They are fools, they cannot see even when it is explained to them. They cannot understand that it is this exact emotional reaction they're having that is being counted on to allow this through to begin with.

If governments cared about the damages of porn, they'd just ban porn

I agree but the point is they're weaponizing this against people to make you support this shit which is going to be pushed everywhere for everything

So looking into it, the judge was actually following the law as it is written and because of this ordered a new case be opened in "the public interest".

So basically, this is clickbait, or the media is crafting headlines in the interest of protecting the administration (which I know everyone here thinks is impossible because they hate Trump so much they couldn't stop talking about him even though every time they did his numbers went up)

Right, the cope is thinking justice matters.

You acknowledge left and right are the same yet don't think they'd take advantage of a release to continue fracturing both sides' worldviews from one another by claiming their side was fraudulently added, again a narrative Trump is seeding himself.

Why wouldn't they release the files that would take them ALL down and end their circus? Gee I can't imagine

That's a solid cope. As if the media would not still say the documents were tampered with. Trump is actually already seeding that possible narrative himself. But tell me more about 69D chess

Ah yes but you see Trump posted a photo of himself where he said he was the hunted now he's the hunter, yeah he's done that before, but I'm in a CULT and must protect my worldview no matter what

They don't have actual beliefs, not in the way you or I might, so that's a difficult question to answer

Normies don't believe anything. I've come to realize most people do not have principles, values, and thoughts. They are animalistic in nature, acting on instinct and then rationalizing it posthoc. As an example, most people may say they are against trannies because it is a perversion of nature or against God, but from what I've observed the majority of those people start from the point of "ew this is disgusting to me" and then rationalize their disgust with principles they do not always keep, but are convenient now. It seems to be the minority of us that evaluate first to inform our opinions (not to say we can't have instincts either, but still my beliefs are downstream from thoughts and values whereas for most they seem to be downstream from instincts and desires which are later rationalized).

Point here being, normies do what they want, if they crave security and acceptance they will believe anything and won't think anything of it

That's what starlink was all about to make the grid inescapable. Why do you think none of our geopolitical "rivals" had any objections about an American company controlling that infrastructure?

And yet there are still people here who jerk themselves off to musk tweets

I've been seeing the same thing for awhile, the posts people are sharing are just too perfectly crafted to fit a certain narrative

Wow you're going to be a good little pod person in a couple​ years

Don't forget that she's an actress, unlikely anything about her is genuine

It's all part of "making the democrats demand the files". Why? "Because they're going to be shocked and BOOMERANG!". Why is that helpful, how does that justify there being no justice?

At that point you get a breakdown, some mixture of "you need to trust Trump" "timing is everything" "there's a plan for a reason"

Elon is talking about failing birth rates and then tries to differentiate his company's AI with gooner bait. He's a sideshow, a front man who's too socially inept to understand his own role and believes he's the main character

Nothing new, disagree with the consensus over there even a little bit and you're lambasted. If your disagreement falls within their Overton Window you'll just get roasted for not keeping the faith but if your disagreement is outside of it you get banned immediately.

The whole Q movement has a ton in common with high control groups (aka cults) so it's not surprising behavior

Yes, precisely. But to say it tells lies or is deceived is to humanize it, which is imo a huge conspiracy in and of itself. People will accept AI governance because they will think it's smarter than them because they've come to believe it actually "thinks", and use of language (e.g. referring to it as something with the capability to lie) is part of instilling that belief. I don't think OP is part of that aspect of the conspiracy, I think he's been swept up by it

If you acknowledge it's a bot, how can you possibly think it has the faculties to lie or be deceived? If anything, my answer places far less confidence in the technology than yours

Grok is an LLM, it predicts what words it should generate based on the context you've provided and the data it's ingested (and then iterates continuously during generation, based on the context it is generating as it answers)

It does not lie nor can it be deceived because it does not have the faculties for such behavior

Channel got nuked over this it seems

USBID has entered the chat

Nothing substantive to add but still needing to get the last word. Thanks for continuing to prove my assessment and have fun out there

Middle school tier retorts, middle school tier understanding of technology. You attempted to attack my ego in hopes of incensing me. People attempting to provoke (instead of debate) go after others in ways they know would get a rise out of themselves. Make of that what you will

Parallel profiling was not used to train "LMM"s.

Regarding my other point, you continue to prove it. You literally don't understand the architecture if you think it's the quality of training data that has anything to do with the system's inability to engage in logic. But you'll keep overrating yourself (like somehow thinking it should be a big deal that you made a poor attempt at a veiled insult), narcissism is big in conspiracy circles these days

Why would I assume my data was used to train the AI? I've had very little online footprint outside of here for decades.

So no I didn't see that as calling me stupid, I saw that conclusion as you exposing your ignorance about the inner workings of LLMs which you continue to do. If it massages your ego to insinuate your mental superiority while discussing topics you have limited understanding of by all means continue

You called my post saying "no logic is happening" an oversimplification so, you pretty much did my friend. If you don't understand how the 'LMM's work and don't understand how a word prediction engine can at times appear to follow logic I don't know what to tell you