Jews were here long before America was founded. The Revolutionary War was essentially funded by Hayim Solomon with the help of Robert Morris. The Masonic networks were in full operation. The question is how much good and evil can be done in the system and in particular which predominates in the people at large.
Welcome to c/Conspiracies! u/Thisisnotanexit will be along shortly to see if your link can be approved as being from a newcomer.
No, right now I'm rereading John Burke, Imagine Heaven, what should be the new definitive NDE book after Moody.
Oh, not to complain about your modship, but I don't think he was attacking me, he's relying upon his fallacious interpretation of my past comments that he failed to process correctly last time. IMHO.
Unevidenced complaints against my character fail because they are unevidenced. Evidenced complaints against my character fail because the full evidence acquits me, by God's grace. Win-win.
Ask him for evidence. [The one time he dared to produce a lot of evidence, three of his sources were all literally Hebrew University. But oh look, that link of his was taken down from SearchVoat and unarchived so he'll have to find a new one if he wants to keep quoting the U. To start, the three sources were: Mail, "Huge drop in sperm count could lead to human EXTINCTION: Study reveals 60% drop in fertility since 1970 - driven by the unhealthy Western lifestyle." Guardian, "The infertility crisis is beyond doubt. Now scientists must find the cause." News Target, "CONFIRMED: Sperm count in Western men is HALF what it should be; what is happening to the average American man?"]
If you think I deny Christ, then when I affirm his mission (even as he defines it to you) then you should thank me for stepping in the right direction. If you have no evangel for those who affirm Christ's mission, what evangel do you have?
SwampRangers.com has always admitted to being a membership organization.
Your inability to acknowledge a difference between what is thought and what is said continues, which was my initial point.
Now, perhaps you recognize that the laws of physics as we know them are incomplete and perhaps you recognize that those deeper laws that God has preset, such as the ones he uses for "miracles" and "resurrections", are also part of the laws of physics, but your inability to acknowledge difference between thought and word suggests you don't recognize this either.
If you recognize that the laws as known are incomplete, you'd have no problem with variable lightspeed; but if you believe constant lightspeed is the whole of the law then you'd be surprised, as I said. Of course when we discussed it you hemmed and hawed, sometimes going with millions and sometimes with billions, without indicating what you actually believe. So I'm not sure you want the debate.
The challenge I lay to people is as to new experiments that can be constructed. We can talk that if you like, but you seem to prefer to deal with interpretation of evidence already submitted. To that end I submit that the resurrection of Jesus in 33 AD (with 3D photographic evidence recorded in the Shroud of Turin) demonstrated an exception to currently-known laws of physics. The spontaneous reorganization of the body and soul into the glorified life displayed by Jesus (and a number of others at various times) requires energy from currently-unknown sources and may even require violation of current lightspeed assumptions.
Do you mean the laws as known by God (in which case variable lightspeed need not violate those laws)? Or do you mean the laws as currently known by man (in which case the resurrection does violate those laws)?
Youβre still unable to violate the laws of physics.
You'd be surprised. I recall you thinking you know how those laws work and your assuming that they can't possibly be used to create a universe currently in its 6,018th year. I tell everyone else to work with me to select criteria by which a particular new law of physics can be discerned objectively and undeniably, but they always back down long before we get into full negotiations. If you're interested in constructing a test of laws of physics where you would be willing to submit to its results, let me know.
But somehow, reading your mind, I think you're not referring to miracles generally but only taking a swipe at the number of Swamp Rangers being irrelevant as not affecting the results of your life. So far I'm the only Ranger with a mission on Scored, the same mission in Christ you claim BTW. And I'm very happy with the progress of my work with you. Sometime we can engage another round of mutual learning.
-
Genetic chimeras are known to exist. They have two DNA in one body and experience life as one human. However, since their cases ultimately connect "seamlessly" with parasitic twins and then conjoined twins, who experience life as two humans (some with intuitive experience of each other), this indicates the chimera really does carry on the life of a second soul within itself.
-
Therefore an ordinary dead twin, such as that of Jim Kelly (who survived an abortion that took his twin sister's fetal life; add: Sarah Smith and her brother are another case), may well lay some burden on the living twin, but when the two bodies are separate and go separate ways this is not much more significant than the ordinary experience of living identical twins or other close relations who share lives.
