3
mithridates 3 points ago +3 / -0

He's not gonna sue. He's just gonna jerk it to rape porn and cry and call it a day.

1
mithridates 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you! I'm very interested in this sort of thing.

2
mithridates 2 points ago +2 / -0

Where did you find that info on James Holmes? I've been reading about the dude for an hour and I can't find anything about that.

2
mithridates 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hahaha beleaguered cunt. I'm stealing that.

1
mithridates 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's not about being quick. It's about providing accurate and complete information whenever possible. This forum has really gone downhill if the users can't understand something so simple.

1
mithridates 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't think a source is too much to ask.

8
mithridates 8 points ago +8 / -0

So according to them the lockdowns made older women 13-27% more likely to get heart disease. Does this count as "killing grandma"?
What's the source on this? I'd like to read the whole article.

3
mithridates 3 points ago +3 / -0

We've all been manipulated to some degree by this overwhelming psyop. Understanding you've been duped in the past makes you more likely to be able to resist it next time.

2
mithridates 2 points ago +2 / -0

I feel that. Deprogramming is so much harder than programming. I guess they have more resources than we do. If I tell my family about, say, VAERS, they may think about it, but their attempts to think critically will be constantly interrupted by a deafening chorus of "safe and effective" and "only conspiracy theorist grandma-killers believe otherwise". Threats of being otherized are also ever present.

I doubt I'll be the one who figures out how to cut through and reach hijacked brains, but if I am, I'm screaming it from the rooftops.

3
mithridates 3 points ago +3 / -0

Replying again to let you know I appreciate your comment. If I had been broaching the subject the first time this way, it would have been a mistake. Thank you for looking out for me and my family, fren.

2
mithridates 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, that one! I hadn't felt my eyes open that hard since rejecting the cult 20 years ago. It's really quite something, isn't it, how many levels there are to awakening. I've stopped even considering myself awake, because I know there's another dose of cold water just around the corner.

2
mithridates 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well hello there! Yes, I feel it has done the same for me. For years I thought I was ruined, damaged beyond repair, but recently I've seen that I was just different in a way that wound up saving not just me but my husband, too.

I have definitely considered that about my family. It's a hard thing to come to terms with though, so I'm still holding out hope. I actually read The Parasite Pill yesterday, I think you posted it? Very interesting read. I've been concerned about parasites lately and it really got under my skin.

2
mithridates 2 points ago +2 / -0

Agreed. I actually watched the German interview he did a while back, and it explained a lot of the stuff that just seemed like crazy nonsense before.

2
mithridates 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh I've already done that. I've softballed them, led them gently to obvious conclusions, tied it to my previous experience with a cult (which they already knew about), agreed with them on certain points, etc. None of it has worked. They've already gotten two shots. If I can save them from the third, I will. The gloves are coming off.

4
mithridates 4 points ago +4 / -0

It really is amazing that this information is not more widely discussed. Obviously there's a gag order on this, but it's out there, and people just don't care.
If the clot shot lovers in my family give me shit this Christmas, imma hit em with this and see what happens.

1
mithridates 1 point ago +2 / -1

I agree with you, except for the banning people part. If they're proven bots or paid shills, then yeah, but otherwise, no. It doesn't matter how evil they are, they should be allowed to say what they think. It's the only way to preserve free speech.

1
mithridates 1 point ago +2 / -1

I'm with ya, brother. The comments in this thread are evil.

0
mithridates 0 points ago +1 / -1

You have lost so hard and you don't even know it. Once they succeed in making us just as vile as they are, they win. Don't you see that? Or are you too busy jerking off to someone else's tragedy? I pointed out the old pictures because taking pics of your dead baby is a known manifestation of grief, and has been for a long time. So she didn't do it exactly the same way, so what? She's obviously become accustomed to oversharing online. It's one of the ills of our society. You are also demonstrating one of our society's ills by your inability to sympathize with someone who's been brainwashed and abused.

-1
mithridates -1 points ago +1 / -2

Back in the day people used to dress their dead babies up and take pictures of them, sometimes with living family members posing with the dead baby. Maybe you've never seen anything like this before, but I have.

1
mithridates 1 point ago +2 / -1

You make a good point. There's a middle ground between slavering beast and god emperor that everyone's ignoring, which is concerning. It's not impossible that one side or the other is mostly right, but it is unlikely, given what we've already seen.

by pkvi
2
mithridates 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hah! "Hijacked" is a weird way to spell "exposed". Love your take on what BBC stands for, too.

view more: Next ›