▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Make a no battery home radio, tune it to an AM band then listen to it with no power source to see how strong AM radio waves are with no amplification. (You should still be able to hear it just fine)

Exactly. That is why idea of using ferromagnetic particle as simpliest possible long-wave receiver to work inside human body could be valid. Such receiver in correct place could create "voices in head". Some occasional proofs that it works was documented in history, f.e. when one subject got teeth stop containing metal powder as filler, he began to hear broadcasts from nearby AM station, received and demodulated by his teeth and then sneaked into nervous system. This created effect of "voices in head".

Also remember AM Radio bands are on the weaker end of the radio spectrum and by law those radio towers have to be at the "Lowest wattage possible to complete the transmission".

Not at all. long/mid-wave AM transmitters have to be very powerful to reach good coverage. Exactly because AM is at the weaker end of spectrum. To deliver noticeable energy to remote receiver you need a lot of power at transmitter. Check wattage of real AM stations of the past.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

The message of the greatest importance is that after the shift, ELECTRICITY WILL NOT WORK. The new Earth polarity will not allow present generators to gather magnetic molecular structures from the ionosphere and then form them into electrons.

All generators now in use does not gather anything from ionosphere to create electrons, AFAIK only one of Tesla proposed devices gathering electricity from atmospheric potential, but it is unable to produce enough current in load to be somehow useable.

All generators we use today use electrons that are already present in wires and stuff naturally, they just force them to move, not create new ones, to make potential difference and so current through the load.

So, pole shift will not affect any existing generators.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

I imagine it would be something transmitted from a cell phone that everyone carries. Or something in the towers.

Good suggestion, but ferromagnetic antennas are not good at receiving anything high-frequency. And gadgets and cell towers does not have antennas suitable for long-wave transmission.

If you want go this way, I'll suggest using power lines as long-wave antennas to interfere with ferromagnetic particles in jabbed people. At least power lines is only existing infrastructure that is more or less suitable for transmitting signals as long-wave antennas.

It will be interesting to check power line voltage for 100kHz-5MHz low frequency noise/signal on top of 50/60 sine wave. AM long-wave signal could be injected in local power lines at local substations.

If there was any suspicious upgrades/repairs on power line substations or appearence of strange equipment on power line poles just before or during coronahoax, it could be interesting to check what exactly was replaced/installed.

I don't think a potential voice transmission is limited to the AM frequency bands.

In this case it is limited with properties of ferromagnetic particles as ferromagnetic antennas. At any frequences higner than few MHz, ferromagnetic antenna have extremely poor efficiency. That is why any multi-band portable radio from the past had ferromagnetic antenna for long-wave AM and telescopic one for short-wave bands. Vintage tube radios had a socket to connect external antenna on the back, and for long/mid-wave bands you need a piece of long wire of at least several meters.

Also, oxide layer on particle could be used as detector diode for demodulating carrier signal and turning it to something meaningful, f.e. "voice".

IDK, I think theory about not-a-vaccine ferromagnetic particles for receiving long/mid-wave AM signals in attempt to induce "voices in head" in subjects using some devices at power line substations that inject AM long/mid-wave signal into power lines looks more logical, consecutive and rational than all that "magnets stick to graphene in jab" shit. And it doesn't need any magic of non-existing technologies, easy to implement and could be falsified by checking power line voltage and equipment on substations.

Also strange that this simple theory does not pop up after that "magnetic jabs" videos. Well, it is not so entertaining, quasi-scientific and fashionable as "5G WiFi6 router nanomachines", but why the hell not a single take on "power lines, AM and ferromagnetics" at all?

PS: Why the hell nearly everything suspicious today have to be connected with smartphones, cell towers (5G only, looks like 3G/4G are fine), some overhyped substances and AI? Just like somebody who wrote marketing articles for corporations switched to creating "conspiracy theories". :)

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Let's imagine that we have some foreign particles in bloodstrem.

Overall, this particles either will be attacked by leukocytes, either will be left intact if they are chemically passive. In any case, most of them will end in liver, which have a function of blood filter for our body, and later will be extorted with bile.

If particles are magnets by itself, they will not be able to form suspension in a not-a-vaccine and will qickly stick to each other in a vial into single blob, long before an injection.

