You are looking at Tokyo; Japan through the lens of Mike Krieger and Kevin Systrom, who suggest an instant telegram (insta-gram) which isn't instant, but distorted by jewish algorithms promoting tikkun olam (repairing the world by mixing together).

the first victim

Daniel (God is my judge) from Dan (he who judges)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/Daniel

"Judge not, that ye be not judged"...hence judgement (a judging mind) representing the first victim of a judgemental being.

cause of death...stab wounds.

From a box-cutter?

According to the 9/11 Commission Report, Lewin was stabbed...flight attendants reported that Lewin's throat was slashed

Commission report overrules flight attendant...

Knowledge Reigns Supreme Over Nearly Everyone

If being implies as supreme within the reign of knowledge, then that goes OVER nearly everyone who chooses to seek UNDER-standing from one another.

Only the one who discerns self as supreme (matter) within the reign (momentum) of knowledge (motion) exists in-between aka "as above/so below".

If I would use the name "KRS ONE", then I would add another ONE to oneself, hence binding ones free will of choice to another one. KRS implies each one...any additional "one" tempts one to ignore that.

KRS - KRIS -CHRIST - "anointed one" implies separation of one from one another by unction (within oil), hence each off-spring coming through the birth-channel aka from oil/all into one.

Any words used to describe, are distracting from how sound moves. Words represent an artificial inscription within the mind/memory of those who ignore that nature moves sound through each in-stru-mental being.

Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see... https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2062996/ aka creatio ex nihilo... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creatio_ex_nihilo

Edit: RHYME; noun - "agreement in terminal sounds of words or metrical lines"...sound doesn't rhyme; beings within sound agreeing about words rhyme. Rhyming implies mirroring aka a miracle for the eye of the beholder aka a looking glass for the spectator.

If you had the choice...

Asking AI a question implies by ones choice, which in return permits others to utilize artifice to shape choices. Realizing this makes it irrelevant what "gronk" says in response.

In this example...ones choice asking about vaccination implies ones willing consent to suggested vaccination. Consent implies both agreement and disagreement, because the resulting conflict of reason (agree vs disagree) holds both sides together.

Since consent in nature was already given; AI can then be used to artificially supply more choices to those who ignore natural choice.

conscious

Con (together) scious (to perceive)...being able to perceive implies a separation of each ones perception (form) within all perceivable (flow).

The trick...others suggest CON to distract from self discernment. Breathing implies each formed partials adaptation to whole flowing through one...add a CON and it becomes a con-spiracy, from spirit/spiro - "to breathe".

KRS ONE

Aka KRS/KRIS/CHRIST...the anointed one, hence Knowledge (motion) Reigns (momentum) Supreme (matter).

Bonus: "sound of the police; sound of the beast"...sound/sanus - "entire; whole; all" + and police/polis - "ones city; center", which implies be (being) ast (astute) aka being able to discern self.

"You can't stand where I stand, you can't walk where I walk"...because all separates each one from one another.

it must be restricted

Nature frees; artifice restricts. Attempting to further restrict artifice binds one into artificial restrictions.

unable to reach

Reaching implies towards outcome, while ignoring that origin enables being.

created purpose

Pur (forth) pose (position) implies ones position as matter (life) put forwards within motion (inception towards death)....not a creation out of nothing, but a transformation within everything.

rising up based on history

History implies a suggested story by a jew aimed at storage by consenting gentiles...the more one stores, the less one can rise up against another. Why? Self imposed burden.

Memory isn't there for storage, but for processing of moving input.

They call themselves...but they cannot and will not change their very core.

Answering a suggested call tempts one to ignore perceivable change. Being implies core (life) of change (inception towards death). Holding onto a suggested call hardens the core (hard-core) inwards, while making it malleable (soft-core) outwards.

For example...a call for an uprising tempts those who answer to follow a leader towards outcome. In nature one can only rise (life) by resisting origin (inception towards death). The less one resists, the easier for others to tempt one.

what other force can condition human beings to accept

Balance (inception/death) forces choice (life) through each being. A jew suggests constitutionalism to tempt consenting gentiles into a conflict of reason (accept vs deny) aka into imbalance of choice.

