by pkvi
-2
SmokeAndMirrors -2 points ago +1 / -3

Now you can argue the money is being laundered, not actually going to Ukraine, etc.

It is literally not going to Ukraine, no matter how much you will pretend it does.

-2
SmokeAndMirrors -2 points ago +1 / -3

Russians don't use that tactic. It is accounted as not honorable and absolute no-go. Ukrainians use.

Source: your ass. We all know that Russians have no honor.

Didn't saw that here.

They literally had demonstrations calling for Ukraine to be nuked.

But that stupid and shitty HIMAR

Denial is not a river in Egypt.

I had militatry education and training and got leutenant rank after university, as every male (real male, not some gender shit) student in USSR. So, I know enough about tactics. And what is your military rank?

First Lieutenant, my little vatnik and If you ever made officer then it is no wonder why Russia's army sucks as badly as it does.

by pkvi
-4
SmokeAndMirrors -4 points ago +1 / -5

The US isn't sending money to Ukraine you retard.

by pkvi
-2
SmokeAndMirrors -2 points ago +1 / -3

You think that the US literally sends money to Ukraine?

-1
SmokeAndMirrors -1 points ago +1 / -2

Yes. It's one of the main tactic NATO teached ukrainians.

Source?

Crimea bridge was necessary only when that standard route, was under the West occupation. Now, when all that territories is liberated, Crimea bridge is just a nice feature, not something urgently critical.

Then why did Russia bitch and moan and cry so much about the bridge?

How could you forgot, that now there is a land bridge with highways and railroads to Crimea peninsula through old Russian towns Mariupol, Berdyansk and Melitopol, just like it always was in USSR and Russian Empire in times when no any Ukraine existed at all.

And those soon will be in range of Ukrainian Artillery. You know nothing about military tactics.

-1
SmokeAndMirrors -1 points ago +1 / -2

It is Russian territories temporarily occupied by NATO. To remove NATO from that territories, Russia bomb out NATO shit and infractructure that allow NATO to occupy that territories.

NATO is hiding in residential buildings?

How come NATO is able to occupy Russian territory? Is Russia that weak?

PS: What happened with your joyful mood you had when Crimea bridge was blown? Why are you not so joyful now?

I am very joyful still. Russia has announced that it will take at least 2 months for the rail bridge to be repaired. Nothing above 3.5 tons can pass the road section. This is a crippling blow to Russia's ability to supply Crimea.

-2
SmokeAndMirrors -2 points ago +2 / -4

Libya had higher living standards than most European nations.

No it didn't you fucking liar.

by pkvi
-1
SmokeAndMirrors -1 points ago +1 / -2

Asking OP for a source for his claim is useless. He's just spamming lies and propaganda all day every day.

-1
SmokeAndMirrors -1 points ago +1 / -2

"Roll over and submit to us" is what Russia has been offering. Would you agree to that?

-4
SmokeAndMirrors -4 points ago +1 / -5

The vaxxed will die any day now!

Only two more weeks, I mean months, I mean years, I mean generations.

-2
SmokeAndMirrors -2 points ago +1 / -3

I have been told here over and over again that Hitler was a good guy.

So this financing was a positive thing?

-2
SmokeAndMirrors -2 points ago +1 / -3

Do you fucking retard expect me to type out these urls or should I just accept a screenshot form 4chan as gospel just like you obviously do?

-2
SmokeAndMirrors -2 points ago +1 / -3
  1. A bridge that is a genuine military target gets bombed in a precision strike.
  2. Russia indiscriminately fires missiles at civilian targets.

"Payback".

Yeah, there will be payback. The West will pour even more and more modern weapons into Ukraine and obliterate the vatniks.

Thank you for showing your real colors though. For you, it's about killing people.

For Ukraine, it's about freedom from Russia's imperialism.

-1
SmokeAndMirrors -1 points ago +2 / -3

Wapo

What, you mean the commie MSM that always lies? Why should I believe it?

-3
SmokeAndMirrors -3 points ago +1 / -4

I believe

Who cares about your personal interpretation?

Here is what the passage says;

Those who see you stare at you, they ponder your fate: “Is this the man who shook the earth and made kingdoms tremble, 17 the man who made the world a wilderness, who overthrew its cities and would not let his captives go home?”

Satan is no man. He is an angel of Yahweh.

You simply pick and choose the parts that you agree with and ignore the rest.

It literally says that it's a taunt against the king of Babylon:

"On the day the Lord gives you relief from your suffering and turmoil and from the harsh labor forced on you, 4 you will take up this taunt against the king of Babylon:"

-1
SmokeAndMirrors -1 points ago +1 / -2

Martin Arthur Armstrong (born November 1, 1949) is an American self-taught[1] economic forecaster and convicted felon who spent 11 years in jail for cheating investors out of $700 million and hiding $15 million in assets from regulators.[1]

Kek

3
SmokeAndMirrors 3 points ago +5 / -2

What will you do when it doesn't happen?

-1
SmokeAndMirrors -1 points ago +1 / -2

The section that contains the name Lucifer is a prophecy addressed to a Babylonian king. It has absolutely nothing to do with Satan.

Did you even ever read it?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›