Actually, you did, by asking how porn could be banned without the framework to ban it (informational control) when I said it should be made illegal, you implied porn could not "just" be made illegal WITHOUT it.
Cool, yeah. Your point is what.
The stance you're adopting now (that it should be illegal WITHOUT information and technological control)
Explain what you think a law is.
is a retroactive modification of your statements
So stop retroactively modifying them.
you continue thinking that your spastic attitude gives you some kind of win and moral high ground.
So stop thinking that.
It’s pretty fucking simple to comprehend.
Jews want porn to be legal.
Porn is objectively bad.
Porn should not be legal.
Make porn illegal.
There is no
“WAAAAAA MOMMY YOU CAN’T DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT YOU HAVE TO LET IT INTO SOCIETY BECAUSE MY FEELINGS GET HURT BY THE CONCEPT OF THE FRAMEWORK REQUIRED TO ENFORCE A LAW!”
Cool, yeah. Your point is what.
Explain what you think a law is.
So stop retroactively modifying them.
So stop thinking that.
It’s pretty fucking simple to comprehend.
There is no
because that’s mental illness. On your part.
See? You continue to completely misrepresent what this conversation was so you can "win". Good luck with your book
Neato. Enjoy whacking it to porn as your society collapses around you.
You deserve what you get.