If you live so far away from other people, you should be able to fly your bushcraft around anywhere you please without anyone noticing, right?
In most countries anything flying lower that 30-300 meters (this ceiling depends on the country) anywhere except from areas around airports and other strict air control zones are not accounted as aircraft at all. No licensing or registration needed. It is accounted right thing to do to notify nearby ATC about your flight, but it is not mandatory. So, I could fly here on anything I want perfectly legally. Just do it lower than ceiling.
There is small amateur airport nearby (relatively), they fly on everything from hot air balloons to autogyres over my house for more than 20 years. I fled too on their devices, just for fun (autogyre is the best, really. Amasing flying machine).
Funny, right now moroized deltaplan fled over. :)
Cities become overpopulated during inductrial revolution to keep cheap and poor workforce closer to factories. Today it have no sense at all. Factories moved out of cities, need much less workforce and workforce become wealthy enough to have their own means of transportation.
There is jus no any sense in overpopulated cities anymore.
About "Chineese piece of shit". Chineese long ago learned how to make high quality things. We have large influx of Chineese cars here. And suddenly, people find out that they are not any worse than South Korean and modern European/Japaneese cars. Chineese could make anything, and will never deny making shit if customer will ask for cheapest possible price. So, you have to deal with "Chineese piece of shit" only because importers from your country, or you yourself want cheapest possible price. Pay decent money to Chineese, and you will get decent Chineese product instead of "Chineese piece of shit". Simple as that.
Why do you think that living in highly populated area is a reasonable thing to do in the first place?
The fact that you need someone to spell out for you why aviation is fundamentally different than driving is like reddit tier stupidity.
Aviation is not any different from many other potentially risky things available to regular person. Anyone could make a bomb or set a fire without any problem. It is even much easier than buy a flying car and crash it into something. Only difference is that making a bomb or setting a fire do not provide guarantee of dumbfuck elimination. Flying cars does.
Safety trolling is one of the worst tools NWO use to make people obedient and dependent. Those who push that safety trolling are NWO shills without any exception.
At some point there will be more humans than there is food, that is a problem sadly.
It is too far perspective that there is no need to think about it. Earth could sustain hundreds of billions people without any problems. If climate will return to normal Earth climate, like in eocene, when Earth had ~1200ppm CO2 and was green from pole to pole, then, I think this number would rise to trillions of people.
So there is no any problems with number of humans at all.
Do you really want tons of idiots with no training operating low cost aircraft above your house all the time?
How it is different from tons of idiots that drive pass your house all the time?
Again - flying cars will quickly end lives of that idiots. So they will not take lives anymore. Self-cleaning of society. Crucial for healthy society thing that thoroughly prevented through last half century by all that insane safety trolling, keeping idiots from their well-deserved end and all that stuff.
Of course, some equivalent of that stupid iPhone app "who throw up iPhone higher" that only idiots will use and kill only themselves will be preferrable, but unfortunately probability that such thing will be allowed is even much lower than that flying cars with their near-zero probability of allowance.
I know they forbidden to eat squids (like pork), but shrimps are OK for them. IDK, in Russia muslims eat shrimps without any doubts.
Meanwhile, Turks, being muslim, have dishes with shrimps in their cuisine.
Really that things with shrimps is interesting.
Jews, due to genetics are very suspectable to the allergen in shrimps. Up to anafilactic shock and all that stuff. Arabs, being genetically close to Jews could have same prohibition about shrimps (do they?). In Russia muslims are not of arab origin, so shrimps pose no danger for them.
Also, shrimps allergen activate same immunoglobulins that was used to detect "COVID-19 immunity". So, if you had need "not-a-vaccine proof" for, f.e. for travelling abroad, you could eat a lot of shrimps (with beer f.e.) and make that test within a day or two. Test will show that you "vaccinated"/"had covid". :)
Again, people will find out what to eat and what not by themselves, without any NWO marketing or any "experts" and "interpreters" of any kind.
Shrimps are kind of bugs too. Only Jews have abomination about shrimps. It is wrong to put Jews in one row with Muslims and Christians on that topic.
Problem with eating bugs is not in bugs themselves. Problem with eating bugs is with elites that push eating bugs unsuitable for eating that demand heavy factory processing before consumption.
