▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Moon albedo, calculated from visible sun and moon brightness ratio is around 0.07. So it reflects only 7% of light. I'ts pretty bad, really. Charcoal reflects 4%, for example. White paper reflects around 90%. Usual river sand have around 50%

Moon surface is only twice brighter than charcoal and 7 times darker than river sand. Pretty black thing I could say.

It is too easy to calculate, so hardly Kubrik, being perfectionist would have been fucked up with such simple thing. Color of moon surface on NASA color images is correct. It have to be kind of nearly black sand or dust to appear in our sky as we see it.

If moon had something like river sand as surface, it would have been 7 times brighter in full moon night, which is still far from sunlight, but already enough to read.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

If that is the case, then it is orthogonal to "self-driving". Those who make sacrifice could do it regardless of "self-driving" and even a car.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Actually there is no math component required for it to be a theory.... It just has to be sufficiently proven through repeated tests and experiments. That can and often does involve math, but it doesn't have to necessarily.

You are absolutely right, math is not absolutely necessary, proof could be obtained without it, just in most cases especially in physics/chemistry, some math appears when hypothesis become theory.

Strictly speaking, it's not math, it is predictability, which provide way of proving/disproving. If you could predict outcome of your hypothesis given input variables/conditions, and so could check if it happens in reality, it is already a theory.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes.

theory is when hypothesis get some mathematical form.

Hypothesis is like "phenomenon A connected with phenomenon B"

Theory is like "phenomenon A is proportional to square root of phenomenon B"

Hypothesis is a broad assumpion about existence of connection of A and B. Since absence of something could not be proved, there is nothing to prove or disprove yet.

Theory is a next stage of obtaining knowledge that could already be practically verified by experiment and could be proven or disproven.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

That too.

I'm about the whole hype around that "self-driving cars" "problem". Ways of routenly resolve such situations, regardless of obviously corrupted court practice is not anything new at all. There is just nothing special to discuss about. Corrupted jurors and judges is another question that have nothing to do with tech.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Shit happens. A lot of people was killed by automatic industrial equipment, so that "self-driving" point "specificity" is a bullshit. In case of factory casualities from the equipment the responsibility is either on the owner of tech, either on manufacturer of tech either or on employee who failed safety protocols, depending of circumstances of incident. Don't see why that century old scheme could not be used with that "self-driving" cars. They are not different from industrial equipment in sense of automatic action at all.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

One of the main purposes of science is to enshure that theories of our world have no contradictions. You could not do it without searching for contradictions. Finding contradiction just means that theory is wrong and should be replaced or rewriten. It's the inalienable part of scientific research. You make theory, you check if experimental results align with theory predictions and look for contradictions to proove or dicsprove theory.

I don't even know who is worse in that case - Daily Mail who reports on some studies like they are scientific fact, or one who made this meme based on complete ignorance.

Science, and scientific approach is very important today. It is the only practical way of finding the truth that is not completely perverted yet. And those who are trying to bury science itself, instead of burying MSM, corrupted scientists and those who make profit on that, definitely is not on the side of truth.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

In order to decide to not work with them, I have to judge them first though, eh??

You do it for yourself every time you make any decision. But it's your busines, not anybody else. That's simple.

Why f.e. LGBTXYZ+ are so despised? It's not because they fuck wrong way in their bedrooms, not at all. They despised because they try to push their own, and only their own business into others heads. Same here. Thats what make them despised.

You should go spend some time over there. Maybe you wouldn't be such a simp.

I don't need to simp or whatever to make trade. As soon, as gastronomical preferences or whatever of business partner don't interfere in my business, I'm perfectly fine.

And notice - I don't condemn or despise you for your attitude to Chineese. And I will be perfectly fine about doing business with you, if it will make sense, despite our different views on Chineese traditions and way of life in their own land, or on any other cultural, political and so on thing.

Isn't that puriest form of capitalism and free trade you stand for?

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't see hordes of Chineese in Russian towns. There are no any China-Towns in Russian cities. There are no illegal Chineese migrants crossing Russian border daily. And any cafe or restaraunt caught doing something like what in video will be immidiately shut down by Russian sanitary inspection with likely criminal charges to the management.

