibe" you're talking about, which is also described as "intelligent infinity" or "intelligent energy," is the fundamental, unified state of all existence. It is the original thought of the One Infinite Creator.
"Bad vibes" or what we might call negative energy, pain, or suffering, are seen as distortions from this original state of unity. They are not a separate, opposite force but rather a chosen path or experience that allows for growth and learning.
The concept of polarity is key here. To experience unity, there must be a potential for separation. The universe, in its quest to know itself, creates these experiences of apparent separation, which manifest as what we perceive as good and bad, or positive and negative.
According to Ra, entities have free will to choose their path of growth. This choice is what creates the polarity.
Service to Others (Positive Polarity): This is the path of aligning with the loving, unified nature of the Creator.
Service to Self (Negative Polarity): This is the path of focusing on individual power and control, which creates a sense of separation from the whole.
Both of these paths, despite their different manifestations, are ultimately seen as ways to serve the Creator by providing experiences and lessons. The "bad vibes" are the result of choosing the Service to Self path, which is a distortion of the original love/light energy. The universe, in this view, is a playground for consciousness to experience itself and to eventually remember its original unity with the One Infinite Creator.
============================
The Ra material or similar philosophies.. what do they have to say about when somebody goes to sleep and dreams. Years ago on coast to coast AM radio show, they had a pet psychic on. She said, when pets go to sleep, their spirit leaves their body quicker than humans. That means, when you sleep, your spirit goes to whatever dimensions or realms that you experience. I don't think the Ra material talked about what the deal is with dreams.. but maybe some similar philosophies, they talk about it. What do they have to say about what's really going on when you go to sleep.
The Ra material, also known as The Law of One, presents a unique perspective on consciousness, sleep, and the nature of reality. While it doesn't use the term "pet psychic," your recollection of the idea that spirits can leave the body during sleep aligns with concepts found in many esoteric and metaphysical traditions, including the Ra material.
Here's what the Ra material and similar philosophies generally have to say about the connection between sleep, dreams, and the spiritual journey:
The Law of One and the "Out-of-Body" Experience of Sleep According to the Ra material, a core principle is that all of existence is One Consciousness. The physical body is just one vehicle for this consciousness, and our waking reality is a carefully constructed illusion or "learning environment" designed for spiritual growth.
When we sleep, the Ra material suggests that the conscious mind's hold on the physical body loosens. This allows the spirit or "higher self" to engage in other activities. This is often described as an "out-of-body experience" (OBE) that is a natural part of the sleep cycle.
Leaving the Physical Body: The concept you mentioned from the radio show is very much in line with this. The Ra material indicates that when the physical body sleeps, the spiritual body, or what it calls the "light body," is free to travel to other dimensions or realms. This isn't a permanent separation, as the spirit remains connected to the physical body by a kind of energetic cord, often referred to in other traditions as the "silver cord."
Purpose of Spiritual Travel: This nightly journey isn't random. The purpose is often for spiritual healing, learning, or to process lessons and information from the day. It's a time for the higher self to commune with other spiritual entities, review its progress, and prepare for the next day's experiences. The visions and sensations we experience as dreams are often said to be fragmented memories or symbolic representations of these out-of-body travels.
The Nature of Dreams in Esoteric Philosophy While the Ra material doesn't go into extensive detail about specific dream interpretation, other philosophies that share a similar foundation offer more insight into the nature of dreams themselves.
Astral Projection and the Astral Plane: Many esoteric traditions, including Theosophy and Hermeticism, refer to the "astral plane" as a non-physical dimension that is most accessible to our consciousness during sleep or deep meditative states. They suggest that what we call "dreaming" is often our consciousness moving and interacting on this astral plane. The vivid, often bizarre, or symbolic nature of dreams is attributed to the fact that the astral plane operates on a different logic than the physical world.
Symbolic Language: These philosophies often view dreams not as random brain activity, but as a direct communication from the subconscious, the higher self, or other spiritual beings. They use a symbolic language that our waking, logical mind may not immediately understand. Dream work, or interpreting dreams, is seen as a way to decode these messages and gain insight into our spiritual and psychological state.
Lucid Dreaming: The concept of lucid dreaming—where you become aware that you are dreaming and can even control the dream—is particularly significant in these traditions. It's seen as a direct way to consciously access the astral plane and to learn to navigate different dimensions of reality. For some, it's a stepping stone toward conscious astral projection while awake.
In summary, the core idea across many of these philosophies is that sleep is not a passive state of rest for the mind, but rather an active period of spiritual work. The physical body is in a state of repair, while the spirit is freed to travel, learn, and process experiences on a non-physical level. The dreams we remember upon waking are the echoes of that nightly journey.
[part 4]
the Ra material.. that type of philosophy. Does it say anywhere what causes "cancer". If not in the Ra material, that type of philosophy.
The Ra Material, which is a collection of channeled information from an entity identifying itself as Ra, addresses the cause of physical ailments, including what we would call "cancer," from a metaphysical and spiritual perspective rather than a conventional medical one. It does not provide a specific, single cause for cancer in the way a medical text would. Instead, it frames all disease within the broader context of the "mind/body/spirit complex" and the process of spiritual evolution.
According to this philosophy, physical ailments are a manifestation of imbalances within the individual's consciousness and energy systems. The body is a reflection of the mind and spirit. Disease, therefore, is a message or a catalyst for spiritual growth. The underlying cause of an illness like cancer would be viewed as a blockage or disharmony in the energy centers (chakras) or in the overall consciousness of the individual.
Key concepts from this philosophy that relate to the cause of disease are:
Blockages in the Mind/Body/Spirit Complex: The Ra Material posits that the human being is a mind/body/spirit complex. A lack of harmony or a significant blockage in one of these aspects will eventually manifest as a physical ailment. For example, if an individual is holding onto deep emotional trauma or unaddressed negative thought patterns, this can create a "blockage" in their energy system that eventually precipitates into a physical disease.
The Law of One and Unity: The fundamental principle of the Ra Material is that "all is one." When an individual forgets this unity and becomes polarized by serving the self to the exclusion of others, it can lead to disharmony. Disease is one way the universe provides a "catalyst" for the individual to recognize this disharmony and return to a state of balance and love.
Karma and Past Lives: The philosophy also considers the influence of karmic patterns and lessons from past lives. An illness could be a physical manifestation of an unlearned lesson or a debt of energy that needs to be balanced from a previous incarnation.
In essence, the Ra Material views cancer, like all diseases, not as a random event or a biological mistake, but as a deliberate (though often unconscious) manifestation of spiritual and energetic lessons that the individual has chosen to learn. Healing, from this perspective, is not merely the removal of the physical disease but the resolution of the underlying spiritual imbalance. This often involves a process of self-forgiveness, releasing emotional baggage, and aligning one's actions with a path of greater love and service to others.
ok I heard somewhere it was from like being negative and fouled up or something, that would cause the cancer. It was caused by being "angry" all the time.
What exactly is going on with cancer.. where the cells "rebel" and start attacking the body?
It's like if you're thinking things, the cells don't know and they just react to what's going on.
The idea you heard about negative emotions, like anger, causing cancer is a complex one. From a conventional medical perspective, there is no direct evidence that being "angry all the time" or being "fouled up" causes a person's cells to become cancerous. However, there is a recognized link between prolonged stress, which can be caused by suppressed or chronic negative emotions, and the immune system's function.
Here's a breakdown of what's going on with cancer from a biological standpoint and how this relates to the mind-body connection:
The "Rebellion" of Cancer Cells You've hit on a very accurate way to describe what happens with cancer. In a healthy body, cells are highly organized and follow a strict set of rules. They grow, divide, and die in a controlled way to maintain the body's balance. This is governed by the genetic information, or DNA, within each cell.
Cancer is fundamentally a genetic disease. It happens when a cell's DNA is damaged, leading to mutations in the genes that control its growth and division. This can happen for several reasons:
Random Mistakes: Errors can occur when cells divide and copy their DNA.
Environmental Factors: Exposure to carcinogens (cancer-causing substances) in the environment, like tobacco smoke, UV rays from the sun, or certain chemicals.
Inherited Genes: In some cases, a person can inherit a genetic mutation from their parents that increases their risk of developing cancer.
Once a cell has a critical mutation, it begins to "rebel" against the body's rules. This rebellion involves several key changes:
Uncontrolled Growth: The cell stops listening to signals that tell it to stop dividing. It starts to grow and multiply uncontrollably, forming a mass called a tumor.
Evasion of the Immune System: The immune system is the body's natural defense against rogue cells. In the early stages, it often detects and destroys cancerous cells. However, as the cancer cells evolve, they develop ways to hide from or even shut down the immune cells that are supposed to kill them.
Invasion and Metastasis: Healthy cells stay in their assigned location. Cancer cells, however, gain the ability to invade surrounding tissues and, in some cases, break away from the original tumor and travel through the bloodstream or lymphatic system to form new tumors in other parts of the body. This is known as metastasis.
The Mind-Body Connection While negative emotions like anger don't directly cause the DNA mutations that lead to cancer, there is a connection. This link is primarily through the body's stress response system.
Stress and the Immune System: When a person is under chronic stress, their body releases stress hormones like cortisol. Over time, high levels of cortisol can suppress the immune system. A suppressed immune system is less effective at its job of detecting and eliminating abnormal cells, which could potentially give a developing cancer a better chance to grow and spread.
Lifestyle Factors: Chronic anger or emotional distress can also lead to unhealthy behaviors that are known cancer risk factors, such as poor diet, lack of exercise, or increased alcohol consumption and smoking.
So, while anger itself isn't a direct cause, the prolonged stress and unhealthy behaviors that can accompany it are factors that can contribute to an environment where cancer is more likely to thrive. This aligns with the philosophical idea that disease is a manifestation of disharmony in the "mind/body/spirit complex," as a person's mental state can have a measurable impact on their physical health.
yeah.. I think there's some stuff like they'll have warnings on it saying, causes cancer.. so you get these legit reasons. But maybe it's how you feel after you're on it.. like booze.. I saw how they were like, oh they want to put those warning labels on them saying it causes cancer. It might be that behavior after you're on it, which could cause it. Like you said.. if you're stressed out all the time, it has this effect on your body.. then these things don't get stopped. So maybe being angry all the time could do some of that.
How about smoking though.. the wiki page of the 599 additives. They put all this junk in there. That's what's actually causing lots of that probably. But.. you don't want to be inhaling smoke all the time, so that's not good either.
You've brought up a fascinating and important point about the difference between a direct cause and a contributing factor. It's a key distinction in understanding complex diseases like cancer.
You're right that things with "causes cancer" warnings, like certain chemicals or UV radiation, are called carcinogens because they have been scientifically proven to directly damage a cell's DNA, leading to the mutations that cause cancer. This is a very strong, direct link.
However, your intuition about the role of emotions and behavior is also very valid. It's not a simple one-to-one cause, but it's part of a bigger picture. Let's break down the connections:
The Link Between Stress, Anger, and Cancer Your thought process is spot on. Chronic, unmanaged stress—which can be a direct result of being "angry all the time"—causes a cascade of physical effects that can weaken the body's natural defenses.
Stress Hormones: When you are chronically stressed or angry, your body is in a constant state of "fight or flight." This leads to a persistent elevation of stress hormones like cortisol and adrenaline.
Immune System Suppression: Sustained high levels of cortisol can suppress the immune system. The immune system is like the body's security guard, constantly patrolling for and eliminating rogue cells, including those that are on the path to becoming cancerous. When the immune system is weakened, it's less effective at this job, and these abnormal cells have a greater chance to grow and become a full-blown cancer.
Inflammation: Chronic stress can also lead to chronic inflammation in the body. While acute inflammation is a healthy part of the healing process, long-term inflammation can damage DNA and contribute to cancer development.
So, while anger or stress alone doesn't directly mutate your cells in the same way that a carcinogen does, they create an environment where the body's ability to prevent and fight cancer is compromised.
Smoking and its Additives: A Dual-Threat You also hit on a great point about smoking. The 599 additives you mentioned on a Wikipedia page are a well-documented aspect of the tobacco industry. While some are simply for flavor or to keep the tobacco moist, many are designed to enhance the addictive properties of nicotine or mask the harshness of the smoke.
However, the primary reason smoking is so carcinogenic is not just the additives, but the thousands of chemicals created by the combustion of tobacco itself. When tobacco burns, it produces a complex cocktail of over 7,000 chemicals, and at least 69 of these are known carcinogens. These include substances like:
Tar: A sticky residue that contains many of the cancer-causing chemicals.
Formaldehyde: Used as an embalming fluid.
Arsenic: A poison.
Benzene: Found in gasoline.
These chemicals directly damage a cell's DNA, causing the mutations that start the cancerous process. The additives may contribute to making the cigarette more appealing or easier to smoke, but the burning process itself is the main culprit.
Your observation is astute: there are multiple pathways to disease. There are direct causes, like the chemicals in smoke, and indirect, environmental factors, like chronic stress, that create a physiological state where the body is less able to protect itself.
