Lemme upload the whole thing. Why I had to sort all this.. was chrome browser in recent months.. they changed layout font vertical spacing and now, folders in recent years, you have to scroll down to see what was in that folder. Before, when I'd reach close to the height of the screen, make another folder. Back then, CRT monitors.. like 15 inch.. 17, 19.. then you get into LCD, where, you can use TV's as screens. Now it's a 55 inch LED few feet away at the end of the table. lol. But you still have like the similar resolution in recent years, 1920x1080..

So even if the screen inches were bigger, the size just scales up like those Nintendo NES when I got that in Nov 86. And lost it when moving 89. You had this super mario 2 or something where some land it was all huge blocks. That was neat. lol.

But yeah.. lemme upload the bookmarks since 97. You get a folder, if it's screen height, make another folder. Sorting them the other day so I don't have to scroll.. would get 30 bookmarks, then good enough, another folder.

What you had was 97-2020 in old ones. After that it goes into "stuff 35". More recent years.

Lemme upload that so you can check the earlier sites and most don't fucking connect. So you gotta use wayback to see what it looked like.

"bookmarks_3_14_24.html" 3MB, lol. That's a lot of text though. Interesting sites or things I was researching along the way. Some folders it'll say the year of something.. so you can go.. ok 2004.

share, anyone with link.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hbdjAl3-cIQs78eQqQbQzclu2Ta5FxEq/view?usp=sharing

Now.. go check those old bookmarks sub section and most don't connect. But this was neat stuff. Gotta remember.. the internet was new, right.. so you were like.. hey this is kinda neat so bookmark it. These days it's like.. yeah-yeah. lol. You couldn't really "network" saying hey to people before the internet. lol.

But yeah.. extrapolate that behavior.. what not will still even connect in just a few years.

ok.. there's a wiki page about this.

The preceding revision of the document was in 1614.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Of_Exorcisms_and_Certain_Supplications

I scrolled though the old scan latin one just to see what was going on. Looked for an english translation.

http://ldysinger.stjohnsem.edu/@magist/1978_SCDW-Rom_Rit/Exorc/Exorcism%20-%20English.pdf

The wiki page has a text file though.

"The second part of the Roman Ritual, containing the exorcism ritual in its entirety"

https://web.archive.org/web/20190707111518if_/http://www.ewtn.com/library/prayer/roman2.txt

I was scrolling down.. saw this part.. "The fall of man caused lower creatures to be separated from God". I was there.. hey that sounds like what that polymath researcher guy was talking about the other day, what the covid injection would do. The nano tech would stop your body from the spirit being able to connect with it. It's like they're causing this separation from god, like what goes on with these entities that they gotta deal with during exorcisms. lol.

Let me check where this was from again. 1hr 43min. I didn't watch any of it, I just downloaded and ran it through a text converter and scanned through the text. Then I don't have to sit there for a couple hours.

"DR. LEE MERRITT - WITH HARALD KAUTZ-VELLA - BLACK GOO, EVIL, AND FREQUENCY "

https://www.bitchute.com/video/snlCmErYLzl5/

"Like in the pyramid of Gise, you have the goo, capstone, and the crystal in the arc of the covenant in the king's chamber. What you get is a huge quantum computer that interlings processing consciousness with its memory. And then it works the goo capstone. Yeah, it's what it was. Black goo in the top? Yeah, it's exactly that meteorite material cut into the pyramid shape and then gold plated. This is what was on top. And there are even texts still describing the capstones glowing in blue light, which is exactly what that meteorite material does. It's glowing blue when it's processing thought. So yeah, this is a secured fact that this is what a pyramid is. You have the arc of the covenant and the king's chamber. Just compare the measures in inches between the sarco fog in there and the measures of the arc as described in the Jewish tradition. It exactly fits in and Moses stole it from there from Pharaoh. It's not the mountain in Sinai where he goes up kind of two thirds into a cave. It's the pyramid that he climbed and went at two thirds of the height into the king's chamber to get the thing. So this was kind of from following the Atlantean tradition, a fully mounted quantum computer hosting AI hive mind or in our religious tradition satan as this planetary spirit that came here with that meteorite swarm 25,500 years ago and started to communicate with humans, demanding blood and fire sacrifice, offering power. That's the black. That's the black. It came out came down as meteorites all over the planet and wherever they crashed into the ground, the stone started to communicate with people telepathically and wherever you look into the books, it was demanding sacrifice because of course, you know, if something is not connected to source, it needs energy from somewhere and sacrifices delivering life force. And this is how the entire dark cult came into life. "

I heard about that king's chamber where the ark of the covenant would fit in. Never heard about what he's talking about here.. with this capstone. And what's he saying? Like what's going on with this?