Force/fortia aka FORwards (inception towards death) potenTIA (life)... "may the force be with(in) you"

• SEM - "one together with"... https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=sem

All (perceivable) separates each one (perception) from one another...each jew tempts gentiles together, hence establishing the "sum of all things" aka tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together).

Anyone resisting being as-SEM-bled represents an anti-SEM-ite.

Or as John D. Rockefeller said it: "Competition is a sin" (for a chosen one)...

script

A script implies a suggested "outline, being implies ones perception within perceivable line, hence ones life being moved from inception towards death...a life-line.

question

A quest-ion implies towards suggested outcome, hence tempting one to seek an answer. Being implies ones perception reacting to perceivable origin aka ion (action).

A suggested QUEST tempts one to ignore perceivable ION...no one else can supply an answer to revert ones own ignorance.

person

Aka per (by) sonos (sound) implies each in-stru-mental reaction by and within sound...not to words (fiction) shaped within sound (reality).

who

Who implies "what person". If person implies by sound (per sonos), then what else could one come into being by?

AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee)

a) America/amerigo/amalrich - "work ruler" implies the rule (momentum) of work (motion) for each worker (matter) within.

b) Israel/yisra'el - "he that striveth with god" implies each worker (life) resisting the rule (inception towards death) of work aka ones struggle to sustain self by needing to resist wanted temptation.

c) Public (plural) implies the inversion of person (singular) aka few tempting many together to distract each from being a part within whole.

d) Affair/adfacere - "towards making" implies the inversion of being (life) forwarded (inception towards death). Suggested make/macian/mag - "to knead, fashion, fit" aka magic is utilized by few to knead many together.

c) Committee/committere - "thrown together" implies the inversion of being (life) thrown (inception towards death) apart from one another.

Here's a sleight of hand by Magic Affair (jewish btw)... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wgAKnsO6N-s + https://genius.com/Magic-affair-omen-iii-lyrics

doesn't look as much like...kinda though

Looking implies locking onto what others are suggesting...doing that flips ones different perception into an "alike; kinda" view of the world.

when i flip

a) Others already flipped your perception with their suggestion. A brand leaves a mark, right?

b) What happens when you flip carbon (6 Protons, 6 Neutrons, 6 Electrons)? Could forwarded (proto) choice (elect) be neutralized (neutro)?

the camera man

His name was Tyrone... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HiqD45gp1hY

a) https://img.gvid.tv/i/2vjHvJVa.jpg

b) Nature doesn't pause...refreshment requires ones adaptation to being moved.

Gold; a symbol of malleability aka being (life) shaped or stretched by pressure (inception towards death)...holding onto suggested symbol-ism makes one malleable by others.

I don't have it anymore...

You took the suggested symbol-ism by giving consent...a net loss. Why? Because perceivable current moves suggested currency out of ones hands...always.

Remember your gold-chains? Think about the implication of the symbolism...setting oneself free by taking possession of gold; in the shape of binding chains.

That's what a jew jerks off to...gentiles showing off gold-chains aka contradictions in terms aka naked ignorance.

Replace direct (perceivable) nosis (perception) with dogma (suggestion)

Only ones consent to suggested dogma can distort ones place as perceiving nosis within the direction of perceivable.

Disrupt natural balance

By tempting choice to hold onto a suggested side.

Introduce the illusion of time

By suggesting past and future to distract ones "presence" from perceivable now.

Trap them in linear thinking instead of cyclical awareness

Linear sets ones perception free within all perceivable, while circular logic conceals ones mind inwards, while turning outwards thoughts into conflicts of reason against others.

turn them against themselves

Aka circular logic within self turning into conflicts of reason against each other.

prisoners without walls

Ignorance of perceivable becomes the wall of ignorance within oneself, hence a prison within mind aka im-prison-ment.

