1
TallestSkil 1 point ago +3 / -2

Does it ever occur to you that everyone you meet online instantly knows you’re a woman and also incapable of defending any of your claims? Your delusions betray you. Your strawmen show your cowardice. You’re a tiny, little thing, yapping like a terrier because the world is big and scary and you can’t disprove a thing anyone in it says.

Scream for me, dumbass.

0
TallestSkil 0 points ago +1 / -1

Exactly; this “limited war” shit seems to exist solely to increase casualties and enrich corporate interests.

4
TallestSkil 4 points ago +4 / -0

No. Feel free to do exactly what I told you to do, since you’re apparently too illiterate to comprehend this.

0
TallestSkil 0 points ago +2 / -2

why does he oppose almost everything the Jews stand for?

He… doesn’t. He supports multiculturalism, jewish banking, the whole nine years.

And while it’s true Putin has laws against denying the holocaust

Which began decades after other nations had them… The law prohibits you from saying that the USSR and Germany simultaneously invaded Poland, which is an obvious truth that literally every nation has reported since before the war was even over.

8
TallestSkil 8 points ago +8 / -0

For every day that the Ukrainian government still exists after, oh, April 2022, my belief that the entire war—in all aspects—is nothing but a hoax has increased by 0.01%. There’s absolutely no excuse for the continued existence of any Ukrainian government officials right now. None which includes the “war” being an actual war, at any rate.

by pkvi
1
TallestSkil 1 point ago +1 / -0

That both systems are being used by a singular system of government surveillance for the express purpose of totalitarian control over all thought, word, and deed worldwide.

by pkvi
1
TallestSkil 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don’t think that’s the primary point here.

2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

An idealist then?

That’s the thing about ideals: they exist in their own vacuum as aspirations. Doesn’t mean we shouldn’t work toward them. Their guidepost against which to lean.

brief periods under just sovereigns

And what’s wrong with that? Better than never having it.

Natural human interaction makes for a life that is nasty, brutish and short.

Doesn’t seem to have been the case in the early US. Self-reenforcing social convention does better at upholding civilization than a dictator.

0
TallestSkil 0 points ago +1 / -1

I don’t care about one individual’s life. The only proper form of government is that which respects and upholds natural law, stands out of the way of people’s individual liberties (without respect to their effects upon others of the nation), and which jealously guards the nation against foreign interference and domestic enslavement.

A proper government exists only to protect “laws” which are part of natural human interaction in the first place. It may well codify them in writing, but only to ensure they are not ✡misunderstood.✡

2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

You won’t be allowed out of your favela, pajeet.

1
TallestSkil 1 point ago +1 / -0

Take your embarrassing irony and fuck off. It’s the jews.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›