People will find out what to eat and what not by themselves, without any NWO marketing or any "experts" and "interpreters" of any kind.
would you want an urban ghetto dweller to have a flying car?
Yes. He will quickly kill himself, and problem is solved forever. Much better than jail, police or other ways of state attempts to keep urban ghetto dwellers at level that will not lead to normal population uprise.
Fortunately, there are much more normal people on Earth than dumbfucks. And now dumbfucks exterminate normal people without losses in their rows. Nothing wiill change with flying cars, except dumbfucks began to die.
Would you like to have guns, that somehow unconditionally kill owner if owner do something really dumbfucky? Today guns don't do that. And looks like elites want to protect dumbfucks from killing by normal armed people when dumbfucks do their dumbfuckery. They issue laws, sign bans and so on, to prevent natural dumbfuck extermination. With flying cars, unlike with guns, elites will not be able to ban or outlaw gravity and kinetic energy.
If you are ready to be inder the risk of being killed by dumbfuck with gun (car, knife, chainsaw, etc.), then I see no any obstacles for you to be ready to be under the risk to be killed by dumbfuck on a flying car.
You independence is always paid up by some risk, in one way or another. Same thing here.
Most people can't even stay between two lines on the freeway without almost killing each other
At the beginning it will he a disaster. Yes. But it is a great cleanup of society from dumbfucks. Today, dumbfucks kill much more people just staying alive. Flying cars will guarantee dumbfucks will die quickly.
Those who are ready to exchange some freedom for safety does not deserve nor freedom nor safety.
If my roof have to suffer for extermination of dumbfuck, then, so be it.
Just because we can doesn't mean we should.
This thought somehow applied only to technologies that gives more independence to the people, but never applied to all that shit elites push.
How is that?
Why flying cars "shouldn't" but inbreed arrogant and ignorant aristocracy "should"? That aristocracy is much more harmful for humanity than flying cars. But somehow I never heard that anybody say "We can allow aristocracy to exist and rule, but shouldn't"
There are ton of things we "can", but "shouldn't". And all of them, suddenly, one way or another would have been made people more independent and humanity in general smarter and cleaner. The things we "should", again, suddenly, only benefits elites and make humanity dumber, encouraging grow of dumbfucks percentage.
Your argument is valid but you should apply it to all things, including ones that "sholdn't" but "is". Then, may be you will find out that flying cars are not in that list. Because humanity have no dumbfucks, since things that "is", that create dumbfucks become "isn't".
Your approach is like prohibiting kitchen knives, guns and chainsaws, because dumbfucks use them for doing shit. Does knives, guns and chainsaws "shouldn't"t because of dumbfucks? Obviously not. How flying cars different?
Getting rid of dumbfucks is the solution, not "shouldn't"ing of flying cars, RITEGs, well, whole science and tech branches that could rise humanity to the next level.
Interesting that today "flying car" could be built by anybody with hands from the right place.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNxoHqZGYa0
How it was built and tested - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBSN8afdy4g
Flying cars become a half-century joke not because of some unsolvable technical problems, but because of decision of elites to limit people freedom as much as possible. Even small planes (which is much less useable as everyday transport) was made unaffordable to own through certification-driven spare parts and service price hike.
White people are indeed superior.
Then why White people allow Jews to rule over them and throw Whites into endless wars with each other? There is no any problem for superior race to deny and expell usury, greed, perversion, money worship and other Jewish crap.
They make most of the best inventions.
Indeed. But looking at the ways that inventions used today, I'll suppose that White race is ill in the best case, and extincting in the worst.
Their civilizations are the best and most advanced.
Best and most advanced civilization would not have problems with birth rate. There is no any sense in having best and most advanced civilization if you don't have ancestors.
Their culture is the best.
We don't know how real White culture could look like. All you see now is mostly Jewish entertainment and senseless professional sports, not White culture. Just look at that crap that is consumed by majority of White race. It is a shame.
Their infrastructure is the best.
Chineese have better infrastructure now. And I don't really think infrastructure means something. If you have advanced enough technology, there is no any need for some special infrastructure at all. You could live in middle of nowhere without any discomfort and with all technological benefits.
You are trying to hold on the past glory of White race, but ironically in exactly that past White race allowed Jews to take over by accepting Jewish usury and religion of money.
