Watching latest Redacted where their guest told about faked self-conducted studies by BigPharma of their own mRNA vaccines to pass fake approvement process to show that all formalities passed, I think out yet another theory of what that mRNA vaccines really could be. May be too long, but I'll try to explain everything.
Shortly, the girl told that in that tests they had to show, that there are no any other proteins, except spike protein of alleged SARS-CoV-2 virus produced after cell will make protein according to the artificial RNA sequence in vaccine. Of course they failed to do that and even in their faked study you could see the traces of proof that there definitely some other proteins was produced.
What if all that vaccinehoax was not about money and even not about killing people instead of failed virus?
Imagine a group of insane globalists that dream about ultimate bioweapon they need for whatever goal.
Imagine scientists who are ready to serve that globalists for cookies.
Globalists are limited by their IQ. Scientists are limited by their knowledge.
So, globalists order scientists to create a modern time plague. Scientists running gain-of-function experiments trying to make harmful virus, as obvious straight-forward way. But scientists are limited with knowledge, and they don't know what combination of proteins in virus would be optimal for the task and main thing - they don't know how to write a RNA code to get desired result.
Time goes, and globalists, for whatever reason began to hurry scientists about result. Scientists got nothing and all they could give out is barely working SARS-CoV-2 or even just a computer model of it.
Globalists, who already prepared everything for their harmful virus understand that they are fucked. Virus does not work as they expected (or not even exists if you wish), so they press scientists hard about what the fuck, and what they need to fucking finish their fucking job they was paid for.
Scientists eventually override dumbness of globalists and explain them, that they don't know how all that RNA-proteine stuff works so they have to randomly replace some sequences in RNA in the hope they eventually hit the target.
Imagine a JPEG picture of a cat compressed to the size of few kilobytes. You have a very slow decoder that show JPEG picture, but have no encoder. You have no any idea how to compress pictures into JPEG, but want a JPEG picture of a dog for whatever proposes. You hire scientists and pay them to solve your problem.
Scientists try to replace some parts of example JPEG with cat to see if that change something to get a picture of something they could pose as a dog (gain of function research). They slowly get some results, mostly broken files and few pictures with garbage. They could spend thousands of years before they eventually get something resembling the dog working that way tossing bytes of JPEG picture.
How globalists could help scientists to create that picture of the dog they need?
Exactly - they could do a massive bruteforce using people they rule to decode all possible JPEG byte sequences produced by scientists in billions at once and then pick one that produces a picture of the dog they need.
So, you see where it comes.
Globalists who failed to get a virus from gain-of-function research was told by scientists that they need a massive bruteforce attack on the problem. They could create all possible mRNA sequences, pose them as vaccines, globalists will mandate vaccines and scientists will have at least few billions of human mRNA decoders that will produce proteins and instantly check produced proteins for properties globalists look for. It will be easy to sort out interesting results, because all interesting results will eventually fall into hands of medics globalists control. Knowing batch number it will be easy to find desired RNA sequence.
Looks like that theory explains absolutely everything in coronahoax/vaccinehoax - failed virus with faked "pandemic", untested vaccines, that stupid boosters (they didn't get satisfying result in first run, too many RNA combinations to test, so they have to continue), even batch numbers with different results, huge variety of side effects and even not banning VAERS and other similar vaccine adverse effects databases filled with results of that enormous bruteforce attack on the finding necessary sequence.
Humanity was used by globalists as a giant parallel RNA decoder to find a RNA sequence that will produce something they need. So all that coronashit is just an imtermediate operation done in a hurry to get some component vitally necessary for them to finally complete whatever globalists promised to do to their masters. Did they failed or not? Did we win? Did we lose? I don't know. But that's the story I have for now.
I'm done. Enjoy. :)
PS: Of course, if you have some thougts or examples that will disprove that theory, I'm all ears, as usual.
Redacted is fake. Ex Fox, trained in Virginia, shady businessman. Came out of nowhere. Guy glows. Anyone still on YT you should be really careful of.
They could easily do a actual super potent pathogen
I believe you are on the right path but all the data collection is teaching the AI/Neuralink how to interact seamlessly with the biological self. I believe this data capture is being stored through some sort of blockchain tech.
You’re… surprisingly correct on all counts.
Not surprising everyone is having all sorts of medical issues if they have a working computer in them. There may be some mind control going on as well.
There is. To make an immense field of study into a short summary: it’s Optogenetics. Mind control via ultrablue light, (re)discovered by Karl Deiserroth and given to the DoD/Google in 2015 (the EU’s “Year of the Light”). It requires a full two-shot CRISPR gene therapy for it to work.
If you go down the rabbit hole of Gain of Function / Optogenetics / Neuromodulation / RTOS platforms, my only advice is to use Yandex, and get ready to never trust light sources ever again.
I know and I don't really care while they have interesting info and guests. I also like his English, pretty clean and understandable. Meanwhile they present most interesting info on Rumble, because YT banned them few times. Clayton also a friend of Tucker Carlson, who also not a saint. I care about information, not about who bring it.
