accidentally triggers a gravitational wave.
You mean gravity wave. Gravitational waves are not gravity waves (which are still only theoretical). If you believe LIGO, we are already being bombarded with them (gravitational waves) on a regular basis and they are damn near undetectable. Just a semantic nitpick.
What do you do to overcome the 2x weight being put on the body every day?
Normally, people kind of "waddle". Worst case, they lay down horizontally and stay that way (often forever).
I think the others have done a pretty good job of answering this one already.
When you are driving, or in/on any moving vessel, look at the ground close to you and compare it to the ground far in the distance.
The ground near you appears to be moving very quickly (when you are, anyhow) and the ground in the distance (or a bilboard, for instance) seems to be moving much more slowly.
The reverse of this effect is the reason you can see things moving very quickly at a great distance (of course, assuming they are big enough and light from them is received by your eye).
If the bullet were large enough (or illuminated in some way, like a tracer round for instance) you could do this test yourself to confirm - but it is the exact same situation as with the billboard.
The billboard is moving the same speed relative to you as the ground right below the window of your car, yet appears much slower. If you could fly the car up to be close to the billboard - it would appear to whiz by just like the road does (close to you) on the highway. Likewise, as you get farther and farther away from the billboard it appears to move slower and slower - even though you are still traveling the same speed.
You might want to drop this meme out of your collection.
Whoever built the horoscope knew.
Knew about parallax, triangulation and/or the distance to (or spherical shape of) the lights in the sky? The horoscope doesn't require any of those things.
Whoever built the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antikythera_mechanism knew.
Also requires none of those things - right?
Someone knew the world was round, long before humans could supposedly even add and subtract. Inconsistencies, for sure.
Possibly, but the first people to historically record such a thing (that survived to us, anyhow) were the ancient greeks and they came to the conclusion by sitting around and guessing. The ancient egyptians conceived of a flat world, for instance.
Personally, i like the blue ones.
It's slightly more complicated/convoluted.
There is a massively advertised (i.e. funded) flat earth psyop.
However, contrary to popular misconception (encouraged by said psyop) - the primary purpose of the flat earth psyop is to suppress the subject because of how valuable it is.
Anyone with any earnest interest in the subject (including purely critical), please join us to exchange views on c/flatearthresearch.
Wrong
That's an insane, and reflexively contrarian, view. He who has the gold, makes the rules. It is the most "special treatment" that exists in our civilization.
You get special treatment if you're a black lesbian mentally retarded obese jew
Why on earth do you think that "special treatment" is somehow mutually exclusive? You can't seriously think that because one group - say, black people - gets special treatment that other groups magically can't have special treatment also.
Besides, who do you think pays to make/legislate those special treatments for the minority groups you mentioned above? The poor? Don't be so naive.
Wealth doesn't matter to your ideology
I am not espousing any ideology. I'm just calling a spade, a spade. You get special treatment if you can afford it (though that is not the only way/criteria that entitles you to such special treatment, as you mentioned).
woke projection never fails
Those that are ignorant of history are doomed to repeat it :( Empires (as well as individual empires), and their wealth, are built on the backs of slaves coupled with mass murder and other forms of theft (often euphemistically called "conquest")
Cults are obviously incapable of coexisting with other cults.
And yet there are so many cults, today and historically. They are evidently quite capable - though often do not do so amicably. Anyhow, i am against all cults and am a heretic to most all religions. You are simply mistaken about my perspective. When you assume...
If you want to know what i think and why, you should try asking questions instead of just guessing and being wrong over and over!
marxism, satanism, atheism, and queer are all derivations of the same religion.
That is your ideology, and i understand why you say that and what you mean. I don't necessarily even disagree.
Depends on the "conspiracy" theory you want to explore.
Granted, but my question was specifically directed at the op.
Or if you wanna go down the mackinnon
I cut my teeth in ufology. The phil schneider rabbit hole comes to mind too.
There is enough money missing from the pentagons budget we could have several moon/mars/space colonies.
If those places were real and reachable - sure, possibly.
All the land masses were prolly substantially bigger 10,000 years ago.
That is generally the biblical view, and the uniformitarian secularist view as well.
Most flat earthers believe it because its part of their religion
Believe what? Communism?! That the rich get special treatment?
but they have yet to link a video where someone talks about flat earth and then doesnt mention god as well
There are many. However, there is a significant amount of - not just god - but the christian god in the flat earth videos. The movement in england during the 1800's was almost exclusively christian.
