by pkvi
▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

99% of code scriptmonkeys write for web and games could be easily written by simple neural network trained on their code.

99% of code on github is scriptmonkey crap. So you could easily deduce what their neural network will produce trained using code from github.

Of course, none of that code should not being wrintten in the first place, but then hardware corporations would had no chance to sell their new hardware. So, bloatware is necessary for their survival, but they don't want to pay scriptmonkey salaries for it.

And as always with anything the "garbage in, garbage out" principle works like a charm.

Really, I'm amased they didn't do that years ago.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Weird you love China so much.

I don't have to love or hate people who are different. It is more than enough for me to understand that difference.

They kinda look down on the Russians.. think they're stupid.

They look down on nobody. They just don't care. All they care about is their own image in their own eyes. Sometimes that could looks for others like looking down, but it is not. Chineese don't have that mostly western concept. You can't be down or up for chineese, you only could be interesting or not. And "interesting" for them is not what "interesting" mean for others.

If you account chineese as people like you with similar motivations you already lose. Just like with jews, niggers, arabs, whatever race or nation you could mistakingly believe "they like you, just another color and form".

Be like "yeah, Russia, go hit that guy... go to war with NATO, we want to see what happens"

Looks more like NATO was pushed to go to war. Long ago and everywhere. Not by China, meanwhile, they just looking how it goes.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Neato.. so you think currency should be tied to cheap plastic junk? Quite the concept.

If the plastic junk took most part of international trade, then yes - plastic junk is most wanted commodity so most valuable. It is pefectly logical to tie the currency to the most wanted and valuable commodity.

I too could imagine they'll need to send their citizens to grow potatoes.

Then imagine that citizens will be perfectly happy to do that.

They went down that forced agricultural road before in the cultural revolution. Millions of people starved. 🤷‍♂️

And survived. And they have billions now. Meanwhile, how that ended eventually? Yes, China took over all world market of consumer goods. And modern people can't live a day without plastic junk. Guess, who have more power over that people?

by DrLeaks
▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't even try to convince anybody, I show others obvious and very simple difference between believing and knowing.

Today, for very clear reasons science posed as something too complex to understand that have to be just believed from the words of those who pose themselves as scientists for public. But science is complete opposite of that. And it is not complex at all. That is why they try to trash the science hard.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

I can exchange a $10 note for "made in America" bag of potatoes.

Good for you. But I'm asking about what I could buy with $10. It will be very strange to buy american potatoes with all that logistics when I could buy local potatoes for roubles without any problems and much cheaper. $10 is useless for me today. So for billions of other people. Why anybody would want to keep something useless? Of coulse they will try to get rid of that useless thing.

Question is about international trade. There is no any sense to use some currency in international trade when currency issuer have nothing to sell for it and at any moment could just deny to accept them back at all.

Whose goods circulate on the international market? So whose currency should be used for trade? Simple as that.

There is no significant amount of USA goods on the market, so there is no any sense to trade in USD.

The Chinese might struggle a bit with that.

They would not. If they will need to, in the worst case they will just order half of their people to go grow potatoes, and that's all. But more probably they will exchange some microwaves and smartphones to potatoes. And they don't need dollars to do it anymore.

by DrLeaks
▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

It is very simple to determine the age of sun (really an age of fusion reaction start), you don't even have to know some complex math to do it.

It is like determining a time when you started a fire in fireplace looking over amounts of charcoal and wood you currently have.

There is a nuclear fusion reaction going on in the star. Lighter elements, starting from simpliest one - hydrogen, assembles into heavier elements. So it will be less hydrogen and more other elements as time pass. Current amount of elements could be determined by observing Sun spectrum. Initial composition could be estimated from interstellar gas composition that did not experience fusion reaction. That's all, no magic or anything murky behind that Sun age estimation. You don't have to believe in it, you could do all the observations and math by yourself.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

BRICers sink everyone that hitches their boat to them.

That's one of the key points of BRICS, is you are still not aware. To make countries who are in to finally get ZERO wealth and commodities nominated in any western currency.