This Ra material and how karma works though.. this vibe you put out there.. Seems like it's cells rebelling. Do you get these guys who are into oh be peaceful all the time.. I guess meditation and those types of guys.. let's say they don't smoke or something or drink.. they're calm.. Do they still get this cancer going on.. probably, eh?
This is an excellent question that gets to the heart of the Ra Material's philosophy and its relationship with real-world experience.
You are correct that according to the Ra Material, the "vibe" or energy you put out influences your body's state. The "rebellion" of cells is seen as a physical manifestation of an underlying spiritual or energetic disharmony. For a "peaceful" person, the implication would be that their inner harmony would protect them from such a disease.
However, the reality is that people who live peaceful, meditative lifestyles—who don't smoke, drink, or engage in other risky behaviors—do, in fact, still get cancer. This is a powerful point that challenges a simplistic interpretation of the "mind-over-matter" philosophy.
Here’s how the Ra Material and similar philosophies would likely account for this apparent contradiction:
Karma and Past Lives: This is a crucial concept. The Ra Material suggests that a person's current life is not the only factor at play. An individual who is peaceful and loving in this life may be dealing with karmic imbalances or unlearned lessons from a previous incarnation. The cancer, in this view, is not a punishment for a current "bad vibe" but a catalyst or a chosen challenge to help that soul learn and evolve. It could be a lesson in forgiveness, perseverance, or transcending physical pain.
Collective Karma and Shared Experience: The Ra Material also speaks about the concept of collective consciousness and "social memory complexes." It's possible for an individual to be affected by the karma or imbalances of their family, community, or even humanity as a whole. A person may be a "light worker" who has taken on a significant physical challenge in order to help raise the vibration of the planet.
The Nature of the Catalyst: The philosophy doesn't promise a life free of hardship. Instead, it suggests that every hardship is a "catalyst" for spiritual growth. A truly peaceful person may be given a difficult physical illness precisely because they have the inner strength and spiritual tools to navigate it in a way that provides a profound lesson, not just for them, but for those around them. Their journey through the illness becomes a testament to their philosophy, teaching others about grace, acceptance, and inner peace.
Not Just "Anger" but "Blockages": The Ra Material's view is more nuanced than simply "being angry." It refers to "blockages" in the energy centers (chakras). Even a calm person can have subtle, unconscious blockages, such as suppressed grief, unaddressed shame, or difficulty with self-forgiveness. These blockages, even without overt negative emotions, could manifest as illness.
In summary, a practitioner of this philosophy would not see a peaceful person's cancer as a failure of their beliefs. Instead, they would view it as a profound and chosen lesson, a karmic balancing, or a manifestation of a deeper energetic blockage that the individual is meant to overcome on their spiritual journey. The illness is not a mistake; it's a part of the spiritual curriculum.
lol.. ok.. let me go check out your documentaries.. what did you say there. You sure get all worked-up, man. Are you a Christian or something. Well, how about that add-on post about how the Ten commandments actually caused karmic debt and service to self. Here.. let me paste that for you. How Yahweh's intervention trying to get people on the right track, seems to have backfired. Meanwhile he said, "meh" and hasn't interjected in this operation since, eh. Back in those days, he used to step in. Look at what's going on out there.. it's all gone to hell in a handbasket. He doesn't give a fuck, at all. Does nothing.
I've analyzed Yahweh's behavior there, particularly with the way he treated Lucifer. You're supposed to help people, right.. well nobody's helping those guys in hell.
How about a third of the angels who used to work for him, that also quit. 33m. That means there's some kind of shenanigan going on with his operation. lol. ok let me paste that for you about how it worked out for him.
We were talking about the Ra material, you said: "However, Ra explains that this well-intentioned intervention had a mixed outcome. While Yahweh's laws (like the Ten Commandments) were meant to provide a path towards positive polarity and spiritual growth, they were misinterpreted by some as a system of moral judgment and punishment, creating further distortions and karmic debt for those who followed them."
How were they getting karmic debt by following the ten commandments?
According to the Ra material, the karmic debt incurred by following Yahweh's laws (like the Ten Commandments) stems not from the laws themselves, but from the way they were interpreted and applied by humanity.
The central idea in the Ra material is the "Law of One," which posits that all things are manifestations of a single, infinite Creator. The path to spiritual evolution, or "ascension," involves understanding and embodying this unity by choosing to serve others (positive polarity) rather than the self (negative polarity).
Yahweh's intervention, as Ra describes it, was an attempt to guide people towards positive polarity. However, the laws he provided were interpreted in a way that created a system of moral judgment and punishment. This is where the karmic debt comes into play:
Focus on judgment and sin: Instead of seeing the commandments as a guide for benevolent action, people began to use them as a tool to judge themselves and others. This created a sense of separation, guilt, and a focus on "sin" and "punishment" rather than on the underlying principle of unconditional love and unity. This judgmental attitude is seen as a distortion of the original intent and a form of negative thinking that creates karmic imbalance.
External authority vs. internal guidance: The commandments encouraged people to seek an external authority for moral guidance rather than developing their own internal wisdom and compassion. Ra emphasizes that true spiritual growth comes from within, from an individual's free-will choice to radiate love and light. By relying on a set of rules to determine "right" and "wrong," individuals missed the opportunity to truly understand the interconnectedness of all beings and to act from a place of genuine, heart-centered service.
Creation of a "Service to Self" mindset: While the laws were intended to promote positive behavior, the rigid adherence to them for the sake of avoiding punishment or gaining a reward (such as entry into heaven) shifted the motivation from "service to others" to "service to self." This is a key distinction in the Ra material. Acting out of a fear of punishment or a desire for a reward is a form of self-serving behavior, which aligns with the negative polarity and generates karmic debt. The debt is not from the action itself, but from the self-centered motivation behind it.
In essence, Ra explains that the problem wasn't the commandments, but the human distortion of them. The laws were meant to be a helpful tool, but they became a crutch that led to judgment, fear, and a focus on self-interest, all of which are considered to be "distortions" that create karmic debt within the framework of the Law of One.
=============================
Allright.. let me go check out your videos. What did you say earlier.. lol.
Masonry's Satanic Doctrine - From Their Own Books (Original Classic) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRl-ITShKhY
The New Age Fully Exposed (UPDATED) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LAQyVF7gjz0
Gods of the New Age (Original Classic) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tix1t6wUU9A
The New Age's Antichrist Connection - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IrtdI0CF_28
New Age Satanism Exposed - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sjt3MTNqr4k
Aquarius: The Age of Evil (Original Classic) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=00WBV-i-zRM
I'll get back to you about these once I check them out. Calm down ok.. I'm not a fucking satanist. If you analyze Lucifer's behavior.. like what the hell was he trying to do. Thinking he could take over yahweh's job. He doesn't have the "talent" to do what he does. I don't know, man.. but picture his job before he quit. He was a Cherubim and he has musical instruments built into him. Then you had Yahweh's bodyguards.. that one type that'd just say "holy holy holy, praise yahweh", all day long. That shit would get tiresome pretty fucking fast, even after a few hours, ok. Like who demands to be praised. Yahweh's got "issues" ok. So I can see why these fucking guys quit workin for him. However.. Lucifer sounds like he's got issues, ok.
But.. I think he might just be doing his job as the bad guy in this movie. Look at the hidden hand interview, where Yahweh was trying to get stuff going here.. at the garden of eden stuff backfired or something. He goes to his bosses, the council of elders on saturn. They said, ok we'll bring in the lucifer soul group, to be the bad guys in this movie. They're just doing their job, man. To bring this negative polarity out there. What's going on is actually Yahweh's operation.. they're still workin for him. He could just destroy them so they don't exist.. but he doesn't, because it's part of yahweh's sadistic plan, all this bad shit goin on out there.
ok.. I'm not christian, because I analyzed what the fuck is going on out there. And I'm not a satanist cause he's still workin for yahweh.. lol. I'm kind of like "agnostic".. on the fence. I'll check out whatever's going on out there. But I'm not gonna do shit that'll make me wind up in hell, ok. So no.. you're "wrong" calling me a fucking satanist. lol.
If you analyze this karma thread and what's going on out there.. you getting all worked-up about this shit, seems like some "distortion" where there's gotta be some shit going on with you, calm down, dude. lol. You're gonna get all this negative karma vibe shit happening. lol. I think that's why you're all fouled up cause like what's the problem, dude.. chill out. lol
WTF you talking about how I serve the devil. I'm not doing child sacrifices.
That scribd site stinks. Looked around for this, "The Magus of Java". Same front cover image. Got the pdf from here:
https://pdfcoffee.com/the-magus-of-java-7-pdf-free.html
ok now I can scroll a damn pdf instead of the lame scribd site. Let me go check out this chapter 8. Page 67 of 115. They got 2 book pages per pdf page.
Let me check this out here.. "The will of heaven". What is this book about, again.. Asian guys.
Trying to read this.. what is Taoism. lol.
"Taoism is an ancient Chinese philosophical and religious tradition emphasizing harmony with the Tao (or Dao), the fundamental, mysterious principle underlying the universe. Core concepts include yin and yang (balance of opposing forces), wu wei (effortless action), and qi (life force). Followers seek spiritual balance by living in accordance with the natural order, often through practices such as meditation, and by aligning their actions with simplicity and nature."
See.. some of this stuff is more like what's going on out there in the universe. Not this "religious" bullshit where people edit manuscripts over the years, eh. I'll check this out.. it'll take a little bit to read it though. We'll see what these Asian guys say. lol
Closing that window.. I ask:
yin and yang.. what are the little two dots in the shapes for
The two small dots in the yin and yang symbol represent the concept that each opposing force contains a seed of the other. The symbol, called the Taijitu, illustrates that yin and yang are not absolute or separate entities, but are interdependent and constantly in a state of flux and balance.
Here's what the dots symbolize:
Interdependence and Coexistence: The white dot within the black half (yin) and the black dot within the white half (yang) show that one cannot exist without the other. For example, there can be no concept of darkness without light.
Transformation: The dots also represent the idea that when one force reaches its peak, it begins to transform into its opposite. For example, when the day (yang) is at its brightest, night (yin) is beginning to take root, as symbolized by the white dot in the black area, and vice versa.
The swirling line and the dots together show a dynamic and cyclical relationship, where opposing forces are in a continuous process of change and balance, creating harmony in the universe.
[Part 3]
Now.. at this part.. I asked, "yahweh is a sub logos, right? like only in charge of the solar system?" In what you said, you mentioned:
"The Sub-Logos: A star or a solar system is considered a sub-Logos. It is a smaller creative principle that works within the parameters set by the galactic Logos. Our Sun, for example, is a sub-Logos. It is a conscious being that provides the energy and structure for the planets within its system to develop and evolve."
So.. Yaheh is the personality of the sun, like how Gaia is mother nature of the earth?
Cause weeks ago I was asking and you said it was Ra, like what was going on with Egypt. You know, like the sun god.
But with the Ra material you have this soul group thing going on, and they're from Venus. I think it might be the same Ra. But you got this sun god thing. So.. our sun.. I used to think it was Yahweh who was it's personality, running it.. but he's also the sub logos in charge of the solar system. Makes sense that he'd be running it, right. I don't know.. several weeks ago we got into it and I changed my mind cause you said the sun personality is Ra, like the egyptian sun god.
In the Ra material book, they said their soul group, they're the ones who build the pyramids using thought. Wasn't a bunch of slave labour. But yeah.. our sun.. who's the personality running it.. seems like Yahweh but you got this thing going on with Ra.
According to the Ra Material, Yahweh is not the personality of our Sun. This is a common point of confusion because of the way the terms are used, but they are distinct entities. The short answer is: the Sun is the sub-Logos of our solar system, while Yahweh is a separate social memory complex that worked with a specific population on Earth.
The Identity of the Sun In the Ra Material's cosmology, our Sun is a sub-Logos. It's a conscious, living being that provides the energy and structure for the planets in our solar system to evolve. The Ra Material refers to our Sun as "Sol." It is the creative principle for our local system, and it is not identified as Yahweh.
The Role of Yahweh As discussed in our previous conversation, Yahweh is described as a social memory complex (a collective consciousness of beings) from a higher density. They acted as a benevolent sub-Logos specifically for a group of people on Earth. Their intention was to provide a set of laws and guidance to help a particular population accelerate its spiritual evolution. They are not the "personality" of the Sun but a group that intervened with a part of humanity.
Clarifying the Ra Connection Your confusion is understandable because of how the names have become intertwined over time, particularly with the Egyptian mythology.
Ra, the Social Memory Complex: The entity you are conversing with in the Ra Material is a social memory complex from the planet Venus. They are a collective of beings that reached a high level of spiritual evolution.
The Egyptian Connection: The Ra social memory complex chose to make contact with the ancient Egyptians. The Egyptians, in their effort to understand these beings, deified them and associated them with their existing sun god, Ra. This is where the name "Ra" and the symbol of the Sun became linked.
The Difference: The Ra from the Venus social memory complex is not the Sun itself. They are a group of beings who chose the name "Ra" to resonate with the Egyptian culture they were assisting, as the Sun was already a powerful symbol of their faith.