-
In that general category, we all pour portions of our souls into each other's lives and some "influences" are stronger than others. The soul that was formed with the body, because it contains a code that matches the physical DNA, still drives the body; it's treated under the metaphor of "51% ownership", sufficient for all determinations but also swayed by many other influences.
-
Both humans and other spirits often seek to wrest majority control over the body in extraordinary cases, aka (co)dependency. Building strong families with individual and group boundaries respected will avoid this. Weak individuals without parental support and gradual emancipation fall prey to "alternative parents" in gurus and spirits. The whole game is pressuring the soul to yield its control, which it does temporarily but which, evidence indicates, it still has the authority to take back at any time its will is awakened (from a new spirit inside or outside). This describes most walk-in episodes.
-
Your description of a soul "deciding to pass on" aligns with a point of no return (keeping in mind that the true barrier of no return is typically further away than expected). Without distinguishing OBE from NDE as there is similarity on this point, I'm theorizing that this point or barrier is being "truly dead" (as opposed to "mostly dead", happy 78th birthday Billy Crystal). The soul not only departs the body but also breaks all quantum entanglement with the body: and the "point" at which that final breaking will be reached differs according to how strong one's resonance is between soul and body (stronger resonance allows greater range before a breach). St. John indicates that the "mostly dead" phase can last into the 4th day and so it's fitting to count it as up to a whole week at the extreme. The wise can discern the difference. (This is not related to general resurrection, which involves transfiguration.) Therefore it's fitting to accord all the living as not having crossed a point of no return (because a true and full takeover rather than walk-in would be external-vampiric and no longer reliant on the DNA-keyed soul's power to maintain life). To theorize an exception of a body that remains alive but that is also completely severed from its origin soul, I think we'd be in the realm of other-animated corpse, i.e. truly dead but in use as a zombi; this calls for exorcism and probably physical restraint. If the body contained any life it would seem that life would have power of reconnection to its home soul and invocation of 51% rights, which has also been attained via exorcists.
In general, this shares with the other current post (NDE deceptions) the concept that the body born to (encoded to) the soul is so easily influenced that deception is rampant. The solution is the same as I always espouse, pursuit of truth at all costs (even of the body).
Oh, u/TallestSkil does expect people to read his mind. IMHO. He also expects them to take him solely at his word without inferring anything. He has a history of playing it both ways, but his self-contradiction isn't the most endemic or destructive so we play with him much as he claims to play with you.
Thanks, I read you as saying "it's the satanists".
FYI as a newcomer, two or three of us give more upvotes when collectivist language isn't used. I tell people Name The Jew For Real: don't blame the fictional boogeyman "The Jews", blame the Kushners specifically and name their associates.
Also I have read about 500 of the NDE stories and many of them report this experience.
By definition all NDE stories are about those who returned when given the choice. (There's a very small exception for those experiencing open vision and testifying about it as it happens, just before death without return; they don't report on this choice situation.) Therefore we have no technical information about any other choice than returning to the original life.
In the joke, the politician is given a choice and finds hell the more attractive, but after choosing hell it is standard agony and the devil explains that yesterday we were campaigning but today you voted. Thus any NDE, no matter how often replicated, might be part of a conspiracy to make one choice more attractive than another. I have my theories but this is probably not the thread for such detail.
Therefore the theme of OP is framed as, if it feels like love it might be an attempt to harvest you in hell on earth; and if it feels like escape from all voices via darkness then it might be cosmic paradise and greater connection with God and other lives. At the same time, it might also be that love is rightly discerned and the darkness of the cosmos is also rightly discerned. The only way to make the right decision in the future is to practice making right decisions every day (and ultimately the only way to do that is to follow the word of the One who never makes wrong decisions, Jesus Christ). Answering OP by analyzing the meaning of each of the experiences and deciding logically on their import is not my purpose today as what's more important is the right approach in the present. You will not confront the light based on what I or OP says alone but on the whole of life: you won't pick me or him out and say that is the only guidance I need, you'll find it in the collection of choices you made and their overall trajectory.
Thanks for checking in with us Brother Alpha!
I'm troubled how to respond because this is complex but here's a simple thing.
Whatever you choose in the afterlife will be determined by the trajectory of your whole life and not little things along the way. Right now counts forever.
So I think it's in vain to concoct plans of how you will conduct yourself because you haven't experienced what it's like. It's like planning what dream you're going to have tonight, and if you can't do that then how much more this type of convo is counterproductive. What's productive is to practice the discernment right now with the people and spirits you face daily rather than to imagine the future disembodied without taking on the practice you face today.
