-2
TallestSkil -2 points ago +2 / -4

While he literally quotes word for word what the ADL told him to say.

-1
TallestSkil -1 points ago +3 / -4

Paper gold is speculated out the ass, sure. Remove the paper duplicate sales and gold goes to $60,000 an ounce, minimum. Silver is the “daily” currency, held at 15:1 with gold.

-2
TallestSkil -2 points ago +1 / -3

arbitrarily

Yeah, you’re a paid shill. Commit suicide, communist whore. Your saussurean bullshit doesn’t apply here.

0
TallestSkil 0 points ago +3 / -3

Oh, sure. Measurement of goods against gold is probably the best metric (though industrialization has altered the metric quite a bit since it’s so damn useful).

-3
TallestSkil -3 points ago +2 / -5

Q-LARP doesn’t exist and Trump is a jewish puppet. Aliens aren’t real. You’re clinically insane.

-2
TallestSkil -2 points ago +2 / -4

It becomes worse when using their fake metrics. They use those for the opposite effect—to cover up lack of historical precedent. “Worst inflation in 40 years!” is the biggest hoax, because inflation was calculated differently back then. We have the worst inflation in American history right now.

0
TallestSkil 0 points ago +1 / -1

only advocate for research and discussion.

2+2=4. Discussion over. No discussion need happen anymore. You’re a bad actor.

Even someone with only “rudimentary knowledge of physical relationships” couldn’t actually believe that.

You were already disproven.

look at the equations

Did. Thanks for admitting Earth isn’t flat.

0
TallestSkil 0 points ago +1 / -1

Repeating your assumption over and over again won’t make it true.

Shoot yourself. We’re not three years old. We have, at the very least, rudimentary knowledge of physical relationships. You’re a paid shill. No one is falling for this subhuman bullshit.

There are other reasons why distant things stop being visible than perspective.

Wrong.

Directly addressing it would be responding with either another procedure/measurement we could actually use to validate/measure the spherical shape of the world or refuting what i have said about the eratosthenes procedure.

Cool, did that already.

Ignoring that the eratosthenes procedure was never intended to measure or validate the spherical shape of the world is not directly addressing it

Too bad. You were already shown it’s not flat.

Then why didn’t eratosthenes say that

Because he wasn’t mentally ill or paid to post lies.

How can a procedure that depends on the world being spherical in order to be meaningful

But it doesn’t.

Can you explain your reasoning?

Yes.

You cannot lose a conversation

Thanks for asserting something no one questioned.

Why bother listing the others

You haven’t posted one. Why bother continuing to be alive when no one will believe your lies?

-1
TallestSkil -1 points ago +1 / -2

geometry doesn’t control reality

The law of perspective states that the angular height of the point of rotation, like everything else, can’t become negative while above a plane. You would always be able to see it. You cannot always see it. The Earth is not flat. You are paid to spam lies.

You’re missing the point.

Directly addressing it.

You believe it is for the exact same reason eratosthenes did.

Nope.

The question was, “How can we best measure/validate that the world is spherical ourselves?”

Nope.

Clearly we can’t use eratosthenes procedure, because it doesn’t measure or validate the shape of the world in any way

Except it does, oops. It’s not flat. You lose. Fellate a shotgun.

I just didn’t

Mhmm, sure thing.

-1
TallestSkil -1 points ago +1 / -2

so you assume

It’s how geometry works, subhuman retard.

This is a (popular) misunderstanding. Eratosthenes never set out to measure or validate the shape of the earth. He merely set out to calculate the circumference of the earth assuming it was a sphere.

Mhmm, because it is. Because all observational data shows this. Because all physical data shows this.

His procedure depends on the world being a sphere - so obviously it can’t determine if it is or not.

Fun fact: it did and it is.

If the earth is not a sphere (or the sun isn’t unfathomably far away

Your personally inability to fathom the distance does not preclude its calculability.

or one of many other unvalidated assumptions aren’t correct

Your personal inability to name even one is telling.

-1
TallestSkil -1 points ago +1 / -2

The point of rotation doesn’t move

Exactly, and since a flat earth would see the point never become invisible, and since in reality it does, your psychosis is clearly paid shilling.

care to elaborate

Yep.

everything you don’t agree with

Truth isn’t a matter of agreement, paid shill.

-1
TallestSkil -1 points ago +2 / -3

Of course we can stop it. We’re just not going to. Our only hope is that more nonwhites die from what’s coming than whites.

1
TallestSkil 1 point ago +3 / -2
  1. “Oy vey goyim, private crypto exchanges are rife with fraud and unsafe, see.”
  2. “Therefore we’re making it illegal for private crypto transactions to exist entirely.”
  3. “Oh look, goyim, we have a CBDC for you right here.”
  4. “Look at that, it’s accepted everywhere (by law, or your business will be shut down). So convenient.”
  5. “And it’s even accepted anywhere in the world, lol, aren’t we good for you.”
  6. “By the way, anyone from anywhere in the world can now come live where you are.”

Expect this to happen in succession within the next 7 years.

-2
TallestSkil -2 points ago +1 / -3

Except the point of rotation moves depending on where you’re standing”

I suppose you believe airplanes don’t exist, otherwise I would have you bound and gagged and put on an airplane flying from north to south to watch as Polaris falls to the horizon.

Perhaps

Nope.

. How can we best measure that to validate it for ourselves?

Rudimentary geometry.

you fucking propagandist

Yes, and? Stop lying and you’ll stop being called out.

-4
TallestSkil -4 points ago +2 / -6

you’re a mason because you refuse to believe Masonic hoaxes

you’re a luciferian because you name the jew

Albert Pike did not predict three world wars. You cannot provide any primary evidence of any of these statements by him or any other individual during his lifetime. You cannot provide any evidence that terms only invented decades after he died were in use by anyone while he was alive. You cannot explain why everything that happened in actual reality contradicts the narrative established by this mid-20th century hoax. Either defend the actual position you took or stop acting surprised when people call it out as bullshit.

-3
TallestSkil -3 points ago +2 / -5

So no plan, no books, and no prediction, because it was written after WWII in the first place. Got it.

-3
TallestSkil -3 points ago +3 / -6

So... no argument, then. Albert Pike did not predict three world wars. You cannot provide any primary evidence of any of these statements by him or any other individual during his lifetime. You cannot provide any evidence that terms only invented decades after he died were in use by anyone while he was alive. You cannot explain why everything that happened in actual reality contradicts the narrative established by this mid-20th century hoax.

Either defend the actual position you took or stop acting surprised when people call it out as bullshit.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›