That trailer. Cringe
Yes, two pipes taped to a piece of wood, battery taped underneath. But that's nothing, check out the 9 barrelled one they found in his home:
Here's Novaxx's actual win:
Also, a Russian born woman Elena Rybakina won the women's, despite Wimbledon BANNING Russians from competing; She changed her citizenship from Russia to Kazakhstan in 2018 because Kazakhstan offered her a lot of money to do so. from what I've read that seems to be the only reason for her doing so... no mention of any familial connections to Kazakhstan.
I definitely think she is being groomed as a poster "girl" for trannying. They need a prominent (and youngish) tranny "success" story (that is openly acknowledged, unlike Mike Obama or "Brigitte" Macron) to influence younger people who might be encountering too much tranny-realism online. She's probably carefully cultivated by handlers to always appear enthusiastic and never betray any doubt about what she's done, and probably had the very best surgeon money could buy, sponsored of course. Having said that, in some photos she looks absolutely wretched and you can see the suffering in her eyes, which shows trannying has done zero to help her psychologically, despite what she says. If it is all as I believe, trannies are being cultivated as a type of "priest" class, as they were in the ancient pre-roman Mithras religion (male priests dressed and behaved like females), an evolution of which appears to be under revival among the uber wealthy
if it did not exists, according to the model everything would be massless
This in a nutshell is all modern physics. Faith in our models, not in observation. "The model they pulled out of our asses says it should be there", and when it proved difficult to find, they lowered the bar for observations, allowing vague "data signals" to be enough to declare existence of something - "you want more solid proof? Triple our funding!" - ad infinitum. And here we are, with LHC being bumped up at tremendous expense to find even more elusive and vague signals identifiable only by the insane and delusional (or clever con-artist) theoretical physicists.
The brief case is actually a ballistic shield, but it failed to operate as intended. it's supposed to open and unfold to three times longer, blocking Abe's silhouette. I would agree it doesn't look like a regular bullet hit, but also: it was a homemade gun using black powder, hence all the smoke. So the projectile doesn't quite have the same velocity or power as proper shot fired from proper gun (I guess?). Still could be fake though.
You can see his DIY sawn-off shotgun more clearly in that image.
It might have been this article, I posted it a while ago:
Fat fuck Gov Pritzker, he of the Hyatt Hotel crime family / empire, who has a troon sister who is the largest private funder in the world of tranny shit, just won the democratic primary on June 29th to run for re-election as gov - he was quick to get in front of cameras about this shooting, something people are saying he's never bothered much with before, despite the large quantity of gun violence that happens in Chicago
Link to a blog with photos and videos, posted in the reddit thread, still up:
subreddit already banned, but archive has screen shots (https://archive.ph/https://www.reddit.com/r/robert_crimo_project/) and it was indeed created one month ago according to JS:
The original post had 780 comments before Reddit banned the sub - none of the comments are archived there.
Wayback has one capture from 4 minutes after the original post was created on may 17:
And then 4 captures from over night, again none appear to have captured all the 750 comments, but the earliest one caught some:
Twitter account temp restricted: https://twitter.com/b74776838
Some archived screenshots, account created May 17:
Lmao - how many of them were yours?
Still one of the least acceptable conspiracies, even among the so-called "red-pilled". It is fascinating, I think it's deeply seeded in scholastic indoctrination, and racial/national/ideological pride. I think the key is revealing to them that all the major players in the landings were freemasons and occultists. There is still the general belief (especially apparent when the topic is discussed on 4chan) that Apollo was a White Christian achievement, when in reality it was an achievement in deception by (((Freemasons)))
lol. lmao even.
You vill own nothing
The differene between Assuredly and Username13 is Username13 would ban you for posting that 1st comment, whereas Assuredly just removes the comment.
Assuredly is actually alright, just follows the crazy reddit rules to the letter; it's User_Name13 you have to watch out for. 100% shill. Never participates on the sub, just there to ban people who post wrong think.
Interesting!
You've made no real points here, and launched straight into ad hominem, which is telling.
I'll just address one point:
Because the moon does not have spy satellites orbiting around it.
I'll just quote from the link I provided, since you probably didn't read it:
Since 2009, the LRO’s camera (LROC) has been mapping the lunar surface with resolutions of between 1m/pixel and 0.5m/pixel. In 2011, NASA announced that LRO had briefly descended in altitude and returned pictures of 0.25m/pixel.
For comparison, the cameras aboard the privately owned GeoEye-1 satellite have a resolution of 0.41m/pixel and are perfectly capable of distinctly resolving cars and humans from an altitude of nearly 700km (435.7miles).3
While bearing in mind that the ISRO probe is even more capable than the GeoEye, it is also true to say that having stated that the Apollo lunar landing sites were imaged by the LROC from a distance of 50km (31miles) at 0.5-meter resolution, the NASA images of these locations should be able to show any hardware present at these sites in distinct detail.
Yet the only LROC images that NASA has released since 2009 show a few white or gray pixels. Some are better than others, but generally they leave much open for interpretation.
the LRO images of the alleged landings sites are dodgy for many reasons:
-
They should be higher resolution. NASA has made two sets of images of landing site from lunar orbiting satellites. The earlier set at 50 km out and a later set at 25 km out. There was no improvement in resolution in the closer set of images.
-
At the time they made the images, both times, they have technology that can take images of earth from space with a high enough resolutions to tell what make of car is own the ground and even spot individual people. There is nothing like that resolution in the moon images. Why not?
-
The trails of the astronauts foots prints and rover tire trails are visible, despite the resolution issues. A stark contradiction. The rover itself appears as a pixelated blob, yet at the same resolution the tracks are clearly defined.
-
The boot print trails and rover tracks mysteriously stop abruptly outside the confines of the published area of the promotional image, and even rover tracks change color from black to white (the landing site images are a small part of a much larger surface scan)
-
inconsistent lighting between photos: with some pictures showing the artifacts lit up a bright white and others showing them pitch black, despite the Sun being directly overhead in both pictures; there is even one obliquely angled picture of the Apollo 15 site with the sunlit side of the ‘LM’ in darkness
-
there are ridiculous photos supposedly showing the US flag still casting a shadow on the lunar surface, when it should have been destroyed by micrometeorites decades ago. For a valid comparison, in 1992 the Soviet Union flag erected outside the orbiting Mir space station was reduced to ‘only two threads’ after less than two years of micrometeorite bombardment
Today, the Supreme Court not only reversed nearly 50 years of precedent, it relegated the most intensely personal decision someone can make to the whims of politicians and ideologues
Sounds like he doesn't believe in democracy
https://twitter.com/Rasmussen_Poll/status/1547172306052648966