West will be like - "Look at that loosers! They have no dollars! They are obviously bankrupt and defaulted!".

I'm perfectly OK with that. Better to have food, roof and energy than some dollars nobody needs.

As for yuan, rouble, rupee or other fiat currencies, of course they are globalist tools too, but at least you still could exchange them to some real things. Remind me, where I could exchange my last vintage 10 US dollar banknote to something really useful with "Made in USA" engraved on it (and really made in USA, by Americans, receiving salary in same dollars)? Or that banknote usefulness as a mean of exchange, tool for the trade, does not really exist anymore?

by DrLeaks
▲ 6 ▼
CrazyRussian 6 points ago +6 / -0

If you replaced your good old diesel pickup with Tesla, gas stove with fancy inverter induction one, completely rely on services that will crush without electricity, then yes, you will be back in stone age. Even without carrington event, just really serious power outages will be more than enough.

▲ 4 ▼
CrazyRussian 4 points ago +4 / -0

As a one of many ways - use high intensity ultrasound signal modulated with garbage to overload mics of that spy gadgets.

However, I think, best way is a microwave gun. Because damage is nearly instant and irreversible. Unfortunately, affordable microwave gun made from microwave oven parts is not a compact thing, so hardly it could be used stealthly. :)

▲ 4 ▼
CrazyRussian 4 points ago +4 / -0

Nice example of how BigBrother shit could be used against BigBrother worshippers.

▲ 5 ▼
CrazyRussian 5 points ago +5 / -0

Looks like enhanced and more degenerate version of what we had in Russia 10 years ago and was condemned by "civilized world" for. In the same way people who have to do pills doing laws instead, and about things they know nothing about.

In Russia, as usual, nobody give a fuck, and all that crap is mostly on paper, along with every noob knowing how to circumvent any restrictions.

Wish fellow Americans to do the same if that crap will be eventually passed.

One thing looks strange - NWO run tests in Russia before rolling it out to the West. But tests obviously failed. Then why they are trying to do it on the West? Or they just not aware that this failed because corrupted Russian bureacrats falsely reported a full success to their bosses to cover their asses? :)

I began to think that corruption is not that bad all in all.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Everybody have future. The question is only what future. And if you take a look at the past, China is definitely not among those who will have the worst.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

They already solved potential problems with oil, and I think they will solve potential problems with food without much problems. Really, US will be just excluded from equation on the China side. US as a market will be exchanged to the markets of all other countries that will become available as soon as US stop extract wealth from international trade using US dollar as currency. World will buy China goods, China will buy food and resources providing money to others to buy Chineese goods.

From technical side, for China it does not matter, what smartphone to assemble - iPhone, Xiaomi or Huawei or other Chineese brands. For South America, Africa, Russia, India and Middle East does not matter what smartphone to buy iPhone or Chineese brands. But chineese smartphones will be cheaper for buyers and China will get more profit assembling them. There is no any sense for some unknown reason pay a huge part of phone price to US for manufacturing and consuming iPhones. And both parties of that smartphone trade will be wealthier just because US will get nothing.

And don't even begin with IP and patents crap. Nobody cares about that US scam.

So no, China will have enough food oil and jobs. May be even more than they have now.

US is only 300M customers. There are much more in the world, but it is US "dollar tax" that make the world too poor to be as good as 300M US customers. Getting rid of dollar will create much more wealthy customers around the world than this limited 300M US customers. So it is very profitable for the China to destroy US dollar and kick US out of world trade.

by pkvi
▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

OK, started the fire at backyyard fireplace. I know it's a tiny bit of that gigatons, but that's my ivestment into the making the Earth green form pole to pole again. :)

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Imagine the price of garbage bin or a tee cup will cost if something happen with China economy. Then imagine how much any paper assets will fall when everybody will began to sell them to get money to buy stuff they need. And so on.

When your country is not self-sufficient then real things skyrockets and all virtual things plummet if something happens with the source of real things.

