3
VeilOfReality 3 points ago +3 / -0

Even the phrasing here is weasely. Nothing that was "concerning" to her? What kind of behavior WOULD cause concern for a child sex trafficker?

3
VeilOfReality 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not enough people will care. They were desensitized to all their info being stolen by government agencies and private companies, and the rollout for this is targeted to go after things the majority of people agree with first. Look, most people agree kids shouldn't have access to porn, and most people do not give a shit about porn games. I happen to fall into the majority on these. But that's why those represented the initial phase of the rollout because it would be non-controversial in subject matter - and even here at this conspiracy board you have people celebrating these actions - your average person will not care to impugn deeper motive.

Keep spreading the word, as that's our moral obligation

2
VeilOfReality 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have friends and relatives who have had lyme disease. I believe it came from a lab in Connecticut but I also think it's real. No idea how, why, or even that celebrities are getting it

1
VeilOfReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree with not giving them to the government just don't get the point of burying them away from technology

1
VeilOfReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

Should we remove our appendixes and tonsils and put them in the ground too? What's the point of burying an organ?

1
VeilOfReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah I hear you on the screen for work, but for me it makes me want to spend time on it less for pleasure. I hope enough people will refuse to participate as you seem you will

3
VeilOfReality 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wow, there really is 4D chess going on. Distract everyone with the Epstein files that are never going to be meaningfully acted upon in order to distract people from the next phase of medical tyranny

1
VeilOfReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

You think it's "rare" for an Internet user (aka pretty much every first person in a first world country at this point) not to be addicted? You need to go outside and meet people - preferably not grown up iPad kids.

I use this place like a newspaper, and it's the only platform I engage with, about once a day on average. Sure I'm being tracked, harvested, profiled, etc, and this is all a tool for control. I also keep in mind that every single story on communities may be a psyop and use my own brain and life experience to make decisions, not much else can be done considering tptb pretty much knew how to manipulate all of humanity even before having extreme amounts of data on all different types of people. I don't think them exerting more control is the solution, and certainly I don't need them to do so in order for me to have control of my own life. In fact I'd have even more control if they fucked off entirely

1
VeilOfReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you need to assume everyone is like you in order to feel better, have at it

3
VeilOfReality 3 points ago +3 / -0

"fuck my screen addiction"

Way to admit you don't have control over your actions and need someone else to exert greater control over humanity in order to fix your flawed behavior

3
VeilOfReality 3 points ago +3 / -0

They are fools, they cannot see even when it is explained to them. They cannot understand that it is this exact emotional reaction they're having that is being counted on to allow this through to begin with.

If governments cared about the damages of porn, they'd just ban porn

1
VeilOfReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree but the point is they're weaponizing this against people to make you support this shit which is going to be pushed everywhere for everything

1
VeilOfReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

So looking into it, the judge was actually following the law as it is written and because of this ordered a new case be opened in "the public interest".

So basically, this is clickbait, or the media is crafting headlines in the interest of protecting the administration (which I know everyone here thinks is impossible because they hate Trump so much they couldn't stop talking about him even though every time they did his numbers went up)

1
VeilOfReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

Right, the cope is thinking justice matters.

You acknowledge left and right are the same yet don't think they'd take advantage of a release to continue fracturing both sides' worldviews from one another by claiming their side was fraudulently added, again a narrative Trump is seeding himself.

Why wouldn't they release the files that would take them ALL down and end their circus? Gee I can't imagine

1
VeilOfReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's a solid cope. As if the media would not still say the documents were tampered with. Trump is actually already seeding that possible narrative himself. But tell me more about 69D chess

6
VeilOfReality 6 points ago +6 / -0

Ah yes but you see Trump posted a photo of himself where he said he was the hunted now he's the hunter, yeah he's done that before, but I'm in a CULT and must protect my worldview no matter what

2
VeilOfReality 2 points ago +2 / -0

They don't have actual beliefs, not in the way you or I might, so that's a difficult question to answer

5
VeilOfReality 5 points ago +5 / -0

Normies don't believe anything. I've come to realize most people do not have principles, values, and thoughts. They are animalistic in nature, acting on instinct and then rationalizing it posthoc. As an example, most people may say they are against trannies because it is a perversion of nature or against God, but from what I've observed the majority of those people start from the point of "ew this is disgusting to me" and then rationalize their disgust with principles they do not always keep, but are convenient now. It seems to be the minority of us that evaluate first to inform our opinions (not to say we can't have instincts either, but still my beliefs are downstream from thoughts and values whereas for most they seem to be downstream from instincts and desires which are later rationalized).

Point here being, normies do what they want, if they crave security and acceptance they will believe anything and won't think anything of it

2
VeilOfReality 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's what starlink was all about to make the grid inescapable. Why do you think none of our geopolitical "rivals" had any objections about an American company controlling that infrastructure?

And yet there are still people here who jerk themselves off to musk tweets

2
VeilOfReality 2 points ago +2 / -0

I've been seeing the same thing for awhile, the posts people are sharing are just too perfectly crafted to fit a certain narrative

2
VeilOfReality 2 points ago +2 / -0

Don't forget that she's an actress, unlikely anything about her is genuine

6
VeilOfReality 6 points ago +6 / -0

It's all part of "making the democrats demand the files". Why? "Because they're going to be shocked and BOOMERANG!". Why is that helpful, how does that justify there being no justice?

At that point you get a breakdown, some mixture of "you need to trust Trump" "timing is everything" "there's a plan for a reason"

3
VeilOfReality 3 points ago +3 / -0

Elon is talking about failing birth rates and then tries to differentiate his company's AI with gooner bait. He's a sideshow, a front man who's too socially inept to understand his own role and believes he's the main character

1
VeilOfReality 1 point ago +2 / -1

Nothing new, disagree with the consensus over there even a little bit and you're lambasted. If your disagreement falls within their Overton Window you'll just get roasted for not keeping the faith but if your disagreement is outside of it you get banned immediately.

The whole Q movement has a ton in common with high control groups (aka cults) so it's not surprising behavior

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›