Many proteins in ameoba is much more complex than ones used by viruses.
As for viruses origin, one of theories is that one of amoeba organella that carry DNA/RNA parts to organellas that build proteins of amoeba occasionally have DNA/RNA of itself to produce inside, this DNA/RNA was damaged by whatever cause so to add ability of outer proteine to pierce cell walls and when that broken DNA/RNA was transcribed by protein producing organella, new entities broke out of amoeba into external world and began to pierce into other ameobas.
Really, virus is not something alive, it is just a chemical substance with information of how to build that substance suitable for cell part that produce proteins. So, when that substance is reached part of cell that produces proteine according to given DNA/RNA it will produce same substance,
Technically there is nothing impossible in existing of such substances. So, the real question is not if they could exist, and even not if they exist (there are enough proofs that at least some of them are real) the question is how many of them are real and what they really do, apart self-replicating, and how many was thinked out for cookies by scumbags who pose themselves as scientists.
-
Shutoff is a multiple different things now. Often, when you shutdown laptop by button or from win/ios, it does not turn off the power, but fall into suspend mode, where everything except RAM is turned off to keep the contents of the RAM intact and immidiately continue from the place you stopped when you turn it on. But RAM used in modern PCs is dynamic one and eat noticeable amount of power. And things goes worse with every new dynamic RAM generation.
-
If modern OS sheduled applying updates, it will not shutdown really, it will just turn off screen and continue to work installing updates. This could eat battery very fast, since for unknown reason applying updates in win/ios is not just unpacking new binaries in place of old ones as in normal systems, but a lot of power hungry searches, rebuilding databases and tons of other stupid stuff due to stupid OS design.
-
I met some laptops that had strange vendor software, something like "WhateverBrand Laptop Control Center" with "battery care" folder/section with option of "thorough battery check" - it tries to discharge battery for some time loading processor with useless calculations and calculate battery real current capacity from voltage drop under serious load. As usual for "vendor" soft such utilities are low quality and often have serious bugs. So, if "periodic thorough bettery check" option is turned on, it could occasionally endlessly loop in that discharging test. Always remove any "vendor helper utilities" from your computer if you are not ready to investigate sudden strange accidents.
One small remark - there was no such thing as "Ukraine" nor 1000 years before Khazaria, nor diring Khazaria nor long after Khazaria. However there always was some outskirts of Rus/Russia everywhere on its borders. Word "outskirts" in ancient Russian written as "oukraina" ("ѹкраина" where "ѹ" is single letter of ancient russian alphabet). So, there was multiple ukraines in Russia, and none was something more than just outskirts. LARPers that find mentions of word "ѹкраина" in ancient Russian texts and pose them as a proof of existing of their "Ukraine" state are just lying directly to your face. As a kind of state Ukaine was first established by Lenin in 1922 as part of future USSR and it was assembled from Malorossia and Poland regions of Russian Empire.
Confirm that. Also, in Orthodox Christianity skull symbol have a different meaning than in Catolicism or wider in the Western culture, f.e. Skull symbolic in Orthodox Christian culture symbolize freedom from the death and possibility of salvation for anyone and also is a reminder about frailty of this world. It is not grim and frightening as in the West.
We also nodding but more to people we know, like colleagues, neighbours, not to strangers. Silent version of "hello". However, in rural areas it is accepted to say hello to everybody, even to someone you don't know.
IDK, it is cultural thing, I think. I know people on the West smile more that Russians, but it is mostly act of politeness, not always a demonstration of real feelings. We smile only when we really feel so, not just to be good looking. Of course, the lovely girl is often the case for me. :)
Fear is a side effect of the low vibe.
That sounds more reasonable.
Helps you determine who to smile at.
I'll smile only if I have a reason to, regardless of who is before me.
Weird.
We had something from that area of knowledge in Soviet school, but it was combined military/survival preparedness lessons where we was teached everything from how to disassemble/assemble AK47 and use it to PPE stuff and how to get clean water in case of disaster using things laying around. It named "Basics of Military Training", and was mandatory for both boys and girls. Nothing weird, really. Of course with grain of some politics and learning ceremonial steps, but overall now I still think it was useful and sometimes fun. Still could disassemble/assemble AK in less than a minute. :) And most of girls from my class still could too. :)
Nobody to blame but the governor
I already get it.
It is a reply from a server, so it is perfectly accessible from Russia, but deny access from Russian IP's.
So, no, it is not Russia restricting my internet access, it is 10TV restrict my access to their news because I'm in Russia. Fascinating, isn't it?
High vibe attracts better things to you.
I agree.
Low fear vibe attracts negative things to you.
