Einstein exposed.
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (107)
sorted by:
Because Einshtein worshippers said that? :) It is absolutely impossible if somebody ended with E=mc² formula and subbenly didn't have any thoughts about connection of mass with energy. On;y complete idiot could believe that having E=mc² Poincare "failed to connect" something. He was not as dumb as Einshtein.
How interesting, that nearly all of your "Nazi cunts" always eventually ended working for Jews. Werner von Braun who ended working for disgusting Jews in control of USA at that time is not an exception.
Are they really "Nazi cunts"? Does "Nazi" really means antisemitic? Why your "Nazi" never destroyed any Jewish state and never threaten any Jewish business? Why Nazi always work only for Jewish benefits, from Third Reich to modern Ukraine?
In any case it is inevitable that Einshtien cult will be destroyed and all that Jewish science-like cabal will be buried in oblivion. It's just a matter of time. In the best case, Einshtein will be mentioned in one row with Judas and Trotsky, as one of the greatesrt enemies of humanity.
Poincaré, however, failed to connect E with the mass of any real body.
Fuck. Another one who doesn't understand the words they use. Impossible? What fuckin world do you live in? Improbable maybe but doubtful
Why do you think that something written in MSM is true? Scientific American is a shitty science-like MSM who wrote a lot about climatehoax, vaccinehoax, coonahoax and other hoaxes. Why wouldn't they support einshteinhoax?
If your common sense (if you have any) could be so easily shut down by some shit printed in MSM, you are doomed.
It's fascinating, really. Scientist, who derived some very interesting formula, deny to analyse it in depth for all possible deductions and physical meanings. :) You definitely have to be completely retarded or indoctrinated to believe that crap.
We are not yet in a world where they can blatantly contradict physical books on known scientific findings and assuming that nothing you read can possibly be the truth because of the source means they've programmed you effectively.
We already are. Climatehoax, at least in "greenhouse" area blatantly contradicts basics of thermodynamics. But that contradiction is absolutely silenced in any literature. Basics of "geenhouse" include not only rise of average temperature, but also unalienable lowering of temperature gradients in time and distance. Show me a single climatehoax article (peer-reviewed or popular) touching "greenhouse" question where lowering of temperature gradients is ever mentioned. And this have huge importance. Rising average temperature from 5°C (with -40°C to +50°C gradients) to 15°C due to greenhouse effect does not mean that we will have -30°C to +60°C hell. It is likely will be something like +5°C to +25°C with average +15°C. Isn't that much better than current -40°C to +50°C range?
Scientific findings does not matter when those who control information have an agenda.