So, to show effect declared in video, particles should be ferromagnetic, but not magnetized and be too small to be able to form a suspension. This will make not-a-vaccine kind of very low density magnetic liquid

What could be a purpose of injection of magnetic liquid into human body? I have no any idea, really. Theoretically, this ferromagnetic particles could create some mess in body (in liver?) in case of taking MRI scan, since very powerful magnets are in use. IDK, not-a-vaccine produce miocarditis in person, person took MRI scan, ferromagnetic particles damage liver in addition to heart, or do that stuff mentioned in article you linked?

Articles mentioned in your link tell about using very strong magnets near the sample, and apart MRI scans, only known case when strong magnets was used on jabbed is, suddenly, only that "jab spot is magnetic!" videos. Kind of strange, isn't it?

Another option is a probability that some ferromagnetic particles will end in hearing circuit of human. Then, if they will settle in the right place, one could kind of hear long-wave AM broadcasts. You could remember that ferrite core antennas in old radios.Something like that in smaller variant. Voices in your head, yes. But to use that for some bad things you have to transmit powerful AM broadcast over long-waves. And it will be easily received also by anybody with AM receiver. Of course AM as broadcast media is nearly extinct today, only few stations is alive. But since AM band is empty, it attracted attention of amateurs who often experiment in it. There are still a lot of very vigilant hams around who will notice weird transmissions and publish them on their forums. But I didn't see any reports about weird transmissions in AM band apart traditional reports about "number stations".

All in all, I don't see anything that could be useful enough for malisious actors to run such a complex project like coronahoax just to inject ferromagnetic particles into population. And even as side-effect it does not have any sense.

I could only suppose that the whole jab thing was a broad test of a lot of different compositions on a very large sampling to find something useful for elites by banal bruteforce method. That is why too many too different side effects from different not-a-vaccines batches we observe. Some random batches of not-a-vaccine could have also ferromagnetic particles as part of bruteforce try.

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

What proof you need again? That magnets do not stick to copper or aluminium? :) :) :)

Well, if you demand some proofs for that, being pefectly able to check it yourself in a seconds, this is a proof that you are either some brainless NPC who believe anything you stick to, either just intentionally pushing some agenda.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

"They discover misterious BLE addresses ready for connection with kismet and even didn't try to connect to them" - Your statement.

Where is your proof?

Right in your video. They show absolutely nothing except some BLE devices addresses. They didn't show what that devices are. No attributes lists for that devices, no descriptors contents. Device address tells absolutely nothing about device. Everything interesting began only after you pair with device and began to query it.

What they do is identical to showing you some IP addresses and telling you that it is some very malicious deep state sites or whatever, without showing you real contents or even main pages of that sites. Just senseless numbers.

Or if you wish, it is like showing you some bank account numbers without telling you names of owners, sums on them and sources of transactions.

If you need any more proofs that your video is complete fraud, I can't help you at all. This will mean that you are either dumb, either shill.

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Graphene is diamagnetic. Like copper or bismuth.

Graphene oxide is paramagnetic, like aluminium or platinum.

Paramagnetic is barely react to magnetic field. Diamagnetic is pushed out from magnetic field. None of both, even in pure form could hold any available magnet, not even talking about some sparse particles in amount of micrograms.

It is ferromagnetics that could be attracted by magnets with significant force.

So, magnetic properties of mRNA jab spot could be proof of some ferromagnetic, like iron, cobalt, nickel or rare-earth alloys like iron or cobalt with addition of neodymium or samarium in a jab, but in no way it could be a proof of presence of grapthene or graphene oxide.

Does it really matter what bullshit you stick to - that jabs are "safe and effective" or that jabs "have tons of graphene, 5G receivers, WiFi8 routers and bluetooth controlled laser nanomachines"?

I don't see any difference, really. It's all just ignorance and dnial of knowledge.

PS: does anybody know why exactly such hillarious failure like graphene had been choosen as scarecrow for idiots? No material on the Eart ever had such enormous expectations and marketing bullshit along with total absence of any real usefulness for over 150 years? And don't even try to talk about some Super-Absorbing Nanotecnology Vacuum Cleaner Exhaust Filter with Graphene Nanotubes Coating you bought online, which is really just cheap chineese paper filter slightly powdered with charcoal powder.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Clearly, you have no proof.

Proof of what exactly you want? Could you just answer that pretty simple question, or you just yet another troll that fall into endless loop?

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

large western corporations are held privately or publicly traded by shareholders, but not owned by the public or workers.

Don't mix some idealistic textbook socialism with real world socialism. USSR enterprises was not owned by workers too. China enterprises also not owned by workers. You could barely find any really large enterprise who was owned by workers in any timespan of any socialism implementation existence.

workers get recompensed for time but typically aren't shareholders.

