Almost there but this thing tapped out. Never had that happen in gemini. It doesn't like you going there, eh. Plus I was originally in "deep research" where it adds this right side panel. Later on, too much data to deal with simultaneously. It was spinning circle, so I went to the bank, came back.. doing laundry. 2 hours of this spinning circle shit, eh. Finally I said, quit fuckin around and sack that right side panel shit. Let's just get a list.
It was fuckin around too, eh.. where I get it to 74 edits. That was kicking it's ass bad, repeatedly to get to that point. Kept trying to get it to cough up more. It's all stubborn, like it's trying to save processing power.
We had this edits section, then once that was done, it would get into this omitted books that were originally referenced. I'm there, let's just keep track here and start numbering this shit. It screwed up where it continued the numbers into the omitted section. I'm there, no, you restart the numbering with those. Before that, both of these would go into the low 100's.
It was stuck at 74 edits though, no matter what I did. Then I was trying to get it to sort the 74 by what shows up earlier in the bible. It was starting to get too complicated, and it screws up and says:
There are 121 edits and 47 omitted books in the following list.
So now it admits it had access to more than 74. I go, ah-ha.. nabbed you. Was working on trying to get these sorted by what shows up first in the bible. It was too fuckin stupid, then it taps out and says oh you reached some kind of limit and shit. Never saw that before. Then it would say, oh it's resetting in like whatever time. Just one task, then it craps out, doubles that time saying like a few hours later. The fuckin "deep research" shit, you don't get many of those.. only got 1 left till oct 4th.
Couldn't even get this piece of shit to add numbered lines that I could select. It doesn't select that area. I go to chat gpt, logged in. Inputted the list. Got that in code window where it had numered sections. Then I was getting it to resort the list by what shows up first. It was noticing shit like the dates. I'm there, don't mess around with this shit here. But it was giving you more specific dates. Then this thing taps out and says, "You’ve hit the Free plan limit for GPT-5. Responses will use another model until your limit resets tomorrow after 12:59 AM." You can barely input shit with these pieces of shit. Gemini kicks ass compared to them.
I go to the fuckin microsoft copilot. You couldn't fuckin even input the 121 edits list, it would say, oh 10k characters max. Inputted the shit in like half a dozen parts. Got it to number the sections cause couldn't select the numbers in gemini. Then it was changing the bullet points to dashes. I got it to get the list with numbers and bullet points, where I could select it in code window. Trying to get it to sort the shit though.. even though I'm in "think deeper", it's tapped out. Been like an hour and it can't handle it. Too complicated for this piece of shit. So I'm tapped out on all 3, can't fix this shit. We'll just have to go with what it fuckin said, where it wasn't sorted by what showed up first. Plus I gotta manually add each number. We'll get this shit going in the comments here. I think I saw somewhere, that, straight up, oh something about adding or removing a damn, "commandment". lol. This is what you get with these fuckers who edit shit, as the years go on.
Give me some time to input all this shit and manually add numbers to each, one at a time.
Oh wait.. I'll go try grok. Lol.. I try inputting it, and it crapped right out.. it said:
Grok was unable to reply. Something went wrong, please refresh to reconnect or try again.
Piece of shit too.
Oh yeah I also noticed it was 114 points but it said 121. So maybe that's all it can find is the 114. Looks like I gotta do this manually. lol. Oh, hold on.. trying the grok 4 beta and it crapped out but I kept going after and was able to get it to number the list here. Gonna see if I can get it to sort it by what happened first in the bible. lol
I think these things do on purpose to be stupid so you run out of queries and gotta pay the money.
At least I got it sorted by biblical order. Got 113. I gotta manually add numbers to each section because can't select the text number at the start of each segment.
Manually adding each number. This is like fuckin manual batch filing here.. jeez. I was looking around, for: ai free. Tried a few, then tried this Ninja AI.
I inputted: Here's a list, I couldn't select the numbers so you'd have to add one to each of the 113 sections. Add a bullet point to each line of "book", "original date", "edit date", "reason". Add a line break after each "reason" line.
