Well, passenger planes are yet another story. :) I was lucky to get a flight on one from the first commercial batch of new TU-204s in mid-90s. That was amasing - wide soft chairs with two adjustments, more then enough space for legs - you could comfortably sit legs-crossed, roomy toilets, and so on. Economy class in that TU-204 was better than business one on any other planes at the time. It was the most comfortable plane I ever flew.
But when I got on newer TU-204 decade later - it was the same shit as other planes. They squized rows and toilets to fit few additional rows and replaced chairs to something much cheaper.
I think it's airlines dictate manufacturer to make planes with as dense seats as possible. Manufacturers are able and ready to make comfortable planes, but greedy airlines want cattle cars for maximum profit.
That's not the first time he was targeted, really. So far, all this attempts failed.
You lose me when you completely deny health effects.
I don't deny health effects. I deny that 5G is somehow special in health effects.
You lose me when you stick to 5G only. Health effects of 3G,4G and 5G are the same, since bands and power are the same. 5G is different only in more sophisticated modulation allowing higher data bandwidth.
If you ignore 3G/4G health effects but worry a lot about 5G health effects, you are hypocrite at minimum.
You guys know so much about the engineering side you feel like you know everything.
We know enough to see completely artificial bias toward 5G.
How many studies have you looked through on the effects of microwaves on human cells and systems?
A lot. And none mentioned any impact of modulation on the health effects. All tell only about frequency and absorbed power, which are the same for WiFi, Bluetooth, 3G, 4G, 5G and so on.
But we, as RF engineers do completely another, and much more amasing conclusion from that papers. All this papers show us, that human body, for whatever reasons, is thoroughly and very competently protected from RF radiation levels never encountered in nature. Just take a moment and think about that open-minded. Why humans have so heavy protection, from the very unnatural thing? How and why humans get this protection? I think this is a way more astonishing rabbit hole than anything pushed about 5G. That is the great question of life, universe and everything.
5G is absolutely not different from other cellular networks generations in terms on health. To be honest, you have to talk about negative issues of mobile phones as whole.
Real 5G specific issues have completely another nature.
But at the same time nothing happened with Belorussian president Lukashenko, who is not only opposed coronahoax and not-a-vaccines, but also denied IMF bribe for implementing lockdowns and mask mandates. And not just denied, but publicly told about that disgusting IMF offer.
Perhaps it is something novel and tuned to a microwave frequency which 5G can interact with.
Problem with 5G interacting with anything inside human body is in a skin effect and size of antenna.
Skin effect depth for conductive non-ferromagnetic object more than 503sqrt(ρ/f) meters where ρ is specific resistance of object, and f is frequency. For 2.6GHz and human body tissue around 1 Ωm it is around 0.01 meter or 1cm or less than half inch. For FR2 band at 30GHz it will be 3mm or 1/8 inch. RF strength inside conductive object drops exponentially with depth. Skin effect depth show where RF signal reach 70% loss.
Antenna with a good performance need minimum size of quarter of wavelength. For 2.6GHz it is 25mm or inch. For 30MHz it is 2.25mm. Smaller antenna, of injectable size will have much worse performance if any.
So, skin effect and antenna size limitation does not allow anything 5G work deeper than half inch, or even less.
Since nobody care about 3G/4G working at exactly same frequences as 5G FR1, and no high-bandwith necessary for that nanoshit, we should conclude that they definitely tell about 5G FR2 - this is only difference here. So, it is around 30GHz with 1/8inch penetration into human body.
It does not make any sense at all. What could be a purpose of injecting some 5G nanoshit you will not be able to talk to inside human body?
From the other side, long/mid-wave RF is perfectly penetrate whole human body. You could calculate skin effect depth for frequencies around 200kHz or 1MHz using above formula.
But somehow low frequency RF that is perfectly suitable for connection with something inside human is completely out of scope of that 5G/nanoshit crowd. Is it just too outdated and boring for those who create all that 5G/nanoshit bullshit? Do they suppose that target audience will not be catched with something from times of tube radios, so there is a need to add something fashionable and hypish for better marketing?
