language not available in this community
a) "Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking"...if others have the power to make not available what one freely thinks about, then others are conspiring against one.
b) Kike/kikel - "circle" + nigger/negra - "black" represent the main tools for deception aka circular thinking (logic) and the absence of light (ignorance) within a deceived being.
Linear thinking implies enlightenment, which circular logic blackens...
for us to take
You already took...both offense at the comment and suggested pluralism (us)...while ignoring that nature gives which each being within needs to resist taking into wanted possession.
to take away
Away implies a way of motion aka procession, which cannot be taken into possession. A jew suggests procession (currency) to tempt gentiles to take it into possession, while not only constantly loosing it, but also paying interest on it.
Not just money, but any and all beliefs are based on taking artifice, while ignoring what nature gives.
Whatever you take represents the idol (witch) which transfers your strength (craft) to another.
Do you wish to retard our logic skills?
Wish implies want, which establishes a logical conflict of reason (want vs not want); which then retards ones mind within motion. Why? Because wanting vs not wanting an outcome tempts one to ignore being moved forwards within origin.
our logic
Logic implies a singular being mentally deciding between one side (want) or the other (not want)...it's choosing one side over the other which establishes OUR conflict of reason (want vs not want) aka turning one against another.
Directional > practical or theoretical
Ask yourself...are you directed? Is it practical for you to respond to being directed? Would ignoring direction for one another represent theory? What if your mind stuck on theory permits another to practice witchcraft on you; through you; within you?
a) Witch/wih (idol) + craft/kraf (strength)...suggestion represents a jewish idol which gentile consent gives strength to.
b) Directional (perceivable) > practical (perception) or theoretical (suggestion)...a jew practices within natural direction to trick gentiles with theoretical fiction.
c) If ones choice consents to any suggestion, then the chosen one who shaped the suggested becomes the Γminence grise (gray eminence).
Eminence implies to project aka all perceivable projecting through each ones perception...ignoring this for any suggestion by another grays out ones eminence.
"outer religion" VS "inner religion"
Inner (being) implies within outer (nature)....religion implies inner responding (re) to bondage (ligo) by inner, hence turning against (vs) one another while ignoring outer.
If one doesn't join another (suggestion), then one can discern self as inner (perception) within outer (perceivable)...as soon as one joins one becomes part of a religion.
the Father (God-Head) exists within the hearts of all Life Forms as an indestructible, incorruptible nucleus of our own souls
It's each life's FORM which represents the nucleus within the sole/soul, indestructible; incorruptible FLOW of all. It's trying to own, which corrupts and destroys form, while inverting sole (singular) into manifold (plural), which corrupts nucleus.
Nucleus implies center (perception) of exterior (perceivable)...the suggestions of another tempt one off-center.
manifests life
If one mani (manually) fests (to seize) then one destroys life, which is auto (inception towards death) mated (life). If one fests (to seize); then one gets parasitically infested by another, while experiencing seizures like taxes or debts.
Both wrong
Wrong implies versus right aka both sides bound to one another if ONE chooses to hold onto either.
Impressively bad
Bad implies versus good aka circular confinement of expression. A jew utilizes impression to trick gentiles to choose a side; thereby self confining expression.
stormfaggotry
That's a suggested branding tempting those who consent to it into ignoring that a storm rages from the center outwards, while moving. It's holding onto the brand which becomes the faggot (burden)...once again a trick to tempt self confinement of expression.
the "noticers" were Epstein's white noise machine
a) White (pure light) doesn't make noise...only within a spectrum (impure light) can there be noise among rays/race.
b) A jew tempts gentiles with machines (artificial devices) to make noise which distracts from nature. As an example for such a machine...information (artificial) distracts from inspiration (natural).
a) Nature reveals everything (perceivable) through each being (perception)...it's filing the suggestions of another which tempts one to ignore that.
b) Nature implies linear procession (inception towards death) of being (life) hence a released revelation...filing suggested information as "right" or "wrong" confines ones mind within a circular conflict (right vs wrong) against others.
In short...a jew releases in accordance with nature; while gentiles fight each other over the right vs wrong of artificial releases.
Ask yourself this...can a jew release any information that would prevent gentiles fighting each other over it?
Edit: Even simpler...left gentile holds onto negative; right gentile holds onto positive; jew simply let go instead of holding onto.
post 2010
Close. It was 28 Days Later in 2002, which I only watched because I met the director at a filmfest earlier, where he was gushing over his next project in an empty London.
With what? With cords or chains? With what?
With free will of choice holding onto any belief; faith; creed/credit; trust; idea/idol aka ideology; opinion; judgement; sentiment; definition; conclusion; theory; dogma/doctrine etc.
the Theist is free
An -ist (ones consent) binds oneself to a suggested -ism (consensus), hence a theist joining theism. A theist is free to choose to let go of theism, but bound to it for as long as he holds onto by free will of choice.
Jesus Saves.
Jesus aka je suis(I AM) implies holding self in possession aka "saving" for self. Meanwhile... βIt is for freedom that Christ has set us free. Stand firm, then, and do not let yourselves be burdened again by a yoke of slavery.β β Galatians 5:1
Christ (to anoint) implies the separation in-between free (choice) and dom (balance)...Jesus tempts choice to take what God is giving freely to each Christ.