I can't select numbers or bullet points, so after that, put the list in a code window, but don't have the bullet points change to dashes, make sure it's a bullet point in the code window. Do a mini test run of a dozen points first. Here's the list:
Then it was going along, slowly. Stops at 92. I have it resume. As I'm checking it, there was fumbling going on with the sequence order, which it shouldn't have fucked up. Like 113 was ending with Jude. I'm there.. ok, enough fucking around with this stupid shit. So fuck the bullet points. And manually adding each of the numbers. Plus copying from grok, it didn't have any line breaks so adding one after each reason line.
Grok was not too bad though but lots of kicking it in the ass for stupid shit it wouldn't realize. But it was able to take the list and sort it in biblical order.. so what shows up first, and ends with revelations stuff. Enough fucking around with testing out other ones that probably can't even handle inputting the whole damn list, nevermind dealing with whatever with it. I'm out, manually fuckin batch filing this shit one at a time. lol.
This is just too much shit, for this AI shit, to be dealing with. It's used to pea brained shit, on those "smart" phones, where they can barely grunt out an emoticon.
[continued in comments]
[part 5]
This is interesting here.. it's like what's going on with "why" they'd go, oh, something's fishy here, let's weed it out.
47 Books Referenced or Once Considered But Omitted, from the bible
What it's about: This book is a lost historical text that is referenced in the Book of Numbers. It is believed to have been a collection of poems or songs describing the victories of God over the enemies of Israel. No known copies of this work have been found, so its exact content is unknown beyond the single reference.
Original Date: The date is not specified, but it would have been written before the book of Numbers.
Reason for exclusion: It was never considered part of the canonical texts and has been completely lost to history, so there was no material to include in the canonization process.
What it's about: This was likely a collection of ancient Hebrew songs and poems that celebrated the heroes of Israel and their exploits in battle. It is referenced in the Book of Joshua as a source for the account of the sun standing still and in 2 Samuel for David's lament for Saul and Jonathan. The original text is lost, but modern forgeries with this title exist.
Original Date: Referenced in Joshua and 2 Samuel, so it would have predated those books.
Reason for exclusion: The original book has been lost to history. While its name appears in the canonical books, this was because the biblical authors used it as a known extra-biblical source, not because it was considered part of the sacred, inspired canon.
What it's about: This is a lost book that is referenced in the Book of Exodus, where Moses reads from it to the people of Israel. It is believed to have contained laws and instructions given to the Israelites at Mount Sinai.
Original Date: Written during the time of Moses, around 1400 BCE.
Reason for exclusion: The original text has been lost, so its specific contents are unknown. There was no material to be considered for inclusion in the canon.
What it's about: This was a historical record referenced multiple times in the Book of Kings. It is believed to have contained detailed accounts of the reigns of the kings of Judah, including their wars, political actions, and other events not fully covered in the canonical books.
Original Date: The dates would have corresponded to the reigns of the kings it documented.
Reason for exclusion: Like many other historical records referenced in the Bible, this book has been completely lost to history and was not part of the inspired canon.
What it's about: This was another historical record referenced in the Book of Kings. It contained detailed information about the reigns of the kings of Israel, similar to the annals of Judah.
Original Date: The dates would have corresponded to the reigns of the kings it documented.
Reason for exclusion: This book has been completely lost and was not considered part of the inspired canon.
What it's about: Referenced in 1 Kings, this book chronicled the full scope of Solomon's reign, including his deeds and wisdom. The canonical book of Kings refers to this larger record for more details.
Original Date: The dates would have corresponded to the reign of Solomon, around 970-931 BCE.
Reason for exclusion: This historical record has been completely lost, and as such, was not considered for the canon.
What it's about: This book, along with the writings of Nathan and Gad, contained records of the reign of King David. It is possible that some of its content is preserved in the canonical books of Samuel.
Original Date: The dates would have corresponded to the reigns of David and Samuel, likely around 1050-970 BCE.