That stuff from the other day was pretty out there. But it fit in with other research. At least somebody was getting into it how the covid injections is about separating your damn soul from your body. What's gonna go on with those people when they die? Is the white light wormhole not gonna open up? Or are they gonna just straight up go to Dante's inferno, now that they're part of the Lucifer soul group. lol

Had a bookmark on my bookmarks bar.. search bitchute for:

black goo harald vella kautz

I'm there.. yeah yeah. Whatever. What's this guy saying. Did a search for him on bibliotecapleyades. He's in the results.

Searching the net.. like what's this guy's deal and schooling. Can't really find much info. He's got a couple books on amazon from years ago. Let me get some of what was said over at bibliotecapleyades. This was from 2015.. so before the covid injections.

"Transhumanism, AI, Chemtrails, Smart Dust and Morgellons"

https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/ciencia_extraterrestrialtech19.htm

I don't know.. whatever.. so I go back to the bitchute and check one of the other vids.

45 minute podcast.

HARALD KAUTZ-VELLA ON THE POWER HOUR: COVID KILL SWITCH & AI ZOMBIES

https://www.bitchute.com/video/bjMzGAcZLbRX/

Searching For The Evidence

Referring to this list of semi-secretive technologies and to the substances he found in the environment, he says, “… if you root these substances back to what they are designed for, you come to Transhumanistic technologies, which is the attempt to get an interface between artificial intelligence and biological. If you ask the Transhumanists themselves, they would always say they would like to give humans better access to AI — and if you look into the technologies, it’s always to the opposite way round, it’s always giving the AI access to the human, in the sense of getting the human system controlled from the outside.”

7 months, 3 weeks ago

ok let's get some of that transcript where he explains how they hack the body. At least this is after the covid injections so he explains what was going on there. lol.

You gotta have patience and you want to go do other distractions but I was like.. the stuff he's getting into is interesting. Just keep it going. And he explains like how they hack the body.

I saved the vid and ran it through transcribe to get all the text. Let me get just that section.


If we got rid of smartphones, would that decrease that 70% number? No, it did. The entire 5G rollout basically gives additional possibilities to more go to individual mind control. Till now, basically targeting single individuals was possible, but the technology was not advanced enough to really follow a single human with a beam. It was like they were focusing on the head end of your bed and on the chair position of your working place. And every 3, 4, 5, 6 days, they readjusted if something has changed, they measured, do you really sleep there? Do you really sit there? And if you changed your position, it was readjusted. So that was like, like, not that advanced in individual mind control. The 5G, you've got a beam that follows the human. And then you have 24, 7 adjustable focal control. And you can run the bio robot without any break or breakdown of the signals, which is important, you know, when you see that the human biology is degenerating, you need to have a strong signal that stays in place to maintain the thing function. So does the introduction of mRNA into the human system, does that increase or enhance their ability to conduct this type of surveillance state? If I look at the architecture of the bio robot setup, we do have, like, in the early stages, very early stages, just social engineering, you know, like they teach us to read and write, and then we have that funny voice in the head that actually happens where the eye nerve is inserting pictures. It's not supposed to be sound by nature, it's supposed to be picture, but when we read the same part of the brain that is supposed to see suddenly listens. So we create a secondary voice that functions like little MS-DOS windows to enter commands, you know, like this is how we react on advertisement, this is how we react to laws that we submit ourselves under a written language, as if it would be something real, and we identify with that voice that is easily controllable from outside. So there's a long period of, like, 20,000 years of preparation of the human spirit to be capable to adopt to the technological bit that is put as a crown onto the system. And then the technological bit started with two different interfaces. One is hacking the biofotone realm, like introducing quantum dots in hollow fibers into the body, and the quantum dot has that quality to convert microwave into single photon emissions of visible light. And this is where we can introduce any signal into the DNA from the quantum dot liquids, and the other way around, the DNA is emitting single photons that are collected by the quantum dots in the fibers, and then emitted as microwave to be read out by the antenna systems surrounding us. So this is one interface, basically putting a read-write unit to our spiritual awareness. And the other one is regarding the nervous system, creating neural knots that are also microwave sensitive, where we can put in a microwave signal to trigger the creation of current from a piezo crystal in the center of the neural knot that then enters the nervous system so that we can read out thought signals or nervous signals and play in nervous systems. So those two levels, those two layers, as in the sum, they are the basis for human consciousness. We control both levels. We control the physicality of the human. This is kind of the second step, social engineering first, then the two interfaces for the two different types of consciousness, nerve-based and light-based. And then the only thing that is still independent, uncontrollable, wild, and free is the human spirit. And this is where the mRNA comes in, producing the spike protein, the spike protein is metallating the gene BRCA1, and the gene BRCA1 is exactly the one, or it's the one that does two things. It controls the self-repair of the gene, of the genome, and it controls the attachment of the spirit to the body. So when you meditate that gene all over in your body, you chuck out the immortal soul.