So you think that absence of any fear will automatically put you on high vibes?
That’s the secret.
Attracting good and bad is not a secret. This works, i know.
You can call me a scitzo and not believe it if you wish.
I don't think you are a schizo or watever, I just want to understand how fear connected with vibes in your theory.
You think it is easy to find that stuff from Russia?
Access Denied You don't have permission to access "http://www.10tv.com/article/news/local/ohio/fema-team-deployed-to-ohio-train-derailment-site/530-d4df1cd1-9a4d-4c40-b2e4-db6c0220e4c3" on this server.
Fucking paranoics.
However, i have a VPN and it is a yesterday article. Kind of too late to save people from more than two week old disaster?
Here is a link to the article accessible for everybody:
For example, if someone fears getting burned severely for a long enough time, they will get burned.
You are talking about some mental issue, not about normal human instincts.
High vibe attracts all desires whether it's a good spouse, good health, good friends or even a good income.
So, you suggest to live in same shitty system, but just be happy about that in the hope that all shiit will somehow resolve itself?
I know about that kind of stuff, like "mastering reality", like "imagine that you already have a job you want, then you will have much more chances to really get it", but how it is connected with fear? And usually people who are able to do that kind of stuff don't have any problems with fear and they don't need to get rid of it. And that things does not work always. Sometimes they doesn't and without fear you will not be able even to prepare plan B for case of fail.
It is not fear, disgust or whatever normal human safety mechanism that do not allow such things, it is more giving a fuck to each and every single problem, including completely unimportant ones, people meet or forced to believe in. Or leaning on artificial narratives people was indoctrinated before.
I'll say to get your "high vibe" it is much more important, f.e. to kill a government in yourself, instead of fighting with your own basic instincts.
For example, mental peace is much more valuable than money.
Mental peace is orthogonal with money, you could easily have both and have none, they are not connected. Money is just a tool. It is like to compare an ability to properly design and calculate a house with a hammer.
Y’all want fema camps now?
I'm just trying to figure out how such things works in US. I thought that this catastrophe will be immidiately used by FEMA to force their FEMA camps along with other activity to show the usefulness and virtue of that controversial FEMA camps, but seems it need an invitation from state to do that, as other user told me.
So, state tell Feds that there is no emergency?
Well assume fear was a magnet that actually attracted what you feared to you. What good is that?
Explain please, how, f.e. fear of high temperatures attract high temperatures to you?
You can say you get a job out of fear of going hungry or you can say you get a job out of love for you and your family to stay fed.
I thought in your picture of high-rise vibe realm people get a job because they like to create things for others, f.e. But you are talking about fucking money. I'm disappointed. Seems that we have very different meaning of "high vibes" and all that non-physical stuff.
Whatever world we live in, physical or not, there are some basic instincts to protect us. Whatever world we live, there are dangers, not necessary physical. And fear helps us to avoid them. What if somebody, who already abandoned fear, will then rise his vibe frequency too high or in wrong direction? There will be no mechanism anymore to prevent him from that or to think carefully before doing it.
Funny that mind controlled computing is not a new thing, and suddenly does not need any implants. EEG is pretty complex thing containing a lot of information perfectly useable for computer control and even DIYers successfully do that kind of stuff without billions of finacing for a long time.
But somehow nobody except enthusiasts are trying to decode EEG signals. Instead, without studying even that basic thing, corporations want to intrude right into the brain. It's like disassembling a car engine when it is necessary to just pump a flat tire.
Looks like they don't need any real results, just want to legalise the next, direct step of fucking your brain. They are not able and don't need to get a mind control or whatever pessimistic part of us think they want to do, they just want to fuck others brains deeper then they already do.
I like your writing, but really fear is pretty useful thing. Reasonable fear, of course, not induced irrational one.
Fear is just one of our safety mechanisms, like disgust, pain, vomit and so on. And as any other mechanism it could be used wrong way to harm you, not to help you. You don't need to abandon fear, you need not allow others use your safety mechanism against you. Not so complex thing really.
Isn't FEMA supposed to actively doing all that evacuation, cleaning, deactivation and all that emergency stuff immidiately, since first seconds, in case of that kind of catastrophic events in US?
As I understand there are still no FEMA forces (that officially exists exactly for that kind of events) on site for some unclear reason, I didn't get from official explanations.
If me and my neighbour have the same ISP, we will likely be on the same subnet and thus function as only a single node.
You will have half of propability to get reward than single user in network of same size.
Statistically, there will be some known ratio of number of regular crypto users per, say /24 range of regular provider. That could be taken in account and prevent bying of networks specifically to mine coins.