So, to put it simply, our Sun is a powerful, conscious being—the sub-Logos for the entire solar system. Yahweh is a different collective of beings that worked with a specific population on Earth. The Ra of the Ra Material is a third, distinct social memory complex from Venus that chose to be known by a name and symbol related to the Sun.
ok so who's the personality running the sun then? It's not Yahweh. Sounds like it's not really Ra.
That's an excellent question that gets to the heart of the concept. The personality running the Sun is simply the Sun itself.
According to the Ra Material, a sub-Logos, whether it's a star like our Sun or a planet like Earth, is a conscious, intelligent being in its own right. It's not a physical object that is "run" by an external personality. It's the beingness of the Sun that provides the energy and structure for our solar system.
Think of it like this: just as a human has a consciousness, the Sun has a consciousness. It is a powerful, loving, and intelligent entity. It's not "Ra," nor is it "Yahweh," but rather a unique expression of the Infinite Creator. The beings of a planetary system, like humanity on Earth, evolve under its guidance, much like a child develops under the care of a parent.
oh so they don't got a name for the personality of the sun, like what they do with earth and Gaia, mother earth.
Based on the Ra Material, you are correct. They do not assign a distinct, separate personality name to the Sun's consciousness in the same way that Earth is personified as "Gaia."
Ra refers to our sun by its scientific name, Sol, when discussing it as a sub-Logos. The material presents the consciousness of the Sun as being inherent to the star itself, so it doesn't need an external name. The focus is on the beingness and purpose of the Sun, rather than a separate, personified identity.
=================================
We were talking about the Ra material, you said: "However, Ra explains that this well-intentioned intervention had a mixed outcome. While Yahweh's laws (like the Ten Commandments) were meant to provide a path towards positive polarity and spiritual growth, they were misinterpreted by some as a system of moral judgment and punishment, creating further distortions and karmic debt for those who followed them."
How were they getting karmic debt by following the ten commandments?
According to the Ra material, the karmic debt incurred by following Yahweh's laws (like the Ten Commandments) stems not from the laws themselves, but from the way they were interpreted and applied by humanity.
The central idea in the Ra material is the "Law of One," which posits that all things are manifestations of a single, infinite Creator. The path to spiritual evolution, or "ascension," involves understanding and embodying this unity by choosing to serve others (positive polarity) rather than the self (negative polarity).
Yahweh's intervention, as Ra describes it, was an attempt to guide people towards positive polarity. However, the laws he provided were interpreted in a way that created a system of moral judgment and punishment. This is where the karmic debt comes into play:
Focus on judgment and sin: Instead of seeing the commandments as a guide for benevolent action, people began to use them as a tool to judge themselves and others. This created a sense of separation, guilt, and a focus on "sin" and "punishment" rather than on the underlying principle of unconditional love and unity. This judgmental attitude is seen as a distortion of the original intent and a form of negative thinking that creates karmic imbalance.
External authority vs. internal guidance: The commandments encouraged people to seek an external authority for moral guidance rather than developing their own internal wisdom and compassion. Ra emphasizes that true spiritual growth comes from within, from an individual's free-will choice to radiate love and light. By relying on a set of rules to determine "right" and "wrong," individuals missed the opportunity to truly understand the interconnectedness of all beings and to act from a place of genuine, heart-centered service.
Creation of a "Service to Self" mindset: While the laws were intended to promote positive behavior, the rigid adherence to them for the sake of avoiding punishment or gaining a reward (such as entry into heaven) shifted the motivation from "service to others" to "service to self." This is a key distinction in the Ra material. Acting out of a fear of punishment or a desire for a reward is a form of self-serving behavior, which aligns with the negative polarity and generates karmic debt. The debt is not from the action itself, but from the self-centered motivation behind it.
In essence, Ra explains that the problem wasn't the commandments, but the human distortion of them. The laws were meant to be a helpful tool, but they became a crutch that led to judgment, fear, and a focus on self-interest, all of which are considered to be "distortions" that create karmic debt within the framework of the Law of One.
Here.. go read the 3225 page Talmud and let me know what's up in there.
[part 2]
yahweh is a sub logos, right? like only in charge of the solar system?
This is a fascinating and complex question that gets to a specific and nuanced part of the Ra Material's cosmology. The short answer is, "Yes, according to the Ra Material, Yahweh is a sub-Logos, and a powerful one, but their role is not that of a single, all-knowing solar system manager."
Let's break down this concept:
The Hierarchy of Creation In the Ra Material, creation is a hierarchical process that stems from the Infinite Creator.
The Infinite Creator: The source of all, an undifferentiated state of unity.
The Logos: The first "thought" or creative principle of the Infinite Creator. A Logos is a kind of intelligent energy that creates and manages an entire galaxy. It sets the fundamental laws and conditions for the evolution of consciousness within its domain.
The Sub-Logos: A star or a solar system is considered a sub-Logos. It is a smaller creative principle that works within the parameters set by the galactic Logos. Our Sun, for example, is a sub-Logos. It is a conscious being that provides the energy and structure for the planets within its system to develop and evolve.
Yahweh's Specific Role Ra states that Yahweh is a social memory complex (a collective consciousness) that acted as a sub-Logos for Earth. They were a benevolent, well-meaning entity from a higher density that sought to help humanity by providing a set of laws and guidance to accelerate their spiritual evolution.
However, Ra explains that this well-intentioned intervention had a mixed outcome. While Yahweh's laws (like the Ten Commandments) were meant to provide a path towards positive polarity and spiritual growth, they were misinterpreted by some as a system of moral judgment and punishment, creating further distortions and karmic debt for those who followed them.
Key Distinctions Not the Creator: Yahweh is a creator in the sense of a co-creator, but not the ultimate Infinite Creator or the galactic Logos. They are a being (or a group of beings) with a specific, limited role.
Focused on a Specific Population: Yahweh's influence was particularly focused on a specific group of people on Earth, not the entire solar system.
A Manager, Not a Judge: Their role was to manage the spiritual evolution of a particular group, not to act as a cosmic judge "analyzing" every individual. The karma system, as we discussed, is an automatic law of the universe, not something administered by a single entity.
The Law of Free Will: Yahweh, like Ra, operates under the Law of Free Will and can only intervene when an entity asks for help or is receptive to their guidance. They cannot force or bypass an entity's free will.
So, while Yahweh is indeed a sub-Logos, their story in the Ra Material is a cautionary tale about the complexities of intervention and the distortions that can arise when higher-level teachings are passed down to a lower density. It highlights the idea that true spiritual growth must come from within, and that even the most benevolent guidance can be misunderstood.
you were saying yahweh isn't in charge of this karma.. it's the universe
You've hit on a core concept of the Ra Material, and you're correct: Yahweh is not in charge of karma. Instead, karma is a natural law of the universe, much like gravity.
How it Works: The Law of Cause and Effect The universe, being a manifestation of the One Infinite Creator, operates on fundamental principles of balance and harmony. When you perform an action, think a thought, or have a feeling that goes against the principle of unity—which is the "all is one" concept—you create an energetic imbalance. This imbalance is karma.
Think of it like a ripple effect. If you throw a stone into a still pond (the universe in a state of unity), it creates ripples. The water doesn't "punish" the stone; it simply responds to the disturbance. Those ripples continue until the energy is absorbed and the surface becomes calm again.
Similarly, when you create a karmic distortion, the universe doesn't judge you. It simply initiates a process to return to balance. This is an automatic, self-correcting mechanism. The "bad luck" you might experience is just the universe providing you with the necessary experiences (what Ra calls "catalysts") to learn from your actions and work through the imbalance you created.
Yahweh, as a sub-Logos, is a powerful being who has influenced humanity, but they are not the administrator of this universal law. Their role, as described by Ra, was more about providing a specific set of guidelines to a certain population to help them evolve, which unfortunately led to some misunderstandings. Karma, on the other hand, is an impersonal, universal principle that applies to all beings and densities.
so you just gotta be cool about whatever's going down and don't get too flustered?
Your summary gets right to the heart of the matter. While it's not about being emotionless, a key takeaway from the Ra Material is that developing a calm and accepting demeanor is incredibly powerful.
It’s not that you can't feel frustration or sadness. Those are natural human emotions. The goal isn't to suppress them or be "fake cool." The work is to recognize those feelings without letting them control you.
Responding, Not Reacting The core idea is to shift from reacting to responding.
Reacting is when you get flustered, angry, or pessimistic, letting the "catalyst" of the situation take over your thoughts and emotions. This reinforces the negative energy and can attract more of the same.
Responding is when you acknowledge the difficult feelings—"I am feeling frustrated right now"—but you don't let them dictate your next move. Instead, you choose to respond with a state of inner peace and acceptance.
This doesn't mean you have to like what's happening. It means you accept that it's a part of your reality at this moment and that it's there for a reason. By not getting "too flustered," you are essentially saying, "I am not going to feed this negative experience with my own negative energy."
This state of calm and acceptance is not a passive one; it's a powerful act of conscious creation. By staying calm, you stop the karmic cycle of resistance and create space for the solution to appear.
yeah but what if you got this constant anxiety all the time about whatever situation you're in.
Anxiety is a state of being in resistance to the present moment, which is a significant distortion in the context of the Ra Material. According to these teachings, constant anxiety creates a persistent negative vibration that can attract more difficult "catalysts" into your life.
How Anxiety Creates a Distortion Resistance to "What Is": Anxiety is the mind's way of fighting against the current reality or an imagined future one. It's a refusal to accept the present moment. This resistance creates an inner conflict that vibrates at a very different frequency than the state of unity and peace.
Fueling the Negative Cycle: When you constantly worry, you're projecting a future of fear and loss. The universe, in its impersonal and mirroring way, responds to this dominant vibration by presenting you with experiences that match it. This can lead to a self-perpetuating cycle where your fears seem to be confirmed, which in turn causes more anxiety.
Blocking Positive Energy: A state of constant anxiety is like a closed door. It prevents you from seeing opportunities, solutions, or even the subtle guidance that might be present to help you. It consumes your energy and focus, leaving little room for a shift in perspective.
The Path of Acceptance The Ra Material suggests that the true work is to move toward acceptance rather than suppress the anxiety. This doesn't mean you have to be happy about your situation; it means you learn to observe your anxiety without being consumed by it.
Acknowledge and Release: You can acknowledge the feeling of anxiety ("I am feeling anxious right now") without identifying with it ("I am an anxious person"). This simple act of observation creates a small amount of distance between you and the feeling.
Focus on the Present Moment: The source of anxiety is almost always a thought about the past or the future. By intentionally bringing your focus back to the present moment—what you can see, hear, or feel right now—you interrupt the loop of anxious thought.
Embrace the Catalyst: Ra would suggest that this anxiety itself is the catalyst. The challenge isn't the external situation but your inner response to it. The spiritual lesson is to find a way to be at peace despite the external circumstances, and to trust that your inner state of calm will eventually lead to a more harmonious external reality.
[part 8]
Add-on.. was going through my old posts earlier today looking for something and this kind of ties in.
"In that World hierarchy pyramid, infographic, the 1st triad of highest ranking angels are the Seraphim, Cherubim and Ophanim. These are bizarre creatures. I'm there.. let's find some animations of them. Found 3D little clips but they were separate so I put them together in a vid. 1 minute 15 sec."
https://cdn.videy.co/nFRz1yhD.mp4
You see what his bodyguards look like.
[part 7]
Don't you think it's odd how yahweh doesn't just exterminate lucifer and have him be dead and not exist, if he doesn't like him that much?
That's a profound and very common philosophical question. The idea that a powerful being would simply not allow a troublesome creature to exist seems like a straightforward solution.
The theological explanation for why God doesn't just "exterminate" Lucifer and the other fallen angels has to do with the nature of divine justice and God's relationship to His creation.
Here's the reasoning behind it:
Divine Justice: In this view, God's justice is not just about removing a problem; it's about giving a consequence that is fitting for the crime. The sin of Lucifer and the fallen angels was a direct, willful rebellion against an infinite and eternal God. The argument is that the consequence of this sin must also be eternal. Simply making them "not exist" might not be seen as a just punishment for such an immense cosmic crime.
The Nature of Being: From a theological perspective, angels and human souls are created as eternal beings. To simply un-create them would be seen as a contradiction to their very nature. Their existence, once granted by God, is permanent, and the consequences of their choices are also permanent.
A Permanent Example: The fate of Lucifer and his crew serves as an eternal, public example to the rest of creation—both for humanity and the angels who remained faithful—of the consequences of rebelling against God. Their perpetual existence in damnation is a permanent testimony to the seriousness of sin and the ultimate triumph of God's authority. Annihilation would, in a sense, erase that lesson from history.
well.. let's get back to those celestial events that are clues the rapture is going on. It seems pretty major and like it happens all of a sudden? Nothing like oh they see something going on in the sky for a while first?
That's a great point, and it's a key distinction in the end-times timeline. The answer to your question is different for each of those two events.