And only tiny part of their time is really compensated.

profits are distributed unequally and exponentially up the corporate pyramid.

Interesting, that larger enterprise have steeper curve. Despite there are no any logical (in terms of enterprise workflow) need for that.

centralization of decision making process can still occur in either system, and it's sort of needed for most large endeavors to stay focused.

Of course you need some planning just to be able to produce anything. But I'm talking not about technical planning, but about strategic planning. Some car manufacturer board of directors just decide that they should produce 20% of EVs this year. Just because they rhink so or believe in something. It is exactly like some soviet Gosplan decided that there should be produced 20% of yellow fabric on some textile enterprise. Then both could not sell that 20% to the customers for the set price. In case of western enterprise, additional money spent to convince customers to buy unneeded product by marketing or by damping price, in USSR this unneded fabric goes to industry where fabric color does not matter or in some warehouse. But in both cases top managemend will force enterprise to fulfill that based on nothing 20% plan and punish workers if their plan is not fulfilled.

at this point many people realize a lot of large corporations produce only poison, and there is a market for smaller products that can meet the need of not being poisons (food, cleaning products, clothes, etc.).

And that's excellent. This prevent corporations from total monopolisation of the market. And that's why corporations through their cartels like WEF and other global shit trying to suppress small businesses with non-market measures.

Well, in USSR was also some place for tiny small businesses named "cooperatives". Mostly in food and clothes industry. It was businesses owned by workers, so it does not contradict socialism ideology. "Cooperative" prices was noticeably higher, but you could always buy quality products if you really needed to.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you’re the one who writes the rules for a board game, you don’t have to hover over every player to enforce it at every table.

If your rules become an existential threat to players you will have to. That is exactly what happening now. And I think all that wars, surveillance and censorship crap is exactly that attempt to enforce their rules at every table. Or somewhere, somebody will began to play by his own rules, breaking that behaviour conditioning you wrote about. And some could suddenly choose another river.

Aslo, there is another problem that is not connected with Jews at all. Even if you remove all Jews and their things from economy, corporate gulag will still have advantage on the market over other enterprises. F.e. wealth that was directed to the above layer of usurers/investors could be used to dump prices or expand, throwing out competitors from market.

In any case total elimination of socialism inside corporations is a necessary step. Even in case of Jewish economy elimination on the higher level.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

IIRC Marx always said Socialism would arise out of capitalism, not in spite of it.

Yes, he also stated that capitlism is absolutely necessary for socialism and that you can't skip that step. He accounted capitalism and socialism as sequential stages of society development as far as I remember.

The good thing about fighting Corporations is that they're unwieldy and slow, almost as much as governments. Unlike governments, they're sensitive to the bottom line and quite touchy about their public image, thus susceptible to psyops.

Just like USSR. I even think that USSR was more kind of Corporation State, than pure Socialist state. In kind of mild form, really, comparing to what seem to be hatching from modern corporations.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not all heads of big business are Jews. And it's not the Jews who force big business create only croporate gulag from their enterprises.

But you can't throw out Jewish influence from the picture, including purely Jewish things like usury which create conditions for establishing trotskist socialism inside any big business to allow maximum wealth extraction to pleasure Jewish usurers and investors.

Even if you would be lucky to establish some big business without a single Jew, you will have no option other than implement corporate gulag in your enterprise, because otherwise you will not be able to pay all that loan interests, dividents and all that stuff, or you will have to rise final product prices to the level your business would not have a chance to compete with rivals on the market and so go bankrupt immidiately.

Jews with their dogma of usury based economy created conditions where corporate gulag is your only option to have a big business, but they are not personally establish trotskist socialism in the each and every large enterprise.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Still waiting for any proof from you...

You still didn't tell me proof of what exactly you are waiting. :)

I'll wait.

That's the only thing you could ever do with such attitude. :)

▲ 8 ▼
CrazyRussian 8 points ago +8 / -0

Well, I know this game under name of "Mafia" and hardly it was invented by Russian sociology student since I played it in school before 1986 when it was described by Dmitry Davidov who often mistakingly accounted as inventor today. He just get to know about it, found it interesting and wrote his paper.

And "mafia" (or "werewolves" as in video) are not always win. They have better chance of win only if their strategy is smart. It's not hard to defeat "mafia", really, if they are not paying much attention to their behaviour. F.e. if one "member of mafia" always stand for some person who revealed to be "member of mafia", or even never proposed to "kil"l him as "mafioso" before "citizens", then this member will be declared "mafia" in the first place next round. Well, more than enough real world examples of such "mafia" fuckups among elites.

