3
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

How I lifted and moved 4 ton concrete airfield plate (6x2x0.15m approx) without any help:

  1. Find a center of the plate.
  2. Dig out ground from under one end almost (approx 20 cm) to the center of the plate, Fill it up back after 5.
  3. Put some rocks on the end of plate that is over the digged cavern. Plate will tilt.
  4. Push a thick wood plank under the plate approx 20 cm from center of the plate on the opposite side.
  5. Move rocks from one end to another. Plate will tilt to the other side over plank.
  6. Put another plank 20 cm from center like first one, but on another side
  7. Move rocks to the other end.
  8. Repeat 4.-7. adding planks until you get necessary height. Add planks under the ends of plate too, to avoid too much tilt - plate could slide off if tilt is too big.

After lifting this 4 ton plate 30cm I put a dozen round logs under and lower plate to that logs tilting it and removing planks. Then began to push plate on logs using plank as lever. As it moved enough to free last log, I moved this log forward. This way I rolled plate to place I needed.

4 ton plate, one human, some wood and some beer. Lifted and moved without any enormous efforts in a few hours ( beer took some time, you know :) ).

You could move much larger stones same way, especially if you have unlimited slaves. Then say some chutzpa to your friends and shills about magic power of some shitty ring you rob recently of some unlucky dude.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

LiDAR can't make that SciFi "X-Ray" things. LiDAR is Light Detection and Ranging. $10 ToF laser ruler is a basic LiDAR. It measure distance to the reflecting object. Measuring distances to different points of oblect will make 3D "point cloud". This could be automated with few tricks, like moving mirrors. LiDAR scanner price depends on range, longer range you need, more powerful laser you need. Simple LiDAR for robot vacuum cleaner is less than $100 on Aliexpress. Fine for a room, but useless for scanning mountain. $25k looks like a decent price for a LiDAR that could scan a mountain.

You can't measure distance to something that is behind or inside something opaque. Obviously. Light can't pass through opaque things.

To find and picture underground cavern you need acoustic sensors mesh and some explosives. Echolocation in sophisticated form and all that stuff. You put a lot of acoustic sensors evenly around place you want to explore, then detonate something to produce large acoustic wave in the ground. "Fire in the hole" - and collect signals from sensors. Acoustic wave from explosion would reflect from cavities and junctions of different mineral, kind of echo. Sensors will get one large spike of explosion and lower spikes for reflections. Time between explosion and echoes means distance. Analysing this data from all that mesh of sensors in different places you could restore some image that could depict something interesting. However, it will not be a perfect image like on above pictures, in the best case you will get something like ultrasound image of your guts. :) This have nothing to do with LiDAR. And it will cost much more than $25k.

6
CrazyRussian 6 points ago +6 / -0

You can't carbon date anything that was not alive at some point of time.

Carbon dating method based on the fact that atmosphere have known percentage of C14 carbon isotope. Being consumed one way or another from atmosphere, along with normal carbon. After consuming and eventual death of something alive, C14 decays, again with known rate. Since there is no income of atmospheric C14 after death, you could estimate date of death by the content of C14 in remnants. This method works for anything with organic origin, from wood to the human remnants.

It will not work for things that have no parts made from something that was alive - wood pieces, bones, leather, whatever. And certainly will not work for something made from metal alloy.

Also, there are no place in periodic table for any undiscovered rare earth elements.

3
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

And where is it?

Cabal have no brains to develop anything by themselves. So there is no way they could own and control it.

Technology is not the thing you could hide for a long time. There always will be traces of its parts in many areas. If there is no such traces anywhere, then there are no any "secret advanced technology".

The only way cabal could kind of "have" something is when their masters gave it to them as finished devices, but only under their masters control and supervision. Cabal doesn't own it. And it is not very clear then why would cabal masters will ever give such things to cabal. Show them to cabal puppets - may be. To intimidate and bend cabal. Transfer it to cabal - highly questionable. Nobody knows disgusting, traitorus and fouly cabal nature better than their masters. Masters will never trust cabal.