As the things are going that way, I don't care about Chineese gastronomical preferences in China at al.

And if you think they are disguisting inherent cheaters or whatever - just don't make any business with them, what's the problem? Don't sell them, don't buy from them, that's all. Or you mean your government juridically force you to do that like with Israel? Ignore that stupid state laws then.

I have no any problems with Chineese and never had. IDK, may be they just account Russians different from Americans or whatever, so I in different position due to their bias, but this is also not my concern at all. They are free to have any attitude to anybody, as soon as they didin't try to push it on me.

Meanwhile, why do you try to push your attitude to Cheneese on me? What's the point? I don't really care even about your attitude to Russians, but I become suspicious when somebody try to push that attitude on me. It's not your business what I think about Chineese and how I deal with them.

From the other side, f.e. Jews don't like us, and I also don't like Jews (mostly because of endless interference into our life with their disguisting moral and all their shit). So, I don't have any business with Israel, and perfectly fine with that. Nobody cheat me and nobody give lectures about urgent need to hire few faggots in my company. And all that along with fact that some Israely companies produce some components I buy from Chineese, so they could be my business suppliers, especially taking in account that they didn't even impose sanctions on my country and it is as easy to sorce similar components from Israel, as from China. But I just choose not to, and that's all.

So what prevents you to do exactly same thing with Chineese you don't like?

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

I will not give a fuck even if they will eat each other shit. It is their business, not mine.

The only case when I wlll be concerned and furious, is only if somebody from another country will try to push or force their local traditions I don't like on me or my country. Whatever - eating shit, LGBTXYZ+, circumcision, beef taboo, and so on. Or vice versa - if somebody from other country will try to somehow limit me in my traditions we used to follow.

I'm not a God, nor a moral authority to judge or condemn of how other people live in their own countries. If I find their traditions are unacceptable for me, I just don't visit their countries and that's all.

Also, interesting, why the fuck any sane person could care about what other people in their own countries do?

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

You dont think that during some random research into some stupid bullshit that someone somewhere hasnt discovered better energy sources?

I'm shure that it is perfectly possible. But there is no single replicateable proof of anything like that at all.

You seen that article last month about the nuclear batterys that china supposedly invented?

This batteries used for nearly 50 years for hearing aids and pacemakers. China just made same battery with modern tech, and that's all. It is named "betavoltaic battery"

You could easily make similar battery at home - buy thoriated TIG electrode, put a lot of diodes around or just solar cells from calculators or whatever. You will get alphavoltaic battery with more than 7 billion years life.

The problem is that such patteries gives extremely low current, at microamperes or picoamperes level, so they are barely useful for anything, except some very special applications, like mentioned earlier pacemakers, hearing aids or other devices where microamps is enough.

Doesnt the battery on the voyager work on the same principle, just bigger?

No. space probes batteries are RITEGs. It is radioactive substance with mass way below critical, but active enough to produce noticeable heat. Nuclear core placed in protecting case that stops radiation, but pass heat, and on the surface of that can placed Peltier/Zeebek elements that convert temperature difference into electric current. This kind of batteries is powerful enough to make sense.

I did not have time to make meals like this.

Buy a cheap chineese breadmaker. Today they all have "raw dough" mode and knead a perfect dough without your interaction. They also have "ferment" mode to rise your dough if you use sorgdough or yeast dough. So, you could save a tons of time for your meals. I used to make own sordough bread with such a thing, and it works perfectly.

This makes me think they do have these technologies and they keep them suppressed.

With RITEGs it is pretty bureaucratic - they just prohibited owning of nuclear materials for private persons.

However, they can't have any levers to prohibit something that does not use anything radioactive or poisonous that anybody could make in garage if there will be full and replicateable drawings and instructions. They will have no way to find out you made something like that.

Sounds like the people on top have had this planned for a long time, hundreds of years perhaps?

