Almost there but this thing tapped out. Never had that happen in gemini. It doesn't like you going there, eh. Plus I was originally in "deep research" where it adds this right side panel. Later on, too much data to deal with simultaneously. It was spinning circle, so I went to the bank, came back.. doing laundry. 2 hours of this spinning circle shit, eh. Finally I said, quit fuckin around and sack that right side panel shit. Let's just get a list.
It was fuckin around too, eh.. where I get it to 74 edits. That was kicking it's ass bad, repeatedly to get to that point. Kept trying to get it to cough up more. It's all stubborn, like it's trying to save processing power.
We had this edits section, then once that was done, it would get into this omitted books that were originally referenced. I'm there, let's just keep track here and start numbering this shit. It screwed up where it continued the numbers into the omitted section. I'm there, no, you restart the numbering with those. Before that, both of these would go into the low 100's.
It was stuck at 74 edits though, no matter what I did. Then I was trying to get it to sort the 74 by what shows up earlier in the bible. It was starting to get too complicated, and it screws up and says:
There are 121 edits and 47 omitted books in the following list.
So now it admits it had access to more than 74. I go, ah-ha.. nabbed you. Was working on trying to get these sorted by what shows up first in the bible. It was too fuckin stupid, then it taps out and says oh you reached some kind of limit and shit. Never saw that before. Then it would say, oh it's resetting in like whatever time. Just one task, then it craps out, doubles that time saying like a few hours later. The fuckin "deep research" shit, you don't get many of those.. only got 1 left till oct 4th.
Couldn't even get this piece of shit to add numbered lines that I could select. It doesn't select that area. I go to chat gpt, logged in. Inputted the list. Got that in code window where it had numered sections. Then I was getting it to resort the list by what shows up first. It was noticing shit like the dates. I'm there, don't mess around with this shit here. But it was giving you more specific dates. Then this thing taps out and says, "You’ve hit the Free plan limit for GPT-5. Responses will use another model until your limit resets tomorrow after 12:59 AM." You can barely input shit with these pieces of shit. Gemini kicks ass compared to them.
I go to the fuckin microsoft copilot. You couldn't fuckin even input the 121 edits list, it would say, oh 10k characters max. Inputted the shit in like half a dozen parts. Got it to number the sections cause couldn't select the numbers in gemini. Then it was changing the bullet points to dashes. I got it to get the list with numbers and bullet points, where I could select it in code window. Trying to get it to sort the shit though.. even though I'm in "think deeper", it's tapped out. Been like an hour and it can't handle it. Too complicated for this piece of shit. So I'm tapped out on all 3, can't fix this shit. We'll just have to go with what it fuckin said, where it wasn't sorted by what showed up first. Plus I gotta manually add each number. We'll get this shit going in the comments here. I think I saw somewhere, that, straight up, oh something about adding or removing a damn, "commandment". lol. This is what you get with these fuckers who edit shit, as the years go on.
Give me some time to input all this shit and manually add numbers to each, one at a time.
Oh wait.. I'll go try grok. Lol.. I try inputting it, and it crapped right out.. it said:
Grok was unable to reply. Something went wrong, please refresh to reconnect or try again.
Piece of shit too.
Oh yeah I also noticed it was 114 points but it said 121. So maybe that's all it can find is the 114. Looks like I gotta do this manually. lol. Oh, hold on.. trying the grok 4 beta and it crapped out but I kept going after and was able to get it to number the list here. Gonna see if I can get it to sort it by what happened first in the bible. lol
I think these things do on purpose to be stupid so you run out of queries and gotta pay the money.
At least I got it sorted by biblical order. Got 113. I gotta manually add numbers to each section because can't select the text number at the start of each segment.
Manually adding each number. This is like fuckin manual batch filing here.. jeez. I was looking around, for: ai free. Tried a few, then tried this Ninja AI.
I inputted: Here's a list, I couldn't select the numbers so you'd have to add one to each of the 113 sections. Add a bullet point to each line of "book", "original date", "edit date", "reason". Add a line break after each "reason" line.
I can't select numbers or bullet points, so after that, put the list in a code window, but don't have the bullet points change to dashes, make sure it's a bullet point in the code window. Do a mini test run of a dozen points first. Here's the list:
Then it was going along, slowly. Stops at 92. I have it resume. As I'm checking it, there was fumbling going on with the sequence order, which it shouldn't have fucked up. Like 113 was ending with Jude. I'm there.. ok, enough fucking around with this stupid shit. So fuck the bullet points. And manually adding each of the numbers. Plus copying from grok, it didn't have any line breaks so adding one after each reason line.
Grok was not too bad though but lots of kicking it in the ass for stupid shit it wouldn't realize. But it was able to take the list and sort it in biblical order.. so what shows up first, and ends with revelations stuff. Enough fucking around with testing out other ones that probably can't even handle inputting the whole damn list, nevermind dealing with whatever with it. I'm out, manually fuckin batch filing this shit one at a time. lol.