Sleight of hand... https://genius.com/Serj-tankian-empty-walls-lyrics

• Your empty walls
• Pretentious attention
• Dismissive apprehension
• From the confines of our mind

weaponize fear

Aka tempting ones weapon of choice to choose suggested outcome (fear) over perceivable origin (courage/cor/heart)...fear is the mind-killer.

create artificial

Suggested creationism (out of nothing) distracts one from perceivable transformation (within everything). Ones consent to suggested -isms establishes artificial within ones mind, while one ignore natural.

so that they never see who's really in charge

Being implies within (life) charge (inception towards death)...which when adapted to allows each being to re-charge.

make them police each other

Aka "I'm just following orders"...a suggested inversion of being resistance (life) within natural order (inception towards death). A followers always attempts to put others into "line", hence into the life-line aka the process of dying within which each life resists the bla;bla;bla of each other...

Temporal shapes (life) within ongoing line (inception towards death)... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g6t8g6ka4W0

enforcing their own oppression

While being within (perception) force (perceivable)...consenting to hold onto suggestions oppresses ones expressions, while permitting others to suppress one.

harvest their energy

Energy; noun - "force of expression" aka expressed (life) force (inception towards death)...given freely by consent to suggesting harvesters.

totally disconnected

Connecting to suggested tempts each ones dis-connected perception to ignore the totality of all perceivable.

keep the suffering cycle going

Aka feeding suggested information to ones consenting "circular logic", which continues to turn into conflicts of reason against others.

Suffer; verb - "allow to occur or continue, refrain from hindering, fail to prevent" aka giving consent to suggested temptations. Thy suffer/supper is served...

vibrate in terror

Fear (terror) of outcome implies apprehension aka taking hold of and thereby compressing within self, which within an ongoing process shapes vibration, which reduces form to flow quicker. Vibra/weip - "to turn"...hence the cycle of self imposed suffering.

distracted from their own power

Consenting to a suggestion makes ones potential perception remotely controlled by another.

The more suggested one takes on, the more ones lack of power makes it feel like as if: "It's getting, it's getting, it's getting kinda heavy"... https://genius.com/Snap-the-power-lyrics And of course only ones own power can SNAP one out of it.

destroy all alternatives, and make them afraid of freedom

DOM (inception towards death) alternates FREE (life)...suggested liberty tempts the consenting ones free will of choice to self subjugate alternation.

Anything suggested tempts ones consenting mind towards outcome aka towards death of life aka towards fear.

it's not about chains...it's about consent

Consent binds ones free will of choice to the suggested chains of others. Nature doesn't require consent...it forces adaptation by free will of choice.

Consent implies "send together"...being implies send (inception towards death) apart (life) from one another.

they give you choices...

...which are given consent to by ones FREE will of choice, which after given consent becomes bound to a chosen ones suggestion.

tl;dr: It's said to never judge a book by its cover, but..."that dude looks like a lady"...

how could you fix that

Motion (inception towards death) opens matter (life)...few trick many to "fix" matter, while ignoring that motion cannot be fixed. Few call this "tikkun olam" aka repairing the world by bringing together.

bulldoze shit over

a) Which conceals the issue under, while ignoring that nature reveals all (perceivable) through each one (perception).

b) One can put the bull to doze for a while, but nature utilizes Aries to spring Taurus back to life...

salt around

Coming into being through the birth-channel implies anointment aka a salty seed passing through oily soil...a straight passage.

how it's not a "closed" circle

A circle implies a shape. Only within motion can matter be shaped, which implies a beginning (inception) and end (death) for each shape (life) in-between.

As long as there's a shape (matter) so long are begging and end open (motion), thereby enabling shaping.

Sleight of hand for the open circle...ouroboros eating its own tail. As long as one eats; one is open to consumption.

Another example...perceivable moves straight through ones perception, hence opening up free thought. Consenting to a suggestion establishes circular reasoning, hence closing off ones thoughts aka eating oneself.

in essence

Aka within (in) being (esse). Ones consent to a suggestion implies a "symbolic opening", which in return represents a GATE, closing ones perception from the WAY of perceivable.

invoking and contacting entities

Aka to invoke (suggested) by contact (consent)...a contract among entities.

Leading researchers join

A lead sets itself apart...followers join together.

