It's not impossible that they used some bad batch experiments with exotic material. The issue at hand is whether Pablo Campra's Raman spectroscopy proved graphene was in the vials he looked at or not.
Lipid nano particles are fully admitted in the patents as part of this technology, yes. That's a separate issue.
While people are worried about something not even in the shots (at least not the vast majority) they openly put in a known poison protein that gets produced in unknown quantities throughout the body.
By their own science it is already a bioweapon.
Here is more info. Take the wayback machine in SINOPEG website for ALC 0159 she mentions in the Stew Peters interview, and it has no mention of graphene.
Same for this entry on PEG 2000 https://web.archive.org/web/20211016074831/https://www.sinopeg.com/polyethylene-glycol-peg-2000-dimyristoyl-glycerol-dmg-mpeg2000-dmg-cas-160743-62-4_p479.html
Look how this snake transitions from talking about PEG they make into talking about graphene without explicitly stating that the chemical MSDS she cited contains graphene.
And it says ‘polyethylene glycol PEG 2000’, right? And then here you’ll see it’s ALC0159, and this company is located in China. And then if you pull from the patent, from the Moderna patent, it lists out all the different polyethylene glycol 200, PEG 200, PEG 2,000, and you will find those listed under the COVID-19 Excipients in SINOPEG.
So… it’s right there. It’s manufactured in China. And so, there’s other vaccines that are mRNA vaccines that are not being sold in the United States. You can find those excipients here too, by the cast number, the Material Safety Data Sheet cast number...And so if you want to know what is graphene, you know, what they explain here on SINOPEG [completely different page], is, it is the ‘core-shell structure polyethylene glycol functionalized graphene ...’
I checked the patents she cited and they didn't say what she alleged at all.
She claimed proof for Graphene from some technical document on a Chinese chemical manufacturer for a chemical that had nothing to do with the covid vaccine. Just because a manufacturer has a compound with graphene, that in no way states this is in the vaccine.
She claimed it was 100% proof that graphene was in the vaccines. If she knows how to read, which she does, this is a clear lie.
Here is the evidence laid out in a website. They seem to be taken in by it, but if you read the SINOPEG document it is a special form of PEG they are talking about. No where does it state this is in the vaccines.
I don't know where you are getting your information from but it isn't the Bible.
In my own experience, I found at least some of the graphene theory pushers, like Karen Kingston and Todd Callender to be complete frauds.
I hadn't yet seen a rebuttal of Dr. Pablo Campra's work which the Fifth Column bases so much of it's analysis on. Though my bs alarm went off right away when Fifth Column originally declared the shot was "99%" graphene which is simply not possible. This looks like the final nail in the coffin for graphene.
[QUOTE]
I saw the paper and some reviews. There was an expert (against the vax) who had done a lot of Ramen spectroscopy. Including on graphene. This expert in Raman spectroscopy showed his own research in details.
Additional evidence against graphene: In the GO-vaccine paper, graphene is very visible as paper like particles with 60 degree folds. And it turns the liquid grey.
About Ramman .. The crystal of graphene and graphite is hexagonal. The Ramen spectrograph can not distinguish between a single carbon hexagonal (most carbon molecules are hexagonal) and a full slice of carbon hexagonals (graphene/graphite). There were even more possibilities with carbon bonds.
So you have to check what possible carbon can produce a similar structure. You also have to check different angles. The (Raman spectr.) expert showed that it was not graphene at all, but a known component: SUGAR.
Here is the link: https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/fifth-column-promoting-graphene-fantasies
Nothing was so clear cut as that. When I studied early American history, even in early colonial times in the USA there were groups of mixed Natives + whites. One such group was massacred by a jealous Indian tribe. But today it is not at all uncommon to meet white people who are genuinely part native.
French and Spanish didn't simply try to convert the natives. They depended on them. And they also mated with them frequently. Does that mean these people are now more born into sin than the rest of us? I don't think so and history does not prove that.
Conquest is not a great thing, but it does happen. Mixing can also happen because of trade. If your region is an economic hub, like say Singapore or New York, it happens. Any nation that becomes a great empire will see people flocking towards it as well.
If this is a grave sin to mix, then the USA is born in sin. Settlers from different nations in Europe mixed together here with each other and Native Americans. And they brought in blacks. So get mad at them not me.
John sees saints of all people and nations
That doesn't mean a bloodline is sacred.
The Tower of Babble indicates
The Tower of Babel wasn't a mandate to never mix with anyone. The issue was them challenging God, not mixing itself.
There are times when mixing happens and it isn't a challenge the Holy Spirit can't overcome. Though it can have bad effects on national unity, no doubt. But nations also have a lifespan. Even the map of Europe today isn't the same map as 100 years ago, let alone 300 years ago.
This is why I think some of you guys only see the side of these ideologies you wish to see. Of course it's natural to want to support your people and feel closest to them.
But if we look at history, the tendency can become religious and malignant. It becomes an excuse to act with barbarity towards others under the guise of being superior and civilized. Japanese atrocities in WW2, Nazis put people into slave labor camps and did cruel experimentation on them, Belgium in the Congo and Jews in Palestine (and the USA) treating people with contempt and horrific abuse.
Are you a bot? I've quoted it twice now.
"No Aryan is born spiritually flawed"
"No Aryan is born spiritually flawed"
"No Aryan is born spiritually flawed"
I already quoted from the OP message which is the topic at hand. You are instead choosing to describe your own version of Aryanism which makes it sound wholesome and pure. "No Aryan is born spiritual flawed"
At least OP was honest. The goal he (and surely others) have is self worship and rejecting Christ.
I really don't care about any bloodline.
I don't believe the Lord of Lords is obsessing over some sacred bloodline of humanity remaining intact. We are judged (and saved) by spiritual and not physical condition.
This guy claims that by being his alleged bloodline you are not born spiritual flawed. This is self worship.
You are twisting reality into things it is not.
It's saying my bloodline is human, everyone else is not human. My bloodline is inherently good "No Aryan is born spiritually flawed" and so I can now do wicked things to other groups I've deemed subhuman.
Pray about it.
I know "not a conspiracy". But funny to watch the degens on reddit freak out
Really most of his shit doesnt require any of his work anymore, its all done by the smart people he hires lmao.
Then you're saying he isn't really running shit and is a front man. If you're really calling the shots on multi billion dollar corporations, you're not top 20 at any game. It's another job in and of itself.
Just running a small startup you'd be out of time, let alone 3 mega corporations.
The articles also mention Lyme disease as being associated.
Kept them hoping till the last minute.
https://www.reddit.com/r/news/comments/1gkvrmr/donald_trump_wins_2nd_term_in_historic_return_to/
It's on the url. For some reason the in-page player ignores it. 21 second mark.
White people who seem successful right now == Aryan.
White people who seem to be doing poorly == Not Aryan.
White people who disagree with OP == Not Aryan.
I'd rather have a humble servant of God on my side than any self worshiping fool. Your Aryanism is literally the same as what the Synagogue of Satan does, which proves who you truly serve.
If you have information refuting the arguments against graphene presented by this spectroscopist please present them https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/fifth-column-promoting-graphene-fantasies
Vague attacks on what "OP would promote" just makes you look bitter that an idea you cling to was challenged. If you want to engage in scientific discussion you must be prepared to have your ideas challenged and have some humility.