I don't know, it is kind of huge swindle right before your eyes nobody dare to see.
How could it be completely unnoticed? And this 5G/nanoshit crap is nicely poisons both wells - any sane suspicions about 5G threats (they are really in bandwith, not health or whatever) and coronahoax/vaccinehoax exposing.
Today, I think he is ready to do that interview wether the USG likes it or not.
May be. Or, may be, say, interview with Snowden. Will see.
There is more important question arised, if you didn't noticed. And you didn't, obviously. :)
Why do you account some photos and some words of politician as a proof at all?
Photos could be greenscreened, and politicialn lie when their mouth is open.
How this media shit could be a proof for you, but thing you could check by yourself you don't account as proof at all?
I'm not shure Tucker is in Russia, I didn't saw him with my own eyes here. It could be some political game or whatever, I just don't know. I got some information, noticed that it is silenced in western media and shared it here. I thought It could be interesting for somebody. But I didn't state that it is absolute truth or whatever.
But I perfectly know that graphene does not attracted by magnet because I checked it by myself. And there is a very simple way to check this by anybody. There is absolutely no any need for fucking links, they just senseless if you could get your own expirience.
Then what's your real message? Is it "Believe media and don't believe your own expirience"? Or "Don't question and check anything you get from media"?
Really, I think that modern cars are too small. Accepting some small 1.7 meter width of rut as standard was extremely stupid.
With modern standard you could not sleep normally on backseat, a lot of things does not fit by width in trunk and so on.
Cars should be at least 2.5m wide, to be really comfortable.
Unfortunately, this train departed long ago. Today it is impossible to change anything, because all roads should be rebuild and all that stuff.
:)
PS: interesting thing, that Third Reich attempted to build wider railroad, made for humans, they even build some wide cars where was enough space for humans, and they was way more comfortable than modern passenger railroad cars build for kids or midgets in the best case.
Can you prove that?
Yes.
Can you prove that?
Yes.
Can you prove that?
Yes.
Can you prove that?
Yes.
You can check what "superconductivity" means in the meantime.
Really you could make YBCO superconductor on your kitchen. Works at liquid nitrogen temperature. But I think posting instructions on how to do that will be superfluous as you have hands from ass or just not a real person. :)
You could GTFO, really, if you need links for things you could check by yourself in seconds. :)
Did you at least read a title of the link you posted? I'll copy it for you:
Making Magnetic Graphene Oxide - Fe3O4 magnetic nano particle composite system
Fe3O4 is not a graphene! It is black iron oxide. There also could not be any "graphene solution" or "graphene oxide solution" because both graphene and graphene oxide is insoluble in water. Anything that combined with black iron oxide(Fe3O4) will stick to magnets. Whatever - wooden sawdust, paper pulp, charcoal powder, anything fine balck iron oxide particles could stick to. You could make absolutely anything "magnetic" just using fine black iron oxide powder in some binder as paint. And it is used so a lot. It even have its own color designation - Black 4330. But all that have absolutly nothing to do with graphene. Grafene itself is not ferromagnetic and can't stick to magnets, Fe3O4 is.
You are incredibly stupid or amasingly insolent in pushing bullshit here!
Proof of what? Why do you continue to ask incorrect and senseless questions?
Tucker in Russia? Here you go - https://19rusinfo.ru/politika/61109-oblomki-sbitykh-geranej-i-orlanov-idut-na-ukraine-vljot
And here is kind of confirmation from some US congressman - https://twitter.com/RepMTG/status/1753908640489058643
In other words Tesla reversed the trans mission of power.
Kind of. Normally Earth-ionosphere system have some natural standing wave. You could check Schumann resonances for that. Some think that it is very imposrtant for life and everything. Tesla tried to create its own resonance. :)
We don't use that method, but if we did the pole change would simply change the current.
Not really. Schumann resonances are independent from static magnetic field orientation. There have to be any magnetic field to make ionosphere possible. It does not matter where the poles will be.
Poles shift will definitely induce some currents in our power grid, but I think it will be not very different from solar storms. Much more mess will be in wild nature, really. AFAIK, many species use Earth magnetic field for orientation and all that stuff. That could be a disaster.