And any unauthorised use or attempts to study such tech will spread multiple traces in human science and tech with unpredictable consequences. None of that happened.

So, cabal does not have any advaced tech at all.

3
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

There is nothing crazy in semiconductor manufacturing.

There are much more entertaining and informative videos about making ICs f.e. https://www.youtube.com/@SamZeloof/videos Dude makes ICs in his garage and explain a lot of details and tricks. Tricky, but no any magic. And the whole step-by-step progress from simple semiconductor diode to ICs uncovered .

Alien technology should have a very distinct property - it have to appear from nowhere, without all that sequential and continuous developments from simple element based on some discovered phenomena to complex devices. Looking for such tech appeared in whole from nowhere, I still found none. Either there is no any alien tech, either it is strictly prohibited to study and replicate it.

That CGI have many factual mistakes in depicting semiconductor manufacturing. F.e. raw silicon is made from quartz sand, not stones. Before growing silicone crystal, from melted silicone, there is multistage purifying process to get rid of natural contaminants in silicone, and so on.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

In other Lenin's writing ( letter to A.M.Gorkiy, 15 Sep 1919) he decisively stated that "intelligentsia, that gladly serves any capital, is not a brain of nation, but its shit". Go figure. :) Especilally taking in account that Lenin itself served Morgan/Rothshild/Rockfeller capital. :)

3
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Google founders are Sergey Brin, Jewish, and Larry Page, Jewish. Founded by CIA and DARPA, both controlled by Jews.

What did you expect from anything that comes from Google? There is no any need for all that tinkering with logos, brands and whatever shit. Founded/financed by Jews - bad, don't use. That simple.

4
CrazyRussian 4 points ago +4 / -0

I don't remember anything about worshipping some ancient entites from my soviet past. It was mostly agnostic with some shift to the side of atheism, but this shift was mostly ignored by population that was after traditional Orthodox Christianity regardless of jewish attempts to force atheism.

As for death, switch to capitalism was as deadly, as wars. In USSR white population steadily grow, despite all communist shit, with capitalism white population on ex-USSR territory began to shrink.

So, speaking about death cult, I'll choose modern capitalism as a nominate. When population put profit above anything else, that does not help with producing life.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

What could these voluminous data processing centers be for?

Whatever. Cloud storage, surveillance datacenters, yet another soсial shitwork, or just huge hangars with unpowered server racks. But first of all they are just the source of computer hardware manufacturers profit.

Just like wars for MIC or ill population for BigPharma.

There is no any need for enormous computing power produced by all computer hardware manufacturers. So they push bloatware, cloud shit and that "AI datacenters". To sell overpriced chips nobody really need.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

False dichotomy.

Usually, after that statement, comes explanation of third option. Am I missed something?

You can command people while giving reasons.

You can only motivate with reasons, not command. Free will and all that stuff.

Leftists don't see transgenderism is bad.

Many bad persons don't saw cucumbers as bad. So what? I really don't give a fuck about what some human garbage see or think. Who the fuck this leftists you think are, to give any fuck to what they think?

Yes it did. If it didn't, there'd be no Christians.

Christ was last God's resort to bring Jews to senses. If Jews accepted God earlier, there would had been no any need to send Christ to Jews.

Verse???

John 15:13

So?

There is endless ways to live your life right way. Not one, as you suppose.

Verses?

Mattew 5

Contradiction.

Simple logic. Just in "all trucks are cars, but not all cars are truck".

"Those who suffer will be saved" does not mean that those who do not suffer will not be saved.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Stupidity and unwillingness to study how things really work should be a mortal sin.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

False dichotomy found.

It's not a dichotomy, it's the deal I propose. It's up to you to agree to make it or decline it. You free to decline mine and accept some other. If you find one.

I think that there is many ways to solve cabal problem once and for all. But I don't see anybody trying to find that other solutions.

The solution wouldn't be your specific suggestion.

No problem. Describe any other way to destroy cabal and prevent its creation in future. I'll be happy to read about it, sincerely.