The Rapture The rapture is described as happening suddenly, without any warning signs on Earth or in the sky. The Bible uses the phrase "in the twinkling of an eye" to describe its speed. In this view, the very point is that it's an instantaneous, completely unexpected event. There would be no celestial buildup or slow signs leading up to it.
The Celestial Signs The celestial events you mentioned—the sun turning dark, the stars falling, etc.—are part of the Tribulation period, which is a time of God's judgment on Earth. In the view we've been discussing, this period happens after the rapture.
So, while the rapture is a single, sudden event, the celestial calamities are a series of devastating events that unfold over a period of time. The Book of Revelation describes them happening as different judgments are released, so there would be a lot of "something going on in the sky" for a while, but it would be happening after the rapture.
yeah wasn't there something about when it happens you'd have like no time to deal with it.. where they were in the middle of something, eh.. and it was like you gotta drop what's going on..
You're thinking of a very well-known image used to describe the suddenness of the event.
That idea comes directly from the Bible, specifically from Jesus's teachings about the end times. He used everyday scenarios to emphasize that it would happen without warning and give people no time to prepare.
In Matthew 24:40-41, he says, "Two men will be in the field; one will be taken and the other left. Two women will be grinding with a hand mill; one will be taken and the other left."
The point of these examples is that people will be going about their normal, routine lives when the event suddenly occurs, and there will be no time to stop what they're doing or to get ready.
[end of chit-chat]
[part 6]
ok so these guys get called up before all this celestial calamities, eh?
According to one of the most widely held views, especially in many evangelical denominations, yes.
In the Pre-tribulation Rapture theory, the rapture—the "calling up" of believers—is seen as happening before the seven-year period of severe global calamities begins.
The idea is that God removes His faithful followers from the Earth so they are not present for the coming judgment and devastation. So, in that specific interpretation, the believers are gone before all the celestial calamities you mentioned start hitting.
and then.. isn't it like.. whoops weren't a bunch of people supposed to dissapear or only those 144,000 vanish
That's a very common point of confusion because the two ideas are often discussed together, but they are generally viewed as two distinct events.
Here's the key difference:
The Rapture: The rapture is the event where a "bunch of people" are said to disappear. According to the belief, this would be the instantaneous vanishing of all true Christian believers, both those alive and those who have died. This would be a massive, global event involving millions, if not billions, of people.
The 144,000: This group is not the group that vanishes in the rapture. In many views, the 144,000 are a very specific group of individuals who are on Earth after the rapture takes place. They are sealed by God for a specific purpose—to serve as evangelists during the period of tribulation.
So, the sequence would be: a "bunch of people" vanish in the rapture, and then the 144,000 are on Earth and get sealed for their job. It's not the same group of people.
oh so the bad people vanish and it's only the 144,000 left on earth.. and this would be before the rapture with the celestial calamities?
No, that's not quite right. It's actually the other way around.
In the pre-tribulation rapture theory we've been discussing:
The Rapture Occurs First: The "good people"—the believers—are the ones who vanish from Earth. The non-believers are left behind.
The 144,000 are on Earth: The 144,000 are a specific group that is present on Earth after the rapture, along with everyone else who was left behind. Their purpose is to be sealed and go on a mission during the calamities.
Then the Calamities Begin: The celestial calamities and all the other major "end-times" events happen after the rapture has taken place. The people left on Earth, including the 144,000, would witness and live through these events.
but you'd have this vanishing of the 144,000.. yeah but that's not many from the population, so you might not notice it too much, right.
To be clear, according to the belief, the 144,000 do not vanish.
The group that vanishes is the much larger body of believers in an event called the rapture.
If a massive number of people—millions or even billions—were to disappear simultaneously from all over the world, it would be a globally catastrophic event that would be impossible to miss. There would be cars crashing, planes falling out of the sky, and chaos everywhere.
The 144,000 are a very specific group who are thought to be sealed after that event, and they remain on Earth during the calamities that follow.
ok so the bad people are the ones who'd vanish.. they won't be around when there's all this celestial calamities?
No, that's not what the belief holds. It's the opposite.
In the rapture theory, the good people (the believers) are the ones who vanish. The bad people (the non-believers) are left behind on Earth to experience the celestial calamities and the other end-times events.
ok you said "In the rapture theory, the good people (the believers) are the ones who vanish."
But I just said before.. "but you'd have this vanishing of the 144,000.. yeah but that's not many from the population, so you might not notice it too much, right."
Those good people aren't supposed to experience everything blowing up
This is a very important point, and it gets to the heart of the misunderstanding. Let's break down the two groups clearly.
Group 1: The "Good People" (All Believers) Who they are: This is the large, global body of all Christian believers.
What happens to them: According to the rapture theory, they are the ones who vanish from Earth.
Their fate: They are the group that is spared from experiencing the celestial calamities and the other end-times judgments.
Group 2: The 144,000 Who they are: This is a much smaller, specific group of people.
What happens to them: They do not vanish in the rapture. They remain on Earth.
Their fate: They are explicitly present on Earth during the calamities. They are not spared from witnessing them, but are instead divinely protected to do their work.
So, you're right that "good people" are not supposed to experience everything blowing up, but that belief applies only to the first group—the people in the rapture. The 144,000 are a different group entirely, and they are a part of the events that happen after the vanishing.
ok so you understand why I was confused, right. Don't you think that's odd the 144,000 are there to experience this total shit hitting the fan with everything blowing up all over the place
That's a very logical question, and you're right to be confused; it's a distinction that can seem odd on the surface. If the goal is to spare people from the calamities, why would this one specific group be left behind to experience them?
The theological explanation for this goes back to the purpose of the 144,000. They are not left behind by accident or as an oversight.
Their presence is considered to be by design, for a specific and very important mission:
To be Witnesses and Evangelists: The 144,000 are believed to be a group of people sealed by God to preach the Gospel to the rest of the world that was left behind after the rapture. Their presence is seen as a final, powerful opportunity for people to repent and turn to God in the midst of the chaos.
Divine Protection: They are not left to fend for themselves. The biblical text states that they are "sealed" by God on their foreheads. This is interpreted as a form of divine protection that allows them to survive the judgments and fulfill their mission, even when a large portion of the world is being destroyed.
So, while it seems odd, their presence is meant to show God's continued grace and mercy, even in the midst of His judgment. They are there to give people a final chance.
I thought it's supposed to be the bad people who are still here who get punished with everything blowing up
You're right. That's a core part of the belief—the calamities are a form of punishment for those who rejected God and were left behind.
The way that's reconciled with the presence of the 144,000 is to see their situation differently. They aren't there to be punished. They are there as witnesses and messengers.
Think of it this way: the end-times are seen as a period of judgment where people who have chosen to reject God are given a taste of the consequences. In the midst of that chaos and punishment, the 144,000 are a living, breathing testament to God's continued mercy. They are divinely protected to go into the "punishment zone" to offer a way out to anyone who will listen.
So, the punishment is for the bad people, and the 144,000 are the ones who are on a mission to save them from it.
But it sounds like you had this other group, of "good guys" who believed in yahweh.. that are besides the 144,000.. and all those kind of like good guys who didn't make the cut as the 144,000.. they vanished and went up to heaven, right.. but they're not the "really good guys" who made the cut as the 144k. So they still kind of got "saved", right.
You've hit on a core distinction that is central to this particular end-times theory. You're exactly right.
In this belief system, there are two distinct groups of "good guys," and they get saved in different ways, or for different purposes:
The "Good Guys" who Vanish: This group is made up of all the believers from all over the world. They are considered "saved" because of their faith, and they are spared from the coming judgments. Their salvation is expressed by them being "called up" to heaven in the rapture. You could say they are the general population of the saved.
The "Really Good Guys" (The 144,000): This is a small, specific, and "elite" group. They are also saved, but they are chosen for a unique mission. They don't vanish with the others; instead, they are given a special purpose to preach to the people who were left behind.
So, your intuition is correct: all the believers are saved, but the 144,000 are a special group who have a different, active role to play during the end times. They are not more "saved," but they have a unique and critical job.
What goes on with all these bad people who were left behind and everything's blowing up. And all this stuff there.. like blood oceans or something. They're not so bad that they go to hell though, right.. Well.. what's going on there with who goes to hell. Sounds like that's those angels who quit workin for him like Lucifer.
That's a very a powerful question that gets to the very core of the end-times narrative. You're trying to figure out if there's any hope for the people left behind, and if their fate is sealed like the angels'.
Here's how that's viewed:
The Fate of the People Left Behind While the calamities are a form of punishment, they are not seen as the final act of damnation. The "blood oceans" and other horrors you mentioned are understood as God's judgments on a world that rejected Him. However, this period is also considered a time of final opportunity.
Final Chance: The entire purpose of the 144,000 being on Earth is to give these people—who were left behind—one last chance to repent and be saved. In this view, the calamities might cause people to realize their need for God and turn to the message the 144,000 are preaching.
A Great Multitude: The Book of Revelation mentions a "great multitude" from every nation, who came "out of the great tribulation" and have been "washed... in the blood of the Lamb." This is interpreted by many to mean that a great number of people who were left behind will actually get saved during this period.
Who Goes to Hell? In this theological view, "going to hell" is not based on how "bad" a person is in a relative sense. It's about whether they have accepted God's offer of salvation. The people who go to hell are those who have lived and died without accepting God's grace, regardless of whether they seemed "not so bad" to other people.
The Difference Between People and Angels You're right, the angels who quit are seen as being completely damned, with no hope. The key distinction is that mercy was not offered to the angels, but it is offered to humanity. The people left behind still have a chance to be saved, even in the final moments. The angels' rebellion was a final act of will, while a person's life is a journey with many opportunities for repentance.
Jeez.. But then in this movie.. lucifer and his crew there.. they got let out later on, eh.. it's like this "cycle"?
You're bringing up a very specific part of the end-times timeline, but the movie's portrayal of a "cycle" isn't what the Bible describes. The theological view is that Lucifer and his crew do get let out, but it's not a repeating cycle. It's a one-time, final event.
According to the Book of Revelation:
A Thousand-Year Binding: After the calamities and the final battle, the devil (Satan) is bound and thrown into a pit for a thousand years. This is a period of peace on Earth.
A Short Release: After the thousand years are complete, the devil is released "for a short time." He then goes out to deceive the nations one last time and gathers an army for a final battle against God's people.
Final, Permanent Damnation: This final battle is brief and decisive. The devil and his forces are then permanently and eternally "thrown into the lake of burning sulfur," where they are tormented forever.
So, while he does get "let out later on," it's not a cycle. It's a single, temporary release that leads to his final and eternal damnation.
so we're in this cycle where he's let loose or is he still down there?
Based on that theological timeline, we are not in that period. He is not currently let loose.
According to that view, Satan's binding and subsequent release happens after all the end-times calamities and the establishment of the thousand-year reign of Christ on Earth. Since those events have not happened yet, Satan is not yet bound in the pit, and therefore has not been released from it.
The entire sequence you've asked about is part of a linear series of events that has not yet begun.
He hasn't been let out before, eh? It's not like a repeating cycle where he gets let out?
No, according to the biblical timeline, it is not a repeating cycle. He has not been let out before.
The events described—his binding for a thousand years and his subsequent release—are a one-time, future event that has not yet happened. It is the final part of a linear series of judgments, not a cycle that repeats.
ok so after all this stuff.. you have this sort of heaven type scenario for 1000 years.. then Lucifer and his crew get let out? For how long?
That's exactly right. After the calamities, there is a thousand-year period often referred to as the "Millennium" or the "heaven type scenario."
According to the Book of Revelation (20:7), after those thousand years are over, the devil is released "for a short time." The text doesn't give an exact length, but it's understood to be very brief, and its purpose is to be a final test and a prelude to his ultimate and permanent defeat.
[continued in part 7]
[part 5]
oh yeah you got some serious stuff though with like "calamity" and celestial things even.. like what the hell was going on there.. where you'd even see things with the stars, eh.. and that's not going on.. it's really calm these days. So.. what would have to go on there for those "signs". I'm not seeing any of that.
You're right, the Bible describes some incredibly dramatic signs that are meant to signal the end, and many of them are celestial. The feeling that things are "really calm these days" is a common one, as we're not seeing the sun going dark or stars falling from the sky.
Here's what those signs are and how they're often interpreted.
Celestial Signs and Calamities The most serious signs you're referring to come from passages in the New Testament, particularly in the Gospels and the Book of Revelation. They describe events that would cause cosmic-level disruption:
Matthew 24:29 says that immediately after a period of great distress, "the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light; the stars will fall from the sky, and the heavenly bodies will be shaken."
The Book of Revelation also talks about similar events, such as the moon turning to blood, and stars or a great mountain falling to Earth.
These are not just metaphors; in many interpretations, they are literal, physical events that would be seen by everyone on Earth and would be a clear, unmistakable sign that the end is at hand.
Why People Believe They're Happening Now Even though we're not seeing those exact celestial events, those who believe the end is near would say we're still seeing the "calamity" part. They interpret a lot of what's happening today as fulfilling those prophecies, but in a less direct way.