Reason for exclusion: While parts of this work may have been incorporated into the biblical books, the complete text has been lost to history.
What it's about: This work is mentioned as a historical source for the reign of King David and King Solomon. It would have contained prophetic words and accounts of historical events.
Original Date: The dates would have corresponded to the reigns of David and Solomon, likely around 1050-931 BCE.
Reason for exclusion: This text, along with other prophetic and historical records, has been lost.
What it's about: This book is referenced as a source for the events of King David's reign. It contained prophetic visions and historical records.
Original Date: The dates would have corresponded to the reign of David, likely around 1010-970 BCE.
Reason for exclusion: The original text is lost, so it was not included in the canon.
What it's about: This book is mentioned as a source for the history of King Solomon's reign. It likely contained prophecies and historical narratives related to the prophet Ahijah and the kingdom of Israel.
Original Date: The dates would have corresponded to the reign of Solomon, around 970-931 BCE.
Reason for exclusion: This historical record has been lost to history.
What it's about: This book is mentioned as a source for the reigns of Kings Solomon and Rehoboam. It would have contained prophetic visions and historical accounts.
Original Date: The dates would have corresponded to the reigns of Solomon and Rehoboam, likely around 970-913 BCE.
Reason for exclusion: The original text is lost.
What it's about: This work is referenced as a source for the events of King Rehoboam's reign. It would have contained prophetic words and historical records.
Original Date: The dates would have corresponded to the reign of Rehoboam, around 931-913 BCE.
Reason for exclusion: This historical record has been completely lost.
What it's about: This book is mentioned as a source for the reign of King Jehoshaphat. It contained prophetic words and historical accounts.
Original Date: The dates would have corresponded to the reign of Jehoshaphat, around 870-845 BCE.
Reason for exclusion: The original text is lost.
What it's about: This text is referenced as a source for the history of King Abijah. It was a midrash, or interpretive commentary, on biblical events.
Original Date: The dates would have corresponded to the reign of Abijah, around 913-911 BCE.
Reason for exclusion: The original text is lost.
What it's about: This book is mentioned as a source for the reign of King Joash. It was a commentary on the Book of Kings.
Original Date: The dates would have corresponded to the reign of Joash, around 835-796 BCE.
Reason for exclusion: The original text is lost.
What it's about: This book is referenced as a source for the reign of King Uzziah. It likely contained historical records and prophetic visions.
Original Date: The dates would have corresponded to the reign of Uzziah, around 792-740 BCE.
Reason for exclusion: The original text is lost.
What it's about: This book is referenced in multiple places in the Books of Kings and Chronicles. It was a comprehensive historical record of the kings of both kingdoms.
Original Date: This would have been a continuous chronicle covering the history of both kingdoms.
Reason for exclusion: This extensive work has been completely lost.
What it's about: This book is referenced in 2 Chronicles 35:25 as a collection of laments for the death of King Josiah. It may have been a poem or song.
Original Date: The dates would have corresponded to the death of Josiah, around 609 BCE.
Reason for exclusion: The original text is lost to history.
What it's about: This is a philosophical and theological text, not a prophetic one, that praises wisdom as a divine gift. It blends Jewish beliefs with Hellenistic philosophy and addresses themes like the immortality of the soul and divine retribution.
Original Date: Written in Greek around the 1st century BCE.
Reason for exclusion: The book was written in Greek and its authorship is attributed to Solomon, but it was composed much later than his time. Its philosophical nature and late composition led to its exclusion from the Protestant canon.
What it's about: This is a book of wisdom literature that offers insights into life in ancient Judea. It incorporates traditional Near Eastern wisdom teachings on topics like friendship, wealth, and fear of the Lord.
Original Date: Written in Greek around the 2nd century BCE.
Reason for exclusion: It was considered a later composition and written in Greek, with concerns about its authorship. Its wisdom teachings, while valuable, were not viewed as having the same level of inspired authority as other biblical texts.
[continued in part 6]