If you want White race superiority, then you have to reject all things that destroying White race today. From usury and arrogance to obsession with entertainments and attempts to live on others labour and resources. This is what powering White race self-destruction.
Then, your pride toward White race would be justified. As for now, White race looks infected by parasites. Sad picture. Does White race have will and desire to get free from parasites or not - it is unclear for me.
Nazi Germany convinced themselves they were of a special superior race, and so did the Imperial Japanese.
Now do Jewish Nazi with all their millenias of their history full with their unfounded "superiority", "choosenism" and crimes against humanity documented even in Bible. Any other nazi you could think of will look like children in comparison.
Interesting.
So, people should not eat bread, cakes, chocolate, sugar, salt, pasta, hot species, eggs, coffee, grilled meat, fish and vegetables, sauces, salads with plant oil, and so on, whatever somebody in internet declare "unhealthy".
Fuck you with your dietary suggestions. How they are different from WEF agenda?
Healthy man could eat all above in any quantities without any harm or consequences to his health at all. If you are harmed by anything of above - FIX YOUR FUCKING BODY or GTFO!
Most harm from nutrition goes from additives that used on large food factories to enhance food shelf life or lower the cost of manufacturing. If you are so lazy to make bread by yourself or just find a small bakery nearby where bread made without chemicals - that's only your fault, not some gluten or whatever.
Meanwhile, mysogynists and feminists are sourced from single source - Soros NGOs. Practically, there is no difference between them - both are evolution garbage minority without any chance of creating family due to extreme ugliness and they are organised and used by their masters to spread anti-family values, just like all that LGBTXYZ+ perverts and mentally ill.
It is just occasional thing that feminists get more influence than misogynists, so one part of same group is trying to opress another one. This tensions between halves of one phenomenon are good sign, really. As Jesus said - "Every kingdom divided against itself will be ruined". :)
It would have been cool theory if not this "Strategic Maskirovka". In Russian it sounds like "Strategic Shoes" or "Strategic Paint". :)
Seriously, guys, that shit ruins everything. It's the same thing like in 1988 Red Heat movie Schwartzenegger, portraying Ivan Danko replies to a clumsy built Russian phrase "Kakie vashi dokazatelstva?" - "Kokainom!". It could be a nice action movie, but just because of that single dialogue, impossible in Russian language, it is forever a comedy movie for Russians. Well, at least we still remember this movie for such lulz. :)
Yes, Russian is not an easiest language on the planet, but what prevents those who write something about Russia or Russians just find real Russian and ask him/her how to correctly say or name something? Just to not make an instant clownery from what they try to do.
Only thing I found more or less relevant is a statement that Putin was kind of aligned with Kissinger.
That is true. Kissinger's view on NWO was to make global trade so twisted that different countries will not be able to exist without each other, so NWO will inevitably arise from that global unlimited trade like something completely natural. It was different from Soros view with totalitarian approach - to forcefully dumb and enslave people into NWO or some corporate dictatorship of BigBusiness and so on. Putin really adore such Kissinger approach and have (had?) big hopes on it. Putin is (was?) ready to make Russia an important resource source in Kissinger NWO, so destroyed a lot of high-tech industries (those that was still kind of alive after Yeltsin maraudeurs) in Russia since 2000. And was hated for that a lot. All that problems with semiconductors manufacturing, higl-level resource processing and lot of other stuff - it is not only Yeltsin, but also in significant part Putin's fault, when he choose Kissinger NWO approach. Things seems changing now, but still there is a huge resistance mostly in Central Bank and Ministry of Economy. I hope Putin and his liberal finance and economy crowd already have no choice other than to restore at least basic high-tech industries - semiconductors, organic synthesis, rare-earth metallurgy, optics and so on.
Hey now only qtards think most plane crashes are intentional hits on civilians.
Shit happans, but really your qtards are not so far from truth. Planes crush causes are pilot error and mechanical failure. Today humanity have all necessary means to train and hire good pilots and make planes from high-quality parts and do proper quality control. However, greed of airlines and plane manufacturers make this things unachievable. Even private pilots of small planes forced to use scrap parts due to absolutely insane prices for new parts. And sometimes used parts still have better quality than new ones.
And putting profits (or another idol like DEI) over quality and so fligth safety is absolutely intentional thing of exact persons with names and surnames in top management of airlines and aerospace manufacturers.