Every state prints the one american currency. No single fed.

And how that make usury impossible?

The alternative is demonstrably worse. We have all of history to back that up.

We never had replicators. Just stealing all money from somebody to your pocket does not mean you get rid of money.

What makes you soo sure your system is immune?

There is no way cabal could suck wealth from people. Because there wiill be no tool to do that.

They exist thanks to leftism, the fed, the irs.

Why do you think so? They exist because profit is above all. If you cure man properly, once and forever, then you will lose all future profits. So, healthy people are just unprofitable for that business, and that's all.

Won't be solved by anything you propse, that's a fact. Mao, lenin, stalin.

None of them made replicators and power sources to make money useless. All of them used money to control people, just like modern cabal. They just used different ideology to control people, but with exactly same result.

I don't see any fundamental difference between their socialism and modern capitalism. Different words, same result. Moreover, I see socialism much worse than soviet one inside all corporations. They are all more socialist and totalitarina inside, than Mao, Lenin and Stalin together.

If you wanna experiment, experiement with naziism, that's less deadly.

Ntional-socialists had very interesting experiments with different kind of money, but they alll was eventually closed, because elites start to lose control and income.

Then spread the Truth.

Cabal don't care about Truth. And modern system built so, that the only result of removing of current cabal with help of Truth will just bring another cabal, often even worse than previous.

Spreading the Truth is not enough.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Interesting

When you say just

End the irs and fed and immig. act of 1965 and deport illegals and remove cabal

And when I tell you how to remove cabal, then, you immidiately back up.

What is more important for you - existence of money or absence of cabal? Would you agree to renounce the whole concept of money in exchange to final and eternal solution for cabal problem?

If not, the explain how you suppose to prevet creation of cabal if there still will be usury, speculation and all that money stuff that creates cabal? If you have an idea or concept of some form of money that will still could be means of exchange, but at the same time usury and speculation will be impossible, I'm all ears.

Looks like you are ready for anything, including acceptimg cabal to keep that money thing.

Impossible to do practically today.

Today - yes. Tomorrow - not so impossible. But to make it possible tomorrow, you need at least start to think about it today.

Then squish it.

Then, you are not different from modern medicine and BigPharma. Instead of solving problem, you propose just mitigate consequences. Does money really worth that shit?

There'll always be one, money or not. What produces it is contra-Christian worldviews.

If you have just contra-Christian wordview, then you'll just go to hell in the end and that's all. If you have contra-Christian wordview and a lot of money as a tool to force them on other people, then you still will go to hell, but took a lot of people with you, doing a lot of shit to others.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

And then they'll shut down your new attempt. Then what?

Cabal is in no way omnipotent. They could be omnipotent only in their field - money, politics, mass-media. They can't shutdown laws of physics f.e. And there are many other things, those who talk about cabal don't want to discuss.

Look, in that topic I pointed, that one of the things cabal use heavily as a main tool for opression could become void and useless. I mean money. But looks like most account money not as a tool for solving some problems that could be solved in many other ways, but as something untoucheable. When you begin to talk about elimination of money, not as papers bills and accounts, but as a whole concept, people stuck completely. Even here, not even talking about vegetables. So people indoctrinated that money is something untoucheable, and if you touch it, then their whole world will cease to exist.

But you can't defeat cabal on the field of money. And even if you kill them all, and don't get rid of money, then new cabal will appear in no time. Money have positive and negative properties. Cabal use negative money properties to obtain control. From alll variants of money I ever heard about, none was wihout this negative properties. With any kind of money you eventually fall to usury and all its consequences.

Why is it so hard at least for most people to speculate about eliminating thing that produce cabal - IDK.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

End the irs and fed and immig. act of 1965 and deport illegals and remove cabal = prosperity

Cabal will resist heavily with all their resources, and to defeat it in direct clash you need more resources (all of them - money, media, political power, control over education, police and three-letter agencies and so on) than cabal have. I don't think direct defeat of cabal on their field is possible at all. They created this field for centuries exactly with that purpose in mind. So,the solution is to change the game, not to play their.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Running a country =/= running a family.

