▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

the induction motor

a) Motor/meue - "to push away" aka that which imparts (life) motion (inception towards death).

Sleight of hand... https://genius.com/Metallica-motorbreath-lyrics aka "Motorbreath, it's how I live my life...Once you have seen it, you'll never be the same"

b) Induction implies the introduction (inception) of being (life) pushed away (towards death)...

magnets

Magnet/mag - "to knead, fashion, fit" aka magis - "kneaded mass". Being implies elect (choice)...few tempt the choice of many into a kneaded mass (consensus) by attracting them to one another, which reduces the power of the elect among many (one choice) while increasing the power of the select among few (chosen one).

Few suggest electromagnetism to distract many from discerning self as elect tempted by mag-net...like networking on the internet.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Could you make a trust

Trusting implies holding onto which contradicts nature thrusting (inception towards death) being (life).

put...in it then give

Only nature gives (inception) and takes (death) by putting being (life) in.

access to the trust

Implies both sides holding onto while binding "free" will of choice aka access becoming restriction.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Tax/tag - "to touch; handle" hence getting charged (to load; put a burden onto) when trying to hold onto any currency within a moving current.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

pretending to be Christian, National Socialists, conspiracy researchers

a) Coming into being implies the christening.

b) Any -ist implies consent to a suggested -ism, hence consent within consensus aka group think.

c) Con (together) spiracy/spirit (to breathe) contradicts each singular state of being.

thinking processes

There can be only one process for each potential thought within.

entire networks of shills

A net confines each partial within from how entire works...a shill represents a decoy luring ones consent into the consensus net aka the world wide web aka internet.

So how does entire work? It sets each partial within free from one another...no consensus required to enter; pass or leave, nor networking to keep anything together

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

the plutonium core being carried...for assembly

Pluto/pleu - "to flow". The core of flow implies form. Flow carrying forth form implies disassembly.

▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

The way you talk is unbelievably annoying

Way implies fluid; talking implies solidification...trying to hold onto latter, while former moves, becomes quickly annoying.

Truth is...

...a measurement taken while ignoring given.

Truth is...not a river.

Having the choice in-between truth (want) or false (not want) implies a river of change (need).

Need/want implies balance; want vs not want implies imbalance...only within motion can balance (momentum) bring choice (matter) into being.

Truth is objective and absolute.

a) Objective aka ob (forwards) + ject (to throw) implies motion...holding onto truth contradicts that.

b) Absolute aka ab (off; away from) + solute (to loosen; release) implies matter being released within motion. Once again...holding onto truth contradicts that.

Your opinion only affects whether you are correct or incorrect

Cause > effect > affect...judgements (opinion) and logic (correct or incorrect) represents affectation to one another distracting from cause > effect motion.

Furthermore; the RECT in correct and incorrect implies REG - "to move in a straight line"....not circular conflict by choosing one side against the other.

The correct answer remains the same.

Motion (rect) implies sameness forwarding each different matter within, while enabling each ones free will of choice to question or answer each other, or reasoning about correctness vs incorrectness of opinions.

Standhaft

Steadfast (unshakable, stubborn, resolute; firm and fixed) contradicts being given free will of choice aka ones response-ability for adaptation to being (life) moved (inception towards death).

An infant moving through the process of adulteration towards becoming an elder isn't steadfast, but... https://www.wordhippo.com/what-is/the-opposite-of/steadfast.html

lol by dukey
▲ 3 ▼
free-will-of-choice 3 points ago +3 / -0

Welfare for me...farewell to thee.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's the same thing ppl say about taking DMT.

a) A thing cannot be the same as any other thing...only within sameness (cause) can each different thing (effect) come into being.

b) Taking ignores given...ignorance represents a hallucinogenic drug because it dries discernment.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

I heard about this which is quite the trip...

Trip/trap aka entrapment...any drug/droge (to dry) entraps mental fluidity.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

This Popular Culinary Mushroom Makes People See “Little Elves”

Elf implies sprite - "a doublet of spirit"...ones consent breathes life into the suggested populism of another one; thereby establishing a doublet of spirit.