This is just too much shit, for this AI shit, to be dealing with. It's used to pea brained shit, on those "smart" phones, where they can barely grunt out an emoticon.
[continued in comments]
[part 6]
What it's about: This book is presented as the work of the secretary of the prophet Jeremiah. It contains prayers, reflections on the Babylonian exile, and exhortations for the people of Israel to return to God.
Original Date: Written in Greek around the 2nd-1st centuries BCE.
Reason for exclusion: It was written in Greek, and its authorship was disputed. It was not considered to have a clear Hebrew original.
What it's about: This is a religious folktale about a pious Jew who goes blind and sends his son on a journey to retrieve a family debt. With the help of the archangel Raphael, his son finds a wife and heals his father's blindness. The book contains historical inaccuracies and confused geographic references.
Original Date: Written in Greek around the 2nd century BCE.
Reason for exclusion: The book is a religious novel, not a historical document, containing historical inaccuracies and confused geographic references. Its later composition in Greek and its legendary nature led to its exclusion from the Protestant canon.
What it's about: This is a fictional historical narrative about a Jewish widow who saves her people by assassinating an enemy general. The story emphasizes faith, courage, and divine intervention.
Original Date: Written in Greek around the 2nd century BCE.
Reason for exclusion: The book is generally accepted as historical fiction, with numerous historical and chronological errors. The brash and seductive character of Judith may have also been a point of contention for its inclusion.
What it's about: These books provide historical accounts of the Jewish revolt against the Seleucid Empire. First Maccabees focuses on military history, while Second Maccabees is more theological, emphasizing martyrdom and divine justice.
Original Date: Written in the 2nd-1st centuries BCE.
Reason for exclusion: The primary reason for their exclusion from the Protestant canon is that they were not originally written in Hebrew.
What it's about: A letter from Paul to the church in Laodicea that is mentioned in the canonical book of Colossians. A text with this name exists, but it is considered a later forgery.
Original Date: The original letter is lost, but the forgery was written sometime after the original.
Reason for exclusion: The original letter has been completely lost to history.
What it's about: This book, while referenced in Jude, contains fantastical stories about fallen angels mating with human women to produce giants 450 feet tall. Its content includes strange cosmology and end-times ideas that were popular in some ancient Jewish and Christian circles but were not considered consistent with mainstream biblical theology.
Original Date: Written in the 1st century BCE.
Reason for exclusion: The book was rejected by most early Jewish and Christian communities for its late composition, its speculative and fantastical elements, and its theological teachings that were seen as contradictory to other biblical texts, such as Jesus's teaching on angels not being sexual beings.
What it's about: This is a collection of 114 esoteric sayings attributed to Jesus, with no narrative of his life, death, or resurrection. It suggests that salvation is found through secret knowledge and individual spiritual enlightenment, a Gnostic view that conflicts with orthodox Christian doctrine.
Original Date: Composed in the mid-to-late 2nd century CE, though some scholars suggest an earlier date of 60 AD.
Reason for exclusion: It was rejected because it lacked apostolic authority (written too late), its Gnostic teachings were considered heretical, and it omitted the core Christian narrative of Jesus's passion and resurrection.
What it's about: This is a Gnostic text that portrays Judas Iscariot as a hero who betrayed Jesus at his request to free him from his physical body. It presents the death of Jesus not as a sacrifice for sin, but as a necessary act for spiritual liberation.
Original Date: Composed in the 2nd century CE.
Reason for exclusion: The book's Gnostic theology was considered heretical, and it was rejected due to its late composition and its radical reinterpretation of Jesus's mission and Judas's role.
What it's about: This text presents Mary Magdalene as a leader among the disciples, to whom Jesus gave secret, spiritual knowledge. It records a dispute among the disciples where Peter is jealous of Mary's special status.
Original Date: Composed in the 2nd century CE.
Reason for exclusion: This text was rejected for its Gnostic cosmology and for its unconventional portrayal of Mary Magdalene's authority, which contradicted the traditional male-dominated hierarchy of the early church.
What it's about: This text contains a series of stories about Jesus's childhood from ages five to twelve. It portrays a young Jesus as mischievous and sometimes spiteful, using his divine powers to perform miracles, but also to strike other children dead and then resurrect them.
Original Date: Composed in the mid-to-late 2nd century CE.
Reason for exclusion: This book was rejected by the early church because of its disturbing and heretical characterization of Jesus as a petulant and powerful child. It was seen as a fictional work that contradicted the traditional biblical portrayal of Jesus's holy nature.
What it's about: This early Christian writing is stridently anti-Jewish, claiming that the Jews misunderstood God's covenant and that they were never truly his people. It also contains some factual inaccuracies, such as the claim that weasels conceive through their mouths.
