I'm hoping for less low effort (which this post is), but yeah, I'm not moderating content usually but rather behaviour.. People are allowed to have different ideas and disagree.
Where did I say that?
Listen man, I don't agree with every post here but I like people being able to post. (And I did ask for a submission statement from MrEx) All you need to do is follow the rules. I don't want to ban you, you have the power to make it happen tho.
Misquote and double rule 1 violation. Are you still trying to kick people out? This is the last warning, I do consider that subversive. We can all exist here, ok?? This comment is being removed and can be approved upon edit.
Will you please add a submission statement? It can be short.
I and others appreciate the light you shine on dark things, of course some aren't ready to hear and of course not all agree, I think you should keep going and my hope is others will come to understand, in time.
For my part, I think we all have different ideas and theories and within this community we can all exist, I also think we are all capable of being respectful to everyone, whether we agree or not. We are still experiencing growing pains but I am seeing very positive growth from a bird's eye view. (The 3 rules are here for the community's protection)
As to votes, I am not motivated by them and I have an inkling the lurkers far outweigh the participants.
I enjoy your participation and would like it to continue.
Blocking, for me, doesn't solve anything and I think we both enjoy solving things, best we can.
I very much appreciate your well thought out response and I also want to make it clear that I appreciate your research and contributions. The only thing I am asking everyone in this forum is to treat eachother better, rule 1 is simple tho not easy. We should be able to find some kind of common ground and agree to disagree at an impasse, there is no need to resort to our baser instincts of attacking people instead of arguments. Do you agree?
And to you.
That quote has now been removed
Removed for rule 1. No argument to save.
Your contributions as a whole are well appreciated, the infighting being done between any one here is unnecessary, wouldn't you agree that it divides and keeps up distractions from greater issues at play?
Let me know if I'm being unreasonable.
Thank you.
That quote has been asked to be edited, or it'll be removed shortly, as will your meta, call out comments, we're not doing that here anymore. There are 3 simple rules here to prevent community break down and it's not too much to ask everyone.
I was already handling the meta call-outedness of this comment. You breaking rule 1 is not helpful, will you edit?
I'm talking to turtlebam to not be infighting too. (The 3 simple rules are here to prevent the breaking of community)
I disagree, his posts are not trivialities. Jews don't have a monopoly on corruption and evil, though there are some Jews and 'Jews' that are also involved.
I think infighting/meta stuff is counterproductive. Let's find where we have common ground and agree to disagree if need be.
You're right, I should have pruned better, fixed now, on both ends. Your infant remark was what I first removed and commented on. I appreciate both of yours help going forward. Edit: my apologies for my poor time management issues this last little while.
I was being silly with you, I'll delete
Don't mind what was between me and him. Your comment was removed for attacking the user not the argument, maybe reread what I removed?
He was replying to me and I deleted my comment after he read it. The mod won't delete if you don't break the rules, so keep that in mind.
Comment removed by user for being silly 🤪
Removed for another rule 1 violation. Knock it off dude.
Then why commit rule 1 violations and break your streak?
I'm only removing rule violations
No, I didn't remove that one
I didn't say or do anything against this post. Where is the issue?