The 20th century summarized in a single tweet.
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (31)
sorted by:
Yes and it's based on historical evidence. Read Tragedy and Hope by C. Quigley and see for yourself. This is the best meticulously sourced book on 20th century history and prof. Quigley was an insider to the establishment, not a conspiracy hack.
The mainstream version of history is based on historical evidence as well, that's how the study of historical interpretation works. Some idea are well supported, some aren't, and there is a range in between.
Correct. It's up to the individual to discern what's true and what is bs. The problem is mainstream history is written by the victors and the regime you live under will propagate their narrative. One has to be very naive to believe truth won't be the first thing sacrificed when assessing historical events. So even before we consider the evidence, the mainstream narrative has a disadvantage.