Taking anything from another...belittles one.

no psychoactive compounds

Nature implies active; being implies reactive...the animation of reaction within action implies psycho/psyche - "animating spirit".

Few suggest psycho-logy to compound the animated spirit of many together into a consensus called logic (circular thinking).

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's retarded and all that means is that the current Western medical zeitgeist is wrong.

a) A current only moves...holding onto right or wrong retards ones perception of movement.

b) Geist (ghost) implies spiritual animation of essence; Zeit (time) implies the distance of essence in animation. The issue...if essence holds onto the measurement of time it ignores spiritual animation.

c) Medic/med - "to take appropriate measures"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/*med-

To appropriate implies "taking into possession" while ignoring that the process of animation (inception towards death) sets potential (life) free.

The entire medicinal field is designed by few to tempt many into sacrificing potential (given) for possession (taken).

What's the opposite of medic? Patient aka being "capable of enduring misfortune, suffering, etc. without complaint"

▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Judas goat & golden calf...

▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

turning into human and achieving a singularity

Singularity implies delineation...turning implies putting the beginning and end of a line together to shape a circle. Nature delineates; few shape artificial circles to confine many mentally (logic) and physically (reason).

Dont get mad with the lil joke

All good.

▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

black people cannot be racist

Race/radix - "to radiate" implies each ray of light. Black implies the absence of light. Thanks to that contradiction...black people cannot be racist.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

anyone referring to

To refer implies "tracing back to first cause/origin" which contradicts the procession of each off-spring being brought forth from cause into effect.

abortion is murder

Murder (taking a life) contradicts abortion (miscarrying a life) because birth implies carrying being from taking (intercourse) towards giving (offspring).

▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

debating

Aka reasoning.

a retarded waste of time

One cannot retard (delay) time...it's holding onto suggested measurements of time which delays ones perception while laying one to waste.

an argument they can't win

a) Win vs lose implies ones mind confined to a circle (logic); which turns into arguments against another (reason).

b) Argue; verb - "to make reasoned statements to prove or refute a proposition"...only nature proposes being; which cannot be proven or refuted without ignoring nature. Few propose artifice to tempt many into argumentation against each other while ignoring nature.

at least avoid losing

Only during loss (inception towards death) can there be growth (life)...few suggest argumentation to trick many into avoidance of natural for artificial.

Both sides of argumentation represents loss. A boxing match represents loser vs loser while permitting a 3rd party outside the ring to declare the winner.

declaring your entire position

Only within entire (cause) can each particular (effect) have a position...argumentation about position is designed to distract effect from cause.

flipping the table

Flipping logic (circular thinking) and reason (circular argumentation) doesn't get one out of circular confinement.

losing a board game.

Game implies gambling aka ignoring given choice by taking a chance.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Cant serve two masters.

If choice holds onto either side it becomes a servant to two masters. Only motion > balance > choice represents master setting one free from servitude to one another.

An unstable mind is chaotic

Chaos/khaos/ghieh - "to be wide open"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/*ghieh-

Only within the natural order (inception towards death) can chaos (life) come into being, hence balance (stable) generating choice (unstable). Few tempt many into imbalance by suggesting the inversion...order out of chaos instead of chaos within order.

Know your worth and purpose

Pur (forth) pose (to put) hence value (all perceivable) putting forth evaluation (each ones perception). Few tempt many with suggested value (currency) to ignore perceivable value (current)...which when held onto becomes worthless "debt/dead".

Look up not down

Nature sets up/down (balance) apart for each being in-between (choice)...choosing to look/lock onto either side imbalances a beings choice.

This is what happens if one looks up and not down... https://rainydaypoems.com/poems-for-kids/classic-poems-for-kids/the-story-of-johnny-head-in-the-air-by-heinrich-hoffman/

Little dog inverts big God if ones stumbles, and the river refers to the current of the natural order moving life from inception towards death. Falling into it only disturbs the fish temporarily... notice also who and what Heinrich Hoffmann was?