No, they obviously can't. Having all the money on the earth does not make you omnipotent.
AI does not exist, thing they name "AI" is a very dumb and very simple ANN which is just a system of equations. There is no any intelligence in that dumb thing and never will be.
Neuralink have same problem - they do not know how to encode or decode information in brain encoding.
Why not, because they haven't? Releasing a super deadly pathogen is like sending a nuclear bomb. You are eventually just killing yourself and those around you. If they had the tech to release HIV in the 80's imagine what hey have now.
You should look into CERN and what they are doing in terms of communicating with an entity. Pair that with what Harari is saying and what Elon Musk is doing you get a clearer picture.
A couple of things:
I suspect PHMG in sanitizers or something like phosgen in public places.. At least they have symptoms of poisoning very similar to sympthoms we was told was observed in severe cases - lack of oxygenation, liquid in lungs, destroyed lungs tissue.
Optimisation by brute-force is a common technique in biological sciences. Methods range from simple random mutagenesis of organisms, to more complex techniques such as phage display. The basis of all is to evolve a phenotype that can be selected using a screen of some kind, often over multiple rounds.
What you are describing using human subjects is not plausible simply because the sampling space when using human subjects is too small. You should calculate the number of possible alternative sequences that could plausibly be assessed using human subjects, and compare to the number of possible sequences encoded in an RNA or peptide. You'll find they don't even come close. For comparison, the number of combinations that can be tested in human subjects (billions at best) would be possible to do in a single tiny experiment using a biochemical assay or similar.
The supposition that the different batches may be used to test somewhat different compounds has been made before and is plausible. The key difference to your ideas is that a small group of candidate variants is being tested in different batches, rather than a largescale brute-force experiment.
You are absolutely right, I just didn't get into much details for simplicity. Of course it will be sane to throw out sequences that express nothing on assays to cut down the number of sequences to test.
From the other side, shortest known RNA that encodes protein is 7 codons long (don't remember does it include start/stop or not). So it is combination of 22 aminoacids in group of 7 when order is improtant and with allowed repetitions. It is 22 power 7 or nearly 2.5 billion. So technically even raw human bruteforce is possible.
With optimisations you describe, much larger sequences, so more complex proteins or even proteins groups could be bruteforced.
This is a pretty interesting idea; I'd suggest that only a few hundred concoctions would be ideal, to learn quite a bit (this would intrinsically be a multivariate test, due to the number of variables in the test subjects, so fewer tests would net more reliable results), assuming quite a bit of computer modeling beforehand.
Viruses are not alive. They are basically chemicals, not living beings. But that does not matter at all in case of above theory.
Do you understand that your question is completely out of scope of that theory? It is absolutely irrelvant here, since their virus approach didn't work. So it does not matter what theory of real ilnesses is correct. There was no real ilness, there was no any real pandemic, so question "what cause illness" just does not matter.
You behave like a person who run into discussion about algorithms of breaking passwords with something about bigfoot.
How exactly? Please be more specific.
So, what's your point? It did work? How?
Who told you that? Did you read my TLDR or just saw the word "virus" and triggered? Words "for whatever reason" repeated many times somehow means that I know their objective, or what?
Looks like it is you who read something, somehow triggered and trying to switch the topic to some irrelevant issue.
I'm not interested in discussing your topic- which theory, germ or terrain is correct, since it is absolutely irrelevant to the question of my topic. If you are interested in your topic, you are free to create your own post and discuss the question you are interested in.
Maybe they used the vaccines to test something like you say but I think this is still one sided view.
We cannot forget about all the other things they did such as lock-downs, social distancing, extended travel restrictions, etc.. This was a much much bigger operation planned years ahead of time with long term goals.
The end goal is to make a new human, a complete slave. One without connections or social safety net. A slave that can be injected, used, abused and discarded as they see fit.
If all they wanted was to test out batches they could have done it without all of this fuss, they could easily promote yearly vaccines or something in a whole a lot of different ways. Maybe you would get a smaller percentage of the population to "volunteer" for it, but still they could get many people to do it and it would be enough.
As I see it, from the point of view of that theory, globalists prepared everything for their pandemic, but scientists failed them, so they didn't want to throw out all their huge preparations and roll out fake pandemic with all that shit obtaining nearly unlimited control over population. Then, they just use that nearly unlimited control over population to force scientists eventually finish their job.
I see it much worse than just implementation of some evil plan of killing/subdueing people or whatever. They just used humanity not even like lab rats, but like laboratory equipment in attempt to achieve their goals.
What if we are wrong in assuming that they in the war with population or account people as their cattle, what if humanity is just a tool for them like mill or printer? It could be interesting to examine their other things like climate change or wokeism from that point of view.
So, do not read it, what's the problem? :)
No, the expression "tldr" is meant to say "give me a short summary of this".
Last paragraph in that TLDR. :)