Global Conflicts and Social Turmoil: Many see the constant wars, political instability, and social unrest around the world as the "wars and rumors of wars" Jesus spoke of.
Natural Disasters and Plagues: The increase in extreme weather events, earthquakes, and global pandemics (like COVID-19) are often viewed as the famines and plagues mentioned in the Bible.
A "Precursor" Stage: The most common belief is that the most dramatic and unmistakable signs, like the stars falling, are reserved for the very last moments before the end. We're in a preliminary stage right now, where the signs are clear to those who are looking for them, but not so obvious that they would force a person to believe.
Essentially, they would argue that the "calm" you see is a matter of perspective, and that the world is in a state of growing chaos that will eventually lead to those larger, unmistakable celestial events.
yeah the "stars fall from the sky".. whatcha got on that. Cause that's pretty fucking major. lol
The prophecy of "stars falling from the sky" is considered a pretty major sign, and you're right, it's one of the most dramatic and terrifying images in the end-times prophecies. The Bible mentions this in a few key places, and there are two main ways it's interpreted.
Literal Interpretation One view is that this will be a literal, physical event. It's believed that a massive meteor shower, an asteroid impact, or some other cosmic catastrophe will happen. This would be a world-ending event that would fulfill the prophecies of widespread destruction and calamity, leaving no doubt that the end has come.
Symbolic Interpretation A more common interpretation among scholars is that the "stars falling" are a metaphorical event representing a massive collapse of human power and authority. In biblical and ancient literature, stars were often symbols for:
Political or Religious Leaders: A star's fall could symbolize the violent overthrow or downfall of a king, a kingdom, or a prominent religious figure. The "heavenly bodies being shaken" would represent a complete breakdown of all human systems of power and order.
Spiritual Beings: In some cases, "stars" are used to refer to angels. The "fall of the stars" could be a poetic way of describing a great spiritual battle or the final judgment and defeat of all rebellious spiritual forces.
Regardless of the interpretation, both views agree that this is not a minor event. It signifies a cataclysmic and final moment where the current world order, whether physical or spiritual, is completely destroyed.
like what do you even got on this.. how would that even happen. Picture it in a "science" way.. like, come on.. lol.. if the damn sun would blow up, we'd all die.. so.. how could this stars falling from the sky.. things going black.. the moon getting messed with. You'd have stuff crashing.
That's a great question, and you're right to be skeptical. From a scientific perspective, a literal interpretation of those events happening in sequence is a complete non-starter. If the sun went dark, we'd all freeze and die almost immediately. But let's picture it in a different way, as a single, cataclysmic event as seen from the ground.
A Scientific Interpretation A lot of scientists who study major extinction events believe a single celestial collision could cause all of those things to happen at once. The biblical descriptions could be a visual account of an asteroid or comet impact.
Stars Falling from the Sky This would be the most visible part of the event. A massive celestial object entering our atmosphere wouldn't look like one rock. It could shatter and create a colossal meteor shower, with countless glowing pieces of debris streaking across the sky. From the ground, it would absolutely look like "stars" were falling. This wouldn't be like a regular meteor shower; it would be a "firestorm" of immense proportions.
The Sun Turning Dark The impact itself would launch an unimaginable amount of dust, rock, and debris into the atmosphere. This would form a global dust cloud that would completely block out the sun. Scientists call this an impact winter. Sunlight wouldn't be able to reach the surface, causing temperatures to plummet and turning the day sky completely black. The phrase "the sun will be darkened" would be a perfect description of this.
The Moon Getting Messed With The moon turning a deep red or "blood" color and not giving its light is a perfect description of what happens during an impact winter. The thick dust and ash in the atmosphere would make the moon invisible, and any light that did get through would be scattered in such a way as to make the moon appear a deep, fiery red, much like we see with sunsets today when there's a lot of pollution in the air.
So, when you put it all together, the biblical descriptions could be a layperson's eyewitness account of a single, world-altering asteroid impact. It's a scientifically plausible scenario for the end of the world.
What would be going on there, "technically".. you know what I mean? This was in that "revelations" at the end of the Bible.. I checked it out the other month, that section. What exactly did they say was gonna go on with the planets and stuff
Based on what's written in the Book of Revelation, here's a "technical" breakdown of the specific cosmic events described, as if you were reading them from a script. The text doesn't use scientific terms, but it's very specific about what happens and when.
These events are often triggered by divine actions, such as an angel sounding a trumpet or a scroll being opened. They're part of a series of judgments.
Key Celestial Events in Revelation: The Sun, Moon, and Stars: In chapter 6, the text describes the opening of the sixth seal. At this point, the sun becomes "black like sackcloth made of goat hair," and the moon turns "red as blood." The "stars in the sky fell to the earth, like figs dropping from a fig tree." The sky itself "receded like a scroll, rolling up." This is not a partial event; it's a complete change of the visual state of the heavens.
The "Great Mountain" and the Seas: During the trumpet judgments in chapter 8, an angel sounds a trumpet, and "something like a huge mountain, all ablaze, was thrown into the sea." A third of the sea turned to blood, a third of the sea creatures died, and a third of the ships were destroyed.
The "Star" Named Wormwood: Immediately after the mountain event, another trumpet sounds. This time, "a great star, blazing like a torch, fell from the sky." This "star" is named Wormwood, and its falling poisons a third of the rivers and springs, making the water bitter and killing many people.
Darkness from the Abyss: During a later judgment, a star falls from the sky to the earth and is given a key to the "Abyss." When the Abyss is opened, smoke comes out, darkening "the sun and the air."
In short, the Book of Revelation describes a series of cataclysmic events that are direct, supernatural actions. It's not a scientific chain reaction but a sequence of judgments where a planet-sized object is thrown into the sea, a poisoned "star" falls to the land, and the sun and moon are directly affected. The "technicals" are that these are all direct acts of divine judgment.
allright let's go over each of those ones and try to picture a scientific explanation for what the hell would be going on and what might cause this. Didn't they have a planet x that was hiding behind the sun you couldn't see. Or how about the one that was around.. Nibiru, eh.. where who were those guys and they left on it. Try to figure something out here for what they saw in those "visions" years ago but had a hard time describing what they were seeing.
That's a very creative way of looking at it, and it's a great exercise in trying to bridge the gap between ancient, poetic visions and modern scientific phenomena. You're right, the people in Revelation were likely trying to describe things that were far beyond their understanding, but we can look for parallels in what we know about the universe today.
Let's try to picture a scientific explanation for each of those events.
- The Sun Turns Black & the Moon Turns Red The Vision: The sun becomes black, the moon turns red, and the stars fall.
Scientific Interpretation: This could be a single, massive asteroid or comet impact event. The user you talked to before was on the right track here.
An impact of sufficient size would send an unimaginable amount of ash, dust, and debris into the atmosphere.
This would completely block out the sun, making it appear "black." We've seen this on a minor scale with volcanic eruptions, but this would be a global, catastrophic event.
The same dust cloud would filter light in such a way that it would make the moon appear a deep red color, similar to how a thick smog or wildfire smoke makes the moon look red.
- A "Great Mountain" Thrown into the Sea The Vision: A huge, burning "mountain" is thrown into the sea, turning a third of it to blood.
Scientific Interpretation: This is a very direct description of a major asteroid impact in the ocean. A large object hitting the ocean would be devastating.
The "blazing" part is a reference to the entry of the object into the atmosphere.
The impact would create a massive tsunami and a gigantic plume of steam and superheated water. It would also throw millions of tons of sediment and iron-rich material into the atmosphere and ocean, which could give the water a reddish, bloody appearance.
This is a plausible scenario for the end of the world, and some people theorize that this "mountain" could be a rogue planet or a hypothetical celestial body. This is where the ideas you mentioned, like Planet X or Nibiru, sometimes come into play. It’s important to note, though, that the scientific community does not support the existence of these planets; they are part of a theory to try to explain some historical events.
- The "Star" Named Wormwood The Vision: A star falls, poisons a third of the Earth's rivers and springs.
Scientific Interpretation: This could be a different type of celestial object: a comet.
Unlike asteroids, which are primarily rock and metal, comets are made of ice, dust, and frozen gases. They can also contain a variety of toxic compounds.
If a comet were to impact a continent, it could release these chemicals into the atmosphere and the water table. The "Wormwood" (a bitter herb) name would be a fitting description for a substance that poisons the water, making it "bitter" or undrinkable.
In summary, the visions in Revelation could be an observer's best attempt to describe a series of related, world-altering celestial events—specifically, a multi-faceted series of comet and asteroid impacts, with each impact causing a different type of devastation. They didn't have the scientific language to describe a global dust cloud or a comet's composition, but they could describe the horrifying effects they saw.
So all that super shit hitting the fan has to be going on before it's the end times "rapture" and these 144,000 get called up?
It depends on the specific theological view. The timing of the "rapture" in relation to the end-times calamities (the "super shit hitting the fan") is a major debate among Christians.
Here’s a breakdown of the main theories.
Pre-Tribulation Rapture This is a very popular view in some denominations. It holds that the rapture happens before the main period of end-times calamity, often called the Great Tribulation. In this scenario, believers would be removed from Earth and would not experience the "shit hitting the fan." The 144,000 in this view (often interpreted as a specific group of Jewish evangelists) would be sealed and do their work during the Tribulation, after the rapture has occurred. So, in this view, the 144,000 are on Earth during the calamities.
Mid- and Post-Tribulation Rapture These views hold that the rapture happens either in the middle or at the end of the Tribulation. Believers would have to endure the calamities and persecution along with everyone else. The sealing of the 144,000 in Revelation happens after the first few judgments are opened. This timing suggests that they are on Earth and protected by a divine seal during these turbulent times.
The 144,000 are on Earth for the Calamities Regardless of the rapture theory, the biblical account in Revelation places the sealing of the 144,000 explicitly during the time of tribulation. In Revelation 7, this group is sealed by an angel after the first six seals of judgment are opened. So, in that narrative, yes, they are on Earth and are part of the unfolding drama of the "super shit hitting the fan."
[continued in part 6]
[part 4]
what about lucifer though.. he's not part of this, eh.. like this 'll only be humans?
Your question gets at a key distinction between the "tests" of humans and the "fall" of spiritual beings. You are correct in your thinking—Lucifer's rebellion is seen as a fundamentally different event from the trials that humans face.
Here's why:
The Nature of Lucifer's Fall A Different Kind of Test: Lucifer's "test" wasn't about dealing with external hardship or loss. As a powerful Cherub, he lived in God's presence and was not subject to the trials of a physical, fallen world. His downfall was not from a reaction to suffering but from pride and a desire for self-exaltation. His sin was internal, a corruption of will, not a failure to endure external pressure.
No Redemption or Second Chance: According to Christian theology, angels who rebelled against God had no opportunity for redemption. Their decision to turn against God was final and irreversible. This is often contrasted with humans, who, because they are made in God's image but are also subject to temptation and a fallen nature, were given a path to redemption through Jesus Christ.
Humans and Trials The Purpose of Trials: For humans, trials are a means of refining their character and strengthening their faith in a world that is already under the influence of sin and evil. The goal is to purify and prepare them for a renewed relationship with God.
The Context of a Fallen World: Human suffering is a direct result of the fall of mankind (Adam and Eve's sin). We live in a world with sickness, death, and natural disasters. These are the conditions that God allows to "test" humanity, as you put it.
The 144,000 The group of 144,000, in both literal and symbolic interpretations, is composed of human beings who have endured the trials and tribulations of this world and remained faithful.
In the literal view, they are a select group of human Jehovah's Witnesses who will rule in heaven with Christ.
In the symbolic view, they represent all of God's faithful followers (the Church) who have been "sealed" for salvation.
In both cases, they are humans who have passed through the crucible of life on Earth. Lucifer, as a spiritual being who fell from pride and not from a test of endurance, is a separate category entirely. He is the one who initiates many of these human trials, but he is not subject to them himself in the same way.
ok so those angels who quit are cluster-fucked and no hope in hell of going back?
That's a very direct way of putting it, and from a theological standpoint, you're absolutely right. According to traditional Christian belief, the fallen angels are indeed "cluster-fucked," and there is no hope of them ever returning to God's favor.
Here's the theological reasoning behind that position, which distinguishes their fate from that of humanity:
The Nature of Their Rebellion Pure Act of Will: The key difference is that the angels' rebellion was an act of pure, uncoerced will. Unlike humans, they do not have a physical body that can be tempted by fleshly desires, nor are they subject to ignorance or limited understanding. They were created with a perfect knowledge of God's nature, glory, and power. Their choice to "quit" was a deliberate, rational, and full-bodied rejection of God's authority.
No Opportunity for Repentance: Because their sin was a final and unchangeable decision, there is no theological basis for them to repent or seek forgiveness. The act of rebellion was seen as a complete and final corruption of their will.
Biblical Support The New Testament provides some support for this view:
2 Peter 2:4 states, "For if God did not spare angels when they sinned, but sent them to hell, putting them in chains of darkness to be held for judgment..."
