1
etcH_ 1 point ago +1 / -0

This was an interesting watch, thanks

3
etcH_ 3 points ago +3 / -0

While this is true, there are laws and new rules and cultural norms being currently fought around the identity of trannies, so the trannie problem doesn't just disappear if you stop consuming the news surrounding them, nor does it become any less of a problem to society at large.

3
etcH_ 3 points ago +3 / -0

You just speak your mind and share information (with words) while watching the news with them. Low and behold, slowly over time, 'conspiracy theories' that you've been stating that were scoffed at, slowly get admitted or alluded to by the MSM, and you get to have your little 'well, would you look at that, they're finally catching up' (instead of i told you so)

2
etcH_ 2 points ago +2 / -0

If the date titles (eg October 25, 2019) already have a specific day are they assumed to be correct and don't need touching?
and is it just the "october 2019" and "january 2020" sections that need specific dates added?

Another question, october 25, 2019 "Scientists Were Hunting for the Next Ebola. Now the U.S. Has Cut Off Their Funding."
It has the same archive link twice, intentional?

1
etcH_ 1 point ago +1 / -0

I watched it. Its not a response in any fashion to anything I've said, and your responses show such a level of disingenuity I understand why people brand you as a shill and don't engage further. Disappointing

0
etcH_ 0 points ago +1 / -1

What does the video prove or convey that the original photo of yours, and the three photos in my image, don't?
You wouldn't care if I showed you video of a boat with the bottom part being invisible, but once you zoom in enough, the bottom reappears, so what difference does it make?
And again, I never asked you to comment on the picture. That is just for curious and inquisitive eyes, who are looking for answers or responses to your original proposition.
Downvoting these comments is weak btw.

1
etcH_ 1 point ago +2 / -1

Or just ignore all the words and look at the 3 images that convey how your picture doesn't convey what you think it conveys.
And besides the picture, which I never asked you to comment on, I asked questions in my other comment, the image is nothing more than an aside that you can freely ignore and disparage at your leisure.

2
etcH_ 2 points ago +3 / -1

Dolt, you are obviously very contrarian, question, why does attempting to btfo flat earthers interest you?
Do you think their views are harmful?
Are you unaware of how flat earthers would response and 'debunk'/dispute this picture (and the framing)?
Do you think this picture is some kind of slam dunk proof?
Is the aim just to cause pointless discussion on what you deem an irrelevant topic?
Help me out here, clue me in to your thinking, I'd appreciate it.

Here is an appropriate retort/'debunk' picture;
https://ibb.co/z47ysTj

2
etcH_ 2 points ago +2 / -0

What are the french words? What is the video meant to be showing me? All I got was when they sat down, they "manspreaded" is that it? or did I miss stuff.

1
etcH_ 1 point ago +1 / -0

You kind of have to choose between one or the other when making a point, otherwise it's near impossible to converse with someone

3
etcH_ 3 points ago +3 / -0

How do you rationalise the 8inches per mile squared drop-off due to curvature, and the subsequent many tests of people sighting objects that were present (buildings) or that they placed (light sources) or in some instances lasers, over distances that should presumably be curved, according to the globe model

1
etcH_ 1 point ago +1 / -0

I already see everything through the dualistic mind set, so it's not so much that I need a reminder to get into a certain mindset of engaging with need and getting rid of want. It's all just an act, a play, so why not play a few little roles, have a dance here or there.

6
etcH_ 6 points ago +6 / -0

Mate, if you think I'm a bot and not just a regular human being who isn't wholly convinced one way or the other, but that finds the dialog, topic and general conversation interesting, then maybe you've gone too far down the rabbit hole. Don't get me wrong, there are obviously a lot of bots on the internet, but your quippy dismissive 1 liners are far more bot-like than this response or my response above.

8
etcH_ 8 points ago +9 / -1

https://youtu.be/Q1m-nNAZqZw?list=PLimb_UpOKm97RBTHJ_ehaz2W-wNOnTkrl

Learning about 8 inches per mile squared of drop/curvature really fucked me up, how can I see things that I shouldn't be able to see on a curved surface, and no, refraction doesn't make up all the missing drop, or at least I haven't been convinced as such.

That being said, I don't know where I stand, I know NASA produces almost exclusively bullshit, photoshops, greenscreens etc - So I know that I can't trust them with much certainty. However, the 'flat earth' community, or any opinion that doesn't have to go through some kind of vetting/authoritative body is also hugely open to just being wrong or incorrect in any number of ways.

1
etcH_ 1 point ago +1 / -0
  • though of course not necessarily perfect. What are your takes on any part of this? i am too ignorant to know better, but interested enough to want to hear different takes and challenge my thinking.
by nanobot
1
etcH_ 1 point ago +1 / -0

What does phonewalled mean, like it's only for phones? If that - telegram.org, there is a desktop app. But even then, you could download the videos from either and just copy it across. Maybe i've guessed wrong at what phonewalled means

by nanobot
2
etcH_ 2 points ago +2 / -0

https://t.me/The_Greatest_Story_NEVER_Told All here on this telegram channel, though it is split up into parts

by qbqb
1
etcH_ 1 point ago +1 / -0

boo discord

1
etcH_ 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do you think there is no relationship at all? Or just that sat fats (or lack there of, in this case) have a larger impact?

view more: Next ›