There are two main reasons for this in my view.
- The christian bible unambiguously describes the world as flat.
- As a part of the psyop, the christianity angle is pushed to coral people back into a behavior control structure and limit their influence on / communication with secularists. Biblical literalists (a brand of fundamentalist) are considered cooks by the educated, as they are conditioned to under the guise of education.
I know you're a communist because the rich do not get special treatment.
That is an insane hill to die on, but have at it. You get special treatment when you can afford it. It's called service.
"Minorities" like jews, blacks, obese, and child grooming faggots get special treatment.
Did someone say they didn't?
Then don't white people deserve a homeland as well?
That's a separate, and completely valid, discussion. In general, you "deserve" only if you can afford in our civilization (though granted, there are other forms of special treatment like those you listed above).
That "current thing" itself is generated and advertised/marketed through that very same wealth, by those very same rich. The golden rule : he who has the gold (historically acquired almost exclusively through theft and often accompanying murder), makes the rules.
Your ideology is backwards and you don't care how hypocritical it is.
I don't think i'm espousing ideology at all right now; Just calling a spade, a spade.
Religious cultists never do.
That's generally true. I'm against cults and am a heretic to most all religions.
Actually, flat earthers aren't genuinely real at all.
They are products and/or agents of a heavily advertised (i.e. funded) psyop.
You think i am a communist just because i recognize the rich get special treatment in our civilization? I would say that those that don't recognize that obvious fact are deluded and blind - regardless of what political ideology they play cheerleader for.
They're called "the rich".
Lol, that's our civilization.
I was asking the op where this other secret civilization is.
Where do they live / where is their civilization?
So you think it's possible for there to be an unknown species on earth, past or present
Not just possible, actual and factual!
that is capable of building flying saucers
As i said, that is not fundamentally impossible. Of course, there is no evidence to support it.
but aliens are not possible?
Correct. Because aliens only exist in modern fiction! It can't be elves from the lord of the rings either, for the exact same reasons.
Fictional things can't build or fly anything in reality. It is completely impossible, unlike the possibility that some cryptid (or even already known non-human lifeform) is responsible - which is merely preposterous/ridiculous (and evidenceless)
Explain away a whole town of highly educated and literate witnesses
Easy, i already did. Didn't you read my comments you are supposedly responding to?
Flying craft (assuming that is what it was, and not some sort of meteorological or astronomical phenomena) does NOT equal "aliens". That false conflation is the psyop!
Mirror events in India's histories as well.
The vimanas are flying craft. Once again, did you even read my comments before you responded to them?
They've been here since long before us.
Don't misunderstand me. There are MANY forms of life on earth and it is not fundamentally impossible that some of them (currently and historically unknown, of course) also build flying craft. It's just that we have no evidence for them. It is fine to believe in things we have no evidence for, but you must always remember that it is merely a belief!
The only creature in the known universe that builds flying craft is us, and "aliens" only exist in modern fiction (furthermore they require "space" to come from, which didn't exist until modern times either).
Wow - a google search is not just a refutation, but dozens of them?!
Why don't YOU try refuting something i said instead. Using words.
Don't you know anything yourself?
I know you believe that aliens are real and have existed throughout the ages, and have a google search that (ostensibly) supports your preexisting bias. But without any research/evidence/facts of your own to support that (tv based) belief, that's all it is or will/can ever be.
Report yourself to your hearts content - you little tattle tale you.
You’re an admitted
Stop listening to the voices in your head. They're not your friends.
answering any questions
I answer most all earnest questions. If you ever have one, let me know. Reminder: Rhetorical gish gallop copypasta is not an earnest question; it's spam (and a waste of time).
your claimed beliefs
Name even one of my "claimed beliefs", and be sure to quote/link/cite my claim. I won't hold my breath.
Reported for spam
Wasting the mods' time is not a good idea. Best case, they'll ignore all reports from you for crying wolf - again. Worst case, they'll ban you - again.
A more apt analogy would be :
"One magic bullet killed kennedy and then went through the chest, wrist, and leg of the man sitting in front of him."
Some people, like yourself, simply believe such things because the government told them to.
Others, including the forensic experts at the time, are more skeptical.