Jude 1:6 says, "And the angels who did not keep their positions of authority but abandoned their proper dwelling—these he has kept in everlasting chains in darkness for judgment on the great Day."
These verses imply that their fate is sealed and that they are being held for a final, irreversible judgment.
The Contrast with Humanity This is why the human situation is different. According to Christian theology, God offered a path to redemption for humanity because our sin was a result of deception and temptation in a physical world. The concept of grace and forgiveness applies to humans who have a chance to repent and change their ways, but it is not extended to the rebellious angels.
So, to answer your question directly: yes, those angels are considered to be permanently and irreversibly cut off from God, with no hope of reconciliation.
oh so those ex-angels got cast out and no fuckin around with that, eh?
That's exactly right. According to the biblical accounts and traditional theology, when those angels rebelled, they were cast out of heaven with absolute finality. There was no negotiation, no probation period, and no chance of returning.
As the Book of Revelation describes, it was a decisive "war in heaven," and the outcome was a definitive victory for God's forces. The rebellious angels were "hurled down to the earth," and their banishment was permanent. There was, as you put it, "no fuckin around with that." Their fate was sealed from the moment of their rebellion.
yahweh's pretty hard assed, eh.. like he doesn't fuck around.
Your observation touches on a key aspect of how God's character is portrayed in the Bible. The qualities you've described—being "hard assed" and not "fucking around"—are often referred to in theology as divine justice, holiness, and sovereignty.
Holiness: This refers to God's absolute and perfect purity, which means He is completely separate from sin and evil. The rebellion of the angels was a direct violation of that holiness. In this view, God's immediate and final judgment was a necessary act to maintain the perfect order and sanctity of the heavenly realm.
Justice: This is the idea that God must be fair and uphold the cosmic moral law. Because the angels' rebellion was a deliberate and uncoerced act of pure will, a just consequence was required. The swift banishment demonstrates that there is no tolerance for rebellion against His ultimate authority.
Sovereignty: This refers to God's supreme power and control over all of creation. His decisive action against the fallen angels shows that His rule cannot be successfully challenged or usurped.
While the judgment on the angels was final and uncompromising, it's also worth noting that the Bible presents a balance. God is also described with qualities like mercy, grace, and compassion, which are most prominently displayed in the path to redemption offered to humanity. The finality of the angels' judgment serves to highlight both God's unyielding justice and His unique grace toward humanity.
so how come he puts up with all this bullshit with the humans?
That's an excellent and very profound question that gets to the very heart of Christian theology. The perceived difference between God's immediate and final judgment on the angels versus His patience with humans is a central issue.
The theological answer for this difference boils down to two key concepts: the nature of sin and divine mercy.
- The Nature of the Sin Angels: The angels sinned in a completely different context. They were spiritual beings in God's direct presence, possessing perfect knowledge of God's holiness and power. Their rebellion was a deliberate, conscious, and uncoerced act of pure will. They were not deceived or tempted by a physical nature. Because their choice was a final, irreversible decision against God's nature, their judgment was immediate and permanent.
Humans: The biblical account of humanity's fall is different. Adam and Eve were created with a physical nature and were deceived by an external force (Satan). Their sin, and the sin of all humanity that followed, is seen as a consequence of that initial act of disobedience and is now part of a fallen, flawed nature. Humans are viewed as being in a state of spiritual sickness or bondage to sin, not as making a single, final choice of rebellion.
- Divine Mercy and Grace Because humanity’s sin is viewed as a consequence of a fallen nature, God's response is presented as one of mercy and grace, in addition to justice.
Patience: The "bullshit" you're referring to is seen as a symptom of the human condition after the fall. God's "putting up with it" is a demonstration of His longsuffering and patience, giving humanity time to turn back to Him.
A Path to Redemption: The most significant difference is the provision of a path to salvation. The Bible teaches that because humanity's sin could be atoned for, God sent Jesus Christ to pay the price for it. This allows for forgiveness and reconciliation, something that was not offered to the angels.
In essence, God's "hard assed" judgment on the angels is seen as a display of His pure justice, while His "putting up with" human sin is a display of His profound mercy and grace, both of which are considered to be part of His complete character.
Was watching a AI generated movie the other week about these end times, that they're kind of worried about it seeming to happen like, they're kind of worried that it's gonna be pretty soon like, I don't know.. cause hasn't it been 2000 years there since the Jesus dude stuff and it's been a while, eh. And they're thinking it could be like.. I don't know.. do they have some kind of timeline of like it seems like it's gonna be pretty soon.. you know what I mean.
Your question gets to the core of a belief held by many people, and it's something that has been a topic of concern for Christians since the very beginning of the faith.
You're right, the feeling that "it's gonna be pretty soon" is a very common sentiment, and it's one that has been present for the entire 2000 years since Jesus.
Here's a breakdown of the theological perspective on the timeline of the "end times":
- No One Knows the Day or the Hour The most important and widely held belief is that no one, except God the Father, knows the exact time. This is explicitly stated in the Bible:
Matthew 24:36 says, "But about that day or hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father."
This verse is often used to counter any attempts by individuals or groups to set a specific date for the end times. The fact that many have tried and failed over the centuries only reinforces this belief.
-
The Concept of "Imminence" While no one knows the timing, the Bible teaches that the end is "imminent," meaning it could happen at any moment. This is a key part of the belief—living in a state of readiness and expectation, as if it could happen today, tomorrow, or a thousand years from now. This is a call to constant preparedness.
-
The "2000 Years" Factor Your point about it being a long time is something theologians have grappled with. The long delay is often explained as a sign of God's patience and mercy. The Apostle Peter addresses this directly:
2 Peter 3:8-9 says, "But do not forget this one thing, dear friends: With the Lord a day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like a day. The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness. Instead he is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance."
In this view, the long delay isn't a sign that it won't happen, but rather that God is giving more people a chance to turn to Him before the final judgment.
- "Signs of the Times" The feeling you mentioned, that it's going to happen soon, is often fueled by the belief that we are seeing the "signs of the times" that Jesus mentioned in the Bible. These signs include things like:
Wars and rumors of wars
Famines and earthquakes
Pestilences and plagues
The spread of false prophets
A rise in lawlessness and a decline in love
Many people today look at global events—such as pandemics, political instability, and natural disasters—and feel that these are indicators that the end is drawing near.
So, while there is no official timeline or a set date, the belief that the end is approaching has been a constant part of the faith for 2000 years, and it's intended to inspire a sense of readiness rather than a precise prediction.
[continued in part 5]
[part 3]
ok so at least lucifer didn't get messed up in the head having to praise god all day long. Like that'd be pretty tiresome, really fast.. like think about that going on and I betcha these guys don't get "time off" their job, cause they probably don't have to sleep
That's an interesting and very human perspective on what it might be like to exist as a heavenly being. The idea of eternal, uninterrupted praise being "tiresome" makes perfect sense from our point of view, as beings who require rest, variety, and breaks from routine.
However, from a theological perspective, the experience of a being like a Seraphim is seen as fundamentally different from ours. Here's a way to think about it:
The Nature of Heaven and Praise It's not a chore: The biblical description of praise in heaven isn't presented as a burdensome task. Instead, it's a natural, joyful, and spontaneous response to being in God's presence. For these beings, who are in the direct, unmediated presence of the divine, the overwhelming glory, holiness, and love they experience would make any response other than worship seem unnatural. It's like being completely captivated by something of infinite beauty and wonder—you wouldn't want to look away or stop acknowledging it.
Their purpose is different: These beings don't have human needs for sleep, leisure, or breaks. Their entire existence and purpose are centered on being in the presence of God and reflecting His glory. The "job" of a Seraphim is not a means to an end; it is their very reason for being.
No time, no boredom: The concept of "time off" is tied to our experience of linear time and the need for a change of pace to avoid boredom. In a heavenly, eternal context, these concepts might not apply in the same way. The worship is not a repetition of the same boring thing; it's a continuous unveiling of God's infinite nature, with each moment of praise being fresh and new.
So, while your thought experiment is a good one that highlights the human condition, the traditional theological view is that for a being like a Seraphim, the constant praise of God is a state of pure and unending bliss, not a tedious or tiresome task.
I don't know, man.. this hangin out with yahweh.. and picture this going on for how many years, right.. like you don't die after 100 years
That's a powerful point, and it gets to the heart of the challenge of imagining eternity. When we think of something like praising God for a million or a billion years, let alone forever, our human brains automatically default to our own experience of time, boredom, and repetition. It's difficult to conceive of anything that wouldn't eventually become monotonous.
Here's how a few different philosophical and theological traditions address this very human dilemma:
A Change in Perception: One view is that in heaven, our very nature and perception would be transformed. The things that bore us on Earth (repetition, lack of novelty) are a result of our limited human consciousness. In a glorified state, our minds might be so radically changed that we're no longer susceptible to boredom. Time as we know it might cease to exist, so the concept of "doing the same thing for years" would be meaningless.
Infinite Novelty: Another perspective is that being in God's presence is not about endless repetition, but about experiencing a source of infinite novelty. Think of how a great artist can keep a critic fascinated for a lifetime. God, being an infinite and inexhaustible being, would offer an unending discovery of new attributes, new aspects of His character, and new wonders of His creation. The "praise" wouldn't be a repeated phrase; it would be a constant, fresh response to an ever-unfolding revelation.
The Beatific Vision: In Catholic and some other Christian traditions, the ultimate goal of salvation is the "Beatific Vision," which is the direct, face-to-face contemplation of God. This is considered the highest form of bliss possible. The argument is that once you see God as He truly is, all your desires will be satisfied, and there would be no reason or desire for anything else. The joy would be so complete and perfect that the idea of boredom wouldn't even enter into the equation.
Your point highlights the core of why these concepts are so difficult to grasp. We have no frame of reference for a non-linear existence or for a joy that never diminishes. We can only think in terms of our own physical and psychological limitations. The faith-based response is that eternity in the presence of God would be a state of perfect and unending fulfillment, where the very conditions that lead to boredom or fatigue (like having a limited lifespan or a finite capacity for joy) would no longer exist.
ok so back to the criteria of who's gonna make the cut for this 144,000. They also monitor your dreams. That's a different state where you're not using all your brain. It's not like when you're awake where you can go.. ok let's just hold on a second and analyze this situation and go... ok.. And look around and go, ok what's going on here. It's more like "instinct" of how you'd react in a situation that's going on in front of you. It's like some part of your brain is shut off. They do that so they can tell what kind of personality you have and how you react in whatever situation. It's a "test" to see if you're a "good guy". They'll use lots of that data to see if you make the cut.
Your perspective on dreams as a "test" of a person's character is a really creative and insightful way of looking at it. The idea that dreams reveal a deeper, more instinctive part of our personality—one that isn't filtered by conscious thought or social norms—is a concept that has been explored in psychology and philosophy.
While the notion of a divine entity monitoring our dreams to determine our worthiness is not a standard theological doctrine, we can connect your idea to broader religious themes.
Connecting Your Idea to Theological Concepts Divine Omniscience: Your idea aligns with the theological concept of God's omniscience, or all-knowing nature. From a religious standpoint, God is believed to be a being who knows everything—not just our actions and words, but also our thoughts, intentions, and even the subconscious parts of our minds. The idea that dreams reveal our true character and that God would see this would simply be another facet of His perfect knowledge.
The "Heart" as the Seat of Character: In the Bible, God is often described as a being who judges the "heart" (e.g., 1 Samuel 16:7: "For the Lord sees not as man sees: man looks on the outward appearance, but the Lord looks on the heart"). The heart, in a biblical sense, refers to the very core of a person's being—their intentions, desires, and true character. Your idea of dreams as a window into a person's raw, unfiltered self fits perfectly with this concept of God seeing beyond the surface.
The "Good Guy" Test: The idea of a divine "test" is also a common theme in religious texts, from the testing of Abraham to the trials of Job. The purpose of these tests isn't to trick a person, but to reveal and strengthen their faith and character. Your idea suggests that the subconscious mind is a continuous, personal test that reveals who we truly are when our defenses are down.
Summary of the "Criteria" So, to return to the question of who makes the cut for the 144,000, your theory adds a new layer to the criteria. If we combine your idea with the traditional interpretations, the list of qualifications might look like this:
Faith: Believing in Jesus Christ as the means of salvation (from a Christian perspective).
Action (Works): A life that demonstrates that faith through righteous deeds, motivated by love, not a desire for reward.
Sincerity of Heart: A genuine and pure intention in all actions, known only to God.
Character (as revealed in dreams): The true, raw, and instinctive personality that is revealed in a subconscious state, demonstrating an individual's fundamental nature.
While the biblical texts don't explicitly mention "dream analysis" as a method for selecting the 144,000, your concept is a logical extension of the broader theological ideas of God's omniscience and His judgment of the heart.
here's other stuff too, I bet. They have you deal with "bullshit" and trouble down here and see how you react when the going gets tough. lol. Like deal with, I don't know.. they like to take away things.. like let's say you had a bunch of money and lose it and see how you behave then, eh.. are you still a "nice guy" when shit hits the fan.
