1
b654 1 point ago +1 / -0

If I remember right, McCullough himself said somewhere that Tucker Carlson Tonight is around 2 million, and Joe Rogan is about 100 million. I would be actually surprised if the difference between Tucker Carlson and Rachel Maddow is indeed only 1.5x. Surely, people cannot be that dumb.

3
b654 3 points ago +3 / -0

Actually, it's not quite that simple.

For example, with Bolsheviks, globalists sponsored Trotsky, but they had little control over Lenin or Stalin, so the idea of building the Socialist States of Europe with the capital in Berlin didn't work out.

Similarly, the Wall Street did fund the Third Reich, and they certainly hoped that Hitler would unite Europe and pave the way to the world government, but neither Stalin nor Churchill or FDR were on board.

Now with Trump it really gets interesting, because his legacy definitely influences the current situation, i.e some people on left might be more anti-Trump than anti-mandate and it clouds their judgement helping drive the COVID narrative forward. However, I wouldn't give those pedophiles more credit than they deserve, so Trump was more likely an anomaly.

People like Malone and McCullough are just red-pilled mainstream dudes. In fact, I'm surprised that we don't see many more of them, and the vast majority of scientists are such cowards and imbeciles. After all, we are indeed 99%.

2
b654 2 points ago +2 / -0

They are certainly not almighty, though, and many things that bind your accounts to your real identity were added to social networks' code bases as an afterthought (i.e 2FA).

Rob Braxman makes a distinction between "surveillance capitalism" and "being enemy of the state". You can fight the former quite successfully by exercising some good privacy judgement (and it definitely goes far beyond cookies and not using big tech), but for the latter, you should probably stay away from all tech.

5
b654 5 points ago +5 / -0

This is a fantastic presentation!

I saw an article on "Children's Health Defense" that goes over latest Pfizer data, but it wasn't as systematic as given here. No wonder shills at Twitter were so angry when Malone posted it.

2
b654 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wow, this is gold!

One thing to keep in mind about D3 is that for most people, the correct dose would be something like 5000IU a day (even better if you know your level for sure), not 400IU like many conventional docs would suggest.

I had a short summary in PDF with some of these treatments. Feel free to download and share if you find it useful:

https://www.ourfreedomfiles.com/drive/s/M6HTpy7H1NLNRuNmgzASpIJXRerNLR

3
b654 3 points ago +3 / -0

If anyone is interested, there were several interviews with Alix Mayer about this very topic, one with Steve Kirsch and another one with Joe Mercola. She basically says that they want to get it approved for kiddos, then add it into the vaccine schedule receiving full indemnity.

1
b654 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sure, adjuvants and ADE are still risk factors here, but this is the third category. It's not either mRNA or inactivated virus. There is a huge category of viral vector "vaccines", and they also work by turning bodies into spike protein factories, much like mRNA.

7
b654 7 points ago +7 / -0

Highly unlikely. So far, they have been doing a pretty sloppy job, and it's hard to believe that they are capable of something that complicated. It haven't collapsed yet only because of the total media sellout and incredible public stupidity.

3
b654 3 points ago +3 / -0

They wanted to do mRNA, yes, but when it comes to side effects, viral vector "vaccines" are just as bad. J&J, AstraZeneca and Sputnik use a different mechanism of action but achieve the same goal, i.e they all force your body cells to produce spike proteins, which are toxic themselves.

2
b654 2 points ago +2 / -0

Also it's worth watching this video: Sucharit Bhakdi: On the difference between Corona and Flu

Completely agree that all influenza vaccination must be stopped. I suspect that using early treatment protocols similar to what was discovered for SARS-Cov-2, flu's mortality can be slummed down to almost nothing.

2
b654 2 points ago +2 / -0

I've been following Igor's substack for a while, but honestly, I found his recent omicron-related content quite repulsive. He seems to be determined to prove to everyone that "it's not mild" and he's fine with using any sources that can confirm that (i.e Imperial College of London AKA "fear porn institute").

3
b654 3 points ago +3 / -0

What's you're saying makes sense, but it seems that not everything goes according to their plans. Would you consider that the globalists screwed up royally, and jab deaths were not expected initially?

1
b654 1 point ago +1 / -0

Actually, one case specifically could be huge if it's made public enough.

Everyone saw Christian Eriksen collapsing, and then "fact-checkers" got to work and said he was "unvaccinated". But if we look at the interview with Inter's doctor (one of the sources cited here), the whole team got the shot in May.

Now, technically, by WHO's twisted definition, until 2 weeks have passed since your second shot, you're considered "unvaccinated", so when they said "unvaxxed" it still fits.

Does anyone know any sources that mention the exact date? Maybe Christian himself said something? It would be a huge win if we could prove it conclusively.

3
b654 3 points ago +3 / -0

The list is fantastic! I wish I found this forum earlier :)

A couple of things maybe worth adding:

For most of them, there are also good interviews with Mercola. I'll add more if this is of interest.

2
b654 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have a 2-page summary if you need it. It can be read in 5 minutes, but of course they'll need to dive into references if they need proves.