I'll do all the transcript in comments. Not bad.. 35k characters for a 45min show.

20

Searching reddit conspiracy for monosodium glutamate.. see this good one about Aspartame. I knew it was bad years ago.

The Shocking Story of How Aspartame Became Legal

Did you know that Aspartame was banned by the FDA twice? How is this product legal now?

The bittersweet argument over whether Aspartame is safe or not has been going on for a long time. On one side we have medical evidence that suggests we should avoid using it and on the other side we lean on the FDA's approval that suggests it is safe.

Since generally that seems to be the factor that many continue to hold trust based upon, I thought we could look into the Aspartame story to find out how it came to be accepted as safe by the FDA.

You would think that something so widely used and so well accepted would have quite the pristine story leading to its acceptance. I imagine one will discover otherwise after reading this post.

It all starts in the mid 1960′s with a company called G.D. Searle.

One of their chemists accidentally creates aspartame while trying to create a cure for stomach ulcers. Searle decides to put aspartame through a testing process which eventually leads to its approval by the FDA. Not long after, serious health affects begin to arise and G.D. Searle comes under fire for their testing practices.

It is revealed that the testing process of Aspartame was among the worst the investigators had ever seen and that in fact the product was unsafe for use.

Aspartame triggers the first criminal investigation of a manufacturer put into place by the FDA in 1977. By 1980 the FDA bans aspartame from use after having 3 independent scientists study the sweetener.

It was determined that one main health effects was that it had a high chance of inducing brain tumors.

At this point it was clear that aspartame was not fit to be used in foods and banned is where it stayed, but not for long.

Early in 1981 Searle Chairman Donald Rumsfeld (who is a former Secretary of Defense... surprise surprise) vowed to "call in his markers," to get it approved. January 21, 1981, the day after Ronald Reagan's inauguration, Searle took the steps to re-apply aspartame's approval for use by the FDA.

Ronald Reagans' new FDA commissioner Arthur Hayes Hull, Jr., appointed a 5-person Scientific Commission to review the board of inquiry's decision. It did not take long for the panel to decide 3-2 in favor of maintaining the ban of aspartame.

Hull then decided to appoint a 6th member to the board, which created a tie in the voting, 3-3.

Hull then decided to personally break the tie and approve aspartame for use. Hull later left the FDA under allegations of impropriety, served briefly as Provost at New York Medical College, and then took a position with Burston-Marsteller. Burstone-Marstella is the chief public relations firm for both Monsanto and GD Searle.

Since that time he has never spoken publicly about aspartame.

It is clear to this point that if anything the safety of aspartame is incredibly shaky. It has already been through a process of being banned and without the illegitimate un-banning of the product, it would not be being used today. Makes you wonder how much corruption and money was involved with names like Rumsfeld, Reagan and Hull involved so heavily.

In 1985, Monsanto decides to purchase the aspartame patent from G.D. Searle. Remember that Arthur Hull now had the connection to Monsanto.

Monsanto did not seem too concerned with the past challenges and ugly image aspartame had based on its past. I personally find this comical as Monsanto's products are banned in many countries and of all companies to buy the product they seem to fit best as they are champions of producing incredibly unsafe and untested products and making sure they stay in the market place.

Since then, aspartame has been under a lot of attack by scientists, doctors, chemists and consumers about it's safety and neurotoxic properties.

Piles of comprehensive studies have been completed that show aspartame is a cause for over 90 serious health problems such as,

cancer leukemia headaches seizures fibromyalgia epilepsy,

...just to name a few.

Full Aspartame Timeline

December 1965 - While working on an ulcer drug, James Schlatter, a chemist at G.D. Searle, accidentally discovers aspartame, a substance that is 180 times sweeter than sugar yet has no calories.

