3
Plemethrock 3 points ago +3 / -0

The person you are attacking is not subhuman,

This is an interesting point you raise. Being a 5’3, dark-skinned Indian with slight asd/adhd in the west has often made me feel subhuman compared to those around me.

The thing is, I’m also considered smart, attractive, and from a rich family with lots of connections. Im simply a walking contradiction and it makes me wonder why God would give me such a mixed bag of traits that are polar opposites. Why would God give me so many strengths that don’t mean anything because my weaknesses completely cancel them out.

Simply put, unless you can convince me otherwise. I am fine being called subhuman and understand why someone would call me that. Accepting it and working on what I’m good at is what I think is best for me.

2
Plemethrock 2 points ago +2 / -0

Can you explain in more detail? What was this AI you programmed able to do? Was it able to do the same thing as AI today?

5
Plemethrock 5 points ago +5 / -0

Dang, i can't believe bro actually wrote down something like Aristotle for once. I applaud this intellectual thought

2
Plemethrock 2 points ago +2 / -0

Don't strawman me - I didn't say they did a lot, I said they are the fathers of European (WHITE) Civilization.

Well, the white europeans simply adopted the culture of non-whites. Christianity was started by the Jesus and spread mainly by jews like Paul. This then spread to western europe. The same happened with the roman/greek laws and culture that western european "barbarians" adopted after the fall of the western roman empire.

Sadly the byzantine empire fell to Islam, which made north Africa and the levant become islamic. They then were sadly not apart of "western" civilization anymore but apart of the Islamic world.

2
Plemethrock 2 points ago +2 / -0

Of course people from the Levant would be genetically closer to southern Europeans because they live in similar climates and are close to each other. That doesn't make them less white though - it makes Levant people closer to whites and not vice versa.

Levant Arabs aren’t white, neither are ancient Greeks and southern Italians from the time of Jesus. You can’t just claim they’re white because you feel like it.

Imagine going to a Julius Caesar and saying to him he's not white because he's not like the barbarians or the vikings.

A Roman from the time of Jesus would agree that he is a civilized med and not a white “barbarian” because white≠great.

Thanks for destroying your own argument which was that the greatness of a civilization was tied to how smart its people are. Turns out it's all about luck.

Luck is what makes one ethnicity “smarter” than another. That’s why whites aren’t “genetically” smarter than everybody else and the smartest ethnicity had been changing throughout history.

2
Plemethrock 2 points ago +2 / -0

I refer to the Biblical origin of the races originating from the sons of Noah where white people are descended from Japheth. Why should we go with your definition? Go tell the Greek - the people considered to be the fathers of Western civilization - they're not white and see how it goes

Again, they are closer to the Levantine sons of Shem genetically than the Germans/Slavs/celts/nords. The ancient Greeks and southern Italian from Jesus’ time are more like Shem than Japheth.

Go tell the Greek - the people considered to be the fathers of Western civilization - they're not white and see how it goes.

They aren’t genetically white. Just because they accomplished a-lot doesn’t mean they’re white. You can’t just claim every civilization that accomplished a lot as white just because you feel like it.

3
Plemethrock 3 points ago +3 / -0

I previously said I thought you were saying that some white people think just being white makes them superior and I said I thought you were saying historically that hasn't been the case.

This is exactly what I’m saying, specifically in the case of intelligence

2
Plemethrock 2 points ago +2 / -0

How do you determine who's white genetically? Is there a "white gene"? Whiteness is a metaphysical category, not just a biological set of traits. Don't you get you're being ad hoc?

They are literally closer genetically to levent Arabs than any European population. Pick the Slavs, celts, nords, Germans, and the results will be the same. They aren’t white, deal with it.

Whiteness is a metaphysical category, not just a biological set of traits.

Sure, but the ancient Greeks and Romans weren’t biologically white, so they metaphysically couldn’t be.

Btw, how do you rule out luck? You appealed to luck as being the reason for white hegemony - how do you know it's not luck that made those other non-white civilizations great?

It’s luck that made every civilization great. Some civilizations have a string of great leaders and the right resources to go out and conquer other nations and make advancements. They do and then become great.

2
Plemethrock 2 points ago +2 / -0

Dude, persian people are white. Only a small percentage of Iranians are arab/kurdish

Yes, Indian people are also white. So are the berbers of Africa. Let’s throw in the Chinese, Japanese and Hispanics also. Only people that aren’t white are those mixed race Slavic people. Genghis Khans invasion from 800 years ago forever tainted their dna. You realize how wrong your logic is now?

Only populations that are white are Slavs, WASP, celts, and Nords. They are genetically closer to each other than any other population group. Deal with it, the southern Italians and Greeks aren’t white.

3
Plemethrock 3 points ago +3 / -0

No shit. Does that make South Europeans (Italians and Greeks) not white? Where did you get the idea that all white people are nordic vikings?

Greeks during alexanders time were closer to levatine arabs than germans genetically. Roman italians from the time of Christ were also closer to the levant. They weren't white genetically, deal with it.

How did you determine what the smartest ethnicity at any given time was?

The same criteria white supremacists use, which ethnicity had the highest living standards, most power, and advancements.

1
Plemethrock 1 point ago +2 / -1

Do white supremacists have an idea of all/most other races being genetically less smart than whites?

If you can prove they don’t, then what I’m saying is not contrarian to the doctrine of white supremacy.

2
Plemethrock 2 points ago +3 / -1

First off, most of the empires you listed existed parallel to each other in different parts of the world without destroying each other.

The Egypt, Persia, Greek, and Roman empires all fought each other and sometimes completely destroyed each others at times.

Mediterranean people are still white except for the arabs living in Africa. Have you seen Roman statues and images? Dudes were white, deal with it.

No, the physical features of those statues were mostly of a Mediterranean type. The historians literally described the Roman’s as looking noticeably different from the “white” Germans. You can’t just claim they’re white because you feel like it. They weren’t white, deal with it.

Great assertion. How do you back it up? Do you think appealing to luck and chance is a good argument when discussing large scale historic events?

It’s backed up by the fact the smartest ethnicity has changed throughout history and hasn’t been whites for most of it. This means that genetics doesn’t determine the smartest ethnicity but other factors such as circumstantial luck do.

2
Plemethrock 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh, for sure. Most things aren’t just black and white. There are definitely differences between races, but that doesn’t necessarily mean one is genetically predisposed to being smarter than other. There are plenty of other factors to consider when talking about intelligence.

2
Plemethrock 2 points ago +3 / -1

Yes, I didn’t deny that. I’m saying that the countries/peoples with the highest average iq have changed over time because of circumstantial luck and that one ethnicity isn’t just genetically smarter than another.

2
Plemethrock 2 points ago +3 / -1

To add on to what you said.

Before Covid, Bill gates ran event 201 with John Hopkins university in October 2019. Event 201 was a simulation of how the world would respond to a virus outbreak of covid-19. You can claim it was just a coincidence that they ran a covid virus outbreak simulation right before the pandemic, but it actually being planned completely aligns with the elites goals of the great reset. They used it to push there "Build, Back, Better" agendas for the great reset after the pandemic was over.

1
Plemethrock 1 point ago +2 / -1

Yeah, people just went about there lives and didn't even question the world governments trapping people inside there own homes for a whole year and destroying the economy, while the msm was spreading videos of people collapsing on the streets for a virus that wasn't even a 10th as dangerous as any other pandemic in history

view more: Next ›