this post was removed by the site filter. I just approved it now. Good list!
Here's the suit CHD and RFK Junior brought against the vaccine mandate at Rutger's University:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/Rutgers-Complaint.pdf
A decade in the making!
When they say full liability, that's a little misleading though. Pfizer is only liable if when you suffer an adverse reaction, you can prove that it was caused by the vaccine & it was NOT listed on the insert.
I think strange reactions could be related to the Israel connection. He was a valuable political tool for Israel, a crazy Israel-hating Palestinian Christian, who killed a Kennedy.
I think Russia didn't do fakes since America was far superior in producing special effects in cinema and photography and had more money. NASA's fakes were convincing enough that they still convince most to this day.
Think about it like this: compare films from the time; a good comparison is "2001: A Space Odyssey" and "Solaris" - both excellent space films, but the effects in 2001 are far more ingenious and convincing than those in the Russian film "Solaris". US military already had a fully equipped movie studio in Laurel Canyon for producing all kinds of propaganda; some say it was better equipped than even the top Hollywood studios.
I don't think Russia switched particularly; the venus missions are from the 80's for example. NASA's success probably put them off funding much real space exploration stuff, that was already going to be expensive, boring, and essentially unimpressive compared with America's elaborate fakery.
I agree they are in cahoots, but in the early days, NASA faked images and missions from the get go (when they realised they could not get people to the moon alive), whereas Russia didn't.
The info gleaned from these early Russian missions and explorations is valuable because it appears to be real info.
For example, cosmonauts could not last long in space, in cramped confines of spacecraft. When they came back after a couple of days they were near death (infarction). Whereas NASA astronauts emerge from allegedly weeks long mission with big smiles!
However Russia has never called out NASA on it's obvious fakes despite the obvious discrepancies such as above. There is an agreement in place. But who knows when that might break down.
As to China, they have clearly done fakes, but then they also produced lunar rover pictures that showed a brown surface which were probably real. Maybe that was a message to USA?
These were the only photos that could be obtained and transmitted before the lander succumbed to the adverse conditions on the surface. The 2 landers were Russian, not American/NASA.
It's an interesting topic, which I believe may be sensitive issue for some, but in general NASA is the space agency that does the fakes. Devon Island is a NASA project. I don't think I've ever seen a researcher call Russia out on any faked images.
In fact you can use some Russian images to prove NASA images are fakes - since early Russian satellite color images of the earth from the moon's perspective show the surface of the moon as a shade of brown, which correlates with spectral analysis done of the color of the moon's surface. However these things were still vaguely understood when NASA did it's first fakes of the moons surface, and they made it gray since that was the color they thought was accurate. It has been proved at various times in the past though, before and since the Apollo missions, that the surface is dark to light brown and not gray at all as seen in Apollo imagery; but this fact quietly ignored.
Detailed article on this topic:
The brown color of the moon is an established scientific fact!
The original photos were made with a scanner and they are long narrow panoramas. Everyone ever taken can be seen here:
https://www.planetary.org/articles/every-picture-from-venus-surface-ever
In the reddit post it's an image someone 'shopped, to try and make it look like a normal photo, as if you were standing there.
When trying to prove a fake, always find as close to the original image as possible.
countless lives
You can't count them because the number was zero.
Found it:
The Science ~ Lee Merritt, MD ~ “What is VAERS and What Does It Show?” from America's Front Line Doctors WHITE COAT SUMMIT: The One Year Anniversary
Listening again, I believe the title I pasted from telegram is wrong. She says she is a "ten year navy sugreon" not a "tenured navy surgeon" which anyway wouldn't make sense since tenure is a university term and practically doesn't exist anymore!
The clip came from Red Ice TV's telegram channel, but they've provided no context. I'll see what I can find.
I read the CHD and this. Rappoport explains it well at the end I think, it's really just a legal loophole
going forward, the Pfizer Biontech jab, now under the brand name "Comirnaty", is "FDA Approved". The vials of the vaccine in circulation now which are not branded "Comirnaty" do not fall under this approval - they are still only EUA. These vials are much more common than "Comirnaty" ones.
Though the substances in both types of vials are essentially the same, they are legally distinct products. Since the new one is the same as the old, FDA has also given it the same EUA as the older.
But, since the older vials don't have the brand name "comirnaty" printed on them, they do not pass for the legal "FDA approval". Using this as an excuse to refuse to be jabbed (with older vials not labelled "Comirnaty") could be a legal loophole people can make use of, but it is probably not a reliable position to take since "Pfizer Biontech" vials contain the same substance as "Comirnaty" vials.
Combine the standard forum format with: a permanent record, embedded images and videos, functionality like the extension 4chanx for 4chan i.e. show preview of off-screen replies when you hover over the code, previews of images, and custom filters... and I'd be sold.
This place better get embedded images soon - I find not having it very restricting.
While weapons like that exist, I'm skeptical they would be so open about talking about staff being victims of them without there being some ulterior motive. Pre-conditioning of the public for a False flag attack using such weapons?
is vespaisano a mod?
The largest and most important global sources of commercial satellite imagery, such as Maxar Technologies, and the largest and widely-used online resources, such as Google and Bing, are American and this makes KBA a powerful instrument of U.S. government suppression of information. For example, as a result of KBA, images on internet platforms such as Google Earth have been deliberately blurred
...KBA's restriction on satellite image collection and dissemination has been extended to include the Palestinian territories and the Golan Heights. As a consequence, the law has obscured important aspects of the Israeli territories, including the expansion of Israeli settlements in the West Bank, and demolitions of Palestinian homes by the Israeli government
Nice. Thanks for alerting me to the post BTW. I don't see credit given to u/Eagleheart585 on the dcclothesline page. Shame.
Higher res version of that image:
It's claimed she was invented to create a narrative where her father, who is wanted by Intelligence, kidnapped her, and it's hoped that will convince China, where he fled to, to hand him over. Sorry the resolution in the last pic isn't great.
Covid is pneumonia, it's not new. The definition of "covid" is "atypical pneumonia". The "atypical" part indicates the pneumonia is caused by an "unknown" or "novel" pathogen, that they say they have no specific treatment for. Typical pneumonias have treatment protocols already set.
They say they have a test that can pick up this new pathogen, they gave it the name SARSCOV2, and then call you a "covid sufferer" if you test "positive", regardless if you're sick or not.
The problem is the test is triggered "positive" by a number of different molecules or "viruses". It can't distinguish between the "influenza virus" and the "corona virus" for example. It also has a high rate of false positives, potentially extremely high, depending on how it's done. It is generally done in the way that produces the most false positives, seemingly intentionally, since this aspect is well known and was even mentioned by Fauci last Summer.
However, if you are suffering from pneumonia, it is still pneumonia, no matter what it was caused by. If you get pneumonia, it's serious. It can kill and is often difficult to cure and treat, even before the invention of covid, and especially in older, unhealthy (for whatever reason) people.
Steele was 69 and not the healthiest looking guy.