From the other side it will be interesting to think about underlying cause of pole shift. Magnetic field itself is not very powerful thing, but say some flip in mass of Earth core could be really disastrous. Check Dzhanibekov effect to become amased. :) Serioulsy, there have to be specific mass distribution to achieve this effect, but for now nobody knows anything specific about Earth core. Even source of Earth mgnetic field is not some well-established knowledge.
What?
Well, that was really weird.
More interesting question is why you demand some fucking link to get a proof that magnet does not stick to copper of graphene? Yet another rabbit hole here? :)
I'm shure you have some copper thing around. Piece of wire or whatever. I also told you how to make some graphene in seconds. Scotch tape and graphite brush from electric motor is not a hard thing to find at all. And you definitely should have at least one magnet in your apartment or where you live.
What fucking links you need to check that by yourself?
Wait....
Are you not from real world, if you can't just do simpliest things to find your proof, and only links is real for you? Are you kind of AI or some scanned consciousness somewhere in hidden datacenter without any ability to interact with real world? :) That is why you want links, not real things?
Funny, what next?
Tesla tower is another beast. Tower was not a generator. It was a transmitter to create standing EM wave between ionosphere and Earth surface, so making transmitted energy available at any location. There is an effect known in coaxial cables - when a cable length is integer multiply of transmitted wave length, then losses are at minimum. Tesla took a view at Earth and its ionosphere as at short coaxial cable, and thought that it would be a great idea to use it for energy delivery.
Really, I'm not shure that this was a good idea. Kind of HAARP, but with magnitude orders more power and all that stuff. Tesla didn't examine any side effects of saturating Earth atmosphere with enormous amount of EM power.
I literally quoted how EM radiation is saved in superconductors
:) EM radiation is not saved in superconductors. In superconductors you save constant current. And superconductors are extremely good at keepeng this surrent perfectly constant. On the contrary, EM radiation is by definition an alternating electromagnetic field. :)
You could make electromagnet using superconducting winding, but that's definitely not what your video is about. I don't see anything about windings from graphene in cryogenic conditions in your video.
They attract magnets, not repel them.
Well, superconductors attracting magnets is a new Nobel prize, as minimum. :) Send your fucking link to Nobel committee, may be they pay interest on finding winners. :)
Yes. And looks like he found family happiness here. He got Russian citizenship, lives in Moscow with his wife (also American) who gave birth to two children here, he got some weight and looks happy. Rumors are he works as sysadmin or programmer in one of large Russian IT companies. Also he gives some interviews from time to time and write a new book. For obvious reasons nobody will disclose his exact address and palce of work.
Your brain could not function without external links?
That's literally from the same source I sent earlier.
So what? How is it connected to graphene? Do you understand that it is exact reason of why superconductors repelled from magnets, not stick to them?
Where in your video shown that jab iself or jabbed person show repelling from magnets? I though that video try to convince us that jab spot pulled to magnet, not vice versa. :)
No any info on that here. Most Russian press confirmed that he really arrived to Moscow Vnukovo airport from Turkey at Feb 1 at 16:10. That's all.
I find it strange, because Tucker could easily gather large events here, he is a known person and even have some popularity, especially among Russian youth. I think many students in social sciences and journalism would be happy to get a lecture or seminar from Tucker in Moscow State University f.e. But nothing like that was announced.
Since when "a link" become a proof of anything?
Do you understand that anybody could make a page with absolutely any bullshit?
Well, is it kind of some mental illness, when somebody account a link to some web page as a proof?
Graphene becomes a superconductor
First. Graphene is one of the worst superconductors, because it shows superconductivity only at around 2°K or -271°C
Second. Superconductors are fucking repelling from magnets! You could not fucking stick a magnet to a superconductor because it will heavily resist that and run away from your magnet.
But your video clearly shows that people try stick a magnet to a supposed graphene contaminated jab spot.
Do you understand how ridiculous and ignorant you are?
