▲ 4 ▼
TallestSkil 4 points ago +4 / -0

If they start prosecuting us then so be it.

They’re just going to start killing you openly.

▲ 4 ▼
TallestSkil 4 points ago +4 / -0

And there you’ve hit upon the operative point. We consciously refuse to do anything beyond ourselves, so… that’s all that’s left for us to do.

Pull back from society. Keep your head down. Stockpile supplies. Get a bug-out location. Protect yourself and your family. Live as long as possible, merely out of spite for the jews. There won’t be “future generations.” There won’t be “another chance.” Just last as long as possible.

▲ 4 ▼
TallestSkil 4 points ago +4 / -0

Fun fact: the entire population is already being culled. That’s neither here nor there with respect to our ability to do something about it.

▲ 3 ▼
TallestSkil 3 points ago +3 / -0

Could be three. Likely not 14. The United Nations has been openly discussing this plan for the last 40 years, and they’re all saying it will happen in 2030, so I’ll go ahead and trust them when they say it’s going to happen then.

▲ 3 ▼
TallestSkil 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don’t have to

You have four years left of that. What will you do with them? Nothing.

▲ 5 ▼
TallestSkil 5 points ago +5 / -0

Can, yes. Will, no. There’s a huge difference.

▲ 6 ▼
TallestSkil 6 points ago +6 / -0

No one is doing anything, nor will they. Least of all in response to paid jewish shilling like yours.

▲ 3 ▼
TallestSkil 3 points ago +3 / -0

So you can’t even answer questions about your own claimed ideology; great.

▲ 4 ▼
TallestSkil 4 points ago +4 / -0

0

1

”the difference is thirty times”

“Artificial intelligence” confirmed for completely useless.

▲ 3 ▼
TallestSkil 3 points ago +3 / -0

Does it matter that truth doesn’t matter to whites? You tell me.

▲ 3 ▼
TallestSkil 3 points ago +3 / -0

He says this as though it matters.

▲ 3 ▼
TallestSkil 3 points ago +3 / -0

It’s September, brain damaged paid shill.

▲ 3 ▼
TallestSkil 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thanks for confirming this isn’t true.

▲ 5 ▼
TallestSkil 5 points ago +5 / -0

oy vey goyim it’s not the Mossad it’s the CIA!

▲ 7 ▼
TallestSkil 7 points ago +7 / -0

SO YOU CAN’T DO IT; GOT IT.

Id love for you not to be so judgmental.

I’d love for you not to be so objectively wrong.

We judge others due to deep-rooted psychological reasons including insecurity, low self-esteem, and the need to feel a sense of control or safety in an uncertain world.

Cool, don’t care.

Judgment can also be a defensive coping mechanism

It can also be you being publicly humiliated for being a paid jewish shill.

Thats literally all you do.

Said the actual paid jewish shill whose only purpose is to poison the well.

No one is perfect on earth…

…which is not flat…

…so you leverage that and always find the one error/mistake.

It’s more than one with you.

It’s quite boring

Burn in hell. No one gives a fuck about your feelings.

and causes much dissolution to the subject

Good; that’s my point. Fuck off forever and never post on this website again.

actually being propounded.

You aren’t doing this.

Please stop.

Being alive. You, that is. Find another website to spam, admitted paid jewish shill.

▲ 8 ▼
TallestSkil 8 points ago +8 / -0

Well, he skipped logic, reason, and common sense, so I’m not surprised.

▲ 7 ▼
TallestSkil 7 points ago +7 / -0

I’d love for you to explain how many solar eclipses happen when it’s not new moon.

▲ 5 ▼
TallestSkil 5 points ago +5 / -0

why do people who break the law dozens of times a day every single day have a lower criminality than people who don’t

Please recontextualize everything the government tells you before you parrot it. It’ll make more sense that way.

▲ 4 ▼
TallestSkil 4 points ago +4 / -0

Neato. Enjoy whacking it to porn as your society collapses around you.

“BUT WE CAAAAAAAN’T ACTUALLY BAN IT!”

You deserve what you get.

▲ 4 ▼
TallestSkil 4 points ago +4 / -0

Actually, you did, by asking how porn could be banned without the framework to ban it (informational control) when I said it should be made illegal, you implied porn could not "just" be made illegal WITHOUT it.

Cool, yeah. Your point is what.

The stance you're adopting now (that it should be illegal WITHOUT information and technological control)

Explain what you think a law is.

is a retroactive modification of your statements

So stop retroactively modifying them.

you continue thinking that your spastic attitude gives you some kind of win and moral high ground.

So stop thinking that.

It’s pretty fucking simple to comprehend.

  1. Jews want porn to be legal.
  2. Porn is objectively bad.
  3. Porn should not be legal.
  4. Make porn illegal.

There is no

  1. “WAAAAAA MOMMY YOU CAN’T DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT YOU HAVE TO LET IT INTO SOCIETY BECAUSE MY FEELINGS GET HURT BY THE CONCEPT OF THE FRAMEWORK REQUIRED TO ENFORCE A LAW!”

because that’s mental illness. On your part.

▲ 4 ▼
TallestSkil 4 points ago +4 / -0

Porn would still exist for people who really wanted to find it

Sure. But it wouldn’t be legal. It wouldn’t be free. It wouldn’t be everywhere. And jews wouldn’t profit. That’s the point.

Accepting (or even advocating for) complete and total informational control by the very people who were pushing the porn to begin with in order to eliminate those edge cases is absolutely irrational

Good thing no one did that. Run the fuck along.

▲ 4 ▼
TallestSkil 4 points ago +4 / -0

emotional pearl clutchers like you

Try again with something believable.

instead of just

Ooh, “just” doing something! That’s magical. How do you expect things to “just” be done without the frameworks by which to do them, exactly? Do tell.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›