You need to have a good memory, be attentive, use logic and do not believe anybody words to win as a "citizen".

This game is not a proof that "mafia" always win. It is a proof that "citizen" have to be smart, attentive and have critical thinking to "survive", even if "mafia" have an advantage of hiding information and making secret decisions.

Good game, I like it. Even now I gladly play it with friends on occasions, when there is many people and nothing to do.

▲ 5 ▼
CrazyRussian 5 points ago +5 / -0

He's conflating two different issues to introduce doubt in your minds.

I understand that. And I'm not so shure about "conflating two different issues" since if a person not wanted to protect people he governs from invasion into their bodies, then there is completely legitimate doubt that this person would not want to defend his people from illegal migrants invasion or other danger. The issue is the same.

But there is two people in this meme that are imaged different from others. You know, that simple riddles, like "Look at group of objects and find those that didn't belong here"

And since everything I know about internal US politics I know from "Braindead" series, I could get something wrong.

So, if you are into that stuff, may be you will explain me why that two dudes in meme are shown different? Does that mean something, or meme author was unable or was too lazy to find photos of that dudes in masks and taking jabs?

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

So two dudes from LA and NE (Luisiana and Nebraska?) are good guys, as they are without masks and don't have photo on the right with them taking the jab?

It will be nice if guys posting local US memes would somehow provide some context for those who are not Americans.

▲ 4 ▼
CrazyRussian 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well, looks like things are not as grim as MSM picture.

If it is true that many students hide their real view of the world from the teachers, it shows at least three very important things:

  1. they account that woke teachers as enemies.
  2. the brainwashing does not work as wide as many could conclude from news
  3. students have their own thoughts.

This situation could be very dangerous for woke crowd. Since students hide information from them they greatly overestimate their success and greatly underestimate opposition. They live in their own illusion. Also they grow a generation, part of which, and larger than they assume will always hate them, their ideology and when grow up will become a big problem for woke crowd.

And we also could greatly underestimate our youth. Accounting them as dumb phone-masturbators with washed brains we just throwing out great power that could join us.

May be you doesn't account this as something very important, but that's a mistake. It is more important then you could imagine. We had similar situation in USSR with communist ideology. That is why authorities thought that everything is OK, and that is why when things changed there was nobody to support USSR Communist Party elites.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Proof of what exactly do you need from me?

I told you that dudes in your video are not interested in showing you what BLE devices they discovered with scan. It is highly suspicious, since it could be done by them with ease. And I show you how it could be done.

Proof you want is right in the video you shared. They obviously didn't even think to try to connect to BLE devices they found, while it is the first thing any sane person will do on discover of unknown BLE device around. It is a pretty solid proof that clowns from the video are not about telling you any truth at all.

If you have unknown BLE devices around and want truth, then I wrote you what exactly to do to find that truth. Why is it so anticipated by you?

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't think anybody copied anybody. Three-color flags are pretty common and at least several countries use same color combination on their flags. But the thing is that AFAIK Texas doesn't actually used flag with horizontal strips and white star in center that resemble Russian one. It was only proposals never adopted.

But for whatever reason, from all possible Texas flags from pedovikia page Google choose this one to show near the link to pedowikia when you search for "texas flag". Why did they do that? Isn't that strange? Isn't that some kind of mocking Texans by Google today?

Russia used red flag with Jesus face in center as battle flag in ancient times, then Imperial flag of white-gold-black, then Peter the Great established trade ships flag as white-blue-red which was used along with Imperial, then there was soviet red flag, then for some reason trade flag was choosen as flag of Russian Federation.

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well, just thought on the dates in your quote.

Neanderthals existed 5000 years with cromagnons. And then extincted or was genocided by cromagnons. Does neanderthals suspected in their last 50 years of existence, that none of their kind will be alive just after 50 summers?

Written human history, best known to us, have nearly same timespan. What if some cromagnons of modern times already decided to exterminate modern neandertals. Who could be neandertals today, not knowing that their kind have only 50 years to exist? And what they have to do to survive? And who are cromagnons?

Creepy.

▲ 5 ▼
CrazyRussian 5 points ago +5 / -0

Good approach to research, but looks like you should be able to write about "Gaza holocaust perpetuated by Israelis who fully deserved HAMAS" and be safe, at least from automatic censorship.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

So no real evidence, just more text?

