We even have WHO director claiming it’s a killshot that should only be given to 60-65+. I haven’t had a chance to compile any data yet. Figured I’d see if anyone else has seen such an analysis already.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (27)
sorted by:
No. Many countries are already up to 4 and still no mass die-off. The plan is not depopulation right now, but passports, mandates, restrictions, control and obedient population. Depopulation later, as need be.
What's you're saying makes sense, but it seems that not everything goes according to their plans. Would you consider that the globalists screwed up royally, and jab deaths were not expected initially?
Mass sacrifice (herd thinning) events have been both prophesied and motivated by elites for a long time. This would be the most effective way outside of carpet bombing the entire planet with nukes. Especially if you intend to live on the surface yourself.
..which I still expect is going to happen when enough destabilization has occurred. Russia and China can sweep in and finish off the entire west soon.
We lack survival instincts and an incentive to survive at all. If you only live for yourself there's very little morals left.
I don't believe anything is random anymore, just varying variables.