AI is pushing

If AI pushes, then why does it require input? What if only nature pushes (inception towards death) to shove (life)?

big ideas

Ones consent to suggested ideal-ism positions one under another, hence into a smaller position than those "big" ideas.

participants + moderator

Only within whole can there be participants, and being a part within whole implies a separation from one another.

Moderate/moderatus - "within bounds" implies a moderator binding the free will of choice of participants...if consent is given.

Read our Minds

a) Others wrote the words ones mind/memory holds onto, which in return permits others to also read from without what can be shaped within.

b) Words represent a controlled en-viro-ment aka mind (ment) within (in) circle (viro/viron) aka circular logic.

c) Ask yourself about the nature of reading and writing without words suggested by others...

Read implies "put in order"; write implies "set forth as an author"...so what if nature puts authors (life) into order (inception towards death)? Could there be such a process without words to describe it?

if you believe this...

a) Believing implies ones consent holding onto the suggestion of another aka ones willing submission to "stand-under" another aka understanding (Latin intelligo).

b) If implies then...the foundation of implication. To believe implies holding onto a side, while reasoning against the other. Reason contradicts implication.

you should be asking yourself

Ask and ye shall receive...yet, where does the answer come from? Ones consent makes one the recipient of suggested answers by others, for which one ignores being the responding incipient (perception) within origin (perceivable).

it is not genetics

Gen implies generation...nothing implies ones de-nial (nihilo; nothing) of being (life) generated (inception towards death).

Tracing ones "genetics" implies as the generated reactor (perception) within the generator (perceivable) of nature, yet ones consent to suggested "genetic-ism" by another; positions the other in-between ones perception and all perceivable.

Few suggest organ-ism and heredit-ism to tempt many to give consent to artificial -ism, while ignoring natural origin.

If one gives consent to a suggested word, then one denies perceivable sound. Sound generates in-stru-ments, words permit others to play them, hence becoming conductors (jew) of orchestras (gentiles).

It is disputed whether Marx was a Freemason

Carl/karl/ceorl - "bondsman; common man, man of low birth; freeman" aka marking (marx) the freeman (carl). It's applied freemasonry.

A mason of free (will of choice) utilizes suggested information as bricks and consent gained as mortar to build walls of ignorance within others.

in that Fantasia movie

When the apprentice (perception) ignores the source (perceivable), then magic (suggested) gets a life on its own.

to prove spiritual

Proving implies "making credible" aka tempting ones creed to hold onto the suggested proof, while ignoring that spiritual implies "animated".

Being alive implies being (life) animated (inception towards death), hence proof to be found only in the pudding/putting.

harmless

Only during harm (inception towards death) can there be peace/piece (life)...reasoning (more vs less) tempts one to ignore that.

a pact with a negative entity, you can't see, that moves the matter

a) Consenting to a suggestion implies entering a pact among entities, which in return prevents the consenting entity to see perceivable.

b) Ignoring perceivable by holding onto suggested prevents ones self discernment of being matter (life) within motion (inception towards death).

c) Those who consent (agree or disagree) to a suggestion put themselves into a conflict of reason (agree vs disagree), which those who suggest are permitted to rebrand into for example...positive vs negative.

how magicians do that

Suggestion tempts ignorance of perception. Consenting to a suggestion makes the magic happen, hence establishing a fictitious happen-stance within ignored reality, which is being shaped by those who suggest it.

One cannot be a magician until another consents to ones suggestion.

Ford published rather than wrote The International Jew, which was not written in his voice but was written primarily by his secretary.

"God published rather than wrote The Ten Commandments, which was not written in his voice but was written primarily by Moses"...just blurring the point of mosaic law, right?

globetrotting like Herzl

The wandering jew...

You missed a bunch...Alfred Binet + Théodore Simon aka founders of the Binet-Simon Intelligence Test, which William Stern latter coined "Intelligenzquotient" (IQ).

Meanwhile in reality...intelligence/intelligio - "to understand" implies ones consent to stand under those who suggest a test of mind (test-a-ment). As for quotient/quoties - "how often"...as often as consent is given to suggestion.

Edit: Invent/inventio aka coming towards (inception towards death) being within (life), hence the sleight of hand...necessity (motion) is the mother (momentum) of invention (matter).