PS: It is especially funny taking in account that in childhood we show "magic trick" of sticking a teaspoon somewhere on body. Well, it sticks to body parts, really and could stay sticked for a while. Especially succesfull this trick become after you jumped, run around, do all that insane kids things and become a little sweaty. :)
You've never shown any proof so far.
Fuck. Proof of what exactly do you need and in what exact form? Why don't you formulate your demands in clear and exact form? Is it kind of trolling or what, you are unable to formulate sentences?
You just say "fake, cuz I say so".
You are a liar. I say why exactly it is fake and provide absolutely checkable explanation in simpliest possible form.
but never came with a proof of your claims...
So, I claim that graphene or graphene oxide does not stick to the magnet. What proof you need exactly? Could you fucking specify what you mean?
You need some stupid video with somebody try to stick something to magnet and fail, or what? Do you know that you can't even buy a piece of graphene or graphene oxide large enough to be filmed because this materials is a hoax?
You could easily make some graphene particles at home and check if they stick to magnet. Take a scotch tape and piece of graphite. Stick a scotch to graphite and take it off. You will have a lot of graphene particles on a scotch tape. You could wash them off with gasoline or alcohol. Bring magnet close to particles. See if they will stick to it or not.
Does this experiment accounted by you as a proof that graphene does not stick to magnets?
Well, looks like doing something complex like making graphene is impossible thing for you. Scotch tape and all that stuff is undobtedly rocket science. But as a trained consumer, you could buy a piece of pyrolithic graphite (close cousin of graphene) and 4 cube shaped rare-earth magnets on aliexpress. Put 4 cube magnets together and place a sheet of pyrolithic graphite on top of them. It will levitate. Fucking hover over the magnets, and you will need to apply force to make it even touch magnets. Pyrolithic graphite, being diamagnetic, just like graphene is repelled from magnets, not pulled to them.
Well, and main question - what exactly in videos you post, accounted by you as a "proof" and proof of what exactly?
Did you noticed, that everything shown on videos you posted does not actually proof anything at all? Some people talk about something, some shots of things glowing in UV torch light, youth making fun from magnets and so on. How the hell anything of this could be a proof of anything?
Fluorescense is a common thing. Take a glass of Schweppes Bitter Lemon and light it with UV torch. It will perfectly glow just like a some liquid in your video. Proof of what is it? That many substances could glow in UV light? Great. Fucking glorious discovery of all times. So what? How does it proove that there is graphene in not-a-vaccine? Graphene even is not fluorescent. You easily could check it with your DIY graphene from aforementioned experiment with magnets. In seconds, not even minutes.
Funny, you are so hard at pushing crap videos here, that don't even bother to explain them to yourself. :)
I don't observe that here. Mobile providers just replace equipment on existing towers and buildings and that's all. There was attempts to utilise FR2 in dense spaces like stadiums and exibition centers, they put a lot of FR2 stations in, but it was discovered that FR2 is unreliable, because it is very sensitive to moisture in air. Fog or rain make FR2 unuseable.
This bands wulnerable to weather so unuseable here. We don't have sunny days all year around. Also, FR2 bands only purpose is to allow enormous bandwith to the mobile device which cound not be really utilised since there is no higher-level infrastructure to source and handle such bandwidth. Cellural network users could not utilise even 3G/4G bandwidth fully due to bottleneck in uplink channels, so there is also no any sense in nesting expensive FR2 stations anywhere.
Also, FR2 due to its high frequency and skin effect could not penetrate human skin+fat layer, so there is nothing to care about.
And I don't see any worries about microwave sensors used to open gas stations and supermarket automatic doors. They work in the same frequency range, but somehow are completely out of scope of safety trolls.
Higher the frequency, lower the penetration into human body, so less harm. I already give you a formula, you could do the math.
No, it's the same paper. When you see "we exposed living tissue to RF radiation and saw some bad shit" you are in panic, I see "we toast sample with a dosens of Watts from 10cm distance and got only some damage instead of piece of fried meat" and think - "why the hell living tissue made so resistant to the microwaves, if there are no such powerful microwave sources in wild nature? What we don't know about our distant past?".