Gammon's presentation is the theory is that ETFs are forced to sell the shareholdings, and the potential "buyers" know that so there is no point bidding above 0. (or perhaps 0.1 but nominal 0).
And most of George's stuff is gathered from the work of others and presented.
Admittedly I'm only generally interested in the topic so I don't have deep knowledge.
nig nog cope
take a look at her
https://cambridgeafricannetwork.org.uk/?page_id=673
she's a lecturer at a online university and I have more Linkedin connections than her and I do not work in a social position
I don't know but it didn't used to be that way on early Reddit.
subreddits were introduced to funnel interested groups together, it used to be all one page, and so that randos did not comment on everything
once the number of visitors got high enough, the value of controlling the story increased
When people start selling S&P ETFs, which make up 50% or more of S&P holdings, the offers will tend to zero.
This is because the people selling have to sell on instruction.
George Gammon explains how the whole thing could come down
It's a still from Rebel Capitalists video on the regional banking incident
https://youtu.be/swlK8rXcie8?t=323
"should be blue" where can we see the rules?
i can't be bothered to look, but I will lay 3:1 odds the studiesdo not conclude either of the headlines in full, or perhaps type 1 vs type 2