Correct. It's up to the individual to discern what's true and what is bs. The problem is mainstream history is written by the victors and the regime you live under will propagate their narrative. One has to be very naive to believe truth won't be the first thing sacrificed when assessing historical events. So even before we consider the evidence, the mainstream narrative has a disadvantage.
I don't understand basic geometry in a 3D world by design? Gtfo. I can build the abstract model of what we're talking about and examine it in my mind. I don't even need a program to simulate this, it's that simple.
I reject evo theory, materialism and much of the fake and gay mainstream cosmology, science and history narratives, yet not falling for the Flat Earth psy op, which can be disproved a 1000 ways means I'm easily deceived? You are in a cult, sir.
Getting up high will allow you to see farther on a flat plane, that is why they have crow's nests.
That doesn't make sense. On a flat plane there's nothing below horizon no matter where you stand - you'll just get a different perspective of the objects, but if there are no obstacles and clouding you'll be able to see the shore even if you're in the middle of the ocean (provided there is no fog and waves which seems impossible).
Ok but how do I verify they are visible? I can't go to open see to do that.
See the edit.
It would have been nice to see the actual pictures of the lighthouses at that distance. It also depends what vessel you're observing them from - if it's a cargo ship deck you're up 20m above sea level.
But here's my defeater: if the Earth was flat why do ships have crows nests up on the mast? Wouldn't people be able to see at the same distance from the deck? Were all shipbuilders in on the conspiracy for the past thousand plus years?
It is. So is evolutionary theory and any origin story of the universe.
I don't think there will be a big reveal. The whole thing simmered off - sure people die more than before but excess deaths are not too high to raise serious concerns in the masses and they will continue to be gaslight the culprit is anything but the stabbies. Those people don't want the truth. If they did they would be aware of it by now because the info is out in the open. At this point it'd be harder even for the government to convince them they were poisoned.
There are other ways to depop beside mass vaccination and it's working like a charm - just look at the fertility indexes and at people getting sicker and more degenerate with each generation.
There will be another cataclysmic event in the next few years. Most likely war and financial collapse.
What you're spouting is your interpretation of history.
Yes and it's based on historical evidence. Read Tragedy and Hope by C. Quigley and see for yourself. This is the best meticulously sourced book on 20th century history and prof. Quigley was an insider to the establishment, not a conspiracy hack.
Well, I would say your defense of Hitler, who is really a mixed bag, is incompatible with Orthodoxy as I understand it. I get attacking usury and usurers.
As opposed to what? Would you say the same if I came to the defense of the allies? Do you want to bet who's more anti-christian - nazi Germany or the modern "liberal democratic" west ran by those who hate Christ? My defense of Hitler is not endorsement of his regime but acknowledgment of the truth about recent history. I'll stick with the truth and that's as Christian as one can get.
I mentioned the crusades to point how the Vatican went conquering Jerusalem for economic reasons but wouldn't help Byzantium fend off the turks because there was nothing for them to win out of that.
Why do they assume we want to live in a "more liberated society"? Where do they get their telos from and why should anyone care for their marxist bs?
So you don't consider libertarians right-leaning? According to modern political science they are although I'd argue they are classical liberals, based on the origins of their ideas. Anything right from antifa drag queens is portrayed as the right these days.
All wars are bankers wars =/= all wars have economic causation
True. My argument was it became solely bankers wars after the bankers took control of international finance obviously.
I see a Nazi making Marxist arguments and naming the Jew...oh the irony.
You need spectacles then. I'm neither a nazi nor a marxist because I'm Orthodox Christian and my faith is incompatible with any secular humanist ideology.
I second that tier. I'm at Phase 3 also.
Not exactly, that's why I put it in quotes. But of course you chose to nitpick terminology instead of engaging with the actual arguments.
When dealing with people who print money, fines are senseless.
This is the most crucial truth for understanding modern economics.
According to you anyone criticizing the "alt-right" pantheon is a sperg?
I don't need to be one to notice Elon is a zionist DARPA darling, planting chips in human brains. Trump is a zionist and vaxx shill, owned by the bankers who finance his business. Rogan is a gatekeeper of what is acceptable to entertain as a "conspiracy theorist" according to normies. AJ I like the most of the bunch despite his constant fear porn and over-the-top manner but he still can't touch certain topics because of the controllers.
It became painfully obvious during the coof and the controlled opposition figures like Malone.
I've never red it but it seemed sus how widely available the book is. The hard hitters are always hard to find because most publishers (who are jewish) won't touch them with a 10 feet pole.
Try finding a copy of something truly eye-opening like Eustace Mullins, Sutton or Ioan Ratiu. Normies love gifting Mein Kampf because they find it edgy.
I didn't shift at all. Who controls the economy if not the bankers? That was not always the case and at the time of the crusades the economy was in the hands of the state and the church. But yeah, I'd argue the crusades were about conquest and resources and the ideology came second. If that weren't the case explain why the Vatican did jack shit to prevent the Ottomans raping and enslaving half of Europe's Christian population?
As for Napoleon, you guessed it, it was the bankers once again. Napoleon became his own banker and they weren't having it. Sure, there are other factors at play in all those events but we're talking about the origin and the primary movers. Here's the rundown: https://youtu.be/IKuVO4JaqBY?t=2758
Now that's someone using their brain. They have Trump in the office and he's going to shill for Israel and his corporate overlords. That being said, it's still better to have him than any of the democrats. But they will use him as a Trojan horse.
"But, but BTC is anonymous and made me rich so it must be good although no one has a clue why such a technology was allowed to proliferate by the banking elite and where it came from*".
*It was DARPA.
It's easy to judge mistakes in hindsight. He may have made strategic mistakes, I don't know enough about warfare and I won't repeat some Nat Geo History mantra. The argument was about the reason for the war in the first place and who instigated it. It was the internetional bankers.
Tell that to Bernard Baruch, it's his quote. I picked it up from Eustace Mullins' Secrets of the Federal reserve.
Testifying before the Nye Committee on September 13, 1937, Bernard Baruch stated that "All wars are economic in their origin." So much for religious and political disagreements, which had been specially touted as the cause of wars.
How was Mohamed's war not economical in origin? Did he just convert people to islam without caring to extend his rule, taking land, slaves and spoils? The demonic goatfucker wanted to be rich and powerful. He was no different than the international bankers in that regard.
Glad to see someone mention Gladio. Everything around the cold war was fake and gay af.
Source?
And how does that prove macro-evolution? How is speciation determined, as how do they determine when they have 2 separate species?