32k characters just for the input into google Gemini AI, so just the input 'll be cut in couple parts, then Gemini's response. Cause if you're wondering what the deal is with how Jesus was married to Mary Magdalene and she was 3 months pregnant at the second ceremony.. it doesn't make sense how roman catholic priests should be "celibate" when Jesus wasn't. The whole religion is about his stuff, right. So, to get into the "why", you gotta get into what the hell is going on with how the luciferian illuminati has gradually infiltrated all organizations over generations. It's not just the elite, the illuminati.. it's lower levels in society. ok let's get into this.. lol. Yeah.. so to understand the "why", you gotta give some noob 101, conspiracy background on a few things. lol

===============

Here's the start of what I inputted in gemini.

Analyzing when celibacy for priests in the roman catholic church began.

A few months ago, I was checking out this stuff:

"Bloodline of the holy grail. The hidden lineage of Jesus revealed."

https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/biblianazar/esp_biblianazar_11.htm

There is a good deal of information outside the Bible to confirm that Jesus and Mary Magdalene were married. But is there anything relevant in the Gospels today - anything which perhaps the editors missed? Indeed there is.

There are seven lists given in the Gospels of the women who were Jesus’s regular companions. These lists all include his mother, but in six of these seven lists the first name given (even ahead of Jesus’s mother) is that of Mary Magdalene, making it plain that she was, in fact, the First Lady: the Messianic Queen.

But is the marriage itself detailed in the Gospels? Actually, it is. Many have suggested that the wedding at Cana was the marriage of Jesus and Mary Magdalene - but this was not the wedding ceremony as such, being simply the pre-marital betrothal feast. The marriage is defined by the quite separate anointings of Jesus by Mary at Bethany. Chronologically, these anointings (as given in the Gospels) were two-and-a-half years apart.

Readers of the 1st century would have been fully conversant with the two-part ritual of the sacred marriage of a dynastic heir. Jesus, as we know, was a Messiah, which means quite simply an ’Anointed One’. In fact, all anointed senior priests and Davidic kings were Messiahs; Jesus was not unique in this regard. Although not an ordained priest, he gained his right to Messiah status by way of descent from King David and the kingly line, but he did not achieve that status until he was ritually anointed by Mary Magdalene in her capacity as a bridal high priestess.

The word ’Messiah’ comes from the Hebrew verb mashiach: ’to anoint’, which derives from the Egyptian messeh: ’the holy crocodile’. It was with the fat of the messeh that the Pharaoh’s sister-brides anointed their husbands on marriage, and the Egyptian custom sprang from kingly practice in old Mesopotamia. In the Old Testament’s Song of Solomon we learn of the bridal anointing of the king. It is detailed that the oil used in Judah was the fragrant ointment of spikenard (an expensive root oil from the Himalayas) and it is explained that this ritual was performed while the kingly husband sat at the table.

In the New Testament, the anointing of Jesus by Mary Magdalene was indeed performed while he sat at the table, and specifically with the bridal ointment of spikenard. Afterwards, Mary wiped Jesus’s feet with her hair and, on the first occasion of the two-part ceremony, she wept. All of these things signify the marital anointing of a dynastic heir.

Other anointings of Messiahs (whether on coronation or admission to the senior priesthood) were always conducted by men: by the High Zadok or the High Priest. The oil used was olive oil, mixed with cinnamon and other spices, but never spikenard. This oil was the express prerogative of a Messianic bride who had to be a ’Mary’ - a sister of a sacred order. Jesus’s mother was a Mary; so too would his wife have been a Mary, by title at least if not by baptismal name. Some conventual orders still maintain the tradition by adding the title ’Mary’ to the baptismal names of their nuns: Sister Mary Theresa, Sister Mary Louise, for example.

Messianic marriages were always conducted in two stages. The first (the anointing in Luke) was the legal commitment to wedlock, while the second (the later anointing in Matthew, Mark and John) was the cementing of the contract. In Jesus and Mary’s case the second anointing was of particular significance for, as explained by Flavius Josephus in the 1st-century Antiquities of the Jews, the second part of the marriage ceremony was never conducted until the wife was three months pregnant.

Dynastic heirs such as Jesus were expressly required to perpetuate their lines. Marriage was essential, but community law protected the dynasts against marriage to women who proved barren or kept miscarrying. This protection was provided by the three-month pregnancy rule. Miscarriages would not often happen after that term, subsequent to which it was considered safe enough to complete the marriage contract.

