Thank you.
I'm over halfway into this and holy smokes there are a lot of unfair and unfounded criticisms.
I was talking about the meat. I hadn't even considered that eggs would be affected too.
Site is blocked. Is there a mirror?
Anne Heche was to star in "The Girl in Room 13," an upcoming film about child sex trafficking. Actors do their own research to better portray their roles. It could be that she uncovered something big and informed the authorities or was in a position to blow the whistle on it.
If you weren't so intent on being a heel, you might learn something about the topic.
Which of Anne Heche's lovers are pedophiles?
Please don't make fun of her ex's last name like that.
When the "bad stuff" you are talking about is actually bad for their political movement, then that would be an apt assessment.
Poultry processing, not just food. It's part of making meat unaffordable.
Those bins are for more than one person. They are for improving mass graves.
Thank you for continuing to engage with this topic.
Let me break down your argument.
Premise 1a: "The only people who want an independent investigation are people that believe Sandy Hook was a hoax."
I do not believe that Sandy Hook was a hoax, but I still support the ability of citizens in a democracy to independently investigate matters being used by the government to shape its legal framework. This is particularly important in constitutional challenges.
Premise 1b: "No parent or family has come out and said they do not believe what the cops found in their investigation.
This part is not relevant. Despite the families of victims' being one group of stakeholders with presumably a high interest in knowing the truth, the fact that we don't know of any who have wanted better evidence does not mean that the evidence is good enough for other people. There is a vast gap between those who suffered loss and "hoax believing conspiracy theorists" that includes reasonable people with many points of view. If I approached any group of investigators, private or public, and said that they should not look into a matter because of my personal connection to it, they would rightly tell me to fuck right off.
P2: Any investigation would have to rely a lot on what the state police collected.
Yes, many years after the fact, that is certainly the case, and even a fresh case would surely borrow from the official policework. I believe the counterargument is that people be given concrete evidence that does not rely upon opinions or official reports.
Conclusion: Tho[s]e hoax believers say the state police was part of the hoax, would they believe in the evidence the state police give them?
This fails because a) the aim is not to convince a small group of people who won't listen to reason and b) there are people want evidence outside the scope of what is easily manipulated by the police. Would you accept the argument that some people will never believe outer space exists, so we should not conduct astronomy outside of NASA?
Channel Restricted: Contains Incitement to Hatred
Lots of volunteers. Lots of useful idiots, too. They use lots of tactics.
Fortunately a majority of users here are smart enough to tell when they see them.
It looks like the majority of content is from shills and almost everybody else is oblivious as to the scale of what is happening.
Article:
Man Cuts His Throat After Being Confronted by 'Paedophile Hunters' https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2022/08/27/man-cuts-his-throat-after-being-confronted-paedophile-hunters/amp/
Article:
FBI says it ‘routinely notifies’ social media companies of potential threats following Zuckerberg-Rogan podcast https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/3618137-fbi-says-it-routinely-notifies-social-media-companies-of-potential-threats-following-zuckerberg-rogan-podcast/
Of course they are winning. It costs them almost nothing.
I think the news media made quite a show out of Sandy Hook. There were unbelievable interviews and the whole thing was sensationalized to an extreme.
I believe a large number of people would like to see an independent investigation with verifiable evidence. That group of people is in no way limited to the victims' parents as you imply. It is not necessary to "go through the state police" as you claim. You are calling people names.
I am not an expert, but allowing independent investigators access to the forensics would be a start. Much more transparency.
And just to let you know, it looks to me like kids were actually murdered in that building. Why all the theatrics? Why treat the affair like a secret?
It's not "LARPing." It's actual agents, just like the ones on January 6.
They want this place bad. That's why the uptick in provoking violence and murder.
Such a sad tragedy. It makes me depressed just reading about it.
It was redacted the same reason the names were in the report, privacy.
Sorry, but you can't expect any serious person looking into a possible government hoax to accept this.
It's a common thing, no matter what conspiracy it is, people ask for a piece of evidence. But when they get it, they just say it's fake.
That's why it is important to press for irrefutable evidence. When you have a laundry list of reasons why people can't have it then of course some of them are going to wonder.
You can't trust Google searches for shit.
It's getting people ready for China Model online censorship.