4
Thisisnotanexit 4 points ago +5 / -1

You are currently using an alt because your last one was suspended, correct?

3
Thisisnotanexit 3 points ago +4 / -1

From what I understand, alts are allowed as long as it's not ban evasion. Sitewide suspension is rare and the big rules would have to be broken. (The rules you are asking for him would effect you also)

5
Thisisnotanexit 5 points ago +6 / -1

I made 1 meta call out post in 5 years, you have a habit of doing it often, so stop.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +3 / -1

SS: Call explains most title keywords and the current deployment of them.

The Culture wants for nothing, and yet it is defined by a profound need for meaning. The Culture is the most radically, anarchically free society imaginable, and yet it is governed by AIs (known as “Minds”) who make decisions at a speed and complexity that human citizens could never hope to match. The Culture is constitutionally peaceful, and yet it constructs ships and weapons platforms capable of dealing out death and destruction on a galactic scale. What’s more, the Culture’s covert operations wing, Special Circumstances, routinely interferes in the affairs of other societies, sometimes nudging them gently towards more equal, more benevolent forms of government, and sometimes orchestrating coups and civil wars in the hopes that these will lead to better results down the line. It can be hard to tell whether we’re meant to approve of the Culture or be horrified by it. Beyond that, it can be hard to tell whether the Culture is a utopian vision of the future, or a dystopian parody of the present.

https://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2018/03/political-history-future-iain-m-banks

1
Thisisnotanexit 1 point ago +2 / -1

What authority? There's no one here.
I've tried talking to you one on one and now I'm thinking you're not here in good faith and I'm theorizing it's a conspiracy so the forum members can be aware.

1
Thisisnotanexit 1 point ago +3 / -2

I don't look at most of your posts because the spammy nature of them is distasteful to me. So I wouldn't know.

1
Thisisnotanexit 1 point ago +3 / -2

I'm not appealing to authority, I'm calling you out on your behavior.

1
Thisisnotanexit 1 point ago +2 / -1

Jokes aside, I really didn't know it had to be two people, I still think one person can conspire, though perhaps not by technical definition.

0
Thisisnotanexit 0 points ago +2 / -2

(I thought it was two words but I guess it's only one) soapbox: a rough wooden box or any raised, temporary surface for people to stand on while making informal public speeches

1
Thisisnotanexit 1 point ago +2 / -1

I'm respectful, the argument is a theory about a person and I haven't attacked you, haven't reported and the post isn't excessive.

1
Thisisnotanexit 1 point ago +2 / -1

It says this place is for conspiracy theories and facts. Edit: from the sidebar

-1
Thisisnotanexit -1 points ago +1 / -2

Stop deflecting. Post actual theories in moderate amount, please? How does anyone even interact when you're in so many places at once?

-1
Thisisnotanexit -1 points ago +2 / -3

I would like to remove calls to violence, yeah. I would like you to either work with this community to actually theorize conspiracies or get out. I have a thinking I'll be saying that again, hopefully not to you.

0
Thisisnotanexit 0 points ago +2 / -2

Well 'the Offspring' led me to believe there can be a conspiracy of one.

1
Thisisnotanexit 1 point ago +3 / -2

I think most of his posting is soap boxing and overuse looks like spam.

0
Thisisnotanexit 0 points ago +1 / -1

Conspiring can be done independently. Yes there are other problems going on, this is the one I'm focusing on now.

1
Thisisnotanexit 1 point ago +2 / -1

They both follow/instigate eachother, this post is about one person.

1
Thisisnotanexit 1 point ago +2 / -1

Call me whatever you want, stop conspiring against us here.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›