2
cyberrigger 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have a picture of bigfoot and elvis

1
cyberrigger 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am still on the fence.

I have factored out things to make the landing possible

I have factored out things to make the hoax possible

It still comes down to the skill required to make the final approach and landing possible with what NASA had at the time.

Here's the rub --- It would be easy to simulate. The (easy version) simulators I have tried are next to impossible. I am a pilot. I have test flown experimental (never been built before) home-brew aircraft. I have landed some with control reversal. I consider myself an amateur test pilot.

...but fuck -- the lunar seat-of-your-pants landing is hard for me to believe.

So --- I present the Neil Armstrong lunar lander challenge --- still no takers

-1
cyberrigger -1 points ago +1 / -2

The simulators today are way advance to what Neil Armstrong had.

What is your point?

and you're calling people retarded?

Just prove it is do-able.

-2
cyberrigger -2 points ago +1 / -3

Recreate Neil Armstrong's landing.

None of the pussies complaining here will try it.

1
cyberrigger 1 point ago +2 / -1

Now, flying is translating

One has air resistance lift/drag/turbulence.

Will a parachute open in a vacuum?

Can you autorotate a lunar lander?

1
cyberrigger 1 point ago +2 / -1

OH GOD -- you should blow Neil Armstrong out of the window with this advantage that he did not have.

1
cyberrigger 1 point ago +2 / -1

The lunar lander was not flying --- no dihedral stability, no terminal velocity limit

It was translating --- not flying.

1
cyberrigger 1 point ago +3 / -2

Have you ever landed a real plane?

The lunar lander used no computers.

I think you maybe just do not understand just how robust the craft was and the suits.

The "suits" don't enter into it.

I am a pilot and have landed planes over 50 years.

easy mode craft like that?

You are funny -- go land a real airplane.

GO TRY A LUNAR LANDER

No one has taken this challenge yet.

3
cyberrigger 3 points ago +4 / -1

They think this is bullshit (different they).

1
cyberrigger 1 point ago +1 / -0

He's kind of late to the party.

3
cyberrigger 3 points ago +3 / -0

rubberhose .... different passwords

Shit! I remember tossing this idea around at a Linux users club back in the 90s.

This was when everyone was talking about Steganography.

1
cyberrigger 1 point ago +1 / -0

I like nuclear.

The ugly side is that it can create weapons.

Whatever happened to the non-weaponable thorium reactors?

1
cyberrigger 1 point ago +1 / -0

China needs electric cars to burn coal (150 new coal plants).

China has the lithium, etc. to make the batteries.

The globalists saw an opportunity to force an import,

but without having a grid to make it work --- it's a bullshit scam.

Locals don't have the lithium to compete.

1
cyberrigger 1 point ago +1 / -0

Baltic Pipe maybe?

10
cyberrigger 10 points ago +10 / -0

The purchasing power of the pound is dropping faster than the purchasing power of the dollar is dropping.

2
cyberrigger 2 points ago +2 / -0

The "vaccine" --- at best, triggers immunity to a protein, not the whole virus.

There is no off switch.

The spike protein gets manufactured in places where it shouldn't be.

The virus shows up the next week wearing a different pair of shoes (protein binding site).

2
cyberrigger 2 points ago +2 / -0

IMO Putin seriously put a kink in their plan.

Other countries are following.

Ukraine is a cesspool.

2
cyberrigger 2 points ago +2 / -0

Globalism is not the solution.

Globalism is the problem.

World currency is the problem.

1
cyberrigger 1 point ago +1 / -0

I was using metacrawer which uses green text. Metacrawler allows google ads.

I would do a search. The normal green text would show up. A half a second later it gets replaces by anti-Trump blue text (all google ads made to look like search links). There would be a good 3 pages of anti-Trump fake search links.

uBlockOrigin killed it.

Using the google search engine you wouldn't even notice it.

1
cyberrigger 1 point ago +1 / -0

I didn't see it until I used a different search engine ---- turning on and off an adblocker

It was there, sometimes 3 or more pages of google ads designed to look like search links.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›