On the other hand, people with control of the IP address allocation will have the ability to allocate themselves a node on every subnet.
So, they will share probability of getting reward with regular users in this networks doing the job of network support.
This likely favours those with control of the network infrastructure, i.e. tech companies who are in turn owned by billionaires.
Even largest companies have a limited address space. And they can't utilise whole networks to run nodes. So, there will be nodes of regular users that will have same probability of getting reward as nodes installed by owners of networks. In any case this will give more uniform distribution of rewards for supporting network than proof-of work degenerate into.
Notice, that even proof-of-work crypto finally come to idea of minimg pools, where multiple people combine their computing power and share reward. Proof-of-network have this feature as basis out-of-the box.
Also, there could be many other ways to prevent "networking power concentration". It is just a testing ground for now, so nothing is settled yet.
All I said is just example that crypto have other ways to develop in something more interesting, than conventional proof-of-work crypto to avoid many drawbacks proof-of-work have.
Yes, that's more correct.
How hard would it be for a billionaire to own millions of nodes on the network?
It could be limited to IPs, IP ranges or even AS, so IP, IP range or whole AS with multiple nodes receive as much as single node in IP, IP range or AS. So there will be no any reason even to buy IP ranges or Autonomous systems, since it will not give billionaire any advantage over average regular user running node at home, because all his nodes will be accounted as one.
Falsely represent themselves as legitimate media
Fascinating. Do they understand that this is direct Pfizer's acknowledgement of control over "legitimate media"?
It's OK to talk out "company information" only to media that is controlled by Pfizer because they are shure that they will easily censor everything hermful for Pfizer before publishing, and is not OK to talk to media that is not under Pfizer control because that "company information" could reach public without censorship.
Some survived, some don't, really. For those who survived it is all about probabilities. If virus would be deadly it will extinct with amoebas fast. If it is not, it will survive as amoebas Also those amoebas who developed protection against deadly viruses (occasional change in wall protein, f.e.) will survive too.
Taking in account trillions of trillions amoebas who live fast and divide young, this small probabilities moves from region of impossible to region of inevitable.
It is obvious that viruses can't evolve by themselves because they are not alive and could not survive without the cell with that protein fabric inside. But every cell have virus-like particles that transfer parts of DNA/RNA from core to their protein fabrics to grow and divide. billions of years and trillions of trillions primeval bacterias/amoebas/single-cell creatures give a good chance for such thing as virus to be created.
Bacterias are alive, all in all. Concept of virus is that it is a chemical substance, complex, but not able to reproduce by itself. And in simpliest possible bacteria you still have to have protein fabric to build and repair that bacteria. And that fabric have to somehow get instructions of what protein to build and how. And there should be a way to transfer parts of whole DNA to that fabrics. So we again have a ground for a virus creation.
Not all viruses "found" only by PCR tests. Long time ago, when scientists wanted to know the truth, viruses was properly separated, purified and then that purified sample (water and particles of interest only) was used to produce same disease in plants or whatever test species. Separation process clearly point to the average size of studied objects and they was definitely much smaller than any potential bacteria. You can't have bacteria smaller than certain dimentions, because it needs certain parts to exists. estimated virus size was like single bacteria part. And they do not multiply by themselves, so they definitely need a host to reproduce.
There is no better theory of that observed phenomena. Even if methods used for preparation of samples for electron microscopy are questionable, they does not disprove that theory.
Since theory explains everything about viruses, and there are no disproofs, why should we throw it out?
Fact that some bastards use some theory for their scams does not make that theory wrong or evil. It is just a theory, and if it is incorrect, it should be disproven scientifically, and not politically of just because we don't like bastards who base their scam on it.
As for particle physics - imagine that you have a model that perfectly destcribe some part of curve. Every experiment in knwon range validates it. But it is unknown how that curve behave outside that known range. So, everybody is formally free to continue that curve as they wish. Rise it up, bent it down, for any degree. And every such "prediction" is a source of money. Standard model have a strict range. "Randomly continuing curve" is an equivalent of predicting new particle "based on standard model" with certain parameters. Parameters could be validated by actual experiment that will or will not show a particle with predicted parameters. Each prediction of new particle and experiment is a grant money. And nobody care if experiment disprove that random prediction, Publication is not retracted if prediction was proven false. "Scientists with publications" will just roll out a new one and those who give grants will give next grant for "opening new particle" because it sounds cool and it is a "scientist" with publications. You get a business instead of science based on perfectly valid theory.
That problem with commercialising even physics science is perfectly known, but too little scientists risk to talk about that in current circumstances.
With bio sciences things are much worse.