What does "standing firm" imply? As form (life) within flow (inception towards death)...hence the need for free will of choice to balance in-between.
Save/sol - "whole"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/save That implies God (whole) saving each Christ (partial aka anointed one).
Atheism is a religion
A response to religion aka atheism (without god) vs theism (within god). The issue is religion aka that which binds together what God sets apart from one another like within and without.
Lets go of what?
Of that which binds FREE will of choice...
So what?
If moral and belief, then religion as the base of atheism.
Atheism relies on circular reasoning.
Rely aka re (to respond) ligo (to bind)...that's the religious bondage which establishes the reliance circle of reason against one another.
The issue isn't about atheism's reliance on circular reasoning, but about RELIANCE = RELIGION.
If the theist lets go, then the atheist has nothing to hold onto aka the circle (round) dissolves into a line (table)...that's the secret underneath "knights of the round-table".
Notice the use of belief and morality within the "atheist" graphic...
Didn't watch John Wick; never heard of Henry Cavil, and the last Russel Crowe movie I remember was Romper Stomper...
simple - unfortunately real life is rarely so
a) Fortune implies "chance"; real life implies "choice"...taking a chance costs choice, hence gambling.
b) Simple implies singular (perception) within singularity (perceivable)...choosing to take a chance on another (suggestion) shapes simple into complex.
You belong to your father...
Who came before John? Matthew: "And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven."
There can be only one...it's that simple. To ignore that inverts ones choice into a chosen one.
I will make THEM of the synagogue of Satan, who say THEY are JEWS and are not, but do lie...
In this context...plurality equals lie; singularity equals truth. It's not the jews; it's each jew...for there can be only one.
Synagogue aka syn (together) + agein (put in motion)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/synagogue hence also keneseth - "assembly"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/Knesset
Satan implies "to oppose"; Synagogue implies "to assemble"...each jew tempts gentiles to assemble, while opposing the ensemble for being against the singularity of God.
What is the structure of the societal control system?
An artificial circle shaped within a natural line aka circular thinking during linear procession.
Who is at the top? Whoβs below them?
Linear procession (inception towards death) implies being (life) in-between...it's circular thinking which turns top against bottom.
How do they maintain their control?
By con (together) trol (to roll)...it's the inward circle (logic) turning outwards (reason) which keeps control in place.
How do they shut down opposition to their control?
Opposition (one side vs another) implies con (together) trol (to roll).
At each level of the hierarchy, how much does the average individual understand about the system as a whole?β
a) Understanding implies "standing under" which establishes the artificial levels of hierarchy.
b) Sys-tem (standing together) contradicts whole separating each partial from one another.
communism
Com (together) uni (apart from one another)...a jew suggests an -ism to tempt each unique gentile to come together into a consensus.
fractional reserve banking
Being implies a fraction within all (fraction-al)...a jew tempts gentiles together, which tempts each gentile being to respond to servitude (re-serve) by banking trust within a consensus.
middle east wars
East isn't in the middle, but implies inclination from middle towards east. A jew tempts gentiles to incline from middle (choice) towards circumference (imbalance), which establishes a war against the other side of balance.
There's no middle-east; no african-american; no judeo-christian; no one-people etc. only confusion (fusing together) tempting ones free will of choice into imbalance by choosing a side over another. A jew shaping this confusion is called "mystery babylon".
pornography
Aka porno (to sell) + graphy (to write)...nature giving being free will of choice requires no buying or selling, while artificial writing tempts a being (life) to ignore natures delineation (inception towards death).
That's the foundation of pornography, which a jew distracts gentiles from discerning by selling obscene writings.
homosexuality
Aka homo (same; equal) + sex/seco (to divide)...another contradiction in term to confuse gentiles, while using sodomy as the distraction.
civil rights movement
Aka civil (internal affairs) + right/reg (to move in a straight line)...ones mind moves within civil (life) right (inception towards death).
A jew suggesting gentiles "civil right movements" tempts each gentile to consent to a FOREIGN offer...thereby contradicting civil aka abandoning civil right, while tricking the mind to move within inwards (logic) and outwards (reason) circles.
pedophile black mail rings
Aka to envelope (mail) mind in ignorance (black) through for example sexual attraction, which confines the mind within a ring (circular logic) turning into physical conflicts of reason (old vs young).
controlling the US congress
A gentiles consent to the jewish suggestion of "uniting states" establishes a congress of gentiles under control of a jew.
censorship
A ship implies a vessel (life) in motion (inception towards death) ...censor/kens - "to proclaim" implies the demand (claim) to move forwards (pro), which destroys a moving vessel unless resisted.
A jew suggests censorship to tempt gentiles to believe that there's an artifice preventing them from moving forwards, while ignoring nature never ceasing to push each living being towards death.
Free will of choice cannot be censored by another...only by oneself.
killed christ
Christ (anointed one) implies the separation of each being from one another...a jew tempts gentiles to ignore this by joining together as christians, which kills one another.