It's your fact-less opinion
I see that you desperately want/need that to be the case, but my conclusions are based on years of research. I cut my teeth in ufology, and studied the scourge of alien worship (and the psyop that encourages it) first hand.
millions of sightings across the entire breadth of our existence
Sightings of unidentified flying craft (and sometimes meteorological/astronomical phenomena) - yes. Aliens are a purely modern fiction. They do not exist in reality outside of fiction in any era - and do not even exist in fiction before the modern one. Aliens come from "space", and space doesn't exist back then - it really is as simple as that.
Are you a flat earther too?
No, but if i were it wouldn't automatically make what i'm saying incorrect - as much as you need it to :(
I understand i am insulting/attacking your (tv based) religion, but i have your best interest at heart.
If you think 'aliens' are a psyop
I don't just think it, i know it.
In fact, the modern gray we know and love wasn't invented until the early 1990's.
Aliens are entirely fictional, and exclusively modern.
UFO's are clandestine flying craft built and flown by the only creature in the known universe that builds such things. Aliens ("little green men", originally) have been falsely conflated with flying saucers since their first appearance in the 40's to discredit anyone researching, witnessing, or reporting/publicly discussing the subject.
A psyop that has spanned history across thousands of years? Across multiple continents?
No. Aliens do not and cannot exist before the "space age". Angels can come from heaven in earlier christian mythology and such things - but no aliens.
As for "thousands of years / multiple continents", it is true there is good evidence for flying craft existing on those continents and over that period of time. Flying craft does NOT equal aliens - that is the (modern) psyop.
Explain the Sirius tribe.
Most likely simply a hoax. Less likely, they had telescopes in the distant past (and/or the star cluster they worshipped was more visible back then) and devolved to the state we found them in where they were worshipping remnants of their lost culture.
I was there for the mass sighting in in Illinois
Very cool. I would love to see one. Again, the crafts are real. They are real flying machines first designed and flown around the 40's. There is only one creature in the known universe which builds such craft. Alien worship is a scourge, and an encouraged psyop to suppress the reality of the craft.
Our cosmos is a vastly large place.
And what if it weren't? Our estimates as to the size of the universe are simply wild guesses. Let's say, for the point of discussion, that those estimates are cosmically wrong and the universe is much smaller than we want it to be. Would that change your conclusions/estimates?
Because that's nearly the same as destroying a civilization. We're not ready.
And why on earth would they care about that? Especially if they desire the material goods/resources here. The prime directive is television fiction, and an allegory for how the military treats civilization.
This is despicable.
Thanks for posting it. Is any news source (mainstream or otherwise) reporting on this atrocity?
I certainly haven't seen anything...
EVERYTHING IS SUBJECTIVE THEREFORE
Our experiences are all subjective, yes.
However this is one of the rare points which tallestshil makes which is correct : objective truth exists (although that truth is almost exclusively not within our grasp). Manifest objective reality exists and is the basis of all science. Science would not work if that objective reality were not objective.
Furthermore, to accept the tenets of simulationism/existentialism/nihilism is the height of modern sophistry and the underpinning of the dogma of moral relativism found in post modernism. "I can do whatever i want because nothing is true/objective, and therefore nothing matters"
Of course, tallestshil mutters this truth while out of the other side of his "mouth" spewing proud religious fundamentalist delusion about how he alone always "proves truth" and no other views could possibly be correct because they "have spoken".
Said the person with an earnest interest in the subject of flat earth, which you are too cowardly/afraid to legitimately research or discuss - even for a minute.
Your unshakable faith in your worldview as well as reflexive and blind attacking of any heretic with a differing view is commonplace for religious zealots like yourself (assuming you are human - a devastatingly sad possibility)
paid shill.
Still accusing others of the crimes you yourself are guilty of, eh? Familiar tactic...
I often hope they are a bot/shill, for their sake. The alternative is far too sad :(
Belligerently ignorant, dishonest, AND unable to read or respond earnestly :( It's a powerfully terrible combination.
Lol.
That's why einstein, or more likely someone studying the equations he claimed were his, called it that in the first place - and to make it distinct from gravity waves, which remain purely speculative.
Lol, yes - though most of the sci-fi addicted fanboys also don't know the difference between them - so, go with your gut! I personally think this is by design/intention, as LIGO was massively (i.e. very expensively) advertised as "discovery of gravity waves" so the common folk would make this false conflation.