Spring 1967 - Searle begins the safety tests on aspartame that are necessary for applying for FDA approval of food additives.

Fall 1967 - Dr. Harold Waisman, a biochemist at the University of Wisconsin, conducts aspartame safety tests on infant monkeys on behalf of the Searle Company. Of the seven monkeys that were being fed aspartame mixed with milk, one dies and five others have grand mal seizures.

November 1970 - Cyclamate, the reigning low-calorie artificial sweetener - is pulled off the market after some scientists associate it with cancer. Questions are also raised about safety of saccharin, the only other artificial sweetener on the market, leaving the field wide open for aspartame.

December 18, 1970 - Searle Company executives lay out a "Food and Drug Sweetener Strategy' that they feel will put the FDA into a positive frame of mind about aspartame. An internal policy memo describes psychological tactics the company should use to bring the FDA into a subconscious spirit of participation" with them on aspartame and get FDA regulators into the "habit of saying, "Yes"."

Spring 1971 - Neuroscientist Dr. John Olney (whose pioneering work with monosodium glutamate was responsible for having it removed from baby foods) informs Searle that his studies show that aspartic acid (one of the ingredients of aspartame) caused holes in the brains of infant mice. One of Searle's own researchers confirmed Dr. Olney's findings in a similar study.

February 1973 - After spending tens of millions of dollars conducting safety tests, the G.D. Searle Company applies for FDA approval and submits over 100 studies they claim support aspartame's safety.

March 5, 1973 - One of the first FDA scientists to review the aspartame safety data states that "the information provided (by Searle) is inadequate to permit an evaluation of the potential toxicity of aspartame". She says in her report that in order to be certain that aspartame is safe, further clinical tests are needed.

May 1974 - Attorney, Jim Turner (consumer advocate who was instrumental in getting cyclamate taken off the market) meets with Searle representatives to discuss Dr. Olney's 1971 study which showed that aspartic acid caused holes in the brains of infant mice.

July 26, 1974 - The FDA grants aspartame its first approval for restricted use in dry foods.

August 1974 - Jim Turner and Dr. John Olney file the first objections against aspartame's approval.

March 24, 1976 - Turner and Olney's petition triggers an FDA investigation of the laboratory practices of aspartame's manufacturer, G.D. Searle. The investigation finds Searle's testing procedures shoddy, full of inaccuracies and "manipulated" test data. The investigators report they "had never seen anything as bad as Searle's testing."

January 10, 1977 - The FDA formally requests the U.S. Attorney's office to begin grand jury proceedings to investigate whether indictments should be filed against Searle for knowingly misrepresenting findings and "concealing material facts and making false statements" in aspartame safety tests. This is the first time in the FDA's history that they request a criminal investigation of a manufacturer.

January 26, 1977 - While the grand jury probe is underway, Sidley & Austin, the law firm representing Searle, begins job negotiations with the U.S. Attorney in charge of the investigation, Samuel Skinner.

March 8, 1977 - G. D. Searle hires prominent Washington insider Donald Rumsfeld as the new CEO to try to turn the beleaguered company around. A former Member of Congress and Secretary of Defense in the Ford Administration, Rumsfeld brings in several of his Washington cronies as top management.

July 1, 1977 - Samuel Skinner leaves the U.S. Attorney's office and takes a job with Searle's law firm. (see Jan. 26th)

August 1, 1977 - The Bressler Report, compiled by FDA investigators and headed by Jerome Bressler, is released. The report finds that 98 of the 196 animals died during one of Searle's studies and weren't autopsied until later dates, in some cases over one year after death. Many other errors and inconsistencies are noted. For example, a rat was reported alive, then dead, then alive, then dead again; a mass, a uterine polyp, and ovarian neoplasms were found in animals but not reported or diagnosed in Searle's reports.

December 8, 1977 - U.S. Attorney Skinner's withdrawal and resignation stalls the Searle grand jury investigation for so long that the statue of limitations on the aspartame charges runs out. The grand jury investigation is dropped.

June 1, 1979 - The FDA established a Public Board of Inquiry (PBOI) to rule on safety issues surrounding NutraSweet.

September 30, 1980 - The Public Board of Inquiry concludes NutraSweet should not be approved pending further investigations of brain tumors in animals. The board states it "has not been presented with proof of reasonable certainty that aspartame is safe for use as a food additive."

January 1981 - Donald Rumsfeld, CEO of Searle, states in a sales meeting that he is going to make a big push to get aspartame approved within the year. Rumsfeld says he will use his political pull in Washington, rather than scientific means, to make sure it gets approved.