What exactly do you mean under "real evidence"?

I could not imagine anything more real than exact instructions of how you yourself without any third-party could check everything displayed and find out much more than that clowns in your video,

You just want others to believe your words without any proof.

On the contrary, I insist on checking absolutely everything I say.

In internet realm any text, audio and video could be fake. So, I do not account any of that as a proof at all. In the best case it could be just a hint to take a closer look. Instead I constantly trying to provide description about how any person could check my statements by himself. Because it is the only guaranteed way any person could find the truth - check everything by himself.

I don't think giving a fish is a correct way to feed somebody. I'll better teach somebody how to catch a fish.

What exactly stops you from booting linux on your notebook, reading some basic howtos and typing few simple commands in a console? You don't have notebook/PC? Or you can't use keyboard? You afraid of console commands?

And meanwhile, you have to know that I would have a huge problem finding any test subject jabbed with mRNA not-a-vaccine here. It was not allowed in Russia, here we had vector not-a-vaccine with completely different side-effects and nearly zero casualities. And none of those poor fools who take it get any unknown BT addresses. So, if you want truth - dig it by yourself. I already provided all necessary info on how you could do it with minimum efforts. If you don't want any truth - continue to poison yourself with videos made either by some swindlers, either by idiots. You choose.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

You can't do that properly with phone. Nor iPhone, nor android have corresponding BT tools to do that. But you could properly do it with linux PC.

I just dumped you evidence with my BLE mini-keyboard. For obvious reasons I hide only BT address, name and alias. I don't have any other BLE devices around.

You could also easily find linux BLE howto's and check it by yourself. Basically you don't need to install and tune kismet, you could use bluetoothctl of hcitool+gatttool

If you see BLE address in scan results you could connect to it.

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

You cannot connect to the bluetooth MAC addresses. I think you assumed something here...

That exactly how BLE devices work.

They run kismet. Kismet is only for linux. They don't have special hardware BLE sniffers like Ubertooth or nRF24 based one to sniff on established connections. So they have a list of BLE adresses retirned by linux HCI. This list contains addresses of devices you could connect to. If you see address in that list - you could connect to it.

Say, you use bluetoothctl (basic linux BT utility, you have it out of the box on any popular linux distribution).

you do

[bluetooth]# scan on
[bluetooth]# menu scan
[bluetooth]# clear
[bluetooth]# transport le
[bluetooth]# back

then you get list of BLE devices around. Same what kismet will show.

[NEW] Device <BTADDR>

Then you coudl do with <BTADDR> in form of 00:11:22:33:44:55

[bluetooth]# pair <BTADDR>
[bluetooth]# menu gatt
[bluetooth]# list-attributes <BTADDR>

You will get a list of attributes BLE device expose and some additional info like device class, name and so on.

somehting like that:

Device <BTADDR> (public)
    Name: <somename>
    Alias: <somealias>
    Paired: yes
    Trusted: yes
    Blocked: no
    Connected: yes
    LegacyPairing: no
    UUID: Generic Access Profile    (00001800-0000-1000-8000-00805f9b34fb)
    UUID: Generic Attribute Profile (00001801-0000-1000-8000-00805f9b34fb)
    UUID: Device Information        (0000180a-0000-1000-8000-00805f9b34fb)
    UUID: Battery Service           (0000180f-0000-1000-8000-00805f9b34fb)
    UUID: Human Interface Device    (00001812-0000-1000-8000-00805f9b34fb)
    UUID: Vendor specific           (3dda0001-957f-7d4a-34a6-74696673696d)

Then you could read and even write some attributes. Every attribute have UUID, most UUIDs are predefined and you could find how to read and interpret them.

And so on.

It gives you the general message that you cannot connect to the device.

You can't connect to regular Bluetooth device if it is already connected or paired. BLE devices are different. In the list they show you could be only devices that ready for connection. Because to find BLE devices that already connected you need special hardware they clearly don't have.

Why don't you try it in a crowded place to confirm it instead of just theorizing?

I did. And it's exactly how BLE work.

"Why can't a doctor understand bluetooth like a 10-year-old kid?" Perhaps because they don't have the experience in this field.

Well, they somehow installed and get kismet working. It is a sophisticated tool, mostly for hackers, and they have enough expirience to use it. But somehow they don't have a clue what BLE is, what they see in kismet and how to connect and get info from BLE devices.

It's impossible.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›