If there is a trap in the afterlife (and there are a couple, but I don't think this is an accurate description of one), then your current life will direct whether you succumb to the trap out of free will or not. You won't be totally uninformed, you will receive revelation in line with what you practiced in life. If your life makes you easily manipulated and satisifed with contradiction, you'll be trapped and it won't matter what picture it takes to get you there. If you guard your life by putting it in God's hands and observing how he rewards your trust, you'll overcome every lie told to you in the afterlife because you will be given the words to say.
Remember, in the best model of reincarnation, you're talking about a collective soul in which you and other lives have both independent existence and collective direction in relation to a new life; so the "forgetting" aspect (I'll find a better word for it) is locally tied to the physical life and not to the oversoul. So I wouldn't put too much weight upon current views of reincarnation to help direct how to behave. Rather, practice judging all spirits now and you'll judge correctly in the examination.
Then your view of it is like my view of Clement of Alexandria and Origen, whom many Christians still revere. I can't name a single thing I respect about them. But according to my theory their work is mixed too rather than all bad.
True but doesn't apply since the contemporary video is the new offering and doesn't appear problematic prima facie.
A few photos of Netanyahu in Ashdod on the 10th were released. Do you think Reuters reporting a press conference and a separate set of new photos are all staged? It's not impossible, which is why I ask; but it seem Iran is doing the greater bobbing and weaving in this picture.
the talmud is a psyop
Lots of evidence is floating around but it doesn't point and I don't think that's the right take.
I suppose we could say those traditions Jesus rejected were psyops and thus the Talmud contains similar psyops.
My take is that the Talmud reflects the mixed testimony of Judaism and the worst in it is retained, not for it being valid, but for it reflecting concerns held by leaders esteemed by later generations.
I believe Jewish evangelism involves "unspoiling" the mixed testimony, which I define as claiming the good and removing the bad.
It's not to be about force. There are militant Jewish Zionists and militant Christian nationalists who make it about force, but that's not it.
Let's use a text like saying all who were appointed for eternal life believed. God appointing and humans believing happen together. In the same way, Jesus comes when humans are ready and humans ready themselves when Jesus comes. They relate and are coterminous so neither "causes" the other. I think that was Schneersohn's take on "Moshiach" as well, as I don't know him to be a militant.
Incidentally, Reuters has the video the AI is based on, released along with a public press conference with Bibi yesterday. I doubt the whole Israeli media is pretending to have a press conference with a man that isn't alive.
Incidentally, Reuters has the video the AI is based on, released along with a public press conference with Bibi yesterday. I doubt the whole Israeli media is pretending to have a press conference with a man that isn't alive.
Correct. But look it up. The words (Hebrew) were something like, Messiah may still come today, so do everything you can today to cause him to return.
How can Al-Aqsa get bombed without so many countries immediately declaring war on Israel as to make it a worthless step? It's a great theory but I don't see it this year without further supports. The Orthodox want to slay the red heifer, which means they want sufficient peace that no small group can interrupt and potentially invalidate the sacrifice.
Schneersohn literally told him to say that 30+ years ago. However, I just debunked a totally different Jewish hoax so we'll need to take the claims about AI on this clip too.
You seem to be speaking against Jews, Islam, and Christianity just fine here. I don't even call you out most of the time. Why don't you speak your peace every day and tell others they can do so here too? Are you a doomer, or do you believe in growing the fora where you can speak freely?
a) Unit implies apart from one another, hence DI-verse. b) Unity inside diversion implies
What of "unity implying diversity"?
Com (together) ple (to fill) ment (mind) represents the artificial putting together of real and fake within ones mind
What of unity of real with real? What if "the spiritual real and the natural real are" polar?
God isn't a container
Is One within All?
"Oneself as another" implies All is Other; "one to another" implies One to All.
What of "creatio ex Deo"?
The rules come from several years back and at least two mods esteemed by all who are now missing and who our present active mod aspires to emulate. They reflect a community desire that personal attacks be rejected across the board. TINAE decided that those few contributors who like to attack and be attacked with equal rights can be accommodated with a warning tag to indicate to the other contributors that the ordinary rules aren't in effect.
Most "free speech zones", however, are laughable exceptions to censorship of topics. No topics are forbidden here.