- Vulgarity/volgus - "the common people, the multitude"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/vulgar
- Swear - "take or utter an oath" from swer - "to speak, talk, say"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/swear
If one (singular) joins the common people (plural), then one swears an oath to one another. Nature neither makes common, but unique, nor does nature require any being to speak; talk or say anything.
Death implies the outcome of life...inception implies the origin. Dying implies life being carried from inception towards death. Living implies potential (temporal) within the process (ongoing) of dying.
To carry implies a transfer (life) from (inception) to (death)...being implies essential transference.
Sleight of hand for carrying.... https://genius.com/Kansas-carry-on-wayward-son-lyrics
No person is getting dropped.
a) If God implies the highest, then coming into being implies a lowering aka a dropping off.
b) How could one being within a "fallen" world without being dropped?
c) If person aka per sonos (by sound); then drop the be-at (being at)...
the verb "being" as a noun or adjective
Verb expresses motion, hence being implying ones expression within all motion. Noun implies a name for a being within motion aka a branding; marking; idol which contradicts being moved. Adjective implies putting one thing (noun) onto another (being).
Since nature moves...a verb reveals what nouns and adjectives are used to conceal.
Normal people know what I mean
Pluralism (people) represents a suggested norm tempting a singular (person) to measure others together. Such a measurement is being called "meaning".
Knowledge implies singularity (perceivable) moving through each single unit (perception) within.
word games
To play a game one has to choose to take a chance on winning or losing...free-will-of-choice describes how motion works, which doesn't give others anything to hold onto. Separating words within sound isn't gambling...holding words together within moving sound is.
obstruct and obscure
Nature reveals free will of choice...an artificial obstruction or obscurity has to be chosen.
You actually believe the epstien drops are a liquid??
a) To believe implies a further solidification of solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death).
b) Few are using a transfer-protocol to make the "Epstein Drops" available for many to download...so not only does downloading a drop implies ones submissive position underneath, but a transfer implies a flowing current carrying the solid information.
c) Actual implies active/action aka a liquid state.
None of them (suggestions) were made?
A question mark implies suggesting a question to tempt consent into answering, which establishes a mark of a trade.
no one is being dropped
a) Being (life) dropped (inception towards death) aka formed within flow, which is how liquid solidifies each drop.
b) Drop; noun - "a small portion of any fluid in a spherical form, which falls at once from any body"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/drop
Ones consent to any suggestion permits another to enter ones sphere of influence...
No, you're making up
No aka nothing aka creatio ex nihilo aka making something out of nothing.
Drops are not things anyone consents to.
Drop; verb - "allow to fall"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/drop hence intel-drops implying the allowance of intel (intelligence) to drop by ones consent to understand (stand-under).
You are making stuff up.
How does one make UP (upwards) a DROP (downwards)?
Israel (the state)
Israel aka yisra'el - "he that striveth with God"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/Israel
Israel implies the state aka estate of each being within nature...unless ignored for striving against one another.
to divide and separate God's favorite creation
God divides (divination) and separates (christen; to anoint)...a jew suggests favoritism and creationism to tempt gentiles together into a consensus.
Furthermore...God implies everything, while creation aka creatio ex nihilo implies creation out of nothing. Creation inverts God...if consented to.
Everything dividing and separating into each thing implies "transformation" aka the transfer of form (life) within action (inception towards death). Any conspiracy corrupts that transfer.
one people
One (singular) contradicts people (plural)...that's ones mind running a contradiction set up by a jew suggesting for example com (together) uni (apart from one another) -ism or the game mono (singular) poly (plural).
Giving some
Only nature gives (inception) and takes (death) being (life) aka everything giving and taking each thing...a jew suggests something aka the sum of things aka tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together).
A jew utilizes suggestion to summon consensus among gentiles.
too much power
God > chosen one > ones choice...doesn't that imply too much power for a jew over a gentile?
Giving some people a bit too much power here, eh?
Ignoring ones choice for a chosen ones suggestion implies giving up any and all power over self to another.
it's devils of all kinds
Only within singularity (all) can plurality (devils; kindred) be shaped by summoning single units together...aka the prime directive of each jew according to mosaic law. What's a mosaic? Pieces inlaid to form a pattern!
sinister machinations
Machina implies the device (suggestion); sin implies falling for it (consent). If you wrote "one people" then that implies sinister/sinistre - "contrary"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/sinister
Guess who suggested the machination "one people" to make others sinister... https://noahide.org/one-people-one-world/?print=print
Score; verb - "to record by means of notches"...any meaning gentiles put into the world wide web represents a notch scored by a jew.
As for psyop...psyche implies natural animation; a jew tempting gentiles to ignore natural (perception) for fictional (suggestion) implies the operation.
Questionable wants answers; free-will-of-choice needs to adapt to solution, while resisting the temptation of both questions and answers.
All was given (perceivable) before each one (perception) comes into being.
Proper/privus - "one's own"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/proper
a) Nature cannot be owned by any being within, and b) if one gives what one owns, then into the possession of another, while out of ones possession.
Meanwhile...to reply implies by ones free will of choice. Why would one give away or trying to take into possession what nature gives for free?