by Asterix
2
XxxRDTPRNxxX 2 points ago +3 / -1

Gotta love how he doesn't tell you what site he's on or what the map he's showing actually displays.

2
XxxRDTPRNxxX 2 points ago +2 / -0

I mean sure... They did a lot of conquest too... But I'm referring to Muslims coming out of Saudi Arabia, who took over pretty much all the middle east, north africa, spain, and made into france too..

But yes... Turkish Muslims have also been a big problem for the west. They ended Rome.

6
XxxRDTPRNxxX 6 points ago +6 / -0

Pretty much all of the middle east and north africa was white, or at the very least much lighter skinned until Arab Muslims conquered half the world and displaced native populations.

0
XxxRDTPRNxxX 0 points ago +1 / -1

Exactly.... But your overall purchasing power would still increase with crypto because it will be more in demand than it was before, with a lower supply available.

-1
XxxRDTPRNxxX -1 points ago +2 / -3

Define: "Genocide"

Edit for any lurkers: Notice how many days have passed and no one has replied with a definition. Because they know any definition that would make this a "genocide" would also apply to every country in every conflict ever.

5
XxxRDTPRNxxX 5 points ago +5 / -0

You know, I noticed how as soon as you bring up gays molesting kids the left immediately tries to pivot to Catholic priests molesting kids, as if it's not the EXACT SAME THING.

0
XxxRDTPRNxxX 0 points ago +4 / -4

starting a war and then losing civilians in the counter attack is not a genocide.

3
XxxRDTPRNxxX 3 points ago +3 / -0

Should start with a picture of Bill Mitchell and read "This type of faggot claims to be straight and may even have a wife, but he gets mad when straight people have fun."

1
XxxRDTPRNxxX 1 point ago +2 / -1

I've been lurking around this sub for years.... And rarely do I see real evidence ever posted.

It's seems like it's always just conjecture, and then they say "look it up, the evidence is out there you lazy fuck".... As if it's my job to take on a 2 hour homework assignment for every single thing that gets posted here, rather than OP just meeting his responsibility to post some evidence with his claims.

99% of the time they can never cite or explain any evidence, because the "evidence" that convinced them was a shitty 480p youtube documentary done in some dudes bedroom, filled with sophistry and incorrect information, and no citations.

When they say "the evidence is out there, look it up" what they mean is that I should go find and watch the same garbage video with 20 views they watched, and fall victim to the same sophistry. And 99% of them when I actually do search for the evidence they say is out there, I find nothing but information that says the exact opposite of what they are claiming.

1
XxxRDTPRNxxX 1 point ago +3 / -2

You know, as an atheist I really don't understand the point of a Christian blaming anyone for the death of Jesus.

According to Christian theology the whole point of Jesus's existence was to be killed. That was the plan before he was even born. So any people involved in his death would've been acting as a manifestation of divine will.

Brings up some interesting questions about how Christianity defines and interprets free-will. That being said, I'm totally against censorship either way.

-1
XxxRDTPRNxxX -1 points ago +2 / -3

You know, I've never actually seen any evidence that Sandy Hook was faked.

2
XxxRDTPRNxxX 2 points ago +2 / -0

if the dollar crashes, crypto is going to skyrocket because anyone with money is going to start looking for alternative assets they can buy up before their dollars becomes worthless.

1
XxxRDTPRNxxX 1 point ago +1 / -0

i said "can be".... not "are"...

learn to read.

2
XxxRDTPRNxxX 2 points ago +3 / -1

moron the picture on the left is literally just a tourist trinket.

but I was trying to be nice and give you idiots a chance to prove otherwise, or at the very least figure that out on your own

2
XxxRDTPRNxxX 2 points ago +3 / -1

Why though?

Couldnt they just as easily kill six people without leaving any loose ends?

what would they gain?

0
XxxRDTPRNxxX 0 points ago +1 / -1

if it's real then tell me the name of each carving

2
XxxRDTPRNxxX 2 points ago +3 / -1

An alien can be evil without being a demon. That's what I think.

6
XxxRDTPRNxxX 6 points ago +8 / -2

Ima need to see a citation better than a twitter screenshot.

At the very least tell us the names of each carving so we can look them up.

1
XxxRDTPRNxxX 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's not a false dichotomy at all, Retard....

You are condemning dead Israelis 80 years ago for doing exactly what you justify from living Palestinians today.... Using violence to try and reclaim land their ancestors had, that they themselves never lived on.

1
XxxRDTPRNxxX 1 point ago +1 / -0

bro, a false dichotomy is calling an independently governed region a prison just because other countries have a border with it.

1
XxxRDTPRNxxX 1 point ago +1 / -0

What is false about it?

You bitch about it being "their house" and how they were just kicked outta there... They werent even fucking alive when it happened you idiot.

1
XxxRDTPRNxxX 1 point ago +1 / -0

Unless 80 years ago their ancestors stole your great great grandpa's land, then apparently it's okay to kill their descendants so you can have the land, huh?

1
XxxRDTPRNxxX 1 point ago +1 / -0

You can't even keep your fucking arguments straight.

If it's okay to come in and reconquer land just because your ancestors lived there, then that means jews had the right to do exactly that.

If it's not okay to come in and reconquer land just because your ancestors lived there, then Palestinians are in the wrong today.

Make up your fucking mind which it is, you retarded jew hater.

1
XxxRDTPRNxxX 1 point ago +1 / -0

Shove your bible verses up your ass where they belong.

Answer the question... Is it wrong to reconquer land just because your ancestors lived there or not?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›