In my theory, many centuries ago elites make a deal with some non-human entity - to do some job on enslaving and dumbing humans in exchange to something like secret of power or whatever. But being inbred disguisting arrogant and ignorant morons, they just enrich themselves, doing nearly nothing for their master. I think things really started around 1970, when some event, like notification from their master about close deadline came. Then, elite morons began to try to fulfill their promise in great hurry and their usual arrogance and ignorance. They did some shit, like stopping progress and getting rid of population curiosity, started some wars and promoted degeneracy, forced usury and fiat based economy and hijacked MSM, but was not as successfull as they pretend to be Today, looks like deadline of their deal is pretty close, and they still did nothing close to what their masters demanded. Most of their attemps failed. So, nowdays we observe the final agony of arrogant and ignorant idiots who are trying to save their ass doing some stupid shit. They are not that powerful and unbeateable as they want you to think. Only real power they have today is only their MSM that utilise arrogance and ignorance of population.

▲ 6 ▼
CrazyRussian 6 points ago +6 / -0

And, suddenly, all that genius dudes for some unimaginable reasons didn't release their great inventions as reproduceable and thorough instructions to the wide public, i.e. didn't do the only obvious thing that could save them and their great inventions from evil forces. None of them did that.

Smart enough to invent free energy, but dumb as fuck when it comes about their own survival. Every single time.

I will never believe any story about free energy inventor until I see full and reproduceable description of their invention I could repeat without need to guess yet another fucking "inventor's secret ingridient".

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Who we are to judge them? If it is their way, let them go through it and deal with it.

▲ 5 ▼
CrazyRussian 5 points ago +5 / -0

Exactly. Could say the same about place where I live. Never closed the car near my home or groceries around. I take the keys out ignition only because my car with inserted key have some systems running and draining battery, which will be a problem if it will stay so for few days.

It's only about quality of people living around, not about whatever globalist control they try to push.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

One warning - do not occasionally overthrow America, overthrowing (((America))). We nearly made this mistake, and there is nothing good in it.

▲ 6 ▼
CrazyRussian 6 points ago +6 / -0

Enormous amount of starlink terminals with computers with AFU coordination software was seized since Musk began send terminals to Ukraine. They are used for monitoring enemy plans and movements through this AFU system and to control quality of Starlink jamming in moments of advances or sorties. Also, they are fine for running whatever p2p networks like i2p or other to establish non-critical communications between different Russian groups.

Using enemy equipment (if suitable) is not something unusual at all. At least in Russian military concepts.

Since Musk is unable to detect which terminals actually belong to Russians now, the options is either to shut down Starlink over Ukraine, either allow us to use it. :) Whatever decision Musk or his handlers will choose, both are perfectly fine for us and do damage to AFU.

Strange, that this thing about Starlink popped up only now. Starlink terminals used by us since the first days they appeared on the frontline and was seized by Russian troops. It is almost two-years old story. May be you could remember a more than a year old story about hacking into AFU field coordination system. Some MSM even then mentioned it as one of reasons of "great Ukrainian counter-offensive" failure. That's about starlink terminals in our hands too - this AFU system includes starlink terminal and AFAIK locked to the IPs of AFU command and starlink terminals.

So, why now? Revenge of neocons toward Musk for providing platform for Carlson-Putin interview?

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes, that's the level of degeneracy. ANN is pretty universal thing, you could train a model for nearly anything that have a static correspondence between inputs and outputs. Say, if you calculating sin(x) with some limited precision, say 4 decimal digits, you could train ANN to do that. Efficiency will be bad, but who cares today about efficiency?

It resembles me when DSP become cheap and some "progressive" university graduates in electronics began to propose making something like fucking low-pass filter for audio signal (which is a resistor and capacitor) using dedicated DSP IC. :)

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

ANN libraries are very easy to adopt. F.e. with Python TensorFlow library you could literally be up and running in minutes. There are even tons of examples for using it with pretrained models that are freely available around, and there are tons of them.

Make something in your business to use ANN library and that's it - your business using "AI"!!! Make ads and presentations mentioning that you using "AI" and you are in a club. Even if that ANN library just used in a natural language input enchancement nobody really use for calculator for something (IDK, bed cost from size or number of planks for fence) on your site.