When anointing her husband at that stage, the Messianic bride was said to be anointing him for burial, as confirmed in the Gospels. From that day she would carry a vial of spikenard around her neck, throughout her husband’s life, to be used again on his entombment. It was for this very purpose that Mary Magdalene would have gone to Jesus’s tomb, as she did on the Sabbath after the Crucifixion.

After the second Bethany anointing, the Gospels relate that Jesus said:

’Wheresoever this Gospel shall be preached throughout the whole world, this also that she hath done shall be spoken of for a memorial of her’.

But did the Christian Church authorities honour Mary Magdalene and speak of this act as a memorial? No they did not; they completely ignored Jesus’s own directive and denounced Mary as a whore.

To the esoteric Grail Church and the Knights Templars, however, Mary Magdalene was always regarded as a saint. She is still revered as such by many today, but the interesting fact of this sainthood is that Mary is the recognized patron saint of wine-growers: the guardian of the Vine. Hence, she is the guardian of the sacred Bloodline of the Holy Grail.

Sounds like, "Messianic marriages were always conducted in two stages. The first (the anointing in Luke) was the legal commitment to wedlock, while the second (the later anointing in Matthew, Mark and John) was the cementing of the contract. In Jesus and Mary’s case the second anointing was of particular significance for, as explained by Flavius Josephus in the 1st-century Antiquities of the Jews, the second part of the marriage ceremony was never conducted until the wife was three months pregnant."

Meanwhile, they were calling her a "whore" if you check out today's bible stuff. You do get this odd thing, "To the esoteric Grail Church and the Knights Templars, however, Mary Magdalene was always regarded as a saint. She is still revered as such by many today, but the interesting fact of this sainthood is that Mary is the recognized patron saint of wine-growers: the guardian of the Vine. Hence, she is the guardian of the sacred Bloodline of the Holy Grail."

Knights templar, eh.. if you check the wiki about them, it begins with.. oh it's not the wiki page of them, it's of baphomet, but they do mention it on the knights templar wiki page, let me get that section:

"Claims were made that during Templar admissions ceremonies, recruits were forced to spit on the Cross, deny Christ, and engage in indecent kissing; brethren were also accused of worshipping idols, and the order was said to have encouraged homosexual practices.[64] Many of these allegations contain tropes that bear similarities to accusations made against other persecuted groups such as Jews, heretics, and accused witches.[65] These allegations, though, were highly politicised without any real evidence.[66] Still, the Templars were charged with numerous other offences such as financial corruption, fraud, and secrecy.[67] Many of the accused confessed to these charges under torture, and their confessions, even though obtained under duress, caused a scandal in Paris. The prisoners were coerced to confess that they had spat on the Cross. One said: "Moi, Raymond de La Fère, 21 ans, reconnais que [j'ai] craché trois fois sur la Croix, mais de bouche et pas de cœur" ("I, Raymond de La Fère, 21 years old, admit that I have spat three times on the Cross, but only from my mouth and not from my heart"). The Templars were accused of idolatry and were charged with worshipping either a figure known as Baphomet or a mummified severed head they recovered, amongst other artefacts, at their original headquarters on the Temple Mount. Some have theorised that this head might have been believed to be that of John the Baptist, among other things.[68]"

Didn't you have stuff with the freemason DeMolay guy.. let me look that up. "Jacques de Molay". Doing a search for baphomet on his wiki page, not finding it. I saw that somewhere though. Let me get that. "Jacques de Molay was the 23rd and last grand master of the Knights Templar. He was burned at the stake for heresy, homosexual relations, spitting and urinating on the cross, and sodomy" Now you got the freemason youth organization that's named after this guy. Walt Disney was in there. Jeez.

Here, let me get that baphomet wiki page. It has more stuff I was researching at the time.

The wiki page of Baphomet.. let me go get that.

"During trials starting in 1307, the Knights Templar were accused of heresy for worshipping Baphomet as a demonic idol."

Don't forget about "the steps of freemasonry", with Knights Templar at the top on the York rite side.

"structure-of-freemasonry-1956-life-magazine"

https://i.imgur.com/Qr4UMqa.jpeg

This post baphomet image was from:

"Éliphas Lévi's iconic image of Baphomet, the "Sabbatic Goat," was first published in 1854". But it sounds like this was going on way back before it. What is this character's deal here.

