How do we know it's for real?
A pagan demon worshiper meets a zionist demon worshiper. Being deeply religious is not automatically a good thing. Human-sacrificing and Luciferian cults (like theosophy and new age spiritualism) are deeply religious too.
You sure?
Anyone can see bacteria (and even some viruses) with a microscope bought at Walmart.
Thanks for admitting viruses and bacteria exist and can be viewed by anyone with simple equipment available anywhere.
That's your assertion idiot - it's up to you to prove it. I've given you an argument for why it's false (because they'd use that exact method to identify it instead of PCR and culture) and you ignored and deflected accusing me of strawmanning.
Also, I thought you didn't say this and I twisted it out of context. What happened to that deflection?
I'm done with your trolling, you're obviously bad faith because no one using a computer is this dumb.
Soon stating the truth will put us in camps and psychiatric wards. They did the same to Ezra Pound for exposing the international jewish cabal.
Me commenting on the virus pics of your initial comment:
We've seen them - here are some sciency-looking pictures of sub-cellular particles, derived from culturing decomposing tissue in monkey kidney cancer cells and antibiotics that we'll call virions and claim they are the cause of the observed pathology.
You replaying to my comment:
buy a home microscope
spit on a slide
look at it
NOOOOOOOO NONE OF THAT IS REEEEEEEEEEEAL
You again:
Anyone can see bacteria (and even some viruses) with a microscope bought at Walmart.
Thanks for admitting viruses and bacteria exist and can be viewed by anyone with simple equipment available anywhere.
The only thing that's twisted is your mind from constantly lying and doing mental gymnastics as if you can't be instantly disproven. Case closed.
Which one of the links shows virus particles in saliva viewed under a microscope? You said multiple times one can see the virus this way. This was the point of the whole fucking exchange - don't show me how they cultured cancer cells and added a bunch of shit in the concoction. Show me spit on a microscope slide where virions are observable. Is that fucking hard?
You forgot to post an image or link a paper where they've done that, bud. You're all big on talking smack but you fail to deliver the goods.
You're a special one. Let's try again.
If
viruses and bacteria exist and can be viewed by anyone with simple equipment available anywhere
then why DON'T EVERYBODY DO IT, but do culturing, antigen and PCR instead, you fucking retarded cave-dweller?
Where are the images of the virus observed in the spit under a microscope? Find me a single one and I'll concede.
You can't answer, that's ok. Just saying words and blurting accusations isn't cutting it. If I'm strawmanning you, go on and demonstrate it. We both know there's no strawman here - you just tried being witty and made a stupid assertion in the process and instead of owning it, you started dancing around it like a buffoon. I should have known better than to argue with a troll.
You filthy lying pig-snake, I'm doing internal critique of what you told me. You said I can spit on a slide and see the virus under a microscope. If what you say is correct, why don't they use that same method for detecting the coof?
Now concentrate, stop deflecting like a little bitch and give a straight answer to a simple question based on your own premise.
He is though. Only a true dumbass of a person can be that bad faith and deflect and derail like he does. Read our exchange.
Lol, dude. The master deflector strikes again.
None of the shit you wrote addressed anything above. I can't decide whether you're being bad faith or you genuinely are IQ deficient and don't get the simple argument I made.
They use PCR and culturing regardless of how effective that is for detecting the supposed virus. That's not the point and neither does it matter if anyone lied about anything during the pandemic. This has literally nothing to do with the argument.
The question was why would they use such relatively complex, time consuming and expensive methods (culturing, PCR), instead of just getting saliva samples under a microscope and finding out if a person has the virus or not?
No, you pretend you pretending it's shitposting doesn't make it so.
I asked you a precise question: If we can detect a virus by looking at spit under a microscope, why don't they use that method to isolate and detect viruses, but instead do PCR and culturing? If a person is sick with a respiratory virus they should have billions of virions in their saliva - isn't that the reason for social distancing and masks?
I worry that you ignored my argument and resorted to a regurgitated ad hom instead. If only coming up with snarky, yet unrelated personal remarks proved your point, you may have stood a chance at convincing anybody.
That's contradictory. Either viruses are specific RNA/DNA carriers, able to infect and reproduce within the host causing particular pathology or they are what you said - extracellular vesicles and exosomes which can't reproduce, hijack cells and infect other organisms. They are simply cell-garbage.
So you're saying I'll see virus particles if I spit on a slide and look at it under a microscope? If it were that easy, how come they couldn't do just that in the so called "virus isolation" experiments?
I concede you're an idiot if you think I need to buy a microscope to debunk your bs when I can use free common sense instead.
You mean the hundreds of thousands of scientists who believe men can now be women, who study man-made climate change and the "novel sars-cov-2 virus" that originated from Wuhan's wet-market and who told you masks, social distancing and lockdowns work and that stabbies will curb the disease and are absolutely risk-free so everyone should take them and ask for boosters? I love science too!
Imagine still appealing to scientific authority after all this. You are retarded mate.
We've seen them - here are some sciency-looking pictures of sub-cellular particles, derived from culturing decomposing tissue in monkey kidney cancer cells and antibiotics that we'll call virions and claim they are the cause of the observed pathology.
Doesn't work without the music.
He's always parroting the mainstream normie narratives on every subject there is. I mean I get people here can't agree on everything but what's the point in hanging in a conspiracy forum when you are basically anti-conspiracy shill for tptb?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laboratory_experiments_of_speciation
Such sub-speciation definitely happens - that's how we got the variety of animals with different traits within a species (for example all the subspecies of bears or dogs there are).
An accumulation of small changes that happen in a short time leads to large changes over a long time.
That's an assertion. Is there empirical evidence for that? Has anyone observed it? It's one thing to change color and thickness of the coat or the length of the beak, but it doesn't follow big complex changes which require simultaneous mutation of multiple interdependent systems of the organism are possible through the process of adaptation.
By whether or not the populations can interbreed. If they can interbreed they are the same species. If they can not interbreed they are separate species.
Horses and donkeys interbreed. Are they the same species? There are many examples of hybridization.
It's his job. He has to earn a living.
Source?
And how does that prove macro-evolution? How is speciation determined, as how do they determine when they have 2 separate species?
You don't have to be a flerfer to disbelief the NASA space propaganda. How hard was it to place some beacon on the moon so that anyone with a telescope could see it?