1
VeilOfReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't believe the official Magisterial document is required for a teaching to be infallible but understand your point that he was not necessarily making a declaration. Regardless, what you're saying is the head of the faith, when he is directing the faithful, should be ignored when you disagree with him (e.g. when he says it's our moral duty to receive the vaccine)?

1
VeilOfReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

Isn't the Church teaching that the Pope is infallible when it comes to issues of morality? So when the Pope says it is the right thing to take in immigrants or our moral duty to get vaccinated then the Church teaching is...?

2
VeilOfReality 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's so obvious if you pay a modicum of attention.

But even people who "get it" don't seem to get it. Look at how people constantly say there's a "deep state", and talk about how Joe Biden can't even walk straight, and then turn around and blame Biden for everything going on. It's like most people don't have the capacity to understand basic abstract concepts

2
VeilOfReality 2 points ago +2 / -0

"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."

But what I can't figure out is, what would be the true Christianity? Because there are so many problems with the RCC, but how could God allow heresy to be the word most of the world has heard? It makes me think it's all fake, but in my heart I don't believe that's true. Very difficult to untangle

4
VeilOfReality 4 points ago +4 / -0

Gotta leak it so they can't be held liable when it's ingested into LLMs

1
VeilOfReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

Some of the best people in cybersecurity are former hackers (or current white hats) who didn't have formal training so they're not necessarily looking to hire "dullards". I do agree with the rest of the assessment

1
VeilOfReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe you'll find this post interesting https://communities.win/c/conspiracy/p/1994fUkKw8/here-are-10-new-christ-the-king-/c The user is told to submit a statement of conspiracy and subsequently apologizes, saying it will be done in the future, but it's never done on the future posts. And yet for an extremely dead board (even compared to here) the posts pull about the same numbers

2
VeilOfReality 2 points ago +2 / -0

What's the conspiracy?

2
VeilOfReality 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's more than that he spams it on a bunch of subs and aside from consume product which just has many more users they almost always settle around the same number of upvotes.

He told me it's because he has a fanclub

2
VeilOfReality 2 points ago +2 / -0

You're giving yourself a lot of credit thinking anyone here is reading besides us. I tried to come to a mutual understanding with you but you actually have revealed yourself to be quite ignorant on a subject I guarantee I know worlds more about considering I worked on AI years ago (and technically still do to a much lesser capacity). Regardless, if we're going to appeal to an audience rather than actually converse, I'd reckon if anyone actually is reading this they're more likely to understand my point of view given the sad number of upvotes on the post despite the "Trump can do no wrong" contingent that still lurks here.

2
VeilOfReality 2 points ago +2 / -0

Any reasonable person who understands just how deep, subtle, and insidious the use of AI and similar technology is in shaping our world would find at least some merit in the idea. Hot AI girls shilling for Kamala is just silly in comparison

1
VeilOfReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

I actually respect that point of view. I see these types of reporting as outrage bait that also normalize the problem by making them seem much sillier than they are in reality. Hopefully you can understand my point of view as well.

2
VeilOfReality 2 points ago +2 / -0

AI has been influencing us for years and is going to continue to. If you think it's a big deal that there are fake girls promoting Kamala you don't understand the depths to which this technology can and will be used to manipulate you

2
VeilOfReality 2 points ago +2 / -0

A cross .win fanclub that seem to all act at the same time doesn't seem so likely, but this isn't a good faith conversation so shrug

2
VeilOfReality 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, I don't think that's the case

Denigrating pattern recognition on a conspiracy board is a weird method of interaction

2
VeilOfReality 2 points ago +2 / -0

How do these things always get a bunch of upvotes on a bunch of different .win sites at once, while showing little to no engagement?

2
VeilOfReality 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm pretty sure you also need to pay the money back if you withdraw a fraudulent check so even if the law doesn't go after you the bank will overdraft and either permanently close your account, take it from another account, or go after you in collections

3
VeilOfReality 3 points ago +3 / -0

Technocrat Zionist Musk is one of them. There's either a war between factions who want to control the globe or this is theater to give him legitimacy

1
VeilOfReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

He's only been on fire for the jews since then. Seems like a lot of time has elapsed, I think we can call that false

5
VeilOfReality 5 points ago +5 / -0

Thinking of that always makes me wonder about the rest of the site, if that's what they're doing on Patriots.win why do they allow mentioning of other wins where noticing happens?

It makes me wonder if this whole network is a larger more complex psyop for the entire right wing

3
VeilOfReality 3 points ago +3 / -0

They want to quash the spirit of rebellion that awakens in a wronged people. Give them hope then have their leader turn on them while they're taking action. Shell shock

4
VeilOfReality 4 points ago +4 / -0

I don't think they really want to shut down X just like I don't think they really fear Trump

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›