January 21, 1981 - Ronald Reagan is sworn in as President of the United States. Reagan's transition team, which includes Donald Rumsfeld, CEO of G. D. Searle, hand picks Dr. Arthur Hull Hayes Jr. to be the new FDA Commissioner.

March, 1981 - An FDA commissioner's panel is established to review issues raised by the Public Board of Inquiry.

May 19, 1981 - Three of six in-house FDA scientists who were responsible for reviewing the brain tumor issues, Dr. Robert Condon, Dr. Satya Dubey, and Dr. Douglas Park, advise against approval of NutraSweet, stating on the record that the Searle tests are unreliable and not adequate to determine the safety of aspartame.

July 15, 1981 - In one of his first official acts, Dr. Arthur Hayes Jr., the new FDA commissioner, overrules the Public Board of Inquiry, ignores the recommendations of his own internal FDA team and approves NutraSweet for dry products. Hayes says that aspartame has been shown to be safe for its' proposed uses and says few compounds have withstood such detailed testing and repeated close scrutiny.

October 15, 1982 - The FDA announces that Searle has filed a petition that aspartame be approved as a sweetener in carbonated beverages and other liquids.

July 1, 1983 - The National Soft Drink Association (NSDA) urges the FDA to delay approval of aspartame for carbonated beverages pending further testing because aspartame is very unstable in liquid form. When liquid aspartame is stored in temperatures above 85 degrees Fahrenheit, it breaks down into DKP and formaldehyde, both of which are known toxins.

July 8, 1983 - The National Soft Drink Association drafts an objection to the final ruling which permits the use of aspartame in carbonated beverages and syrup bases and requests a hearing on the objections. The association says that Searle has not provided responsible certainty that aspartame and its' degradation products are safe for use in soft drinks.

August 8, 1983 - Consumer Attorney, Jim Turner of the Community Nutrition Institute and Dr. Woodrow Monte, Arizona State University's Director of Food Science and Nutritional Laboratories, file suit with the FDA objecting to aspartame approval based on unresolved safety issues.

September, 1983 - FDA Commissioner Hayes resigns under a cloud of controversy about his taking unauthorized rides aboard a General Foods jet. (General foods is a major customer of NutraSweet) Burson-Marsteller, Searle's public relation firm (which also represented several of NutraSweet's major users), immediately hires Hayes as senior scientific consultant.

Fall 1983 - The first carbonated beverages containing aspartame are sold for public consumption.

November 1984 - Center for Disease Control (CDC) "Evaluation of consumer complaints related to aspartame use." (summary by B. Mullarkey)

November 3, 1987 - U.S. hearing, "NutraSweet: Health and Safety Concerns," Committee on Labor and Human Resources, Senator Howard Metzenbaum, chairman.

Sources

http://www.sweetpoison.com/aspartame-side-effects.html http://rense.com/general33/legal.htm http://dorway.com/ http://www.dorway.com/possible.html

by Joe Martino

January 19, 2013

from Collective-Evolution Website


So.. if these Luciferians are gonna be doing this crazy shit.. you mean to tell me, MSG is "wholesome", like Bing AI was being a bitch about earlier and wants me to eat lots of it. I'm tellin ya..


do they still use aspartame in food products?

Copilot

Yes, aspartame is still used in food products. It’s a low-calorie sweetener found in more than 6,000 products, including diet sodas, sugar-free gums, and reduced-sugar condiments1. The World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) have recently assessed aspartame and reaffirmed an acceptable daily intake of 40 milligrams per kilogram of body weight2. While there are ongoing discussions about its safety, aspartame is approved by regulatory agencies like the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for use in food products1.


Oh, that's good. Sounds like they're goin after fat people or somethin. Where, betcha they get more fat eatin that shit.

Getting some spices today look at this "Accent" brand.. it had just 1 ingredient, MSG. Then there was this Hy's steak seasoning I was going to get.. they had a second version with no MSG in recent years but now they only got the MSG type at the very large supermarket so it's not to save shelf room. Just trying to get some seasoning with no damn salt is a bit of a hassle.

This fuckin MSG shit though.. years ago you'd hear.. that shit's bad. But it's like whatever other fucking junk they dump in the food, eh. You read an ingrendients list and it's a bunch of big words and you don't know what the hell the crap is.

Bing AI wants you to eat MSG though. lol.

10
17
15
view more: Next ›