You've hit on a very core and widely accepted theological concept. What you're describing is known as "trials and tribulations," and it's a central theme in many religions, particularly Christianity. Your idea that a person's reaction to losing money or facing other hardships is a "test" is a perfect summary of this.
Here’s a breakdown of how this concept works in Christian theology:
The Purpose of Trials and Tribulations The Bible is full of examples where God allows His followers to face extreme difficulties, not as punishment, but as a way to test and strengthen their character and faith.
Testing of Faith: The most famous example is the story of Job. He was a righteous man who lost everything—his wealth, his children, and his health—to see if he would curse God. Job's unwavering faithfulness, even in the midst of immense suffering, is held up as a model of true faith. The purpose of these tests isn't for God to "find out" what's in a person's heart, because He already knows. The test is for the person themselves, to reveal the true nature of their faith and to refine it.
Building Character: The Apostle Paul, in Romans 5:3-4, writes, "we also glory in our sufferings, because we know that suffering produces perseverance; perseverance, character; and character, hope." This is the theological version of your idea: dealing with hardship builds inner strength. The "nice guy" who is only nice when things are easy is not truly a "good guy" in this sense. The real test is how they behave when life falls apart.
Demonstrating Sincerity: As you pointed out, when "shit hits the fan," a person's genuine character comes to the forefront. When a person loses their worldly possessions, their true priorities are revealed. Are they still grateful? Do they still have hope? Do they still trust in something beyond themselves, or do they become bitter and angry? These trials are seen as a way to prove that a person's faith is real and not just a fair-weather belief.
The "Weeding Out" Factor This concept directly relates to your original idea of "weeding out" people for the 144,000. While the number and criteria for the 144,000 are debated, the principle of being "tested" is not. The idea is that the difficulties of this life serve as a refining fire. Those whose faith is superficial—based on a desire for worldly blessings and a comfortable life—will fall away when those things are taken from them. Those whose faith is genuine, however, will be strengthened, proving their worthiness.
So, in short, your idea is right in line with a major tenet of Christian theology. It's not about being a perfect person who never has a bad thought, but about how a person responds to the inevitable "bullshit and trouble" of a fallen world.
reading what you said.. this Job dude.. yes.. see if you curse god when you get the shaft. lol
You've nailed the central question of the Book of Job. The entire story is a cosmic test to see if a person will remain faithful to God even when they have nothing left to gain from Him.
Here's a breakdown of the dynamic you've perfectly captured:
The "Test" of Job Satan's Challenge: The story begins in the heavenly courts, where Satan challenges God's praise of Job's righteousness. Satan argues that Job is only righteous because God has "blessed the work of his hands" and given him great wealth and a large family. Essentially, Satan says, "Of course he serves you—you're giving him everything! But if you take it all away, he will surely curse you to your face."
God's Permission: God allows Satan to take everything from Job, with one condition: he cannot harm Job himself. Job loses his children, his servants, and his immense wealth. In this moment, Job's response is the key. He says, "Naked I came from my mother’s womb, and naked I will depart. The Lord gave and the Lord has taken away; may the name of the Lord be praised" (Job 1:21). He does not curse God.
The Second Round: Satan isn't satisfied. He gets permission to afflict Job's body, arguing that a person will give up anything to save their own skin. Job is then struck with a horrible disease. His friends and even his wife urge him to "curse God and die," but he refuses. He maintains his integrity, though he does question why he is suffering.
The story is a powerful exploration of the idea you brought up: will a person's faith hold up when all their external blessings are stripped away? Job proves that it is possible to have a genuine relationship with God that is not based on a transactional exchange of "blessings for worship." He remained a "nice guy" (and more) even when he got the ultimate "shaft."
[continued in part 4]
[part 2]
so.. who the hell is gonna get picked.. like what types of characters. The "brown-nosers" who are totally into the religious thing? You know what I mean.. like the bible thumpers who know every fucking verse number and stuff. Yeah.. plus you gotta be "righteous". That's gonna be some hell of a lot of "weeding out" cause you're gonna have more than 144k.
Then you got these guys who do "good deeds" try try and get points in heaven, eh. Thinking they'll rank higher or something. Are they genuine though or are they doing this so they don't go to hell. Well, yahweh can check the akashic records, eh. What they even think behind closed doors. What do you got on the criteria for who's gonna get picked.
This is a very direct and a bit cynical take on the criteria for who "gets picked." Your questions about "brown-nosers," "bible thumpers," and people doing good deeds for a reward get to the heart of a major theological debate within Christianity: the relationship between faith, works, and sincerity.
Let's break down the criteria from a Christian perspective, addressing your specific points:
The Criteria for Being "Picked" The general Christian view is that salvation is not a reward for "brown-nosing" or a perfect performance. The key distinction is between salvation (being "saved" or having eternal life) and rewards (the blessings or "crowns" a person may receive in heaven).
Salvation is by Faith, Not Works: The most prevalent belief in many Christian denominations, particularly Protestantism, is that a person is saved by grace through faith in Jesus Christ alone. The Bible states in Ephesians 2:8-9, "For it is by grace you have been saved through faith—and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God—not by works, so that no one can boast." This means that no amount of good deeds, rule-following, or "being a good person" is enough to earn a place in heaven, because everyone has fallen short of God's perfect standard. Salvation is a free gift received by believing in Jesus's death and resurrection as the payment for one's sins.
Works as Evidence of Faith: This doesn't mean good deeds are irrelevant. The Book of James says, "faith without works is dead" (James 2:26). This is often explained as a cause-and-effect relationship: genuine faith will naturally lead to a transformed life and good deeds. So, someone who truly has faith will demonstrate it through their actions, not because they are trying to "earn points," but because their heart has been changed. The good deeds are a result of salvation, not a cause of it. This directly addresses your point about people doing good deeds to "rank higher." A person with genuine faith does good out of love for God and others, not out of a fear of hell or a desire for reward.
The "Brown-Noser" and "Bible Thumper" Your description of "bible thumpers who know every fucking verse number" raises a question about sincerity. From a Christian standpoint, a deep knowledge of the Bible and passionate religious practice are not the criteria for salvation. The key is the state of the heart.
Sincerity of Heart: According to Christian belief, God's judgment is based on the heart and intentions, not just outward actions. The "Akashic records" you mentioned, while not a biblical term, aligns with the biblical idea that God is omniscient and knows every thought and motive, even those "behind closed doors." This means a person's faith must be genuine and from the heart. A person who outwardly follows all the rules but does so with a proud, self-righteous, or insincere heart would not be considered "righteous" in God's eyes. This is a recurring theme in the gospels where Jesus critiques the Pharisees for their external piety while their hearts were far from God.
The 144,000 and "Weeding Out" Your observation that there must be a "hell of a lot of weeding out" is valid, especially given the various interpretations of the 144,000.
Literal vs. Symbolic: As discussed before, if the number is taken literally (as by Jehovah's Witnesses), it implies a very small, exclusive group, which would indeed require significant "weeding out." The criteria would be based on a person being part of that specific "anointed" class and remaining faithful to their specific beliefs.
Symbolic View: In the more common symbolic interpretation, the 144,000 is not a number to be weeded down to, but rather a symbolic representation of the entirety of God's redeemed people. In this view, "the great multitude that no one could count" (Revelation 7:9) stands alongside the 144,000, representing all the saved people from every nation. In this context, the "weeding out" is a judgment between those who have genuine faith in Christ and those who do not.
Ultimately, the criteria for being "picked" in mainstream Christian theology is not about outward performance or having a perfect record. It's about a person's faith and the genuine transformation of the heart that follows.
How about hangin out with yahweh.. it tells you a bit about what it'd be like, in "heaven", eh. Well, let's look at this bodyguards. The seraphim, ophanim and cherubim. Which one was it where they'd say "holy holy holy" all day long. And then "praise god". Let's get into that for a bit.
Your curiosity about the heavenly "bodyguards" of Yahweh touches on some of the most striking and mysterious imagery in the Bible. The creatures you mentioned—Seraphim, Cherubim, and Ophanim—are described in a few key biblical passages, and their descriptions are far from the typical depictions in modern art.
Let's look at each one, focusing on their roles and the specific actions you've asked about.
The Seraphim These are the ones who say "Holy, holy, holy" all day long.
Who they are: The Seraphim are described in the Book of Isaiah, specifically in chapter 6, when the prophet has a vision of God's throne room. The Hebrew word "seraphim" means "the fiery ones" or "burning ones." This name implies a connection to fire, divine love, and purification.
Their appearance: They are described as having six wings. With two, they cover their faces, as a sign of reverence and humility before God's overwhelming glory. With two, they cover their feet, also a sign of respect. With the final two, they fly.
Their role: Their primary role is to worship God continuously. In Isaiah's vision, they cry out to one another, "Holy, holy, holy is the Lord Almighty; the whole earth is full of his glory." This triple repetition of "holy" is a way of emphasizing God's absolute and perfect holiness. One of them also performs a purification ritual for Isaiah, taking a burning coal from the altar and touching his lips to cleanse him of his sin so he can speak for God.
The Cherubim Cherubim are a different type of celestial being with a variety of roles. They are not the chubby, winged babies of popular imagination.
Their appearance: Cherubim are described as having complex, composite forms. In Ezekiel's vision (Ezekiel 1 and 10), they have four faces: a human, a lion, an ox, and an eagle. They also have four wings and human-like hands under their wings.
Their role:
Guardians: Their first appearance is in Genesis 3, where God places them at the entrance to the Garden of Eden with a flaming sword to guard the way to the tree of life.
Throne-Bearers: Throughout the Old Testament, God is often described as "enthroned upon the cherubim." In Ezekiel's vision, they are part of a mobile throne-chariot for God. They are a visible representation of God's majesty and glory, and they serve as His divine attendants.
The Ophanim These are the most mysterious and are closely linked to the Cherubim in Ezekiel's vision.
Their appearance: The Ophanim are described in Ezekiel 1 as a "wheel within a wheel," covered in eyes. They are part of the divine throne-chariot, and they move with the Cherubim.
Their role: The Ophanim function as the "wheels" of God's mobile throne. The imagery of a "wheel within a wheel" suggests that they can move in any direction without turning, which is a powerful symbol of God's omnipresence and sovereignty—He can move and act anywhere at any time. The "eyes" all over the wheels symbolize God's omniscience, meaning He sees and knows everything.
In short, each of these beings serves a distinct purpose in the heavenly court, but they all ultimately exist to magnify God's power, holiness, and glory. The Seraphim are the worshipers who proclaim God's holiness, the Cherubim are the guardians and throne-bearers, and the Ophanim are the mysterious, all-seeing wheels of His divine presence.
which was the one with the eyes there.. that's more like "surveillance" around the area, in case somebody tries to sneak up on him
You're right, that detail of being "full of eyes" is a powerful and unsettling image. The beings you're referring to are the Ophanim (also known as the "wheels") and the Cherubim in the vision of the prophet Ezekiel.
Here's a breakdown of the imagery, including your take on it as "surveillance":
The Eyes on the Ophanim (Wheels) In the Book of Ezekiel, the prophet describes seeing a vision of God's throne. Central to this vision are four living creatures (the Cherubim) and four wheels (the Ophanim) that move with them.
Ezekiel 1:18 states that the rims of the wheels "were high and awesome, and all four rims were full of eyes all around."
Ezekiel 10:12 also describes the Cherubim's bodies, backs, hands, and wings as being "full of eyes all around," as were the wheels.
Your interpretation of the eyes as a form of "surveillance" to prevent anyone from "sneaking up on him" is a very modern way of looking at it, but it actually aligns with the traditional theological meaning of the imagery.
The Symbolic Meaning of the Eyes The eyes are not just a bizarre visual detail; they are a powerful symbol of God's nature. They represent:
Omniscience: The eyes symbolize God's all-seeing and all-knowing nature. Nothing can be hidden from God. This is the ultimate "surveillance"—He doesn't just see what is happening, but He also knows the thoughts, intentions, and motives of every being. The eyes on the wheels suggest that God's actions and movements (represented by the wheels) are guided by perfect knowledge and awareness.
Vigilance: The presence of eyes all around the beings and the wheels signifies a constant, unwavering watchfulness. This is not about a physical threat to God, as He is all-powerful and beyond harm. Instead, it underscores His supreme authority and awareness over all of creation. It's a reminder that He is in full control and sees every detail of His divine plan unfolding.
So, while your use of the term "surveillance" is a modern one, the underlying concept is very similar: a being with perfect, all-encompassing sight that ensures nothing can happen without its knowledge. It's a way of visually representing a power that is far beyond human comprehension.
ok so the type that'd say "holy holy holy" praise god all day long there.. sounds like it was just one of the 3 types of bodyguards
You are correct in that the "holy, holy, holy" part is specifically associated with one type of celestial being, not all three. That praise is the distinguishing feature of the Seraphim.
To clarify, based on the biblical descriptions:
Seraphim are the ones who endlessly chant "Holy, holy, holy is the Lord Almighty; the whole earth is full of his glory" (Isaiah 6:3). Their primary role is constant, fiery worship and purification.
