Yep, the talmud is a psyop to steal, murder and destroy the things God wanted known for our good.. Torah and Tanakh are good and seamlessly lead into New Testament.
Lots of evidence is floating around but it doesn't point and I don't think that's the right take.
I suppose we could say those traditions Jesus rejected were psyops and thus the Talmud contains similar psyops.
My take is that the Talmud reflects the mixed testimony of Judaism and the worst in it is retained, not for it being valid, but for it reflecting concerns held by leaders esteemed by later generations.
I believe Jewish evangelism involves "unspoiling" the mixed testimony, which I define as claiming the good and removing the bad.
It's not to be about force. There are militant Jewish Zionists and militant Christian nationalists who make it about force, but that's not it.
Let's use a text like saying all who were appointed for eternal life believed. God appointing and humans believing happen together. In the same way, Jesus comes when humans are ready and humans ready themselves when Jesus comes. They relate and are coterminous so neither "causes" the other. I think that was Schneersohn's take on "Moshiach" as well, as I don't know him to be a militant.
Correct. But look it up. The words (Hebrew) were something like, Messiah may still come today, so do everything you can today to cause him to return.
This is their big failing.. Who is any created being to 'force' God's hand? It's laughable, heartily.
Thatβs literally what their entire religion of talmudism is
See:
Eruvs - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eruv
Sabbath Ovens - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabbath_mode
Shiksas - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shiksa
Shabbat Elevators - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shabbat_elevator
And their absolute favorite, Shabbos Goys - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shabbos_goy
Everyberg. Singlestein. Timeowitz.
Yep, the talmud is a psyop to steal, murder and destroy the things God wanted known for our good.. Torah and Tanakh are good and seamlessly lead into New Testament.
Lots of evidence is floating around but it doesn't point and I don't think that's the right take.
I suppose we could say those traditions Jesus rejected were psyops and thus the Talmud contains similar psyops.
My take is that the Talmud reflects the mixed testimony of Judaism and the worst in it is retained, not for it being valid, but for it reflecting concerns held by leaders esteemed by later generations.
I believe Jewish evangelism involves "unspoiling" the mixed testimony, which I define as claiming the good and removing the bad.
It's not to be about force. There are militant Jewish Zionists and militant Christian nationalists who make it about force, but that's not it.
Let's use a text like saying all who were appointed for eternal life believed. God appointing and humans believing happen together. In the same way, Jesus comes when humans are ready and humans ready themselves when Jesus comes. They relate and are coterminous so neither "causes" the other. I think that was Schneersohn's take on "Moshiach" as well, as I don't know him to be a militant.
I think God told us what would happen, not all of it His doing but all of it His allowing.