So, qtards are mostly right, just real reason is different from what they think.
Kind of weird thing from article I noticed:
The plane referred to in the radio recordings was a 1978 Piper PA-32R
I saw an airplane essentially crash out of the sky, fall out of the sky, and hit the ground at around a 45-degree angle
Piper Cherokee and many other small planes of that class usually have glide ratio around 10:1 That means for each foot of altitude plane could glide 10 feet with engine turned off. It is far from 45 degrees. Either pilot failed to do engine fault emergency routine - turn nose down to get ~70 knots speed (or whatever glide speed from plane manual), set trim and look for place to land, either something weird happened in air. Small planes have low optimal glide speed, so any more or less flat surface will be suitable for emergency landing. As said in article, people on interstate saw plane fall, so there was at least interstate, and probably fields around for landing.
I am not even sure if all this high tech is needed to cure disease. People get sick due to bad diet, stress, traumas etc..
Shit happens.
No proper resources are given to basic consultation
If only they care about health, like "healthcare" suggests. Not much money from consultations. High-tech gives more profits.
You are a 2D creature trying to talk about 3D objects. :)
You are your own perfect donor. You have that cells too. They just didn't tell publicly about that. They need fetuses, not that cells.
The most interesting part of that shit is that we all, without exception have our own stem cells in nearly every part of our body. They named somatic stem cells and have same properties as that stem cells from fetuses. Main difference is that fetuse stem cell don't call immune response being planted in anybody. But that absolutely does not matter if you use your own stem cells in your body - it is your cells, they can't induce immune response from your body.
So, that insane obsession with endless "study" of fetuse stem cells instead of developing practical methods of easy replication and transplantation of body's own stem cells for curing different ilnesses looks very suspicious.
Imagine - every single body already have that universal stem cells right in place, ready to go. In much larger quantities than in fetuses. But they need to hunt for fetuses to extract fetuse stem cells and then grow them on different substrates with chemicals and animal cells, getting contamination and chimerisation of descendant cells due to fetuse stem cell indiscrimination property.
And using own body somatic stem cells have no any controversies from any point of view. Not any different from skin transplantation from one place to another, even less intrusive with proper technique. But they need fetuses.
"Only white Russians are real Russians"
Fuck you with your retarded thinking. Unless you will be able to create new words in your native language you think on, to desribe necessary terms and concepts, there could not be any reasonable discussion.
Your phrase have at least 4 completely different meaning in my language. 3 of them are senseless and one is inherently false.
- Only white Russians (as citizens) are real Russians (as citizens) - false
- Only white Russians (as citizens) are real Russians (as etnicity) - senseless
- Only white Russians (as etnicity) are real Russians (as citizens) - senseless
- Only white Russians (as etnicity) are real Russians (as etnicity) - senseless
Do you understand how completely retarded your understanding of even such simple Russian matter? And there is nothing in your mentality to get any clue about it. You don't have lexicon to do that, you don't have imagination to contain such things, you have no way to think about it in your terms. And it is just a surface layer, I will not even try to explain much more complex things like Russian by soul (ex. famous poet A.Pushkin, ancestor of Ephiopian nigger Ibragim Gannibal), Russian by recognition and other things, that is completely alien for you.
You don't have (and obvioulsy don't want to obtain) any means in your mentality to understand that. That simple.
Strictly speaking astrophysics/cosmology, just like particle physics divided into two separate things - theorists and practics. And problem is that theorists produce too many theories, mathematically correct, but unfounded in reality. Practics do a great job disproving all that stuff (showing that 10^120 errors), but they can't handle all that constant flow of garbage from theorists.
It is like overloading experimenters wtih random theories. Theorists today does not need their theories being proven practically to get grant money, so they just publish mathematically correct garbage and switch to creating new theory to get new grant. Something tells me that this done intentionally, to disrupt science process in very important areas of science that could produce brearthrough discoveries and inventions.
Ideally, theorist should not get grant money in full until his current theory checked in practice. And only when his theory proven or disproven by experiment(observation of things predicted by theory in case of astrophysics), he should be able to apply for the new grant and switch to another problem.
Today, theorist just publish his article, and that accounted like his job is done. This ruins scientific method. Divide and conquer principle applied to science by elites.