2
WeedleTLiar 2 points ago +4 / -2

No, this is a false equivalence.

There was never anything virtuous about being "tolerant"; it was always just cowardice cloaked in moral superiority. When I say "Yes, I am racist", that's not rhetorical; it's an acknowledgement of reality.

We should care about kids, however. If doesn't even matter whether you have your own or not; everyone needs kids to be raised well enough that they can take the reigns of civilization from us when we're too old. Anyone who doesn't understsnd this, or who doesn't care about the future of our species, is a self-centered nihilist who doesn't deserve any credibility.

The correct response is, and always is: The safety of the children is the responsibility of the parent.

The only laws that should even be considered in "protecting" children are those which increase the ability of their parents to protect them (explicit authority relating to schooling/healthcare, strong gun ownership rights, Castle doctrine applying to children, etc).

Governments do not protect children, governments cover up actual child abuse.

2
WeedleTLiar 2 points ago +3 / -1

Lions also let their old die; humans preserve wisdom and knowledge by instilling it into children.

3
WeedleTLiar 3 points ago +3 / -0

I have never lost access to any account due to someone guessing my password.

I have lost access to e-mail after losing my phone.

This practice is a security vulnerability.

2
WeedleTLiar 2 points ago +2 / -0

This.

Wokeness wasn't even a concept.

Yes, it was. Tolerance and diversity were still pushed as "virtues" while "racism" was vilified. Boys were taught that every time they succeeded, they were taking opportunities away from girls. Kids struggling with identity were told "Be Yourself". Every show and movie had this or that token character to show how "progressive" they were.

It was all there but at "tolerable",Liberal levels and everyone though it would just stay like that, not realizing that they were inside a process.

2
WeedleTLiar 2 points ago +2 / -0

I do not; does anyone have context?

4
WeedleTLiar 4 points ago +5 / -1

Everytime I inadvertantly agree with you, I feel the need to reconsider my position...

4
WeedleTLiar 4 points ago +7 / -3

Lol

I've lived around immigrants for more than 20 years, the top 1% of dozens of races; no they aren't.

4
WeedleTLiar 4 points ago +6 / -2

Anything that can be framed as "protecting children" (even if it obviously doesn't) fills her panties full of sand.

5
WeedleTLiar 5 points ago +6 / -1

Mmmhmmm. Is this like the time you posted "TEXAS BLOCKS INTERNET TO ANYONE WITHOUT DIGITAL ID" but it turns out they don't actually have an ID system in place and the law is totally unenforceable?

3
WeedleTLiar 3 points ago +3 / -0

When everything that Jews believe is written in their holy books, and explans not only all of their behaviour but the growing evil across the world, I don't need to bring reptilians into it.

6
WeedleTLiar 6 points ago +6 / -0

The phrase "We hide information that could scare people away from making the decision we want" should be cast in bronze and displayed prominently in front of every building with anything to do with government "health" services.

3
WeedleTLiar 3 points ago +4 / -1

Yeah, National Socialism is cool, but have you tried Racial Socialism?

5
WeedleTLiar 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yeah, almost like I can take two seconds to check memes while waiting for Christmas lunch to cook...

I Noticed you took Hannukah off, guess your bosses didn't want to spring for overtime..?

3
WeedleTLiar 3 points ago +5 / -2

Any religion based on complicated laws which need to be "interpreted" by "learned men" is a scam.

2
WeedleTLiar 2 points ago +4 / -2

Literally the anchor holding us back from space, lol

2
WeedleTLiar 2 points ago +2 / -0

No "AI" that I've seen has anything remotely resembling free will. They are tools that require constant, explicit, instructions to do anything.

Humans will use AI to kill other humans; AI couldn't care less about us.

2
WeedleTLiar 2 points ago +2 / -0

This doesn't make sense. The Vatican predates the CIA; how would the CIA run it?

Technically, the CIA reports only to the US president (obviously not today, but they were still nascent in the 60s) and the first Catholic president was Kennedy.

Not seeing the connection...

5
WeedleTLiar 5 points ago +6 / -1

This is my response to "if Jews are controlling everything, aren't they just better than you?".

No, they're no better than a thief stealing your car. Without you, they die of exposure, and yet because they "cleverly" take advantage of your good will they feel zero need for gratitude.

6
WeedleTLiar 6 points ago +6 / -0

If you say so; I've never seen a Jew do manual labour.

1
WeedleTLiar 1 point ago +2 / -1

People will bitch about you spamming and this nigger is drama posting about a completely different set of forums.

view more: Next ›