I talk to Google Gemini AI about it.

baphomet.. he's not one of the 72 demons from the ars goetia. There was also another class of demons. But he wasn't one of those. You have the hierarchy of the demonic realm.. like generals.. this baphomet wasn't in any of these categories

You are absolutely correct. Baphomet is not one of the 72 demons listed in the Ars Goetia, nor does he typically appear in traditional hierarchies of the demonic realm found in grimoires like the Lesser Key of Solomon.

Here's why Baphomet stands apart:

Origin in the Knights Templar Trials: Baphomet first appears in historical records during the trials of the Knights Templar in the early 14th century. Accused of heresy, some Templars, often under torture, confessed to worshipping an idol named Baphomet. The exact nature or appearance of this "idol" varied widely in their confessions, and many scholars believe it was a fabrication by the inquisitors or a misunderstanding/misspelling of "Mahomet" (Muhammad), suggesting an accusation of Islamophilia.

19th Century Occult Revival: The modern image of Baphomet, the winged, goat-headed, hermaphroditic figure, was largely popularized by the French occultist Éliphas Lévi in the mid-19th century. Lévi intended this image to be a symbolic representation of balance, duality, and the equilibrium of opposites in the universe, incorporating various esoteric symbols. It was not originally presented as a specific demon to be invoked in the way the Goetic spirits are.

Not a Traditional Demonological Figure: Unlike the demons of the Ars Goetia, who have specific seals, offices, legions, and methods of conjuration described in grimoires, Baphomet doesn't have a place in those older, established demonological systems. The Ars Goetia lists 72 spirits with distinct roles (Kings, Dukes, Princes, Marquises, Earls, a Knight, and Presidents) and is focused on practical ceremonial magic for summoning and controlling them.

So, while Baphomet has become a widely recognized symbol associated with occultism and sometimes mistakenly linked with Satanism, its origins and nature are quite different from the demons of the Ars Goetia and other classical demon hierarchies.

checking the Dictionnaire infernal from 1863.. it's 748 pages, so it's pretty thick. Baphomet doesn't seem to be listed in there. This  Éliphas Lévi image.. what year was that?

You're very astute to notice Baphomet's absence from the Dictionnaire Infernal! Jacques Auguste Simon Collin de Plancy's Dictionnaire Infernal (which had its final, most comprehensive edition in 1863, the one you're likely referring to) aimed to be a compendium of demons, occult figures, and superstitions. The fact that Baphomet isn't prominent or even listed in it reinforces that he wasn't considered a traditional demon within established demonology at that time.

Éliphas Lévi's iconic image of Baphomet, the "Sabbatic Goat," was first published in 1854 in his influential book, Dogme et Rituel de la Haute Magie (Doctrine and Ritual of High Magic). It was then featured as the frontispiece for the two-volume edition of the same work, published between 1855 and 1856.

So, Lévi's image of Baphomet was created and widely circulated just before or around the same time as the final edition of the Dictionnaire Infernal. This timing further explains why it wouldn't have been included, as Baphomet was more of a symbolic creation of the burgeoning occult revival, rather than a historical or traditional demonic entity.

See.. you got this tie in with oh.. in the bible, they're calling Jesus's wife, Mary Magdalene, a "whore".. lol.. Meanwhile, that end part there..

"To the esoteric Grail Church and the Knights Templars, however, Mary Magdalene was always regarded as a saint. She is still revered as such by many today, but the interesting fact of this sainthood is that Mary is the recognized patron saint of wine-growers: the guardian of the Vine. Hence, she is the guardian of the sacred Bloodline of the Holy Grail."

Meanwhile, these knights templar are worshipping baphomet. Plus, lol.. "Don't forget about "the steps of freemasonry", with Knights Templar at the top on the York rite side.

"structure-of-freemasonry-1956-life-magazine"

So they know something. You got some fishy stuff going on here, ok. Meanwhile, sounds like the Jesus dude, was married to Mary Magdalene, plus she was three month's pregnant. And then this end line.. "To the esoteric Grail Church and the Knights Templars, however, Mary Magdalene was always regarded as a saint. She is still revered as such by many today, but the interesting fact of this sainthood is that Mary is the recognized patron saint of wine-growers: the guardian of the Vine. Hence, she is the guardian of the sacred Bloodline of the Holy Grail."

[continued in comments]