Absolutely. Country and family run on different principles and on different scale. But this does not mean that principles country runs on, can't or shouldn't be changed.

Many problems with running country rooted in principles this country runs on and their combinations. With time this problems only grow and enchance, which is perfectly observable in realtime. F.e. with current principles most countries run on, kakistocracy and economy of shit is unavoidable, and there are no any working mechanisms to effectively mitigate that.

5
CrazyRussian 5 points ago +5 / -0

Why did JEWS invent AI?

They didn't. AI can't exist for the purely technical reasons carefully organised by Jews in previous decades. "AI" is just another Jewish chutzpa to shift the responsibility from exact persons to non-existent "AI", nothing more.

Jews killed everyhting in computer science that could be a foundation of AI long before public met with "AI" hype.

Real AI is an existential threat to the Jews. That;s why they will do anything to prevent its creation.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's more like a half working model and just the core components are stripped from it so you will never really understand how things work.

Then, there obviously should be another theory, or important addition to the current theory that could be checked experimentally to find out is there missing parts or not.

Such additions and theories generated constantly, but none of them was proven practically, not even talking about usefullness. Mostly, it is just theorists playing with math to get grants and fame, nothing more. Math is not a science, just a language to describe reality. And as in any other language you could easily talk bullshit in math, which is syntactically and grammatically correct, but that have nothing to do with how things really are. The fact that you could use math to describe something real, is in no way mean that if you write something in math it have to be real. Einstein (and those behind him), meanwhile, cheated with exactly that logical fallacy to push his idiotic speed limit, and other shit into science. He, and his supporters insisted that if math jugglery gives something, than it sould be for real.

You are right, that modern "particle theory" is not complete, but this does not mean that this incompleteness make the whole theory wrong. Things that described and predicted by "particle theory" agree well with observations, and proved by endless real-world applications. Need to go further to complete this theory, does not discard anything that already work.

All my speculations about creating matter are deep within well checked and practically proven area of "particle theory", not at some edge of incomleteness.

Developing "particle theory" further, or even creating new theory will change nothing in my speculations, because practice will continue to give same results, regardless of theory behind them.

organic chemistry are riddled with flaws

You don't need to go to organic chemistry, even chemical processes in concrete, known for millenia, is still a mistery. This does not mean that concrete is impossible.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Have you heard that Einstein and particle theory is a hoax to throw our entire civilization off?

Einshtein is a jewish scammer. "Particle theory" is a working and proven model of how our world works. You use multiple things based on what you call "Particle theory" routinely, 24/7.

Mixing, say, Washington Post articles and lathe machining textbook in one sentence makes you a troll.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Families are not goverments nor economic systems.

They are social systems. Social systems that perfectly existing without government and economic relations inside. They are solid proof that social system could be stable and productive without using money and oppression.

You are doing to "communism" and "capitalism" what the dems did to "bigot" and "nazzi".

If you have another terms to describe social relations between people, I'm all ears.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

So what do you do when you need someone to build you a house using your free replicator bricks?

You don't need anyone help to build a house from properly designed parts. And you have a lot of free time to do it by yourself.

You keep saying money won't be needed but how will people exchange services and what will incentivize people to do such work for others?

Boredom will perfectly incentivize people.

So you just glossed over the commandment God gave Adam and Eve - not to eat the fruit?

That wasn't commandment. That was knowledge - "if you eat that fruit, you will become mortal". Humans did their choice, proving their free will.

that disobedience towards God

I don't see that story that way.

God had to flood the world because of how lawless and degenerate people have become

And it didn't work.

The tower of Babel wasn't built by jews. The Baal worshipping nations weren't jewsih (yes jews too worshipped Baal in the OT). Pagan Rome wasn't jewish.

Yes, but Jews was worse than all that. That's why God resorted to attempt to give them direct commandments.

He literally said that the path is straight and narrow, meaning you can't wander off and do whatever you like.