Since investors and customers was thoroughly brainwashed about "AI", this spreaded like flame.

ANN libraries are not very complex thing to write. Training models is harder (in terms of time and volume), but there was more than enough grants for that and even volunteers who did it.

That is how cyberpunk we fully deserved looks like.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Handing over something with stuff around is insecure. Disappearing from their view in such a place like Kremlin is also questionable. You can't be shure for 100% in other people.

Also, you might have missed a smile in a title.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Did you heard about Pale of Settlement in Russian Empire? Jews was not allowed to live outside Pale of Settlement. Uman, Dnepropetrovsk and Odessa was towns where most Jews live at the time. In Uman is some rabbi grave. It is a place of piligrimage of some Jewish sect. Jewish Ukrainian government provide security and assistance for them. This will not be the case if or when Uman will be liberated by Russia. Most probably, Jews will flee from scary awful Russain orcs to the elven West or whatever.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

The owners generally transfer some of their personal assets to the business entity and receive some share of the business, often somewhat relative to the amount of assets they provided to the business (other assets such as talent, personal networks, etc. are not as tangible but still factor into the share each person gets).

Exactly same it works here. You could add something to the "authorized capital" of enterprise anything you want as owner. Even do that not only at moment of business creation. But you (or your business entity) become an owner or co-owner of that business.

Theoretically, yes, I just looked into our laws, one business could "invest" something into another business "authorized capital", and yes, you will not pay any taxes for such "ownership transfer". But, as side-effect, first business will become a co-owner of that another business proportional to the share of "investment" among total "authorized capital".

Also, just a note, when selling the plane, there are not necessarily tax implications. If you have been amortizing your expense claims based on the expected lifetime of the asset, then you have only paid taxes on the depreciated value of the asset, and the sale amount is likely the remaining value on that asset, and therefore no profit and thus no taxes on that sale.

Here we have something similar. You could "write off" some equipment or adjust its price in business assets balance proportional to the part of manufacturer declared lifetime that passed.

Also, you could theoretically sell something below market price but that makes sense only if you pay taxes from profit (13%), not from turnover (6%) - we have both options for LLCs and other types of businesses. And it could attract unnecessary attention from tax agency, especially if it was something expensive. Not fatal, and could be settled, but unpleasant.

Interesting, thanks for clarifications. I appreciate your patience.

▲ 4 ▼
CrazyRussian 4 points ago +4 / -0

Some Russian pierogies for the road?

Pirogi is too large even for this file, they are different from Polish pierogi and could not be easily flattened. You had to choose Russian pancakes. But I didn't noticed a jar of honey, varenie (jam), sguschenka (sweet condensed milk), caviar or pickled mushrooms which are inseparable from Russian pancakes. :)

▲ 5 ▼
CrazyRussian 5 points ago +5 / -0

I didn't heard anything I didn't already know in this interview, but things like above was interesting to see and notice.

Also, f.e. it was clear that Tucker was completely unprepared for such intellectual discussion. Putin didn't fit into his way of interviewing. It's funny that such manner of telling stories is very common in Russia, like "wait, I just started, let me tell the whole story, I'll eventually come to the topic". It is perfectly fine here, especially in long winter evening with some vodka, pickles and stove cooked dishes, when two or more people have a long and thoughtful conversation, but looks like it is completely alien to Tucker itself and his audience in general. Some cultural differences, many omit from equation.

▲ 5 ▼
CrazyRussian 5 points ago +5 / -0

But isn't Tucker Carlson the son of a CIA agent who applied to the CIA himself and supposedly "wasn't hired."

And Putin openly mocked Calson twice on that.

Putin openly promotes the "evil nazi" Holohoax lies and markets WWII as "saving jews from the evil white nazi white nationalists" lie.

Not really. Even in interview talking about WWII he never mentioned Holocaust and mentioned Jews in line with Russians and Poles as usual people, not some "choosen" ones.

Despite some common mistake holocaust myth is not in any laws or whatever in Russia. One of most hated by jews "holocaust denier" Jurgen Graf live in Russia for a long time since he had to search for asylum from Western persecution. And as far as I know he is perfectly fine here and live in Moscow with his Belorussian wife.

