3
Thisisnotanexit 3 points ago +3 / -0

JG is a name of a violent situation/person too. I banned one user for a violent username that was overt.
Both JG and DF are both 'people' that really existed. I wish both would rethink their names but it's not overly violent, tho those in the know, know.

3
Thisisnotanexit 3 points ago +3 / -0

Most people, yeah probably, organs probably going into biodigital convergence stuff like Cortical labs trapping humans brains cells to run their AI computers..

3
Thisisnotanexit 3 points ago +3 / -0

What will it take for everyone to discuss things without resorting to middle school tactics, absolutely ludicrous and yeah, looks like I have a bunch of shoveling to keep up and it's such a waste of everyone's time.. We're in the middle of a learning curve and I'm trying to help people make better choices on their own. Will you be helpful?

3
Thisisnotanexit 3 points ago +3 / -0

I look for the violence. Can we please let go of the infighting name calling?

From a different comment with someone else: There is no actual reason to need to use derogatory language, it's actually counterproductive, did you read my rules post? https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/1ARws81ezP/understanding-the-rules-in-this-/c

And a reminder that resorting to ad hominem (along with all fallacies) often makes one look emoti(o)nal, desperate and out of actual answers or rebuttals, in other words, you've lost, at least keep your dignity and integrity and try again another time having hopefully learned something.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

I should have mentioned that yesterday, talking to Graph, he reminded me I can just be checking the queue and be quick to approve new users getting stuck. I like that idea.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Forgot add you guys sooner, sorry:

u/DresdenFirebomber

u/JosephMalta

See above post for rule explanations.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

There is no actual reason to need to use derogatory language, it's actually counterproductive, did you read my rules post? https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/1ARws81ezP/understanding-the-rules-in-this-/c

And a reminder that resorting to ad hominem (along with all fallacies) often makes one look emoti(o)nal, desperate and out of actual answers or rebuttals, in other words, you've lost, at least keep your dignity and integrity and try again another time having hopefully learned something.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Learn to talk without those words, it's not difficult.

3
Thisisnotanexit 3 points ago +3 / -0

Can you add a summary/submission statement?

3
Thisisnotanexit 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think they are pretty simple, I also would like things to be civil and productive.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling

So many other words to use, makes me wonder why this is such an issue. Why do you need these words to be able to talk about conspiracies?
Edit: spelling

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

I won't be tyrannical, I'm also asking to be kept accountable, this is a community and most of us are frens.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is no longer an anarchy community, tho there are plenty if you'd like my help getting there.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's not just google tracking.

Removing this comment.

2
Thisisnotanexit 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't think so, most people are reasonable.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›