Meanwhile China have T-bills too. Guess what they will do if they will need money to fix their economy.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's the same paper shit, no any difference.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you are right, then, I hope you already get rid of any savings nominated in dollars and converted them in something really valuable.

by WoodDoe
▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Adverse reaction databases could show that some batches are deadlier than others, but that does not prove that other batches are safer.

There is additional factor that heavily influence the data in such databases - was it allowed to create a records for adverse effects or not.

If different batches had different ingredients and so different outcomes, it is certainly a factor too.

So you have at least two unknown factors that could interfere with results to produce results you observe.

If we suppose that they know which batches are more harmful beforehand, then why they need multiple different batches at all?

And if they need different batches to find out most harmful, they obviously couldn't know beforehand what batch will be more harmful and couldn't administer them accordingly.

I think they didn't know outcomes, all experiment was about finding them, so average distribution of harmful and not so harmful results among the batches is constant, but in some places it was prohibited to even admit officially a possibility of adverse effects while other places post them into database. Obviously different batches was distibuted to different places.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wait a second. Why does it matter what is approved or not by FDA bribe-takers? FDA (as any other "food safety" state agency) should not have any authority over you in the first place. It does not matter what they approve or not approve. If you delegate the power to decide what is safe for you and what is not to some third party, than you are a slave of that third party.

Enjoy your cup of fresh raw milk right from the cow, honey from neighbour hive and vegetables from your garden and don't give a fuck to that shitty agencies. And if you are not shure what is really in some corporate food - just don't buy it. You don't need any state agency to make the right decision at all.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think it is relevant to understanding what is going on.

How exactly? Please be more specific.

Your logic tells you that you are correct, because you think it "didnt work"

So, what's your point? It did work? How?

You assume you know their objective.

Who told you that? Did you read my TLDR or just saw the word "virus" and triggered? Words "for whatever reason" repeated many times somehow means that I know their objective, or what?

You behave like someone who is cog dis and heard something

Looks like it is you who read something, somehow triggered and trying to switch the topic to some irrelevant issue.

I'm not interested in discussing your topic- which theory, germ or terrain is correct, since it is absolutely irrelevant to the question of my topic. If you are interested in your topic, you are free to create your own post and discuss the question you are interested in.

by WoodDoe
▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Food corporations like to roll out a relatively normal product at first, with normal ingredients, and when people began to buy it silently replace normal ingredients with chemistry.

Also such things happens when manufacturer tries to keep the same price in times of inflation. Replacing pork and beef in sausages to chicken, shugar with sweeteners, natural juice with artificial flavorings and so on.

If manufacturer is old and had stable quality for years, it is a second case - hiding inflation. There still stocks of normal product in your grocery, but already new batch in town you visited.

If you like that candies, fill your stocks with candies from your town, because very soon they will be replaced with new batches with aspartam.

by WoodDoe
▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Could it be that based states just reported more about injuries and woke states hide numbers of injured?

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

You are absolutely right, I just didn't get into much details for simplicity. Of course it will be sane to throw out sequences that express nothing on assays to cut down the number of sequences to test.

From the other side, shortest known RNA that encodes protein is 7 codons long (don't remember does it include start/stop or not). So it is combination of 22 aminoacids in group of 7 when order is improtant and with allowed repetitions. It is 22 power 7 or nearly 2.5 billion. So technically even raw human bruteforce is possible.

With optimisations you describe, much larger sequences, so more complex proteins or even proteins groups could be bruteforced.

Thank you.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

where do you get the idea Zuckerberg worked on lifelog pre-facebook?

Where did you get that I get an idea that Zuckerberg worked on lifelog pre-facebook?

DARPA launched tender on the surveillance project with internal name LifeLog. Zuckerberg applied, obviously before June 23, 2003, with his proposal. DARPA choose Zuckerberg proposal. Zuckerberg get financing from DARPA and began to implement his proposal. Zuckerberg launch Facebook on February 4, 2004. No any contradictions at all. Everything is sequential and pretty logical.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›