We don't know everything about the game between different NWO factions, why Jewish question never used by any of them (yet?) and so on. But we could observe interactions (preferrably from uncommon points of view) and derive interesting things about what is happening.

The Ukraine war itself is just about greedy jews expanding and instituting the Greater Israel project.

I don't see how it is about "Greater Israel" at all. It is definitely driven by Jews who religiously hate Russians even if some Russians are convinced that they are "Ukrainians", Jews perfectly know that they are Russians, so this war to kill as many hated Russians as they could.

As for "Greater Israel" in Ukraine it is just a nonsence and I don't know who and for what reason drive that shit. Khazarian Kaganate capital (Itil) and center was somewhere near modern Astrakhan, where Volga flows into Caspian sea. In the best case, Khazarian Kaganate borders was in middle of modern Lugansk and Donetsk regions, and in no way had anything with modern Ukraine remnants. Destroyed Khasarian Kaganate is fully on the territory of modern Russia. If Jews have plans about restoring their Khazarian Kaganate, they had already failed. Even if there will be huge influx of Jewish refugees into Russia (which I don't observe and don't see it possible at all), they would be redirected into Jewish Autonomous Oblast on the border with China on the far East.

As for Jewish oligarchs in Russia, I have to admit that their positions are heavily undermined in Russia, and mostly not by efforts of Putin, but by the West. The Abramovich story only could give a clue about what happening with them. Jewish oligarchs from Russia had too much trust to the West so kept all their wealth there. After imposing sanctions, they had no any option to preserve their wealth than to cut their ties with Russia and Russian leadership.

Putin, as Soviet KGB agent, is a heavy internationalist, so he use "nazi" argument a lot and supress Russian nationalism. In the past, Jews used that in their eternal war with Russians, and Russians was the only ones who persecuted for "spreading ethnic hatred", but now situation changed, Jewish NGOs was thrown out or flee, and now that "spreading ethnic hatred" charges used against tribal gangs from Causasus, muslim separatists, even against Jews themselves.

Unlike Western meaning of "Nazi", Russian one does not necessary include "jews" in that term. That is why you see a lot of amusings of Western sheeple or propagandists about "Ukrainians can't be nazis, they have Jewish president". It is kind of cultural mismatch in the meaning of propaganda labels. In Russia, "Nazi" is not the one who question Jews. It is the one who hate and want to exterminate all other etnicities except his own. Purely artificial propaganda thing, but it is different from Western one.

Putin, in his situation have to balance on the thin and fiery edge between NWO masters and Russia as historic phenomenon and even Russian people. He can't/don't want to go full anti-globalist anti-cabal and Make Russia Great Again, and can't allow all that jewish crap spreading in Russia. We had it already, and it nearly put Russian elite to the verge of extermination in 1993 when only intervention of the West along with naivety of Russians not prepared for Western methods of propaganda in nearly destroyed Russia prevented Yeltsin and his clicue of jewish democratic thieves from persecution and jail.

▲ 8 ▼
CrazyRussian 8 points ago +8 / -0

Depends on what is in file. I don't think it is unreplaceable originals of some shit of Western politics that have to be kept in hands to have value.

For example, it could be list of exact numbers of US documents with description Tucker could request by FOIA f.e. to find out the truth he is seeking (if he really do, of course).

As far as I understand it is impossible to get something through FOIA if you don't know what to request. And it is impossible to somehow search through available documents to find what you look for. But if you know what exact document to request, it is much simplier.

In this case there is no any problem to scan them and upload somehwere for further study, and don't have printed versions entering US. Leave only copies of Bogdan Khmelnitsky letters in file as being declared, and that's all.

I don't really know if there was something else, I just noticed that file looks thicker and heavier than it should be. Also, Putin is bureaucrat, paper worm, well-teached in secrecy things. If there was some hidden stuff for Carlson eyes only, that's how it could be done by ex-KGB man, right before the eyes of audience and stuff around to give a perfect cover for Tucker. So this conspiracy theory. :)

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›