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

jews Are Pushing Both Immigration Sides...

...because gentiles ignore that nature simultaneously pushes (inception) and pulls (death) migration of being (life). Ignorance of the natural process represents a revolutionary mindset within gentiles, which a jew disguises as immigration vs remigration.

▲ 1 ▼
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Free will is...

...missing OF CHOICE

You are free to go to hell

Choosing heaven or hell binds free will of choice. God sets choice free in-between...if one chooses either SIDE; then one loses SIGHT of God given while binding self.

▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

in the beginning was the verb

a) BE (being) GIN/GEN (generation)...the word "begin" tempts one to put the effect before the cause. It's an inversion.

b) IN (within) THE (theos)...only within God can there be a beginning (inception) and end (death) for each being (life).

c) Notice that the quote "in the beginning" is from GEN-esis...not BE-GENesis.

Words have power

Aka the consent by the LETTER who LETS another shape words. This transfer of power aka authoritative sanction is called fiat aka "LET it be done".

Sound represents the natural current; words represents fiat currency...if consented to.

hope you are in good intent

Hope vs fear + good vs bad distract from natural intent ...nature delineates; conflict encircles, hence versus/verto - "to turn".

Free will of choice cannot incline towards either side (hope or fear; good or bad) without binding itself.

▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sound implies cause; instrument implies effect...words imply affect. The articulation of words within natural sound represents witchcraft aka spellcraft.

▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

meaning dictionary symbolic

Affect

pattern recognition

Cause > effect

There can be only one pattern/patron/pater - "father".

▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

a) Your mind represents the story/store (memory) for anything suggested by another.

b) Michelin/michael aka mikha-el - "who is like God?"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/Michael

God implies sameness; being within God implies differential..."likeness" represents witchcraft used by few to equalize differences among many.

Cause (god) > effect (being) > affect (witchcraft)

▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Witchcraft brews affection to distract from cause > effect. Affect implies synthesis; effect implies analysis...Primate98 used former; Ndvdmm asked for latter.

▲ 2 ▼
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

properties of the pentagram

Each being represents a property of all nature...a penta (five) gram (that which is written or marked) distracts each being from ONEs self discernment.

Plurality (penta-gram) confines the mind of singularity (being) if consented to.

the other regular "-grams."

Regular/reg - "to move in a straight line"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/regular implies all of nature moving each being (life) within a straight line (inception towards death) aka delineation of essence from one another.

Gram - "that which is written or marked"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/-gram confuses ones delineation by alignment with one another, while permitting another to regulate one.

some collection of...mathematics

Few suggest math-a-magic to collectivize many together, which distracts each from being set apart from ONE another. Nature implies singularity adding (inception); subtracting (death); dividing (life) each being for multiplication (intercourse) with one another.

Counting another one as two makes one accountable to another one.

The most common item (honestly the only one I see)

Item/idem - "the same"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/item Nature implies the same process differentiating each being from one another. Few distract many from that with likeness into common-sense aka a hivemind of collective consciousness.

To see implies each ones sight...which cannot be the same (perceivable); only different from one another (perception) or alike one another (suggestion).

non integer

Only a fraction (perception) within whole (perceivable) can be IN (within) TEGER (to touch) hence being able to touch one another. Few utilize suggestion to tempt each fractions consent into a consensus held together with one another.

This touching one another without letting go, while being (life) within a moving nature (inception towards death) establishes friction, which grinds each integer into a non-integer.

square root

Ones perception in-between left/right + up/down + front/back implies the square rooted within all perceivable...consenting to any suggestion by another establishes circular thinking (logic); which turns into conflict (reason) against one another.

That's how few confine square within a circle drawn by a com (together) pass (to move forward).

Pythagoras

Ignoring ones SIGHT in-between perceivable by holding onto either SIDE suggested permits another to triangulate.

One (life) cannot perceive sides (inception/death) while being transferred in-between...

proof...

...is within (life) the putting (inception towards death).

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›