Straight and narrow doesn't mean you can't choose how to walk it. And it does not mean this way is the only one.

Moreover, Jesus gave many opportinities for salvation. You could become a monk, or just be a honest peasant. Even if you are sinner, all your sins will be instantly forgiven if you sacrifice your life to protect your friends and beloved ones. And so on. That's not one way already. And all that ways goes in one direction.

The way to truth and life is not a sandbox but a very strict and limiting path that few manage to follow.

And for each this way is his own. Not the only one, but many completely different way. If the way was one, then the Lives of the Saints would have been the same. But they are totally different.

As for suffering and all that stuff, Jesus only said that if you suffer, then your suffering will be rewarded with salvation. That does not mean that to reach salvation you have to suffer as much as you can. And that does not mean that if you will not suffer, you will not be able to be saved. Practically, you will somehow suffer in some circumstances on your lifepath, but this is in no way mandatory.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Money is the solution to the problem of determining value of different goods and services.

Once was. Until usurers come. Then we have much more problems than money could ever solve. It's that case when solution turned to be much worse than problem itself.

Exactly, same as not having to work to sustain yourself. This is why it's a double standard.

Interesting how you take everything purely in some abstract way.

Replicator does not eliminate the need to work to sustain yourself. It just make things, nothing more. It will not use them for you. You could get a brick for free, but you will have to do something with it to make it part of building.

Statement that you don't need to work to earn money, does not mean you don't need to work at all.

The whole point is to exclude money with all problems they produce from society.

A more appropriate definition would be changing man's nature according to a man made concept of what man should become

That's globohomo definition, limiting you to the mostly evil usage.

I would define it as a changing man's physical body for some purpose. Then, you have much more options, including good ones.

Look, BigPharma have a great power over people, because people sometimes get ill. Ilness is a malfunction of human body. If you use globohomo definition, then any attempt to really fix that body malfunction will look like something evil. And you stuck with endless mitigation of illness consequences, without actually fixing anything. That's exactly what BigPharma need to keep control over people.

If you deny globohomo definition, then you could fix an illness properly. Make so, that this illness would be impossible, do the same thing good engineer do to broken mechanism - replace/restore broken part such way, it will never broke again.

Is it "changingin man's nature"? Definitely. Is it inherently bad? I don't think so.

The reason why transhumanism is satanic is because it seeks to do so without God - to make us gods on our own merit through our own reason and means.

But you don't need to throw out God to "change man's nature". It's globohomos want you to throw out God and you believe them, stucking in the corner where "changing men's nature" could only be evil.

And you can't become god or even something close only 'changing men's nature". Because men's nature is not just physical body, it is much more.

Did God tell man "here, do whatever you feel like, man"?

No, He didn't. And He didn't say anything opposite. God told them - "Be fruitful and multiply; fill the Earth and subdue it.". That's all. That's not even a commandment, just "good luck" to beloved ones, before the start of endless and unpredictable journey of humanity.

Only when Jews separated themselves from all other people and turned to pure evil, resulting in disgust from any people they tried to live with, He gave them commandments in attempt to save them. This didn't work for long. Then God send His Son to them, in a last attempt to save them, and they just killed Christ.

It's absolutely bizarre to hear a Christian think God didn't set strict rules of conduct that set boundaries and limits our free will.

God did that for Jews only. And only because and when Jews turned to pure evil.

For us, normal people, Christ show direction, in two simple sentences, not set the rules or whatever. He show us the way, and it's completely up to us how to walk it.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you don't like communism in your family, then why don't you implement capitalism in it? There is no problem to do that, just insert money in all your family relations and set the price for everything you do to each other. Go for it, then tell us how you like it.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

The point I made was that man having to work and suffer to put bread on the table is not only natural, but ordained by God Himself.

And there is no any mention of money in that God ordnance.

But your system wants to do away with this natural order of things through technology.

I don't think that food from replicator will be popular. People will always prefer real food, grown by themselves. And replicator will allow to have all tech to do that with minimum efforts and maximum efficiency.