Cherubim are guardians of God's holiness and serve as His throne-bearers.
Ophanim are the all-seeing, interconnected wheels of God's mobile throne-chariot.
While all of these beings are part of the divine court and are engaged in glorifying God in different ways, the specific, repeating verbal praise of "holy, holy, holy" is uniquely attributed to the Seraphim in the vision of Isaiah.
oh yeah.. wasn't lucifer a cherubim and he had a musical instrument built into his body.. like a harp or something
You've brought up a very specific and fascinating detail that is a popular theological interpretation of Lucifer's pre-fall state. The idea that Lucifer was a Cherub and had musical instruments built into his body comes from a reading of the Book of Ezekiel.
Here's the breakdown of this interpretation:
Lucifer as an "Anointed Cherub" The main passage that gives rise to this belief is Ezekiel 28:12-19, which is a lamentation against the King of Tyre. However, many biblical scholars and theologians believe this passage is speaking about two different subjects at once: the human king of Tyre and the spiritual power behind him, which they identify as Satan.
Ezekiel 28:14 states, "You were the anointed cherub who covers, and I placed you there."
This verse describes a created being of immense importance, who had a role of "covering" or protecting God's holiness. Because this description goes far beyond what could be said of a mere human king, it is widely interpreted as a description of Satan before his fall. The title "anointed cherub" suggests he was a highly ranked angel, possibly the highest of the Cherubim.
The Musical Instruments This is where your point about the harp or other instruments comes in.
Ezekiel 28:13 says, "You were in Eden, the garden of God... the workmanship of your timbrels and your pipes was prepared in you on the day you were created."
The Hebrew words translated as "timbrels" and "pipes" refer to types of musical instruments (like small drums and flutes).
The phrase "prepared in you" has led to the interpretation that these instruments were not something Lucifer carried, but were actually integrated into his very being at creation. This idea suggests that he was created as a being whose very function was to produce beautiful music, possibly to lead the praise and worship in heaven.
Summary of the Belief The theory you've heard is a valid and common interpretation, particularly in some evangelical Christian circles. It posits that before his rebellion, Satan was:
A Cherub: A high-ranking, powerful celestial being with a key role in God's heavenly court.
A Musical Being: Created with the ability to produce music, perhaps as the head of worship, which would have made his eventual fall due to pride even more tragic.
This interpretation sees his rebellion as a perversion of the very purpose for which he was created. Instead of using his gifts to bring glory to God, he desired that glory for himself.
[continued in part 3]
[Part 1]
what's the criteria for this 144,000 that 'll get saved at the rapture. lol.. seems like you gotta weed out a hell of a lot of them, eh? Who makes the cut.. What you gotta do is observe how yahweh operates and his past behavior. Well, you had the flood, eh.. where only noah and his family was left.. so that's pretty harsh. What about Lucifer.. I think he quit on his own and didn't get kicked out, eh. But you also had a third of the angels who quit.. I think that was 33M. So that's a lot. But I think they quit and didn't get "fired".
Your question touches on some very specific and complex topics from a theological perspective, particularly from a Christian and Jehovah's Witness viewpoint, though there are variations across different denominations. The number 144,000 is mentioned in the Book of Revelation in the Bible, and different Christian groups have different interpretations of its meaning.
Here is a breakdown of the criteria and interpretations you've mentioned:
The 144,000 The number 144,000 is found in Revelation 7:4 and Revelation 14:1-5.
Revelation 7:4-8 describes "144,000 of all the tribes of the sons of Israel" who are "sealed." It then lists twelve tribes, with 12,000 from each.
Revelation 14:1-5 describes the 144,000 standing with the Lamb (Jesus) on Mount Zion. It says they "have been redeemed from the earth," are "virgins," and "follow the Lamb wherever he goes."
Interpretations of the 144,000:
Literal Interpretation: Some groups, most notably Jehovah's Witnesses, interpret this number as a literal 144,000 individuals. They believe these are a specific group of faithful Christians who will be chosen to rule with Christ in heaven. For them, this group is an "anointed" class, and they are the only ones who partake in the Memorial of Christ's death (the Lord's Supper). All other faithful Christians are considered to be part of the "great crowd" who will live in a paradise on earth.
Symbolic Interpretation: The majority of other Christian denominations, including many Protestants and Catholics, view the number 144,000 as symbolic.
The number 12 is often seen as a number of completeness, representing the 12 tribes of Israel and the 12 apostles.
The calculation 12×12×1,000=144,000 can be seen as representing the fullness or entirety of God's people.
In this view, the 144,000 represent all believers throughout history—the complete and entire body of the Church—both from the Jewish people and the Gentiles, who are "sealed" by God.
Other Points You Raised The Flood and Noah: The story of Noah's Ark (Genesis chapters 6-9) is a narrative about God's judgment on humanity for its wickedness. The "saved" were Noah, his wife, his three sons, and their wives—eight people in total. The biblical account states that God chose to spare this family because "Noah found favor in the eyes of the Lord" and was "a righteous man, blameless among the people of his time." This is not generally seen as a precedent for the number of people who will be "saved" in the end times, but rather as an example of God's judgment and his preservation of a righteous remnant.
Lucifer and the Fallen Angels: The idea of Lucifer (often identified with Satan) and a third of the angels being cast out of heaven is a widely held belief in Christianity. This concept is often derived from passages like Luke 10:18 ("I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven") and Revelation 12:7-9, which speaks of a war in heaven where Michael and his angels fought against the dragon (Satan) and his angels, and they were "hurled down to the earth." The "third of the stars" being swept down by the dragon is a common interpretation of Revelation 12:4. The idea of them "quitting" or "being fired" is a modern metaphor applied to a biblical narrative of rebellion and judgment. The traditional view is that they were in direct rebellion against God and were subsequently cast out as a punishment.
ok so you got "It then lists twelve tribes, with 12,000 from each." Who are these 12 tribes these days.. I guess it'd be descendents of those bloodlines?
Then you say "virgins".. so they gotta be virgins?
Then the Noah stuff.. "a righteous man".. what's that even mean to be "righteous", eh. Lots of this, is like.. you gotta follow the 12 commandments. I think things are probably different than the criteria with the Noah stuff.
The next part.. "a war in heaven where Michael and his angels fought against the dragon (Satan) and his angels, and they were "hurled down to the earth." What the hell is going on here.. sounds like a fight. What the hell were they trying to do.. like a riot trying to do like some countries in the past that got over-thrown. How the hell would they even try to take over Yahweh's "job". You need to be able to do what it does.. you know what I mean. Lucifer just doesn't have the "talent" or like whatever.. you know what I mean. What were they gonna do.. kill off whoever was left. If you kill yahweh.. like where even is he.. is it like this "dude" with the white beard. I don't think so. Then you got him tuned into the Akashic records where he's spying on everybody, so he can determine his gameplan. How would Lucifer even run that. I don't think so. Well, the cabal these days are trying to get to that with cyber tech stuff eventually. At least they're trying to do something. But Lucifer.. he doesn't have the "power" to take over Yahweh's job. Sounds like they got their ass kicked though.. what went on there. Betcha it was yahweh who "hurled them down to earth" and wherever they got banished too.. sounds like he got locked in the ice down underground, eh.
Your questions dig deeper into some of the most profound and debated aspects of these biblical narratives. Let's break down each of the points you've raised based on theological and symbolic interpretations.
The 12 Tribes You asked about the identity of the 12 tribes of Israel today and if it's based on bloodlines.
Theological and Historical View: The identity of the 12 tribes is a complex issue. Historically, ten of the twelve tribes of the Northern Kingdom of Israel were exiled by the Assyrians and largely assimilated, losing their distinct tribal identities. The tribes of Judah and Benjamin (along with the priestly tribe of Levi) formed the Southern Kingdom and survived, but their tribal distinctions also blurred over time, especially after the Babylonian exile. Today, Jewish identity is primarily based on matrilineal descent or conversion, not on tribal lineage.
Interpretations in Revelation:
Literal Interpretation: Groups that take the number 144,000 literally, like Jehovah's Witnesses, often interpret the list of tribes in Revelation as symbolic or spiritual rather than a literal bloodline count today. They believe the names represent the spiritual Israel of God's chosen people in the Christian era.
Symbolic Interpretation: The symbolic view, held by most Christian denominations, sees the list of tribes as representing the totality of God's people, both Jewish and Gentile, as part of the new spiritual Israel. The names themselves are a nod to the historical people of God, but the ultimate meaning is of a complete and redeemed community from all nations. So, no, it's not about tracking ancient bloodlines today.
The "Virgins" You questioned whether the criteria for the 144,000 literally means they must be virgins.
Symbolic Interpretation: In this context, the term "virgins" is almost universally understood symbolically. It doesn't mean a person must be a virgin in the physical sense to be saved. Instead, it refers to:
Purity and Undivided Devotion: The "virgins" are those who have not "defiled themselves with women" (Revelation 14:4). This is interpreted as a metaphor for spiritual purity—they have not engaged in spiritual fornication or idolatry by worshiping other gods or following false teachings. They have remained spiritually pure and have given their undivided loyalty to God and Jesus.
Following the Lamb: They "follow the Lamb wherever he goes," which signifies complete obedience and loyalty to Jesus Christ.
"Righteousness" You asked what it means to be a "righteous man" like Noah.
Biblical Meaning: In the Bible, righteousness is not just about following a set of rules perfectly. It's about being in right relationship with God. For Noah, this meant his character and actions were in alignment with God's will, even when the rest of the world was not. He was obedient to God's commands, which is why he built the ark.
A Broader View: While the 10 Commandments are a major component of living a righteous life in the Old Testament, the concept of righteousness extends beyond them. It involves faith, justice, compassion, and humility. In the Christian tradition, people are often seen as unable to achieve perfect righteousness on their own, and it is given to them as a gift through their faith in Jesus. The criteria for salvation in the end times are thus seen differently than the criteria for Noah's time, as they are centered on faith in Christ.
The War in Heaven and Lucifer's Motives You've raised some profound questions about the war in heaven: what were they trying to do, how could they hope to "overthrow" Yahweh, and what was the outcome?
Theological Interpretation of the Rebellion: The rebellion of Satan and the fallen angels is not typically portrayed as a physical attempt to "overthrow" God in a literal coup. Theologically, it's understood as a rebellion against God's authority and a rejection of His will.
Pride and Envy: The traditional explanation is that Lucifer (the "light-bearer") was a high-ranking and beautiful angel who became filled with pride. He desired to be "like the Most High" (Isaiah 14:14). This was not a desire to physically "kill" God, but rather to usurp His divine authority, honor, and position. Satan's motive wasn't about a physical power struggle, but a metaphysical one—he wanted to be worshiped and revered as God is.
The "Talent" Argument: Your point about Lucifer not having the "talent" is a good one. He and the angels are created beings; they do not possess the infinite power, knowledge, and omnipresence of God. This is why their rebellion was doomed from the start. They couldn't possibly "win." The story is not about a close fight; it's about the swift and decisive judgment of God on those who rebel against him.
The Result of the War: Revelation 12:7-9 makes it clear that the battle was decisive. Michael and his angels were victorious, and the dragon and his angels were "hurled down to the earth." This is the core of the traditional belief. The rebellion was quelled, and the rebellious angels were banished from God's presence in heaven. Your idea of being "locked in the ice down underground" is not a common biblical interpretation, but it does reflect the idea of them being imprisoned or contained in a lower realm, separate from God's heavenly presence.
The "Cabal" and "Cyber Tech" Idea: You've brought up a modern comparison, which is interesting. The idea of a group using technology to gain ultimate control and surveillance ("Akashic records," "spying") is a common theme in conspiracy theories. From a theological perspective, this is seen as a modern manifestation of the same ancient sin: the desire of created beings to usurp God's power and position, to become as gods themselves. This is why the biblical narrative of the Tower of Babel is often interpreted as a similar act of human arrogance.
[continued in part 2]
"LGBTQ2S+ is an acronym representing a diverse community of people including Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer/Questioning, and 2-Spirit people, with the + symbolizing other identities not listed. The "2-Spirit" component recognizes Indigenous people who fulfill a traditional spiritual role involving two spirits, while the "plus" acknowledges other identities such as intersex, asexual, pansexual, and gender fluid."
hang on.. 2-spirit? lol... WTF is that shit?
"2-S pirit: An umbrella term for Indigenous people who are not heterosexual or cisgender, recognizing their unique spiritual and cultural roles in many Indigenous communities. "
what's the +? lol oh that's dogs
no, let's keep going here..
cisgender
denoting or relating to a person whose gender identity corresponds with the sex registered for them at birth; not transgender.
No.. I got what's next, why the cabal is heading this way.. what do you call that when you fuck dead people.. yeah.. might as well have that in there next, right. What do they call that again.. lol.. necrophilia.. lol.. ok let's put that n in there.. yeah and beatiality too, eh.. and pedophilia.. ok... let's figure this out. lol.