Original Date: Composed in the late 1st or early 2nd century CE.
Reason for exclusion: It was not considered apostolic in origin, and its extreme anti-Jewish sentiments were seen as problematic and out of line with the rest of the New Testament.
What it's about: A 2nd-century Gospel that gives a unique and dramatic account of Jesus's trial and resurrection. It contains pronounced anti-Judaism, a theme common in some early Christian writings, and was used by Docetists, who believed Jesus only appeared to be human.
Original Date: Composed in the 2nd century CE.
Reason for exclusion: It was labeled heretical by early church fathers due to its theological views, especially its association with Docetism.
What it's about: Also known as The Teaching of the Twelve Apostles, this is one of the earliest Christian writings. It functions as a manual of instruction for church life, covering ethics, baptism, and eucharistic practices.
Original Date: Composed in the late 1st or early 2nd century CE.
Reason for exclusion: It was considered a valuable and orthodox text but was not included in the canon because it was not believed to have been written by an apostle.
What it's about: This popular early Christian writing describes a vision of heaven and hell. It was widely read in the early church and was even considered canonical by some communities.
Original Date: Composed in the 2nd century CE.
Reason for exclusion: It was rejected due to concerns about its specific theological views, such as Christian universalism, and its lack of clear apostolic origin.
What it's about: A non-canonical text from the early centuries that has been lost. Fragments quoted by early church fathers suggest it was a Jewish-Christian gospel with a unique portrayal of Jesus and his family.
Original Date: Composed in the 1st or 2nd century CE.
Reason for exclusion: The original text has been lost, and the book was not widely accepted by the early church.
What it's about: Referenced in 2 Timothy 3:8, this was a text about two Egyptian magicians who opposed Moses.
Original Date: The date is not specified, but it was known to the author of 2 Timothy.
Reason for exclusion: Considered a later writing and not part of the canon.
What it's about: Referenced in 1 Corinthians 5:9, this was a letter from Paul to the church at Corinth.
Original Date: Composed sometime before 1 Corinthians (c. 55 CE).
Reason for exclusion: This is a "lost book" that has been completely lost to history.
What it's about: Referenced in Jude 9, this was a text that contained a dispute between the archangel Michael and Satan over the body of Moses.
Original Date: The date is not specified, but it was known to the author of Jude.
Reason for exclusion: The original text has been lost to history.
What it's about: Referenced in Hebrews 11:37, this book is an apocalyptic text that describes the martyrdom of Isaiah and a vision of heaven.
Original Date: The date is not specified, but it was known to the author of Hebrews.
Reason for exclusion: Considered a later writing and not part of the canon.
What it's about: Used by the heretic Marcion in the 2nd century, this was a heavily edited version of the Gospel of Luke. It omitted passages that showed Jesus as the fulfillment of the Old Testament.
Original Date: Composed in the mid-2nd century CE.
Reason for exclusion: It was a deliberate, heretical re-writing of a canonical gospel and was rejected by the early church fathers.
What it's about: This was a text from an early Gnostic teacher that is now lost. It was used by followers of Basilides, an early Gnostic teacher in Alexandria.
Original Date: Composed in the mid-2nd century CE.
Reason for exclusion: It was rejected as a heretical writing that promoted Gnostic teachings.
What it's about: Referenced in 2 Chronicles 33:19, the original text is now lost.
Original Date: The dates would have corresponded to the reign of Manasseh, around 697-643 BCE.
Reason for exclusion: The original text has been lost to history.
What it's about: Referenced in 1 Samuel 10:25, this was a document written by the prophet Samuel that outlined the laws and principles of the kingdom for the people of Israel.
Original Date: The dates would have corresponded to the time of Samuel, around 1050 BCE.
Reason for exclusion: The original text is now lost to history.
What it's about: Referenced in 1 Chronicles 27:24, this was a historical record of King David's reign.
Original Date: The dates would have corresponded to the reign of David, around 1010-970 BCE.
Reason for exclusion: The original text is now lost to history.
What it's about: This is a canonical book of the New Testament, but it was once considered non-canonical due to questions about its authorship and date of composition.
Original Date: Written around 60-70 CE.
Reason for exclusion: While some early Christian leaders accepted it, its anonymous nature led to some debate, and some lists of canonical books from the early church do not include it. It was eventually accepted as part of the canon.
What it's about: These are early Christian letters that were highly respected but were not included in the canon.
Original Date: Composed in the late 1st or early 2nd century CE.
Reason for exclusion: They were considered valuable but were not included in the canon due to a lack of apostolic origin.
What it's about: A popular early Christian writing that describes a series of visions given to a man named Hermas. It was widely read in the early church.
Original Date: Composed in the 2nd century CE.
Reason for exclusion: It was not considered to be of apostolic origin and was therefore not included in the canon.
[continued in part 7]