Globalist experimetns with artificial food failed miserably. People don't want food made from chemicals on factories even if they barely distinguishable from real ones. People need and want natural food. Most just have no spare time to grow it, so they have to buy it from BigAgro.

Why not also alleviate women's suffering due to childbirth and get rid of childbearing, replacing it with replicators/lab babies?

Because it is unnatural, just like artificial food.

This is basically transhumanism but you cherry pick things you like

That's the point of science and technology. You could separate good things from bad things and use only good ones.

Again, you for whatever reason accept "transhumanism" exactly like globohomos want it be accepted. They lie about everything, then why do you believe them that "transhumanism" thing is what they told you?

Transhumanism, apart from globohomo definition, in whole is changing human body in some way.

When you visit stomatologist to implant a tooth you lost, it is transhumanism. Is it inherently bad to have a tooth implant? I don't think so. What if you will be able just grow new tooth instead of lost one? Will it be against God ordnance or not?

It's strange for me to hear about some strict rules God once established and defined way of life of his creatures. Looks more like some talmudism or extreme islam, than Christianity.

God created us in His image and likeness. He even gave us free will, just like He have. And then you say that there is some predefined way of how and what we can do with material world. It completely contradicts with God's intentions to create beings in His image and likeness with free will. There is no any point to create beings with free will, and then limit them in using their free will.

Humans, being created in His image and likeness, and by the fact of such creation are obliged to study Universe and themselves to comprehend God's design, and use that knowledge on their will. The whole point of Christianity is to teach people to distinct good from evil and use their knowledge of Universe and themselves thoughtfully, that's all. But in your understanding of Christianity humans are limited to some exact and presribed path. That's nowhere near free will, and barely is Christianity.

It's not a technology or science that is good or evil. In whole technology and science is just a user manual for the material part of God's creation - Universe. And since it is endless, there is endless ways to do good and evil. It is only people who decide how to use it.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

The problem is that you'll have to coexist in a society along with degenerates.

Yes, just like we have to coexist with them now. Replicators do not remove degenerates, they just free you from feeding that degenerates like you have to now.

How will your system promote a virtuous and healthy community?

By removing unnecessary problems with money, usury, cheating and theft from community.

You know, the best way to lose a friend is to loan him some money. Money destroys and divide community. But today they are necessary for living and there is no practical workaround, so we stuck with all problems money create without a way to resolve them. And no, all that CBDC, precious metals and even independent crypto shit will not resolve them, regardless of what globohomos of different kind tell you.

The easiest way to degenerate an individual and society is to tell him to do whatever they like, to "emancipate" them from duties and authorities.

On the other hand, you degenerate an individual even more showing him that he could do anything he want, become authority himself and completely evade any responsibility if he have enough money.

I find it much worse than separate individual who just spend his lifetime in degenerate manner on its own.

Modern system we live in not only create degenerates, but encourage them to gain power and rule over normal people. Look at politicians or corporate owners - you have to try very hard to find somebody who is not degenerate who is doing what he want at expense of millions people who have to work hard to feed this degenerate. It is kakistocracy in full power, and there is no way to break this system by any political or economical means, because degenerates adjusted politics and economy so, that normal people can't change anything.

So, to destroy the power of degenerates, we need something difeerent from politics and economy. Not much things left, and one of them is technology.

Who will govern this tech paradise?

Why do you name it "paradise"? It's sad if you account full material satisfaction as paradise. Human life is not limited to material satisfaction. As for your question, I can't give you exact answer, but at least that will not be those who acquired enough money. It is already a huge progress. You could look at normal family, to somehow estimate kind of people who will possibly govern in such community. Who govern normal family?

Why would you need to make families and have children?

Because it is in human nature. When a human being doesn't want to have children, something definitely wrong with his brain and soul.

Isn't this also part of human nature:

Yes it is. Humans like to grow food. It gives huge satisfaction. That's one of the reasons people in cities more unhappy than those who live in rural areas.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›